Print Topic - Archive

Roulette Forum | www.RouletteForum.net  /  Roulette Challenges  /  Genuine winner roulette system and computers
Posted by: Steve, September 8, 2008, 8:23am
With the absolute nonsense published about my technology from numerous morons (mainly competitors under fake names), it may be difficult to know what or who to believe. The more serious players tend to visit me personally to see for themselves. To take this option, see http://www.genuinewinner.com/conference.htm

Out of over 500 players, there is still the occasional 'nutty' player that has no idea what they've purchased. If this were only 1% of players, that's still 5 or so players. And believe me when I say, there are more nuts in the gaming industry than any other indistry - it baffles me how 'backwards' some people are. Some may occasionally publish their misunderstandings and/or distorted information. What about the other 99% of players? If my technology works, why aren't we seeing hundreds of satisfied customers posting about their winnings everywhere? Firstly, that would be a breach of contract because they'd be identifying themselves as players, and secondly they'd rather just keep it to themselves. So the only feedback you read about my technology is:

1. Fake negative reviews from competitors (for example see http://www.genuinewinner.com/markhowe.htm)

See http://www.roulettewars.com for detailed account of what competitors do under fake names to try and compete.

2. Feedback from the very few unsatisfied players (about 5 out of 500 players)

3. Hearsay from forum members that read fake negative reviews / distorted information - unfortunately some people are taken in by the rubbish others publish, and they perpetuate the lies thinking they're correct.

4.  Caluculated attacks and petty 'revenge' for things like banning people from the forum. I've also banned numerous players of my system and computer for contract breach, and they've threatened to post all over forums if I dont give software access back. On this note, the most assured way to NOT get what you want is to threaten me.

Do you really expect people to come out of the woodwork sharing success stories? What my teams have achieved will eventually be published by mainstream media, and it will rival the Ritz group and Garcia-Pelayo stories. To those that know us well, my group are considered the foremost experts in roulette prediction. To competing cheating device sellers, who dont actually use their technology, we are scammers. You decide.

Any system or device is only as good as the user. A system or computer is nothing more than a tool. A bad tradesman blames his tools. In this case, perhaps 1% of genuine player have no idea what they've purchased or how to use it. Arguably it's a pity my successful players dont defend me on forums, but they have better things to do.

To dispel myths, I've provided videos of public demos, audio testimonials, test reports, videos with minute details like lava lamps in the background (to show video is uncut) and much more. Do competitors do this? No, they pretend to be my players under fake names and give fake negative reviews. Competitors and some individuals will ALWAYS try to discredit me no matter what I do. They are not interested in the truth, so they attempt to refute any proof I provide. For example, they claim the public demos and recorded phone calls were probably with my family members or someone paid by me. Such claims are complete rubbish and desperate attempts to discredit me. Why? For a variety of reasons - typically whoever lies about me is usually doing it to protect either their business interests, or their ego. For example, competitors wouldn't want my technology to be effective, and neither would people that have long claimed I'm a scammer because if I were to suddenly prove them wrong, they'll of course say whatever they must to protect their ego and reputation. One example is competitors initially claimed I would never hold public demonstrations and that the promise of public demos was merely to increase sales - but now that I have conducted numerous public demos, competitors claim attendees of my public demos are probably just family members. They made similar claims like that recorded phone calls from my players were probably from paid people, or their winnings were just luck - but you dont win $100k+ just from luck (for example hear http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial6ADGermany.wma - this player won 70k EUROS so far), and all players can speak to each other via the player only forum (including those that gave audio testimonials) - players frequently call each other, meet each other etc, and if my technology was a scam, the last thingn I'd do is provide my players with a convenient forum to converse.

Unfortunately it is my word against many morons that constantly make new bogus claims, and I dont have the time to respond to every pathetic lie. But the truth is indeed on my side, and all truth comes out eventually. As I like to clear the air and make the truth known, I suggest visiting me in person. As for players that cannot visit me, I suggest the following:

1. Accross all forums, GG, VLS, this forum etc, we identify one member who is well trusted - someone that has been around for a while, and people know are not affiliated with me etc. Someone that is well trusted and respected.

2. I will pay for them to visit me personally for a public demonstration of the hybrid roulette computer (http://www.hybridroulettecomputer.com), standard roulette computer (http://www.roulettecomputers.com) and roulette system (http://www.genuinewinner.com). Only what is available for purchase will be demonstrated - we will NOT demonstrate our most effective technology (what our closest teams are using). I'll also demonstrate competing devices (like both of Mark Howe's computers and Forester's device so they can see for themselves what nonsense they are).

The visitor will see all the myths dispelled. The demonstrations will be video recorded, although some parts will not be published to preserve secrets - the rest of it is fine for publishing (accuracy. checking the wheel for tampering, results etc). I will pay (in advance) for the visitor's airfares, accomodation and any other expenses. They will spend 2-3 days in Melbourne, so they need to be able to spend that time away from home (unless they are already in Melbourne).

Any suggestions on WHO may be the ideal and willing candidate?

It is quite easy to prove truth, so if anyone has any suggestions for validation of my technology, by all means make suggestions provided they are realistic. Roulette is not only beatable, millions are secretly being won. It is up to the individual player to do their own research to determine fact and fiction about my technology. Ever since I entered this field, I found enemies I never knew I had. Ultimately if you visit me in person, you will very quickly learn fact from fiction. But regardless, all truth comes out eventually.

The offer is completely real. Assuming all this does proceed (I have every intention of ensuring this), I expect people like competitors to find some new excuse - as they have with every other legitimate proof provided that embarassed them. For those that have actually visited me, and for my players, the competitors are exposed as clear manipulators and liars. By having a trusted representative visit me, more people will clearly see the desperate manipulation of competitors.
Posted by: rouletteplayer, September 9, 2008, 12:50pm; Reply: 1
Steve,

I don't know if either is interested and I'm not volunteering anyone, but Lanky or TwoCatSam are known and trusted.  Obviously, Lanky is closer to your location.

I remain a doubter myself.  I also really don't care.  I, like others generally enjoy this forum.    

I also don't think that your competion spammed your forum last week unless his/her primary language is Spanish.  Not looking to be banned just noting my observations of the writing style (now deleted) as best I can recall.  Not appologizing for my posts either, but with "johns" posts deleted, mine were somewhat out of context.  I still love the spinning cats.  

These thoughts are written more to you than for the public so I won't mind if you take it down.
RP.
Posted by: Steve, September 9, 2008, 2:20pm; Reply: 2
Is it really that difficult to believe that roulette can be beaten? It's not like I claim to be able to do it with red/black bets or against RNG spins. You can see an outline of what I teach at http://www.genuinewinner.com/gw.zip and as for custom variants, they are a culmination of the various techniques, plus results of my own development. It's not the cure for cancer - it's predicting where a little ball will land. Either way, you are free to believe whatever.

Where do Lanky and Sam live? How about it Sam and Lanky? What I'm after is for the visitor to be trusted and respected by just about everyone, not just on this forum, but the various other forums too. So it is not just your opinion or my opinion.

PS - If Johns was writing in spanish, then he was probably a player I recently banned, and this was his petty revenge. He knew the rules for the benefit of all players, he broke them, then takes it out on me. If it's the one I'm thinking of, he won over $100k with some of the methods I teach, but had problems with another of the methods. He refused to so much as call me for support for reasons like he didnt feel he understood english well enough. Thats not the system's fault. As I said, the system is a tool. A bad tradesman blames his tools. Out of almost 500 players, of course a few are bound to have this sort of mentality.
Posted by: Vetkop, September 9, 2008, 6:57pm; Reply: 3
Lanky is from Aus Steve
Posted by: Steve, September 10, 2008, 11:49am; Reply: 4
His IP is from Melbourne which is ideal. I've emailed him about this.
Posted by: see_jerek, September 15, 2008, 11:56am; Reply: 5
Quoted from Steve
His IP is from Melbourne which is ideal. I've emailed him about this.



Just a suggestion how about Micheal Barnett from Surveillance Technology?He is in Australia also.If you can convince him,I am sure he will be unbiased and give you a good review on his web
Posted by: Steve, September 15, 2008, 3:37pm; Reply: 6
I previously called Barnett and invited him to one of my public demos. He said he'd attend if he was in Melbourne at the time, although he wasn't. But I found him to be extremely ignorant and quite arrogant when on the phone to him. Either way, is it really advisable to show a casino consultant intimate secrets?

I dont think he's convinced that my claims could be possibly true, which is probably why he was so arrogant and rude - or perhaps he is convinced he's the expert. What he may be skeptical of is what he'll be chasing soon enough. Again all truth comes out eventually. In previous times, casinos were convinced roulette was random - they thought they KNEW roulette wasn't beatable. Now of course they know better, but they believe there are only a few methods to beat roulette like visual ballistics, bias analysis and computers. Some know better now, and history will repeat itself.

Back many months ago, he called us computer sellers out to have our computers tested. Mark Howe wouldn't dream of that, but Barnett alreeady has Howe's computer anyway. Forester jumped out and sent his computer, then after extensive testing Barnett concluded that even with the ideal conditions of slow motion video and a top view of the wheel, Forester's computer produced near random predictions. Bare in mind Barnett would profit from Forester's computer being a threat as he could then advise casinos. I was saying that Forester's computer was virtually useless all along and have given ample scientific fact, albeit intentionally only part of it. Forester just turned on Barnett calling him names, but Forester is right in saying that Barnett is not the expert he claims to be - he sincerely does have a lot to learn. On the note of Forester and his device, Forester is not a scammer like Mark Howe. Mark is as bad as they get, but Forester just has a poor product, and he does stretch the truth somewhat. Forester is also extremely ignorant, and he'll know that in time but perhaps his ego wont let him admit it.

As for my computer, when I called Barnett to discuss the possibility of testing my computer, I asked him "what do you get out of it?". I had to ask the question more than once, and he responded "it helps me do my job better". Do I really want to help him do his job better? No. He helps casinos.

What I'm after is someone that is known on forums - someone that is neutral. Lanky would be ideal, but he hasnt responded to my emails yet. I thought perhaps Kelly who's on a few forums, so if anyone knows him, please advise him of this. Perhaps even Snow who's also well known.
Posted by: see_jerek, September 15, 2008, 5:01pm; Reply: 7
Quoted from Steve
I previously called Barnett and invited him to one of my public demos. He said he'd attend if he was in Melbourne at the time, although he wasn't. But I found him to be extremely ignorant and quite arrogant when on the phone to him. Either way, is it really advisable to show a casino consultant intimate secrets?

I dont think he's convinced that my claims could be possibly true, which is probably why he was so arrogant and rude - or perhaps he is convinced he's the expert. What he may be skeptical of is what he'll be chasing soon enough. Again all truth comes out eventually. In previous times, casinos were convinced roulette was random - they thought they KNEW roulette wasn't beatable. Now of course they know better, but they believe there are only a few methods to beat roulette like visual ballistics, bias analysis and computers. Some know better now, and history will repeat itself.

Back many months ago, he called us computer sellers out to have our computers tested. Mark Howe wouldn't dream of that, but Barnett alreeady has Howe's computer anyway. Forester jumped out and sent his computer, then after extensive testing Barnett concluded that even with the ideal conditions of slow motion video and a top view of the wheel, Forester's computer produced near random predictions. Bare in mind Barnett would profit from Forester's computer being a threat as he could then advise casinos. I was saying that Forester's computer was virtually useless all along and have given ample scientific fact, albeit intentionally only part of it. Forester just turned on Barnett calling him names, but Forester is right in saying that Barnett is not the expert he claims to be - he sincerely does have a lot to learn. On the note of Forester and his device, Forester is not a scammer like Mark Howe. Mark is as bad as they get, but Forester just has a poor product, and he does stretch the truth somewhat. Forester is also extremely ignorant, and he'll know that in time but perhaps his ego wont let him admit it.

As for my computer, when I called Barnett to discuss the possibility of testing my computer, I asked him "what do you get out of it?". I had to ask the question more than once, and he responded "it helps me do my job better". Do I really want to help him do his job better? No. He helps casinos.

What I'm after is someone that is known on forums - someone that is neutral. Lanky would be ideal, but he hasnt responded to my emails yet. I thought perhaps Kelly who's on a few forums, so if anyone knows him, please advise him of this. Perhaps even Snow who's also well known.



Kelly seems like a good choice.I seconded it
Posted by: sean43, September 16, 2008, 10:24pm; Reply: 8
I just always wondered if you can make the mega money claimed Steve, why are you bothering with these forums and selling your techiniques?
Posted by: Steve, September 17, 2008, 7:50am; Reply: 9
Sean, it's not like I dont get a fair price. It's actually better than fair. Hear what one player said about the price:
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial1EricUSA.wma

As for why am I selling it? For varied reasons, but of course for profit. Do I use it myself? Not anymore as I dont need to - my teams have something even better so why would we need to spend time with a system that's not as effective? Also see below as per http://www.genuinewinner.com/faqs.html

Q1. Why are you selling your winning roulette system?

For a few reasons: first and foremost, we don't need it anymore. Consider that we have powerful roulette computer cheating technology that is even more effective than our roulette strategy. In fact some of our computers are automated, and do not even require the operators to look at the roulette wheels once the camera is aimed (See Hybrid Roulette Computer). We do still have a few roulette system players that pay us 50% of their winnings, but most of our "profit split" arrangements are with regards to our roulette cheating devices. This is because for the time we spend training players, our roulette computer teams are more productive. Learn about our roulette computer partnerships. We do not need further partners at this stage though, so please don't ask - if our team gets any larger, it will be too difficult to manage. Additionally, we cannot possibly play roulette in all casinos - there are thousands of casinos world-wide. So we can afford to allow others to use it - we want to see the result of our hard work being used.

We sell:

System (least effective and take most time/effort, but still millions have been won) - $2500
Standard roulette computer - $5000-$10000 depending on options
Hybrid roulette computer - $25,000 - $100,000 depending on options

Profit split players start with the standard computer (www.roulettecomputers.com/partners.html) and we are still looking for partners. The most productive partners have the option of the Hybrid later (www.hybridroulettecomputer.com) or something completely different which is not for sale.

Of all the things we sell, they are not $50 or so, they are fair prices. We (the whole team combined) cannot possibly play in all casinos as there are too many, but we play in more than enough. So to maximize revenue, we sell it.
Posted by: sean43, September 19, 2008, 2:52am; Reply: 10
Ive never bought that. If you had broken roulette, why on earth would you tell anybody? Im not out to pick an argument with someone who has far more roulette experience than me but you have a bit of a reputation and anyone stupid enough to by a hybrid computer for £25,000 deserves to be fobbed off. You say this hybrid computer can net you 100,000 a week. Again why on earth are you even bothering to sell something which can net you 100k a week? Play for 1 week every month then and net £1.2 million a year, it just doesnt add up.
Posted by: 1087 (Guest), September 19, 2008, 7:47am; Reply: 11
Steve,

The only thing I struggle with is you have created this forum and many good ideas and systems come from your forum so why cant you post a free system or a way of winning playing roulette ?

No one is asking for the world and all that is posted is also to your benift ?

I also have noted you never seem to pass coments on others systems as an example mine ?

I post systems to screw the casinos and I am not into making a profit out of punters / gamblers.

It's abot time we made the bookies pay as they have had the good times and most sites have crap support so unfair for the punters but they soon take your money.

And a major one that annoys me is if you deposit it come out of your account straight away but most casinos if you withdraw it takes them 7-10 working days sooooooo crap

I would be intrested in your comments

Regard,

Si
Posted by: Steve, September 19, 2008, 11:20am; Reply: 12
Sean:
Quoted Text
anyone stupid enough to by a hybrid computer for £25,000 deserves to be fobbed off. You say this hybrid computer can net you 100,000 a week. Again why on earth are you even bothering to sell something which can net you 100k a week? Play for 1 week every month then and net £1.2 million a year, it just doesnt add up.


What makes you think we aren't using it? Of course we are. Everyone that purchases the Hybrid sees it in person before buying. They also see Howe's and Forester's computer, and my standard computer. They see how it is worth the money before they part with a cent. Anyone able to afford this kind of money is smart enough to know whether or not it's worth the price. It is compulsory to see it before buying, and to meet me because I wont sell it otherwise. Please dont call my players stupid. If it all doesn't add up to you, did you consider there are things that you just don't know? And what makes you think my teams are not consistently winning large amounts?

Simon:

I have published heaps of free information for anyone to construct a winning system. I have said many times how you can and how you cannot win. Not everyone listens. The majority of players are still using outside bets, they are still thinking if you wait for 10 reds that black is more likely to spin next, they are still developing systems for RNG and so on.

When we sell a system or computer, it is like licensing the technology. Is it possible for my private teams to play in all casinos worldwide? No. So we license it out for a fair price. If we sold something like a roulette computer for $100 or so, that would be indicative of the technology being worthless. Our computers sell for $5000 - $100,000 which is a fair price. The large range is being there are automated computers so you dont need to look at the wheel (and error-free timings), and manual computers where you must look at the wheel so you aren't as covert.

The thing is many people say "why on Earth would you sell something that works?", but when you sell it for an APPROPRIATE price, the same people say "oh thats a ridiculously high price, and I'm not paying that".

Simon if you want to sell systems here, go for it. But do it on the right part of the forum or it will be considered spam.

Bookies always win. It's like the tax man and the stock market - there is a winner and a loser, and in the middle is the tax man who wins either way.

In the end, everyone can believe whatever they want. This is a challenge section so ask all the questions you want.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), September 21, 2008, 7:45am; Reply: 13
Steve, can i get a more videos of your computer?
Posted by: Steve, September 23, 2008, 8:22am; Reply: 14
Exactly what do you want to see in the videos?

I've ordered a new Huxley wheel (MK7) which is their current model, then I'm doing a video with it. But it arrives late October.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), September 25, 2008, 7:42am; Reply: 15
A long video demostration, like 200 spins or something like that.
Posted by: Steve, September 25, 2008, 11:56am; Reply: 16
200 spins is still short-term, but sure a longer video can be done, and it is going to be done when my new wheel arrives. It is very easy to establish proof of effectiveness for roulette computers because you have things like a beep when the ball is predicted to fall, plus you need fewer spins to see proof. For the system or any advantage method, you realistically need 1,000 or so spins unless actual principles that reveal where the edge come from are demonstrated. But to demonstrate the actual principles is not something I'd want to publish for casinos to see, although you see elements of it in person if you visit for a demo.

But look at one simple point for example: chart 100 spins and the diamond the ball hits. You will find 1 diamond is hit significantly more than others. It is almost never a perfect spread. This leads to the time of spin being more consistent, plus it gives you a much greater capacity to know what number is under the diamond when the ball falls. From there it is just scatter analysis. What I've just typed is a very basic explanation to exploit a dominant drop point on a wheel. There is of course a lot more to it, but I'm aiming only to explain one of the many principles my system uses. I am not the only one to know how to exploit such an attribute - it is actually common knowledge to casino consultants.

You can also read pages like http://www.genuinewinner.com/theory.html and decide for yourself if I actually know what I'm talking about, or people who publish entire websites about me under fake names just have something to lose from me being honest. Even at Forester's web site, every time I see it, there's new rubbish he's written about me. I'm not interested in stuffing around. I'm not interested in discrediting him or anyone. I only expose the lies from him and others, and that embarasses them, so they try harder and the cycle repeats. Truth is so much louder than rubbish, and all truth comes out eventually and then he and Mark will be embarassed even more. It's quite a pitty that many people choose to believe him, and they truly do not know the full extent of their manipulation. Mark is far worse, but Forester is part very ignorant, and part plain arrogant and he wants to be "king of the hill" with the BEST computer. It's as if he wants to think he has the biggest penis or something and it's very childish. Despite Forester's ignorance, he IS a liar. I have corrected him many times, and he's just not interested in the truth - even with the smallest details and he cannot seem to even conceive that he was wrong - it'd be too much pain for his ego perhaps. But anyway, like I keep saying, all truth comes out eventually.

Beating roulette is really not all that difficult. There are many legitimate ways it can be achieved. I do not release my secrets, and neither did players who have won millions with the techniques they used 10-50 or so years ago (techniques that no longer need to be secrets). At this stage, when you become my player, you dont receive the techniques - what you receive is the right to use them, and that can be removed at any stage because not all players are trustworthy. As for other techniques I teach, like visual ballistics, sure you can rely on them entirely as some players do. Only either an ignorant fool or someone with something to lose from me being honest would claim I was dishonest, and/or that what I teach is ineffective. Specifically with people like Forester and Howe, they make claims, I clearly prove them wrong, and they get mad for that and try harder. Anyone who's actually visited me would know how... full of excrement they are.

I have no doubt my methods will eventually be common knowledge. But there's still a while for that to happen. People that have doubted the legitimacy of me and my techniques, including competitors, will be red-faced in time - in fact they've already been embarassed numerous times which is partly why they're so mad. Some people are so desperate to protect their ego but like I said, all truth comes out eventually.
Posted by: joker, September 26, 2008, 5:39am; Reply: 17
hey mr. moderator i have been predicting tennis match very well...

yes i know a lot of tennis and it does help... surface.. head to head match up, how he or she is playing last two weeks or so.. or where he or she is coming from.. maybe some jet log etc... and it is very predictable....

what is your thoughts on that?  I doubled my bankroll comfortably.... just like you predict your wheel.... but tennis more preditable since there are big difference between great player and good player in tennis.... it is hard to find in other sports...

Anyhow.. what is your thoughts on that?  
Posted by: Steve, September 26, 2008, 7:13am; Reply: 18
I've never really gotten into tennis, but I cant see anything wrong with betting on sports. It's like horse racing though - you are ultimately betting against others, and in the middle is the bookie. So you have to be more accurate that others, with a little extra accuracy. One positive to tennis is perhaps many people that bet dont follow the tennis as closely as you would if you treated it as a business. This can give you an advantage. In my experience though, any kind of sports betting is not really about knowing who will win - it's more about value bets.
Posted by: see_jerek, September 26, 2008, 3:21pm; Reply: 19
Quoted from joker
hey mr. moderator i have been predicting tennis match very well...

yes i know a lot of tennis and it does help... surface.. head to head match up, how he or she is playing last two weeks or so.. or where he or she is coming from.. maybe some jet log etc... and it is very predictable....

what is your thoughts on that?  I doubled my bankroll comfortably.... just like you predict your wheel.... but tennis more preditable since there are big difference between great player and good player in tennis.... it is hard to find in other sports...

Anyhow.. what is your thoughts on that?  


Hey joker,when is the next game coming up?I am still waiting for your tips

Posted by: joker, September 26, 2008, 3:38pm; Reply: 20
Hey there right now is in China open.. go to Atptennis.com...

Men's side... roddick looks pretty well.... women's i go  for Kuzetsunova,

and my men robredo... at this point.. i would say safe to bet on Roddick.. but I have to see who is he going to play with...

well my friend.. you have to be careful I don't play anything dangerous... I bet on early round so I can get high percentage winning...

thank you
Posted by: see_jerek, September 26, 2008, 7:56pm; Reply: 21
Quoted from joker
Hey there right now is in China open.. go to Atptennis.com...

Men's side... roddick looks pretty well.... women's i go  for Kuzetsunova,

and my men robredo... at this point.. i would say safe to bet on Roddick.. but I have to see who is he going to play with...

well my friend.. you have to be careful I don't play anything dangerous... I bet on early round so I can get high percentage winning...

thank you


I have put my money on roddick let's see how it goes
Posted by: joker, September 27, 2008, 1:36am; Reply: 22
Wow.. you made tough bet.. I told you to waitl... he played Ferrero.. boy he is tough customer....

but good news.. you won!!!!!! I also won with Kuztesunova..... my bankroll is triple now......

I hope you didn't put money after Ferrero Match... Never never put money when they are playing quarterfinal or semifinal... anything can happen around this round.....

I will let you know what's good bet next....
hope you won the money with Roddick ... he won the match..... but don't bet on him next.....

oh by the way my man Robredo lost... and no surprise...... and of cource I didn't bet  on him....
Posted by: joker, September 27, 2008, 1:42am; Reply: 23
Okay I looked through the upcoming bet...

No.. that's it... we done.. sorry... No more.... Anything can happen at any moment from now on...

every tournament is almost coming to end.....

well, don't know how much you know about the tennis but in China open half of the top seeds are gone...

I mean after round of 16.... anything can happen.. especially this kind of smaller tournament....

so don't bet anymore... you probaly made $10 if yo bet $40 or 50 on roddick.... he had hard time agianst Ferrero but he pulled it out...

okay... again no more bet....
Posted by: see_jerek, September 27, 2008, 2:22am; Reply: 24
Quoted from joker
Okay I looked through the upcoming bet...

No.. that's it... we done.. sorry... No more.... Anything can happen at any moment from now on...

every tournament is almost coming to end.....

well, don't know how much you know about the tennis but in China open half of the top seeds are gone...

I mean after round of 16.... anything can happen.. especially this kind of smaller tournament....

so don't bet anymore... you probaly made $10 if yo bet $40 or 50 on roddick.... he had hard time agianst Ferrero but he pulled it out...

okay... again no more bet....



I made 20 as  I put 100 on roddick.Do keep me inform if there are good bets.Thanks Pal
Posted by: joker, September 27, 2008, 3:31am; Reply: 25
my pleasure... boy you kind of got lucky.... should have bet on kuzetsunova... women's side... actually if I knew Roddick plays on Ferrero  i wouldn't have bet on it.. but you won.. so it's okay.. well as you know You won't make huge money at once...

and must stick with safe bet... but you think about it... let's say you start with $500 bankroll... you can lose $500 at any game at anytime...

i mean even you start $10 unit... you use any progressive system then you done....  

for this one you won't get emotional.. I bet one match at time.. never muliple.. never.... and this is slow approach but never lose money by losing control...

if you lose the match then you sit and research and place a bet again... if you were in casino you can lose your emotion any time... and heck. we are not really playing.. tennis players are playing and they are very very strickt about cheating.. they can end their career if they lose purposly....

I tripled my bank account without any difficulty... I mean this is the best betting I have encounter in my gambling career.. i don't have to drive.. don't have to deal with weird people at casino.. or i don't have to eat at casino... and I enjoy the tennis so it is great for me... i have billions of tennis match recorded and I know how they play and how they are playing recently...

As I said I was going to bet on number 1 seed... this guy knocked out in first round.. I knew this is coming.. why? he played poorly in his previous match...
and it was his favorite surface also... and plus he came from all the way from Spain to China... and very tired..... and might be possible injury also...
Those players are out.... Tennis.. you have be fresh... i mean you must be...

anyhow.... goodluck
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), September 28, 2008, 6:08am; Reply: 26
Steve when will you get your new wheel?
Posted by: Steve, September 29, 2008, 9:38am; Reply: 27
My new wheel arrives late October, then Huxley will call me to arrange delivery.
Posted by: see_jerek, September 29, 2008, 6:00pm; Reply: 28
Quoted from Steve
My new wheel arrives late October, then Huxley will call me to arrange delivery.



Hello steve,

so how anyone respond to your challenge already.me like the rest of the people here would really love to know the truth.I guess its good for your reputation as well,it can also clear your name once and for all.Let's push this a bit and get it done asap before the matter turns cold.
Posted by: Steve, September 30, 2008, 6:30am; Reply: 29
I have contacted Lanky but he hasnt responded. If anyone knows him well enough, or if they know Kelly or someone else that is appropriate, please encourage them. I too would like this sorted out, but I dont have the time to go chasing it down every day. In particularly people like Kelly would only need to see some of my system material to know the system is legit, as Kelly is familiar with visual ballistics which are just a part of what I teach. I'd prefer Kelly to come as he is better known but Lanky would be welcome too. Anyone else here interested to visit me with airfares/accomodation paid? The demos will be recorded but your face of course wont be shown. I already have audio from many demos available, especially of the hybrid and each go for a few hours but before they are released I need to spend censoring the audio. With this proposed public challenge I want to make virtually all of it freely available.
Posted by: see_jerek, September 30, 2008, 6:57am; Reply: 30
Quoted from Steve
I have contacted Lanky but he hasnt responded. If anyone knows him well enough, or if they know Kelly or someone else that is appropriate, please encourage them. I too would like this sorted out, but I dont have the time to go chasing it down every day. In particularly people like Kelly would only need to see some of my system material to know the system is legit, as Kelly is familiar with visual ballistics which are just a part of what I teach. I'd prefer Kelly to come as he is better known but Lanky would be welcome too. Anyone else here interested to visit me with airfares/accomodation paid? The demos will be recorded but your face of course wont be shown. I already have audio from many demos available, especially of the hybrid and each go for a few hours but before they are released I need to spend censoring the audio. With this proposed public challenge I want to make virtually all of it freely available.



Steve,on a personal note I think this is really good for yourself and your company.It will help a lot in creating a positive image and it will defintely shut out your competitors,flamers,liars whoever they are once and for all.You do have a reputation on the web positive ones and negative ones as well.Proving youreslf and methods is a one time off thingy and it can eliminate any negative impression others have about you.

I wish you success in organising this demo session
Posted by: Steve, October 13, 2008, 11:59am; Reply: 31
If anyone knows Kelly, please alert him to this. I've contacted Lanky but received no response. Even Victor / VLS might be ideal. It's only a day here to see what you need, although you need to adjust to timezone. Consider it an all expenses paid holiday.
Posted by: lanky, October 14, 2008, 4:27pm; Reply: 32
Hi Steve.

Sorry for the delay.

My Email Has Changed I will Pop in A Message to You.

Yes I am from Australia.

I am not in Melbourne (My IP Address is though)

I am from New South Wales ........About 70 Ks From Star City.

I Spoke to Victor about This a few weeks ago And I thought he had Contacted You.

OK I am Available to do as You have said........

I will report back to this Forum & VLs with the final results.

Lets Talk Steve & Get This Going.

Lanky.

PS...My Email is in Steve's Private Message Box Now.
Posted by: see_jerek, October 15, 2008, 2:27am; Reply: 33
Quoted from Steve
If anyone knows Kelly, please alert him to this. I've contacted Lanky but received no response. Even Victor / VLS might be ideal. It's only a day here to see what you need, although you need to adjust to timezone. Consider it an all expenses paid holiday.



Hello Steve,

Great news Lanky has finally responded,its really a once in a lifetime opportunity to prove youreslf,do it good and all negative reviews about you will be cleared forever.
I wish you best of luck and success in this challenge.I have faith in you.Prove your worth.

Regards,
Jerek
Posted by: Ronjo, October 15, 2008, 3:04pm; Reply: 34
Quoted from Steve
I have contacted Lanky but he hasnt responded. If anyone knows him well enough, or if they know Kelly or someone else that is appropriate, please encourage them. I too would like this sorted out, but I dont have the time to go chasing it down every day. In particularly people like Kelly would only need to see some of my system material to know the system is legit, as Kelly is familiar with visual ballistics which are just a part of what I teach. I'd prefer Kelly to come as he is better known but Lanky would be welcome too. Anyone else here interested to visit me with airfares/accomodation paid? The demos will be recorded but your face of course wont be shown. I already have audio from many demos available, especially of the hybrid and each go for a few hours but before they are released I need to spend censoring the audio. With this proposed public challenge I want to make virtually all of it freely available.


Hi Steve,
I have been reading your posts with great interest and saw that Lanky had not responded so I contacted him and told him to do so,which he has now done,I would be very keen to participate if you are keen to have me,it would be great if Lanky and myself participated as we are very close friends,and I have been wanting to come to Aussie for sometime to visit Lanky and Nancy, now would be a great oportunity.I have sent my e-mail to your private box.

Regards,
Ronjo.

Posted by: lanky, October 15, 2008, 9:12pm; Reply: 35
Hi Steve.

You are correct I don't want My private details to be put on any Forum.

And any nonsense about Me being you has just been blown away now that Ronjo has agreed to participate as well.

Plus I have had the pleasure of meeting three forum Members in the flesh Mate.

And all but one of the three are members here as well as on Victor's Forum.

OK Steve we will sort things out as we go along.

I don't mind waiting until Ronjo can be available Either........It will be good for us all to meet....Plus having another person from overseas would dispel any doubts about the tests being True & Honest.

Rest assured Steve that Ronjo & I will treat You Fairly and report back with the absolute Truth to Both Forums.

Yours Sincerely.

Lanky.






Posted by: Vetkop, October 15, 2008, 11:48pm; Reply: 36
Defo good to get a Saffa to validate you Ausies ;-)
Posted by: see_jerek, October 16, 2008, 2:30am; Reply: 37
Quoted from lanky
Hi Steve.

You are correct I don't want My private details to be put on any Forum.

And any nonsense about Me being you has just been blown away now that Ronjo has agreed to participate as well.

Plus I have had the pleasure of meeting three forum Members in the flesh Mate.

And all but one of the three are members here as well as on Victor's Forum.

OK Steve we will sort things out as we go along.

I don't mind waiting until Ronjo can be available Either........It will be good for us all to meet....Plus having another person from overseas would dispel any doubts about the tests being True & Honest.

Rest assured Steve that Ronjo & I will treat You Fairly and report back with the absolute Truth to Both Forums.

Yours Sincerely.

Lanky.









Hooray! this is really getting somewhere at last.
Posted by: Steve, October 16, 2008, 6:52am; Reply: 38
Ronjo I can demonstrate to any number of people, and would be happy to meet you, but I'm understandably not going to pay for everyone's airfares and accommodation. I'll cover Lanky's airfares and various expenses but you would need to pay your own way if you attended too. I'm really looking forward to this and putting an end to the rubbish about me. Lanky I'll call you today.
Posted by: Steve, October 16, 2008, 7:04am; Reply: 39
I'm getting some messages about what will be demonstrated so I'll address it here. I'll demonstrate:

1. The standard roulette computer (http://www.roulettecomputers.com)
2. The hybrid roulette computer (http://www.hybridroulettecomputer.com)
3. The roulette system without electronics (http://www.genuinewinner.com)

I'll also demonstrate two of Mark Howe's computers (his mobile phone and psion 3a version) and Forester's FF IQE6 - this is not to discredit them, but to verify my claims about their devices is not merely nonsense between competitors. I'll prepare a clear itinerary and list of things to cover - everything from working principles of the system, to irrefutable tests for the computers. The bottom line is Lanky will see more than what he needs.

As for when, that depends on what Lanky and I arrange, and Ronjo's availability if he attends. I'll speak with Lanky today.
Posted by: see_jerek, October 16, 2008, 8:40am; Reply: 40
Quoted from Steve
I'm getting some messages about what will be demonstrated so I'll address it here. I'll demonstrate:

1. The standard roulette computer (http://www.roulettecomputers.com)
2. The hybrid roulette computer (http://www.hybridroulettecomputer.com)
3. The roulette system without electronics (http://www.genuinewinner.com)

I'll also demonstrate two of Mark Howe's computers (his mobile phone and psion 3a version) and Forester's FF IQE6 - this is not to discredit them, but to verify my claims about their devices is not merely nonsense between competitors. I'll prepare a clear itinerary and list of things to cover - everything from working principles of the system, to irrefutable tests for the computers. The bottom line is Lanky will see more than what he needs.

As for when, that depends on what Lanky and I arrange, and Ronjo's availability if he attends. I'll speak with Lanky today.


Hi Steve,

I am defintely not getting involed in this,I don't stand a chance at all with my crap skills in roulette and I am defintely not considered a respectable member across all forums.Nevertheless I do have some faith in you putting it off.Winning roulette in tens and hundreds is one issue,winning roulette in tens and hundreds of thousands is another different thing all together,even winning 1 or 5 units is still considered winning isn't it.If it has been advertise on the web then you got to show the people attending the demo how it is done.There has been some negative talk about you at VLS but I did make  a statement to ask everyone to keep their views to themselves and not tarnish other's reputation until the truth is out.

Let's up the stakes a little shall we?All or nothing.Do it in a real casino instead of a controlled enviroment.it may not be convincing enough,even if you are prove your methods are effective in a controlled enviroment.People will accuse you of rigging the wheel or the  wheel is not level these sort of issues.There is a chinese saying that goes like this "Real gold is not afraid of fire".Its a simple statement yet deep in meaning,I am sure all of us know what that statement means.I used to serve in the military and we always have this culture."Do it once,Do it good"Its time to shut people up with their rubbish talk,you want to do this don't you?

Once again,I wish you best of luck and yes I am putting my money on you.


Posted by: Steve, October 16, 2008, 12:22pm; Reply: 41
No matter what is done in the demo to Lanky, there will still be people that attack me, for varied reasons. Even when I conduct successful public demos, and even when I arrange othyer public demos as I'm doing now, some people are just not interested in the truth as it does not suit them. There are competitors, banned players, players that had no idea what they were doing, and even banned forum members that I've pissed off over the years, and they'd love nothing more than their claims about me to be true. They will fight to protect their ego. After I meet Lanky, will these people suddenly admit they were wrong? No, of course not. These are not the type of people to admit they were wrong and say "sorry". They'll just make more stupid excuses as they always have when their false claims are refuted.

I cannot demonstrate the computers in real casinos Australia as they are illegal here. The laws specifically state that even possessing them in the gaming area is an instant $5000 fine, whether it is used or not. Actually using it is a whole lot worse. Check the laws with the gaming commission for yourself. As for the system, if I demonstrated over 1,000 spins, that would be about 2 days of play and still people will argue it is possibly luck. Even a red/black system can end up a winner over 1,000 spins. Anyone that understands advantage play would understand that it is easy to lose 1 or 2 days in a week, but very difficult to lose by the end of the week. In other words, anything can happen in the short term. The house edge is not a short-term thing, and neither is overcoming it. What would a successful or unsuccessful test in a real casino prove? Not much - just that over that sample of spins, a profit was made. To the inexperienced, it sounds like the ultimate test, but in actual fact it proves very little whatever the outcome. Mere results of a test is only part of an overall picture. Positive test results do not necesarily prove effectiveness. I plan to give a lot better proof than solely real wheel tests. The demo to Lanky will constitute actual spins on a real wheel, but more importantly it is about validating principles and understand what it is my systems and technology do, and seeing them do it. What i mean is validating principles, not just success in trials - for example with the roulette computers, they beep when the ball is predicted to fall. I can show Lanky 100 or so spins on a real wheel, and we can check the results and/or he can just listen to the computer beep when the ball is predicted to fall, and he will plainly see it is accurate. In fact with Lanky I intend to do both - that is test over real spins, and he will hear the beeps etc. I'll be doing a lot more though, even Forester's different diamond test etc. Another example is Lanky will see my computer predict which diamond will be hit, and the type of hit that will occur. i.e will the ball fall straight down, or hit the top part of the diamond and bounce a fair way accross the wheel. How accurately? Within 1/3 of the diamond, which means my computer can determine if the ball will hit the top, center or bottom part of a specific diamond. A false claim? Lanky will see it for himself over as many spins as he needs to be convinced. This alone will be very clear proof of effectiveness, and it will be better than real wheel tests alone, although as I said we'll do real wheel tests also.

As for whatever may be said about me at VLS, there will always be morons that attack me. You probably mean Bago. He is a complete dickhead that doesnt know what he's talking about. He's probably anticipating further embarassment. Of course Bago is going to defend himself because if he's proven wrong, then people are going to see him as an incompetent fool and he knows that. Bago said "there is no reason why Steven Georges hoo-hoo would refuse to show the accuracy of his computer in the real casino environment since he states that it is undetectable and that it beats the most modern wheels available." - actually yes Bago, there are very good reasons as stated above - you have always shown how "young" you are. But do I even need to test in a real casino? No. A wheel is a wheel no matter where it is. Lanky can spin the wheel himself. And besides I will show Lanky things that will leave him in no doubt that not only is my computer effective on my wheels, but it would be effective on any wheel design under most conditions (there are of course obvious exceptions such as wheel rotors that change speed after no more bets is called). People like Forester may disagree with that claim, because his computer wouldn't do it and he believes no-one can possibly be better than him and he is king.

If anyone argues my wheel has magnets or is tampered with: firstly the wheel will be disassembled to show no tampering. Secondly, basic things like the timing of ball fall beep will show accuracy. Additionally there will be scatter charts and various statistical analysis. If this is really an issue, we should wait for my Mk7 Huxley wheel to arrive which is exactly the wheel currently used by my local casino, crown casino.

As for people attacking me: It happened before I publicly demonstrated anything, and it happened after public demos. Before public demos, Forester swore on his life they would never take place. After my public demos, Forester said it was probably just my family and friends that attended. To people that actually attended, Forester's comments seemed incredibly stupid. And it will happen after Lanky and Ronjo visit me too. I'm not expecting clowns like Bago to stop attacking me because they have something to lose from the truth. No matter what Lanky's opinions, some people will always attack me.  Am i aiming to shut the critics up once and for all? That's impossible. Some people are complete morons and will keep going no matter what. My aim is so that REASONABLE people will know fact from fiction.

After speaking to Lanky, it is clear he is a very straight-forward type guy. If there is bullshit, he will see though it. If something is legit, it will be clear. If for one second I believed Lanky would leave unconvinced about the accuracy of my claims, I would not be proceeding, but I am proceeding with absolute confidence because I know very well the capabilities of my technology.

On another note, if others want to attend, this is fine but I am only going to pay for Lanky's airfares/accomondation etc. Whether or not Ronjo attends depends on availability and timing. Either way everything will be filmed, although I may just publish the audio because images/video of equipment need to be censored, faces need to the blotched out etc. Besides Lanky's written opinions and the audio alone should be ample.
Posted by: lanky, October 17, 2008, 8:05am; Reply: 42
Quote
On another note, if others want to attend, this is fine but I am only going to pay for Lanky's airfares/accomondation etc. Whether or not Ronjo attends depends on availability and timing. Either way everything will be filmed, although I may just publish the audio because images/video of equipment need to be censored, faces need to the blotched out etc. Besides Lanky's written opinions and the audio alone should be ample.

Iwonder.

As You can see mate from the above Quote from Steve You are more then welcome to be part of this as long as You pay Your own expenses.

It will be great if we can meet up Mate…
Even more so for us if Ronjo flies in from South Africa.

Thanks for the being so gererouse with Your offer Mate.
I will certainly take you up on it Cobber.

I will be in contact with You My friend.

Lanky.
Posted by: lanky, October 17, 2008, 8:07am; Reply: 43
Quote
After speaking to Lanky, it is clear he is a very straight-forward type guy. If there is bullshit, he will see though it. If something is legit, it will be clear. If for one second I believed Lanky would leave unconvinced about the accuracy of my claims, I would not be proceeding, but I am proceeding with absolute confidence because I know very well the capabilities of my technology.

Hi Guys.

I spoke to Steve by phone Yesterday Wednesday the 16th of October Australian time.

This Test looks like it is going to take place the week starting with Monday the 10th November.

Now Contrary to popular belief I am not the idiot that some people may think I am.

Lets get a few things straight first.


Quote
This from Steve
“I cannot demonstrate the computers in real casinos Australia as they are illegal here. The laws specifically state that even possessing them in the gaming area is an instant $5000 fine, whether it is used or not. Actually using it is a whole lot worse.”


There is not a chance in hell that I would put Myself at risk by being in a Casino with this thing.

There would be consequences to pay if caught & I cannot afford to take that chance.

Nor could or would My good Mate Ronjo  want to be put in that position either.

Remember Ronjo sometimes plays in $25 units & bets 12 numbers at a time = $300 a spin.

He would not want to jeopardise what he does for a minute of madness.

I will not be swayed by what people find wrong with Steve .

Nor will I be influenced by Steve saying how good His things work.

I can’t afford to do that if I am to be totally impartial to both sides before the tests.

I do know a little about VB play…Ronjo knows a lot about it.

I also know a bit about Bias wheels.

I will ask Steve that the numbers spun be recorded & I will have those numbers analysed by a friend of mine to see if the wheel was Bias in any way shape or form that could have influenced the results before I report back to both Forums.

My sole aim is to find out if what Steve states is true or not.
Then both Forums will have a totally Honest & Unbiased opinion/s.

Your Friend.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, October 17, 2008, 9:25am; Reply: 44
Thanks Lanky.

Also it appears Bago is still trying to discredit me. Since he found out about this public testing, he has intensified his attacks against me. I assume he is concerned his charade will be revealed again.

Either way, Lanky you will see whatever you need to see, but if the wheel being used will be an issue, we should wait for my Mk7 Huxley wheel to arrive - we can do testing on both. Bago will say the Mk7 used voodoo magnets or something or that it wasn't in a real casino so it doesn't count. I was originally told the mk7 would arrive late October, and I'm waiting for actual dates for arrival. Perhaps to start though, I'll send you a DVD of a roulette computer test that isnt published on my web site. I'll send an email about this. It will at least get the ball rolling with validation of my claims.
Posted by: lanky, October 17, 2008, 4:45pm; Reply: 45
[quote][Either way, Lanky you will see whatever you need to see, but if the wheel being used will be an issue, we should wait for my Mk7 Huxley wheel to arrive - we can do testing on both. Bago will say the Mk7 used voodoo magnets or something or that it wasn't in a real casino so it doesn't count. I was originally told the mk7 would arrive late October, and I'm waiting for actual dates for arrival. Perhaps to start though, I'll send you a DVD of a roulette computer test that isnt published on my web site. I'll send an email about this. It will at least get the ball rolling with validation of my claims./quote]

Hi Forum.

Steve has since contacted me by Email to which I replied with My mailing Address.

If it will help with the Test being seen as even more Impartial then I think it is a good idea to wait for the new wheel to be delivered.

I have told Steve that it would be OK but that I need a 2-3 weeks notification time frame so that I can make arrangements from My end.

OK Gang everyone is now up to date with what is happening .
If there is any thing further that develops We will keep You all posted as the test gets closer to being done.

Your Friend.

Lanky.


Posted by: Ronjo, October 18, 2008, 8:49pm; Reply: 46
Quoted from Steve
I have contacted Lanky but he hasnt responded. If anyone knows him well enough, or if they know Kelly or someone else that is appropriate, please encourage them. I too would like this sorted out, but I dont have the time to go chasing it down every day. In particularly people like Kelly would only need to see some of my system material to know the system is legit, as Kelly is familiar with visual ballistics which are just a part of what I teach. I'd prefer Kelly to come as he is better known but Lanky would be welcome too. Anyone else here interested to visit me with airfares/accomodation paid? The demos will be recorded but your face of course wont be shown. I already have audio from many demos available, especially of the hybrid and each go for a few hours but before they are released I need to spend censoring the audio. With this proposed public challenge I want to make virtually all of it freely available.


Hi Steve
Have I misunderstood you,as you have said above that if  anyone interested to visit you with airfares and accomadation paid.I apologise if I have misunderstood,unfortuantly my budget will only allow me to travel in February next year.Anyway Steve I wish you all the best with your project.

Regards,
Ronjo.

Posted by: Steve, October 20, 2008, 6:59am; Reply: 47
Hi Ronjo, sorry for the misunderstanding. I only agreed to pay costs for one person, but anyone can attend if they pay their own way.
Posted by: lanky, October 20, 2008, 9:12am; Reply: 48
Hi Forum.

This was from Kelly over on Victor's Forum.

Lanky:

What is it exactly Steve is going to show ? What will be the MO for convincing the people present ?

Since I ain`t going I can tell you though what I would note from the spins apart from comparing his predictions with my own predictions.

1. Wheel speed.
2. Predicted number.
3. Strike number and strike diamond.
4. Top/middle/bottom strike of diamond.
5. Final number.

If I get these data, I can make a model that relates prediction, scatter and outcome into a model where we see amount of lucky hits and predicted hits and the tilt level of the wheel and also the scatter.

There are several scenarios. He might produce a session with hardly no hits, but actually good predictions but bad luck. Or vice versa, poor predictions and lots of lucky strikes. Or something in between. From the data above, you can mix and cross match a lot ot things and get some surprising but straight forward information. The downside is, that it actually takes quite an amount of data to build a proper model and people usually gets careless and bored during such a session and misses the strike number, (Strike Number is the number passing below the diamond as the balls strikes this diamond).

A simple prediction versus outcome number gives a very weak analyse. You can make a simple cross scheme where you have P as the predicted number and the outcome number as "+3" meaning it landed 3 pockets from prediction. That IS a part of the analyse, but only a fraction.

Now, as I would rather NOT be involved with ANY of the computer vendors on the scene I would rather stay absoloutely out of it. The history of the 3 vendors is long and filled with mudthrowing and web spamming against each other. I won`t be a part of that.

But feel free to ask if you have a question or you need something to look for.
Posted by: lanky, October 20, 2008, 9:14am; Reply: 49
My Reply to Kelly's Post.

Hi Kelly.

Mate this is a quote from Steve on His Forum.


Quote
In particularly people like Kelly would only need to see some of my system material to know the system is legit, as Kelly is familiar with visual ballistics which are just a part of what I teach. I'd prefer Kelly to come as he is better known but Lanky would be welcome too.

As You can see He wanted You as the main Tester & I could attend if I wanted to.

Kelly I am quite happy to stand aside for Either You or Victor to be the one that gets their Expenses paid to do this with Steve.

You are both  much more experienced with this type of advantage play then I am.

If You or Victor takes Steve up on it I will play a backseat roll to You or Victor & I will pay My own expenses to get there.

It would be great if We could Meet.

Your Friend.

Lanky.  

Posted by: Steve, October 20, 2008, 4:03pm; Reply: 50
Lanky, I read on VLS that Kelly doesn't want to get involved. Thats ok. My primary goal for arranging all this is to dispel myths and absolute rubbish from various people like Mark Howe, Forester, and the occasional 'young' player like Bago who didn't understand what they were doing. You dont need to be a roulette guru to know fact from fiction if you see me in person - you'll see everything you need with your own eyes. Ultimately the ideal person needs to be well known on forums, with at least a moderate knowledge of roulette so you understand concepts I'll present you with. Most of all, the ideal person needs to be trusted by others, which is why you fit the bill.

There are many examples of 'dispelling myths' but one is: you'll see Forester's different diamond test, and you'll see the results are quite the opposite to what Forester claims my computer achieves. You'll also see how my 'paper system' works - of course not all of it (not even players see that), but more than enough for you to know it is legitimately effective. If you understand enough about roulette, shortly after explaining what my methods consist of, it should be quite clear my methods are legitimate. Many of the principles will not need demonstration, only some may depending on your level of experience.

I plan to publish an itinerary of what we'll cover, which includes very specific false claims to refute. Any reasonable person would know who has been lying, and who has been honest. I don't aim to humiliate anyone who spread false information, for whatever reason. My only intention is to let the truth be known.

PS - Someone on VLS asked how a computer can be used wrong. Well you can test on a PC's skipping DVD player as Bago did (he ignored my advice not to do this), you can use the wrong settings for different types of ball deceleration, you can completely misunderstand how a feature is used, and the list goes on. The computer is just a tool and nothing more, and it needs correct use.
Posted by: lanky, October 23, 2008, 12:19pm; Reply: 51
Hi Forum.

Iwonder & I spoke on the phone for 2 hrs+ Yesterday about the upcoming Challenge.

He is a great bloke with no BS in Him.

He is a very hard working successful Family man that works long hours.

Seeing as though it looks like Ronjo won't be coming Iwonder agreed to participate in it with Me.

He has agreed as I have that it can be filmed as long as there is no face shots.
(although in my case it would be good to hang over the Fireplace to scare the Children away from it)

I think this is the best course of action as that way it can then be seen as be being totally impartial Report back to Both Forums by the Two of us.

And seeing as it would involve about 4 hrs per day Iwonder would prefer that the Challenge took place on Sunday & Monday as that would help Him with His Work & Family Commitments.

I have agreed to this as well as long as it can be arranged by Steve on those days.
If not then it will have to be on other Days.

We will await Your reply on this Steve.

OK so now everyone is up to date with what is going to happen in the future.


Your Friend.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, October 23, 2008, 11:08pm; Reply: 52
Hi Lanky, thanks.

1. I dont mind people knowing I'm sending you a roulette computer for testing, just as long as you dont reveal the details of it to anyone. You are probably going to have quite a few people that will contact you to suss out information, but you must keep answers direct and brief - even better perhaps you can write a summary of findings and leave it at that - this way, no accidental leak would occur. We can sort our how we should present your findings later - in a way that gives enough information, but not too much. People like Mark Howe will probably try to suss out information under fake names. For example, with the different diamond test, by all means state how close predictions were to each other and how many seconds before the ball falls were predictions made - this says nothing about features though. You can also verify that I didnt just send you a computer loaded with only a few numbers, like Forester said I probably did in my video demos because he didn't want to believe he's wrong. Sorry Forester, you and the people you have lied to (and they believed you) are in for a surprise.

2. No problems with Iwonder. As per my email I'd just like to speak with him first. Iwonder please contact me via email and specify your phone and best time(s) to call.

3. Sunday-Monday is fine, I'm flexible.

To everyone following this: I'm still waiting for word about exactly when my Huxley Mk7 wheel will arrive. We need the new wheel for the in-person demos, and we cant make Lanky's bookings until the wheel is sorted out. So for now, I'm sending a computer to Lanky so he can test and report back. I have no doubt what Lanky will report will be enough to convince many people already, but this is just the first part. I'm not jumping the gun with your opinions Lanky, I am just confident with my computer.

On a final note, I'm really very pleased to be doing this and it should have been done a long time ago. Unfortunately many of you believed blatant lies about me, from others who put egos and business before truth. \Those that know me here but prefer to stay out of it are right to do so. Arguments lead to unintentional release of secrets and you are best to just get on with the job. Also Kelly, rest assured while I'm spending time on all this, my players are out making money. You can make a lot more with teams than just playing by yourself. Speaking of which, always looking for more partners (serious players): http://www.roulettecomputers.com/partners.html
Posted by: Steve, October 27, 2008, 7:30am; Reply: 53
It appears Mark Howe is now posting at VLS under fake names. He's clearly not wanting this challenge to proceed and is trying everything possible. He is obviously "John" on VLS going on about the fact that I have a conviction against my name. It is all explained in detail at http://www.genuinewinner.com/rentech.htm - how is it relevant to my company, my technology and the competence of my staff? It's not. When you lie about my technology, you are also lying about my staff who are extremely good at what they do. I supect Moccoman is also Mark Howe. After his prepared speech about how I'm a con man, he said:

Quoted Text
"So Lanky, you should be "pulling the pin" on this real quick and don't get conned by his smooth talking."


What are you afraid of Mark? Is claiming I'm just a "smooth talker" really how you explain obvious truth I state? If all the rubbish you've said about me is true, then wouldn't this challenge only help you? Yes I'll show Lanky your computer too, but that's not why he's coming. I dont think there's a person on any of the forums that doesn't know about the Rentech case but it is not going to stop validation of your competitor's technology. What's next Mark? Do you suggest that when Lanky receives the free test computer I'm sending him, he should he just promptly return it? Of course you are afraid of what he'll find.

Kelly, you said:

Quoted Text
"The Cammegh wheel has at a certain speed an effect that causes the ball to stick at the strike number. 0.05 sec. slower or faster, the ball will just travel on past the strike number."


Correct Kelly. Every wheel tends to have at least one "sweet speed range". My computers can isolate to specific wheel speeds, or give the optimal prediction for the specific wheel speed. Idiots like Bago and Forester claim it doesnt deal with different wheel speed which is completely backwards. Sure my computers can use the standard scatter graph too, but it is nowhere near as 'capable'. Without it, as with Mark's and Forester's computer, on many wheels you would get near random predictions, as Barnett found with Forester's computer (and this is assuming the computer correctly predicts rotor strike point). Forester's computer doesnt even have an in-built scatter chart. Forester's computer doesn't even correctly predict the rotor strike point - he does an estimation based on when a ball speed is reached which is not good enough for many wheels. Even the estimation is often not good enough because no wheel is perfectly level. According to Forester, the zaps were best, of course until he made FFA - Forester claims whatever he is doing is best... until he changes it. There are many problems with Forester's computers and I could go on forever. He is so egotistical that truth goes out the window. Kelly if you saw what my computers do, you would understand just how full of it people like Bago and Forester are.

Now as for Bago, I know you are young but your personality is bordering on a sociopath - not everyone on the forums know you as well as I do. You are disliked on forums because of your poor and very immature attitude. Is it plain immaturity or an actual mental condition, who knows but you often sound an awful lot like Mark Howe. A few of your points are addressed below:

Quoted Text
The test would be on 300 spins with no differenciation between wheel speeds, we only note what number is below the striked diamond or the number striked directly by the ball, and the final number. Why this test little moron?. Because Stefano's computer does not deal with different wheel speeds. Why? Because it has only one jump graph (ball scatter) whatever the wheel speed you clocked. If the wheel speed is at 2sec or at 6sec, and you get the predict 10, enter the final outcome, let's say Zero, then in your graph you will have a bar chart at +18. Stefano's computer does not have any accuracy to determine ball scatter from one precise wheel speed, it MIX them, exactly as my test. And again, my test would show a BEST 1 in 25 hit rate if you would have played the peak on modern level wheels, AND WITH 100% ACCURACY OF KNOWING WHERE THE BALL STRIKES THE ROTOR!.
So it is impossible with a button switch used by a human to achieve a 1 in 15 hit rate on modern wheels. This is a very big lie, we smell the affiliate promotor who wants to catch fishes who do not know the game.


Actually Bago, you can isolate wheel speed if you like which is a feature that has always been there, or you can use the feature that selects the optimal prediction based on wheel speed at ball fall time - it can be set automatically or manually. 1 in 15 on a Starburst is certainly not out of the question. Really I dont know how many times you can make an idiot of yourself.

Quoted Text
Oh and should I add a big proof from his ebook instruction that Stefano's computer is completely obsolete when wheel speed varies like in Casino environment? "You should ideally not use more than TEN values. This is because the smaller the wheel speed range, the more spins that are rejected, but the better the scatter pattern will be, and the more accurate predictions will be. What does it mean? It means that Stefano judges that using more than TEN values in the wheel samples would give completely random predictions. If the computer would have been accurate with wider wheel samples, he would have said: use not more than 20 wheel samples, but no, he wrote TEN. Let's see what is the wheel speed interval when you are using TEN values: Let's take a wheel speed that is very common in Casinos, 3sec:
3000-3000-3033-3033-3100-3100-3167-3167-3200-3267 That's it, you are playing with a wheel speed that must be between 3sec and let's say 3,3sec, otherwise, every predictions are rejected. That's how Stefano instructs you on how to apply the computer successfully. I guess he never played in a real Casino with it, because if he did, he would have never wrote this. Tightening to this point, you will get a 1 in 10 predictions. Let's say you are using the computer for 8 hours in the Casino, 40 spins an hour, 320 spins in 8 hours, you will have at the end of the qualification (meaning to know the ball offset comparing to prediction only possible with an EARPIECE), you will have 32 values in your ball jump graph. WOW."


Bago, what about this are you finding difficult? Let's say you had a wheel that spun 3000 - 4000MS per revolution, and using 10 values you isolated to 3000 - 3500MS. That would mean you get predictions about half the time, but when you get them, they are more accurate. Do you really want to use the computer on EVERY spin, or is that just stupid and likely to get you noticed by casino staff? But let's say you wanted to get 100% of predictions - simply use a larger range. Wow, that was really, really hard. Fair enough if you cant understand more complex features, but you didn't even understand this extremely basic feature.

Now let's say you wanted to get more predictions but rotor speed was critical - ie if you didnt want to isolate wheel speeds, and you wanted the computer to find the relationship between strike point on the rotor, wheel speed and offset - the computer does that either manually or automatically. But there's something else before that - the ball is not necessarily going to strike the rotor where the ball reaches a certain speed. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about - or maybe you do, but just don't have the honesty to admit you were wrong. Even so, being a "grown-up" means putting the truth before being "right", but you remind me of a child stomping his feet.

Quoted Text
I don't care at all if your are the owner of this small house, or another owner is renting it to you, or you rent yourself this house. It really does not change the fact that you are not a multi-millionnaire in assets or making 400,000$/year. Thanks for the page though, it shows that this house is rented for 450$/month, as if a multi-millionnaire would buy this sort of small houses and make only 450$ a month, what a joke.


If you didn't care, then why publish it in your post? Because you tried to embarrass me, but only embarrassed yourself so now you backpedal and say you don't care. Also Bago, it is $450 per WEEK, not month, which is at the upper end of the scale for rental properties. How many properties do you own Bago, or do you still live with your parents? Actually not that it's relevant, I earn more than the stated figure - as I said it was only one revenue source. Good for you if you find it difficult to accept I dont care.

As for your dealer signature claims, YES dealer signature is part of what I teach. But as Theo pointed out it is only one of the modules, and I advise against using it because there are better ways to beat roulette. You never had the other modules because you never bought my system Bago. Other modules also cover VB with a stopwatch, thumpers etc not that you had any idea about it. All you had about my system was a free pdf that is floating around and that's all you were ever going to get because you are incredibly far from a trustworthy person. I'll cover all this with Lanky anyway.

Bago, I'm really done responding to your stupid comments. You are progressively getting angrier and more aggressive each time I correct you. Every time you post absolute rubbish indicating you really dont know what you are talking about. Even Kelly recognized how you twisted information and said "This is just another example of how you can twist a correct example into something negative.". I'm not sure if you are genuinely stupid, or just latching onto anything you can use to manipulate people. I think it is actually a combination of both. Do you have any concept of how much your own stupidity has cost you? Obviously not. Bago, the bottom line here is Lanky is going to see it all for himself. People are going to take his word over yours.

PS - Bago you signed your post:

Quoted Text
LOLOLOL. Bago, the truth exposer at your service.


My word, you are a complete utter dickhead Tony - that's the best way I can describe you and we really should say it as it is. It is not just your age because I know many people your age, and they don't act anywhere near like you. I'm really looking forward to this challenge. When people on forums constantly type rubbish like "LOLOLOL", such people don't usually have anything valuable to offer - just like Mark Howe - I think he wore out the L and O keys on his keyboard. Being embarrassed will not make you laugh Bago, and typing LOL wont convince people otherwise. Sorry if you are being made a fool out of, but you really did bring it on yourself. When I embarrassed Mark, it was not intentional - I was just defending myself. It only made him try harder, and it ended up embarrassing him more - he just didn't know when to quit and kept trying to get the better of me. Mark ended up accusing me of ruining his life but like I told him, he did it all himself - all I did was defend myself. I'm not interested in attacking anyone, just making truth known, and if that embarrasses people for lies they've told, too bad, it is not my doing. I have tried to make peace with you, Forester and even Mark, but all three of you are complete dickheads who are not interested in the truth.

Quoted Text
I am exposing you so easily and freely that you can't stand it so you need to lie more and more, saying ridiculous statements that make everyone laugh?


Who's "everyone"? You and Mark's 101 fake names? The fact is most "reasonable" people, even those that are skeptical after all the rubbish that has been spread by morons, probably appreciate that I'm stepping forward for an honest validation of my claims. I dont need to do this, but I want the truth to be known. The reason you and Mark are attacking me for merely stepping forward are varied. You both have something to lose from me being honest. As was said previously, instead of having a "we will see" attitude like the adults here, you attack me like a child. Mark is even trying to convince Lanky to avoid visiting me which is needless to say pathetic and cowardly. I suggest everyone that has lied about me cop it on the chin and take it like a man, which includes you Bago, Forester, Forester's blind followers who actually believed him, players I've banned and wanted revenge, Mark, and his 101 fake names. Coolpaddy said it well as below:

Quoted Text
Bago, You are just a very angry individual - your use of foul language, lies and insults to, and about myself and those other members interested in the truth betrays your lack of real conviction. Steve is willing to have his system tested by a real expert. That is what this challenge is all about. There is real confidence and courage in his initiative. You are sadly lacking in both of those qualities.


Thankyou Coolpaddy.

Lanky, I'll send you the computer today or tomorrow. The instructions are being updated and should be finished by the time you receive the computer.
Posted by: Steve, October 29, 2008, 1:43pm; Reply: 54
Lanky, the computer is on it's way sent overnight express, so will be there tomorrow. Have a play around with it at your leisure and get back to me.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), October 30, 2008, 7:28am; Reply: 55
How will you present the results, a 5 hour a test video?
Posted by: Steve, October 30, 2008, 10:51am; Reply: 56
Vincent, what results do you mean? There will be a lot of different parts to validations of my claims. We'll just take it as it comes. Something like a 5 hour video test is INSUFFICIENT proof. Why insufficient? Because success or failure can be put down to luck. For any effective "test", it needs to be over a larger amount of spins. So how is this remedied? A few ways, but mainly validation of the actual working principles, and details of exactly where the player gets their edge. As just one example, I will explain and demonstrate how at least three of the custom variant patterns occur. Lanky and Iwonder of course wont see 'everything' (not even my players see 'everything'), but they'll see more than enough to know whether I actually know what I'm talking about, or if I'm plain full of it.

If you mean specifically how results will be presented so everyone knows fact vs fiction, that is yet to be decided but we'll have at least:

1. Statements from Lanky and Iwonder that will address numerous claims from people like Forester, Bago and Mark Howe. Then people can see just how 'liar liar pants on fire' these people are.

2. Video/audio of the meeting with Lanky and Iwonder.

I wont need to demonstrate Howe's and Foresters computers and explain the limitations, and compare them to my computers, but I will anyway. Mark Howe's computer is absolutely pathetic - it is very clearly a scam. Forester's computer has merit, but has a lot of major problems he either lies about, or really just doesn't know. We're not going to spend much time on them though.

Regarding validations, as it turns out, we're starting with just sending a computer for testing to Lanky.

Additionally, I just spoke to Iwonder (the other person who will meet me), and I'm sending him a computer too. The main claim I want Lanky and Iwonder to validate is: when testing the computer on the same spin repeatedly, after the initial sample, virtually all predictions are within a 6 pocket arc. Once the computer has fully learned the ball, virtually all predictions are within a 3 pocket arc. On the occasional spin, a prediction will be outside the arcs for reasons like a few bad clicks, but they'll at least be very close to within the arc. Once this is validated, then all of Forester's claims are clearly refuted. Also Bago's (Tony) claims will be refuted too, and since Mark Howe just copies what Bago and Forester says, his false claims will be refuted too. Such a simple test, and a simple principle, but it has very big implications. Who knows what these three will say as an excuse. Bago has already said rubbish like I'll probably bribe them. Forester has said I would probably just load the phone with only a few numbers which is just as stupid, because Lanky and Iwonder were not born yesterday and can do whatever tests they want.

To Forester, Mark and Bago, I have no intentions of embarrassing you, only clearing my name of your, well, bullshit claims. Anyway so it's all starting with the roulette computer, but we'll cover the roulette system (no electronics) in time too. Validation of the system is a bit more involved though, and that is best done in person. Of course the computers will be covered again in person, and it will be filmed (video/audio) will be free to download.
Posted by: lanky, October 30, 2008, 3:05pm; Reply: 57
Hi Forum.

Its 4.pm Thursday here now.

I have just recieved the package. (no instruction etc)

I may be busy for th next day or two and won't be able to test this thing yet.
But by Sat or Sun everything should be OK.

Steve ring Me please so I can get this thing to charge stage.

Lanky.

Ps..I have no interest in what Mr.Howe or Mr.Forrester does or has.(I am not there to test their things)
As far as I am concerned this will be strictly about what Steve has or does not have that works or does not work.

Posted by: Steve, October 30, 2008, 3:09pm; Reply: 58
Lanky, I emailed you the instructions. Check your PM.
Posted by: lanky, October 30, 2008, 3:34pm; Reply: 59
Hi Steve.

We have a problem.

Read Your Pm Mate.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, October 30, 2008, 3:51pm; Reply: 60
Oops. check pm. Should be fine now. If you need anything else we may need to chat monday if still needed.
Posted by: lanky, October 30, 2008, 3:58pm; Reply: 61
Hi Steve.

More problems.

Check You Pm Again.

Lanky
Posted by: Steve, October 30, 2008, 9:11pm; Reply: 62
Hi Lanky no problem I can send you one but any will do. Let me know and I can send tomorrow if needed.
Posted by: lanky, October 30, 2008, 9:15pm; Reply: 63
Hi Steve.

No it sweet I just  found one.......as was just put in Your Pm.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, October 31, 2008, 6:43am; Reply: 64
Ok phew, also if the code is requested, pls email it me today so you can have it unlocked for the weekend. Some of the features are easily understood but you may need to ask questions about the others. Depending on the dvd you have and the wheel (the one you have, not what I sent you), you may need advice on suitable settings. If it's just bob gordon's then basically same settings as my wheel, except predictions need to be later because some of the ball spins are too slow. The main thing I want you to verify is my claim about the 6 pocket arc, then 3 pocket arc. You can start on 3 pocket arc even if your initial sample is good, but usually for that kind of accuracy the computer needs to learn the wheel a bit better first. Almost all predictions should be within those arcs. People including Bago, Forester and Howe all lie and say the predictions are virtually random - even with quite bad clicks you'll see thats not the case. Forester and Howe have never seen the computer but Bago has - he just used a skipping dvd player. This part alone refutes over 90% of the false claims about it. The instructions have the settings for the test dvd already though. Have fun with it.
Posted by: Steve, October 31, 2008, 8:38am; Reply: 65
Also there are number of other false claims you need to look at. I'll send you a list some time next week. Another example is Forester says that the delay for the prediction to be announced is about a second - his argument was that microprocessors are better, because that's what he sells. See if you notice the huge 1 second delay like forester claims. Anyway you'll see from the list I'll send you who has been lying, and who just didnt have any idea what they were doing. But as per previous post, the main false claim is that predictions are virtually random and that mobile phones cannot possibly produce accurate predictions. As for the system, that'll all be in time too.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 1, 2008, 4:17am; Reply: 66
How would i know that you and your friends does not lie?
You can easily fake the whole thing.
Posted by: Steve, November 1, 2008, 9:03am; Reply: 67
Vincent, I do not know Lanky and Iwonder. The idea is to have well known forum members, who many know well are not me and do not have affiliation with me. It makes no sense to choose a random forum member that no-one knows. While you may not know Lanky and Iwonder, many others do and they trust what they have to say.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 1, 2008, 11:17am; Reply: 68
What about you bribe Iwonder and Lanky, to fake the whole thing. I am not convinced until you post a "bulletproof" testreport.
Have you received your huxley get?
Posted by: Steve, November 1, 2008, 3:16pm; Reply: 69
Vincent, the video of my meeting with Iwonder and Lanky will be made public. You will see at least the demonstration component. I can't bribe a roulette wheel. As for bribing Iwonder and Lanky, if you're concerned about that, then you can either attend yourself or encourage someone you know and trust to attend. I've done demonstrations to many people, often 15+ people at a time. The problem is such people are not well known on forums. Lanky and Iwonder are, which is why they are attending. At the end of it all, review everything and decide if I'm either honest and my claims are accurate, or if I just bribed them.

As for the new wheel, it will be shipped to me shortly. Due to the delay regarding the wheel, we're starting everything off with me sending computers to both Lanky and Iwonder. For many people, this and initial opinions of Lanky and Iwonder will be evidence enough, but like I've said, this is just the first part of validation of my claims.
Posted by: lanky, November 1, 2008, 5:35pm; Reply: 70
@Steve./Forum.

Here is where we are at now.

I am waiting for Iwonder to receive his package then we will both set them up together off Steve's Website.
That way we will both know that we have the same settings.

@ Steve .
Just send the package that I have to Iwonder

Other  then that Don't send us any more Stuff mate.

We don't want anything more then what we have already.....This is not a Job...its a test on Your things.
We are not the slightest bit interested in what other people have or don't have.
When we have both packages set up we will contact You to make sure all is right.
Then You can talk to us by phone to verify it is.

You will have a time frame to do this which will be posted here.
Failure by You to call in that time will result in both packages being sent back to You & everything will then be Cancelled.

@ Vincent.

Mate I have met 3 people in person from Both the Forums.
Here are the names & the links to those meetings Mate.

Meeting with Digf on the 13t h November 2007.......Who is both a Member here & Vls and is retired
http://www.rouletteforum.net/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?m-1195201517/s-new/

Met Lanky At Casino Today.  on: March 25, 2008 By Natural9 who is both a Member here & @ Vls who owns His own Business
http://vlsroulette.com/general-board/met-lanky-at-casino-today/

Lanky meets Moccoman. on: September 17, 2008, Who is a Member at Vls ...Not sure about here...who owns His own Business
http://vlsroulette.com/general-board/lanky-meets-moccoman/  

Vincent I can assure You that Iwonder & I are doing Testing for the reason that once & for all both Forums will have impartial Reports done by us both.

If Steve's Methods /Computers etc don't work we will post that as well....Steve knows This.,..

Another precaution we are taking is that the numbers spun when we are with Steve will be recorded and sent to a friend of mine that will determine if the wheel is Bias or not or is influenced by the wheel in anyway.<<<This will have to take place before Iwonder & I will report back to both Forums.

Vincent if You are still not convinced with the evidence that I have put here & You live in NSW You/We can arrange to meet eachother.
If You live in Victoria We/You can arrange a meeting with Iwonder.

Lanky.










Posted by: Steve, November 2, 2008, 6:19am; Reply: 71
Lanky, I'll send to Iwonder early this upcoming week. I know this is not a job, and I'm not expecting you two to spend days and days on this. What I'm asking you to do should about 15 minutes for a test on the test dvd, plus the play dvd which is a bit over an hour although this is optional, as is any testing you do on your own dvd. You may take a bit of extra time to get used to the clicking to level where accuracy is at least reasonable. As I said the main part I want you to verify about the computer is about the 6 then 3 pocket arc because it focuses on almost all of the false claims about it, such as the false claims that predictions are random, mobile phones arent fast enough, there's a huge 1 second delay for predictions to be announced etc etc. The only reason I sent it to you is because of the delay with the new wheel, and I wanted to get the ball rolling as stated earlier. Anyway you dont need Iwonder to do the simple test, but if you prefer to do it that way you can wait.
Posted by: 959 (Guest), November 2, 2008, 8:18pm; Reply: 72
Stefano!

May I ask what did you send to Lanky? Is it old Nokia mobil phone with old or a NEW program?
Old prog. sucks!!!
Posted by: Steve, November 2, 2008, 9:06pm; Reply: 73
Franky, dont know who you are and dont much care. Obviously someone threatened by this challenge - there are many of you, take your pick. Either way you have to hide under a fake name. Why? Perhaps scared of being embarrassed. Take it elsewhere my friend.
Posted by: Steve, November 4, 2008, 5:03am; Reply: 74
I now have Iwonder's shipping address. I'll be out today due to melbourne cup day so will ship tomorrow, and Iwonder will have the computer Thursday.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 4, 2008, 5:39am; Reply: 75
Steve, can i test your genuinewinner?
Posted by: 1807 (Guest), November 4, 2008, 8:14am; Reply: 76
Hello Vincent

In response to your post of 31 Oct      [How would i know that you and your friends does not lie?
You can easily fake the whole thing.]

I have never had any dealings with Steve hoo-hoo or Iwonder, but I have met Lanky and his lovely wife Nancy in Nov 2007 at Sydney.
I first communicated with him a couple of years ago after reading his posts on the forum and after a little while we began to telephone one another. I live in England.
I quickly came to realise that he is a very good, honest and helpful man who will do his best to help anyone who needs it but he certainly won't be taken for a fool and he is the straightest bloke you could wish to meet.

When I met him and Nancy I very quickly knew that the opinion that I had formed about him over the previous few months was correct. At one point during our meeting I needed to go to the toilet but I didn't have any hesitation in leaving my rucksack which contained among other things, my passport, a few hundred Aussie Dollars and my return plane tickets to Adelaide and England, with him. I was on a holiday in Adelaide at the time.
That is the level of trust that I would put in him.

Whatever he says about the device being tested will be results and facts that he has seen during the trial.
Steve hoo-hoo is the one taking the risk because I know that Lanky will report, good or bad on the result.

digf
Posted by: Wally Gator, November 5, 2008, 4:05am; Reply: 77
Hi Steve,

I'm new here, but have spent a good deal of time reviewing your website and the like.  Have also read all the negative hype about you.  As far as I can tell, it seems like a bunch of personal crap that has no bearing on anything really.  My question is this.  Becasue I'm from the US and play here, your computerized system does me no good, unless I travel to, say, Europe.  So, while the testing will provide you with great credibility for those who can use the cheating computer system, how about a means to test your other systems that supposedly work elsewhere, like here in the US?

Is there someone on the forum who has your system and plays it in a real casino in the US?  And, could you arrange for some of us to watch an hour or so of play?  I think it could provide you with a tremendous sales tool through this forum, especially for US players.

I specifically ask because when I watched your video with the streak of losses and then the comeback, I was wondering just how often that occurs.  If it constantly wins and loses like a rollercoaster then the only way to win in the long term would be by increasing your bet size or doing some sort of progression.   Even some of the testimonials talk about having alot of patience.   This indicates that the player is continually making comebacks or waiting for the right time or sequence to bet.

Anyway, since this thread was about testing and proving things, I thought I'd throw the idea out to you.

Regards, Gator
Posted by: 1806 (Guest), November 5, 2008, 6:09am; Reply: 78
Steve,

I live in the UK, and as far as I'm aware electronic devices are also illegal here, so the computer is not really an option for me either.  Funnily enough, I was about to suggest something very similar to what Wally Gator has posted. Do you have many players of your system in the UK? and would it be possible to meet some of them?
Posted by: fredytedy, November 5, 2008, 7:08am; Reply: 79
Likewise as above , i`m also from, the Uk and would it be possible to meet some of them?
TKxs ft
Posted by: Steve, November 5, 2008, 8:34am; Reply: 80
Vincent, Lanky and Iwonder will already see enough of my methods to know whether or not they are legitimate, or a scam.

Digf and Lanky, thankyou for verifying various points.

Wally Gator, yes what is written about me is a lot of personal crap, because if people that wanted to discredit me actually focused on my technology, they would either be blatantly lying about things, or accidentally validating the techniques as effective. There are many examples, but Forester goes on and on about how I'm a fraud, then says visual ballistics is legitimate. VB is only part of what I teach, and there are many different ways to apply it. I intend to teach VB to both Lanky and Iwonder, among numerous other legitimate techniques I teach. It appears that to people like forester, such legitimate techniques are only legitimate when taught by someone else that doesnt sell computers. Mark howe is the same - goes on about how I'm a fraud etc, then says visual ballistics and bias analysis are legitimate methods, although I teach them too, and they are only a small part of what I teach overall.

Wally, you said:

Quoted Text
while the testing will provide you with great credibility for those who can use the cheating computer system, how about a means to test your other systems that supposedly work elsewhere, like here in the US?


Really it's not "cheating" - you are using predictive technology. Cheating is influencing outcomes. The computer is only part of what is being tested. Originally I did not intend to just send the computers to Iwonder and Lanky, but since someone claimed my wheel is an old design and it would make winning easy, we decided to wait until I receive a John Huxley Mk 7 wheel, which is Huxley's current model. And due to the delay, I just sent a computer to Lanky (and Iwonder today) so they can at the very least get the ball rolling. At the very least, all they need to do is a quick test to validate my claims about the 6 and 3 pocket arc - it exposes over 90% of the lies about my computer, and leaves Forester, Mark Howe and our poor friend Bago quite red-faced.

My non-electronic methods will be addressed too, but validating my claims about them is a little more tricky. That's because while the computers are far more effective and the proof of their effectiveness can be done quickly, the effectiveness of a system takes much longer. Realistically we'd need thousands of spins, and that would take days. A few things to consider about the system validation:

Any system can end up with a profit after even 2000+ spins. Does it mean the system is legitimately effective? No. Many players on various forums have tested systems on programs like roulette xtreme and produced profits over tens of thousands of spins. But extensive testing shows the methods eventually crash, usually in spectacular fashion, due to betting progression. My point is an actual test of the system does not prove much - it is only part of a picture. Even playing a biased wheel often produces a loss over 2000+ spins, although if the bias is legitimate, losses are made back over larger amounts of spins. Does the temporary loss make wheel bias an illegitimate method? Of course not, but to someone that doesnt know any better, wheel bias may seem like an illegitimate way to win. My point is a test on a real wheel, successful of not, does not actually prove much. To many people, it would seem like an ideal test but it is not.

Actual tests on a real wheel are practical and an effective demonstration for roulette computers, but not for non-electronic systems. So what I'll do is explain and demonstrate many of the working principles of the methods I teach. From just explaining various elements of my system alone, they both should know they are legitimate methods, but I'll demonstrate the actual principles too - of course not all, just enough for them to have reasonable information to ascertain whether or not my methods are the real thing, or if I'm the scammer many people have been led to believe. Exactly what I'll show them with regards to the system is not yet decided, but I'll at least cover traditional advantage techniques, and the basics of the first 3 patterns of custom variants as they are the least sensitive, although alone they should be more than sufficient to validate my claims.

I'll also show them both the hybrid roulette computer (http://www.hybridroulettecomputer.com) which may not be necessary, but a lot of people have said it probably doesnt exist, and it's just a scam to increase sales of my other products. For example, Mark Howe claimed that he and a "newspaper" offered me $1M to prove it exists, which is completely a false claim as explained at http://www.genuinewinner.com/markhowe.htm - I've agreed to the challenge many times but Mark ignores it, and refuses to state the name of the newspaper that he claims wants to pay me $1m... for a single story. Yes it's a stupid claim, but for Mark Howe, it's just one of many ludicrous claims - really the man has serious problems and literally appears to be sick.

Wally, every legitimate winning system can and does have losing streaks. There is no way to avoid it. Sure you can use progression, but then you run the risk of blowing your bankroll if the losing streak continues. I've seen losing streaks even continue on biased wheels, but losses are recovered eventually. Generally yes, you need a lot of patience for wheel analysis methods, which is largely why many players dont succeed. But patience and hard work is well rewarded usually with an income far greater than standard employment, plus you dont deal with the thieving tax man in most cases. I do teach quicker methods that enable profitable play within a few spins, and accuracy gradually increases, but such methods require more skill and thorough understanding - it is fine for the serious player, but usually too much for the casual player. If you want quick AND easy, the computers are more what you want, but even they are not perfect because while you can beat any wheel design, not always are conditions suitable (ie if no more bets is called too early).

I've never found a "holy grail" - only legitimate methods that are both effective and practical on most wheels. One method may be completely impractical for one wheel, but perfect for another. This is why I teach many legitimate methods, not just a singular method as some people have been led to believe. In my experience, even without electronics, there is almost always one way or another to beat any wheel. But a wheel being beatable and being practical to beat are two different things. MOST wheels are both possible and practical to beat - even the newer designs, although of course you dont focus efforts where application is less effective. Can you lose with the methods I teach? Yes of course. Even with correct application, you can lose over a few days or even a week, but continued correct application will almost definitely lead to recovered losses. Non-electronic methods to beat roulette, especially wheel analysis methods, are realistically long term - nothing in this field really happens over hundreds of spins. Often an edge is not fully realized until 2000+ spins are played. Of course it's not always like this. The average play can confidently profit after 1000 or so spins, but there are rare occasions where even more spins are required to overcome losing streaks. The casino achieves an edge from ordinary players very slowly, and that's how professional players turn the edge in their favor. Because many people have trouble coping with the required patience, they dont succeed, but it doesnt mean the methods dont work. I'll clearly state my techniques are not for everyone. For some people they're easy to understand and logical. But some players never seem to fully understand what they are doing, or what they've purchased. Usually they are players that dont speak english well. One Spanish player "Addonai" lost over 10,000 Euros which I only found out about a week or so ago, although he's been a banned player for a long time. Before I deleted his wheel analysis software account, I tested his spins and found clear profit so he clearly had no idea what he was doing. I had to fight to get him on the phone to give support, when it should be the other way around. Addonai was banned fro contract breach, and he breached the contracts because he was frustrated. All my documentation clearly states never to apply the methods without first thoroughly testing, so you know application is correct and effective. Did Addonai do this? No, he went out and lost 10,000 Euros. That to me shows a very clear gambling problem - it is not professional play. Who does Addonai blame for this? Me of course, not himself. It is just easier to blame the provider of the tools than to blame himself for incorrect application. In the end I have no idea what Addonai did to lose that much money - but this moron has been attacking me on forums and blaming me for his own mistakes. As for other players, many regularly earn tens of thousands of dollars and more per week. It is not as uncommon as you think. As I have said many times, I have over 500 system and computer players, and there are an enormous range of situations players are in - ranging from literally becoming millionaires, to losing 10,000 Euros and blaming me. Unfortunately for my credibility though, winners dont brag about it on forums. But losers blame me and post rubbish based on their own mistakes and misunderstandings. This creates the illusion that my methods dont work and that I've scammed a few people. Then you have people like Bago who is probably the least trustworthy person i've ever dealt with - basically a child who refused to accept my call (because he didnt speak english well enough) when I only wanted to give him support and correct his misunderstandings of my computer's features. It was very basic things like advice not to use PC dvd players because they are notorious for skipping, but he didnt want to accept that. All this on top of rubbish spread by competitors has led to me having a bad reputation, but I trust soon the very simple truth will be known soon.

Regarding the UK and computer legalities, before the Ritz incident (NOT a "scam" like the papers call it), it was legal. Then it became illegal, and since last years September gaming deregulation, they are legal again. Dont take my word for it though - I suggest all players do their own legal research. That way you have it in writing, and this is your insurance policy. So many people believe computers are illegal, but in actual fact they are mostly legal. There are only a handful of jurisdictions where application is expressly "illegal", which include Australia & USA. Gaming laws are usually state by state, not national, but my solicitors have covered most major states in the USA and found application is illegal. On this note, some have claimed I dont really have solicitors which to me sounds like a claim from someone that has never encountered significant wealth, so I'll specify my solicitor who did this particular research is Lynda Slavinskis, who I hired because she previously worked for Tattersalls which is a major gaming organization in Australia. Anyway perhaps I shouldnt cover all the rubbish claims that aren't really relevant otherwise issues that matter most may be clouded. So starting with the computers, I'll prepare a simple list of the most relevant false claims about the computer for Lanky and Iwonder to investigate. The most important one is about the 6 and 3 pocket sectors.

Regarding meeting UK players, if you were them, would you agree to meet complete strangers and tell them how you covertly win in casinos? If you are actually another player, then that would be fine and many players meet up often for many reasons - usually to either form teams, or just collaborate on which casinos are best, which casinos should be avoided etc. If you want to speak to players without being an actual player, then you need to compensate them for their time which is perfectly reasonable - see http://www.genuinewinner.com/speaktoplayers.htm
Posted by: 1806 (Guest), November 6, 2008, 3:04am; Reply: 81
Hi Steve,

I understand your observations regarding losers posting on forums and winners keeping quiet, and I'm not trying to get "on your case" here, but there are a couple of points in your last post (and on your website) which are bothering me, hopefully you'll be able to address them.

As indicated in my previous post, I'm primarily interested in your non-electronic methods (although I didn't realise that computers are not illegal in the UK, so I may reconsider this) and it seems to me that there is an inconsistency here:

You said -
Quoted Text
My non-electronic methods will be addressed too, but validating my claims about them is a little more tricky. That's because while the computers are far more effective and the proof of their effectiveness can be done quickly, the effectiveness of a system takes much longer. Realistically we'd need thousands of spins, and that would take days.


But on your web site you state that the most effective methods require collecting between 300 - 600 spins, this is a lot more than the "thousands of spins" you mention. It's true you mention on the system home page that "more assured" methods require 300 - 3000 spins, but these numbers are only mentioned once, on the FAQ page and elsewhere it's 300 - 600 spins, please can you clarify this?

Also, in FAQ 57:

Quoted Text
Assuming you want to use the most effective method, start by collecting 300-600 spins. While you collect these spins, you can apply one of the quicker methods so you profit while you collect spins.


But surely, if you can profit from some other method while collecting spins for the most effective method, why bother to collect those spins in the first place?  the quicker method may not be as profitable, but couldn't you just increase your stakes and thereby get a greater return?

One of the difficulties (as far as I'm concerned), is that there are so many different techniques used in your system, this may be necessary in order that 95% of wheels can be beaten (your figure), but it would be helpful if you were to say what proportion of wheels on average require application of which technique. For example, you mention that VB and dealer signature are both incorporated into your analyses, but VB requires a lot of practice, plus you need to see the wheel and be able to bet late (in the FAQ you say that in general, it is not necessary to have a good view of the wheel) . I'm no expert, but isn't it the case that VB requires a certain amount of bias? but you say a biased wheel is not necessary, or is this only for using the custom variants?

In FAQ 45 you say that you previously analyzed all spins for players, but that this took too much time and so now you provide the software, but elsewhere you say that users of the software can only use 2 of the nine patterns that are available. Doesn't this severely limit the effectiveness of the system? particularly as you say that casinos are already aware of these 2 patterns and monitor their wheels...
I'm not clear as to what you are actually doing at this time. You have a page for players to submit spins so you must still be analyzing them, but then, you say that you now have more than 500 players, and 400 players was the limit of your support...

Again, I'm not trying to catch you out here, I'm seriously considering purchasing one of your products, but I want to get as clear and complete a picture as I can before committing myself, after all, the initial purchase price is a relatively minor factor here.
Posted by: Steve, November 6, 2008, 9:08am; Reply: 82
JD1963, you said:

Quoted Text
But on your web site you state that the most effective methods require collecting between 300 - 600 spins, this is a lot more than the "thousands of spins" you mention. It's true you mention on the system home page that "more assured" methods require 300 - 3000 spins, but these numbers are only mentioned once, on the FAQ page and elsewhere it's 300 - 600 spins, please can you clarify this?


Yes I was going to elaborate on that. Good question. Generally the more spins that are analyzed the better. The absolute minimum should be considered 300 spins per direction. This usually allows me to get a reasonable overall picture of patterns. It is not enough for all pattern types though. If a player sends me 300 spins and I see numerous pattern types, I will usually need extra spins to verify the patterns. Why? Because patterns may be coincidental - there is always that chance. So by analyzing extra spins, this reduces the chance that patterns are mere coincidence. So before at least a basic CV is generated, I need two completely independent sets of data to compare. With smaller amounts of spins, usually it is only possible to generate a reliable enough CV that has only 2 or so patterns. With more spins, finding other pattern types is much easier. Also factors like segregation play an important part. For example, if the player separates spin directions, then I may need only half the amount of spins for the same reliability of analysis.

Usually if a player sends me X amount of spins, the first thing I do is split them in half to check for consistency in patterns between them. Sometimes X is 100 (too few but I still look at them), and sometimes it is 2000+. Not every play has a team and the time to collect thousands of spins which are required for a full analysis. Most players stick to 300 spins, so I split into two segments of 150 spins. 150 spins is adequate for at least 1 pattern type. If patterns are consistent between 150 spins, then a CV can be issued but it is usually better to send more spins so I can verify patterns are authentic. If the player wants to send 2000+ spins that's good, but it doesnt guarantee other patterns will be found - at the very least though it enables a better understanding of previously found patterns. More specifically, always, always the patterns are there, but sometimes they are just too weak to define and if they cant be defined, they cant be used. But sometimes I will see the patterns, but they come and go with irregular cycles and it is too difficult to know when the cycle will start or end. Essentially any of the chart types only tell you what "was", not what is going to be. You use history to predict the future, but you can never do it with 100% accuracy, although you only need enough accuracy to overcome the house edge.

To explain a typical scenario: a player sends 300 spins. I find at least 1 pattern type and inform the player. I will usually request an additional 300 spins to check for consistency, and if there is consistency, a custom variant (CV) with at least one pattern type can be issued. Such CVs will usually have patterns that change, but the pattern types will remain consistent. So I may recommend that before play each day, the player collects 100 spins to use in the online software (or do manual calculations) to make adjustments for pattern changes. Pattern types and actual patterns are two different things. You can use 300 spins to find pattern types, and once the pattern type is known, you can use only 100 spins before play each day to see how actual patterns have changed - this allows optimal accuracy. By teaching players about pattern 1 and what to look for, they will be better prepared for changes that happen with other pattern types. If they dont do this before progressing to other pattern types, they'll be too confused as the charts between pattern 1, and pattern 4+ are like the difference between 2D and 3D. I know many players want to go straight to 9 patterns, but it is not advisable. While CVs are charts that say when and where to bet, they often require adjustment on a day to day basis - the adjustments are very simple once you know what you are doing, but if you dont, then you may be predicting the wrong sectors instead of the correct sectors - this means what should be a strong positive edge goes to a strong negative edge. There are similar issues with traditional advantage techniques like visual ballistics, where betting the wrong sector actually gives you a lower edge than you would have with random bet selection,

Regarding the quicker methods, typically they are not as effective, but it depends on which one you mean. There are a few of them. Some of them are overall better than custom variants - for example visual ballistics, but for this you need a lot of practise and skill, plus not always is no more bets called late enough for such a technique to be viable. Visual ballistics can form part of custom variants - this is what I call format 3 spins.

You said:

Quoted Text
One of the difficulties (as far as I'm concerned), is that there are so many different techniques used in your system, this may be necessary in order that 95% of wheels can be beaten (your figure), but it would be helpful if you were to say what proportion of wheels on average require application of which technique. For example, you mention that VB and dealer signature are both incorporated into your analyses, but VB requires a lot of practice, plus you need to see the wheel and be able to bet late (in the FAQ you say that in general, it is not necessary to have a good view of the wheel) . I'm no expert, but isn't it the case that VB requires a certain amount of bias? but you say a biased wheel is not necessary, or is this only for using the custom variants?


You are referring to different methods. They all have different requirements. In the FAQs on my site, people want clear answers so that's what I try and give them. But in reality, different techniques have different requirements. For example, yes visual ballistics requires a certain degree of 'tilt' to be practical. Indeed application is possible on perfectly level wheels, but it is quite a bit harder - you can learn application, but it is better to simply seek easier to beat wheels. Some players just attempt application on the first wheel they find which is not how it should be done - I always say it all starts with wheel selection. Also to address your comment, yes VB of course needs you to look at the wheel. But CVs dont always use VB (format 3). With the typical CVs, you dont NEED to look at the wheel, unless you segregate which means something like accepting only spins where the wheel is significantly slower - you need to see that, and place your bets after ball release even if no more bets is called way too early (too early for normal visual ballistics). Correct that biased wheels are not necessary, but if a bias is found, the analysis contributes to the CV.

I think what many people get confused about is what CVs actually are. To put it simply, it is nothing more than a method that is a combination of every possible and/or practical method for any given wheel. Do not assume they are anything mystical. If I explain patterns to people, it is usually just patterns 1,2 and 3 because they are least sensitive, it is very clear the methods are legitimate. Pattern 1 does not rely on any form of bias, but patterns are stronger if the ball has a drop zone (tilted) - many things can increase pattern strength for pattern 1. As for patterns 2, it is wheel bias. Pattern 3 is a form of bias that casino software completely misses, so it is far more common than pattern 2. How many wheels are actually biased? Every wheel has some degree of bias, and whatever it is, it is incorporated into the CV. To determine a reasonable bias, if it's something like a half wheel bias due to wheel wobble, you need about 400 spins to detect it, and another 400 to confirm it, minimum. For smaller sectors, you need a lot more spins to validate the bias. For pattern 3 bias, you need realistically thousands of spins because it is a cycle that repeats.

As for patterns 4-9, I dont release details on them but they have nothing in the slightest to do with any form of bias. They have to do with the design of the actual wheel. For example, if a wheel has 12 diamonds, they are manifested in the patterns found. There is nothing at all mystical about them - it is basic science, albeit a field of science that is less prominent.

You said:

Quoted Text
n FAQ 45 you say that you previously analyzed all spins for players, but that this took too much time and so now you provide the software, but elsewhere you say that users of the software can only use 2 of the nine patterns that are available. Doesn't this severely limit the effectiveness of the system? particularly as you say that casinos are already aware of these 2 patterns and monitor their wheels... I'm not clear as to what you are actually doing at this time. You have a page for players to submit spins so you must still be analyzing them, but then, you say that you now have more than 500 players, and 400 players was the limit of your support...


Players do not immediately receive software access. After a month or so and a chat or so with me on the phone to get to know each other, I give them initial software access which covers part of 2 pattern types - it is a basic analysis. When they become better known and trusted, they access other parts of the software. There are more than 1 programs players can access - the online software is independent of software that analysis all 9 pattern types - very few players have it. But many players have the basic software which is accessibly online. Over time more of the pattern types are being added to the online software, but not all players will access it, at least not until they become more established and trusted. Players almost never go from being a new player to receiving full 9-pattern Cvs. This is to protect secrets, but also not always spins sent for analysis are adequate to develop full CVs. I can almost always develop 2 pattern CVs, but 9 patterns is far more involved.

I hope that answers your questions. Let me know if you need elaboration or if anything was missed.

PS - I'll be explaining patterns 1,2 and 3 to Lanky and Iwonder. Possibly pattern 4 also. Pattern 1 doesnt have anything to do with bias, but it is helped by ball drop zones and various other ballistic factors. Pattern 4 gets a little more involved and uses multiple reference points and permutations, so even 100 spins can form thousands of reference points.
Posted by: Steve, November 6, 2008, 10:24am; Reply: 83
@ forum: Iwonder should now have the computer. Lanky already had it.

Lanky & Iwonder, the main claims I'd like you to investigate are:

# 1. When using the test DVD (same spin repeated), after the first ball sample, almost all predictions are within a 6 pocket arc, irrespective of the reference point used. After the tone is heard at least once (ideally twice) to indicate the ball sample has increased in accuracy, almost all predictions are within a 3 pocket arc. Of course if your initial sample is good, then almost all predictions may be within a 3 pocket arc from the start. The false claim from people like Forester, Bago and Howe is that predictions are virtually random. In particularly Forester claims mobile phones cannot possibly be accurate, although he knows nothing about using core timers on cellular phones. He just wants everyone to believe what he sells is superior - like how he said electric zaps were best and audio just saying the prediction is bad, but now he changed his mind since offering FFA. He'll change his mind about other things too if he develops his devices further after finding why Barnett determined FF's results were close to random on a modern wheel.

# 2. There is no significant delay for predictions to be announced. For example, there is no huge 1 second delay before the prediction is announced like Forester has claimed.

# 3. The computer can predict which diamond will be hit, and which third of the diamond (top, middle or bottom) will be hit. You can see this in the DVD supplied, and test it for yourself to confirm it's not some kind of DVD footage manipulation. This will take a bit longer to verify. The above two points are more important though. Mark's computers and forester's IQE6 all assume the ball is going to hit the rotor when the ball reaches a certain speed. Does it really happen like that? No. You need to take into account mild drop zones, and ball-diamond interaction. Despite this, Forester and Mark have the audacity to claim their simplistic technology is superior. And many people believed them because I didnt have the same amount of time to address all this on forums - especially mark was 24/7 on gamblers glen until he was banned. I had better things to do. To be clear though, I'm not interested in discrediting them - I only want to clear my name.

# 4. Forester, Bago and Mark Howe all claimed my computer cannot deal with different wheel speeds. They claim if the wheel speed is outside a certain range, "risk" is announced, so predictions are almost never given and the computer is useless. Their comments are a terrible distortion. Bago simply passed his misunderstandings to Forester and Mark, and it they published their misunderstandings without caring for the truth - because the truth didnt suit them. Even after I corrected them, they didnt want to correct their statements. What's the truth? You can specify whatever acceptable wheel speed range you want. Additionally, the computer can adjust predictions based on wheel speed with an in-built analysis feature. It can be applied manually or automatically. No other computer can adjust predictions based on wheel speed. The others analyze scatter as if wheel speed was the same on every spin, which it is not. My computers can do this, plus also analysis based on wheel speed and resulting ball scatter. Foresters computers only have adjustable offset, but no scatter analysis at all - same as Mark's latest version which is very poor. But anyway perhaps I shouldnt tell them what's wrong with their computers.

If you confirm the above, that exposes over 90% of the false claims about the computer. If you cannot confirm the above, let me know and we'll see what the problem is. There may be many other lies about the computers that we can address, but unless people ask specifically about it, perhaps it is best to focus only on the most relevant points.

Especially with # 1, people like Forester will claim I sent you a manipulated phone or something - he already used that excuse when I created videos to demonstrate this test. Bago sure as hell wont admit he was wrong. And as for Mark, who knows - he may claim the aliens manipulated lanky and iwonder. I dont expect an apology from any of the three stooges. That's because Forester and Mark knew they were lying and distorting information - especially Forester cant plead ignorance because I corrected him many, many times but he just wasn't interested in the truth. I even called him personally, man to man, and he was a complete moron about it all. Some of the most blatantly obvious truths and corrections I made were ignored by him. In the end I concluded Forester was an extremely arrogant person who was so convinced he was right about some things, and about other things, he was not interested in listening to reason probably because the truth didnt suit him - regarding some points, he has blatantly lied. An arrogant person like Forester admitting he was wrong and apologizing? Not a chance. As for Mark, he is the most full of it person I've ever known and has no regard for truth at all - he never had the balls to speak to me via phone. But I think Bago sincerely had no idea what he was doing and was so pig-headed he wouldnt let anyone tell him he was wrong. Whatever their reasons, all I want is for simple truth to be known. If the truth embarrasses them, it is their own doing.
Posted by: lanky, November 6, 2008, 7:41pm; Reply: 84
Hi Steve.

Mate Iwonder & I have some concerns about the computer & how it is to be tested.
And how it can be done totally independent of what You have supplied us with.

But in the interest of an Aussie Fair Go.

Iwonder has sent You am Email on behalf of us both.(I now have a Copy of that Email)

Please answer this Email by 4pm tomorrow Friday the 7th November.

If Not then the packages will sent back to You.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, November 6, 2008, 9:04pm; Reply: 85
Responded. As I said previously, you have my time as needed on this. I have no intention of delaying or stuffing around.
Posted by: Steve, November 7, 2008, 6:58am; Reply: 86
I'll be sending you both another email soon about validation and will offer more suggestions.
Posted by: lanky, November 7, 2008, 7:32am; Reply: 87
Ok Steve Thanks.

That will be good.....It would give Iwonder & I more options to go ahead.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, November 7, 2008, 8:39am; Reply: 88
just to keep everyone informed. Lanky and Iwonder are just concerned that tests being done with my computer and with my dvds may be subject to my influence, and that any results may not be "independent". It's a fair call. However I've emailed them a list of suggestions to verify the phones are not "rigged".
Posted by: Steve, November 7, 2008, 8:41am; Reply: 89
The bottom line lanky is I know my computers are legit, you and Iwonder dont yet. I have absolutely nothing to hide and am somewhat naked in sending phones to you both for whatever tests you want - test it until the keys wear down for all I care. Because my claims are accurate, any testing you do will validate my claims. The question is now what testing can be considered "fully independent", and this is addressed in the email I just sent.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 7, 2008, 11:03am; Reply: 90
Quoted Text
The computer can predict which diamond will be hit, and which third of the diamond (top, middle or bottom) will be hit.

I mean rly what world do you live in? I highly doubt that any roulette computer can predict this. Since the ball does not drop at a constant speed.

Quoted Text
The ball is going to hit the rotor when the ball reaches a certain speed. Does it really happen like that? No. You need to take into account mild drop zones, and ball-diamond interaction.

Steve...
First you claim that you can predict, which diamond it can hit, then you say that ball don't drop in to rotor at the same speed. These claims are against eachother.

What average hit ratio can i expect on the computer?
When will the demonstration video be done? What is status on the huxley?

Feel free to ban me if i'm a monkey on your back
Posted by: Steve, November 7, 2008, 11:28am; Reply: 91
Vincent,

You said:

Quoted Text
I mean rly what world do you live in? I highly doubt that any roulette computer can predict this. Since the ball does not drop at a constant speed.


I live on Earth. You dont have the computer so it is easy to criticize what you dont know. If I thought for a second that Lanky and Iwonder couldnt verify this, I wouldnt include it in the list of claims for them to investigate. My players know it is true, and anyone that actually tests the computer will know. It may not be correct 100% of the time because there are other factors such as slight timing errors, ball track deformations etc, but it is correct about 90% of the time with regards to which diamond will be hit, and which part of the diamond will be hit. Accuracy to within 1/3rd of a diamond may not be possible with all wheels, but even on the most modern wheels it is correct to within 1 diamond on clearly the majority of occasions.

Skeptical? How about we let people that actually have the computer decide if it's true.

You said:

Quoted Text
First you claim that you can predict, which diamond it can hit, then you say that ball don't drop in to rotor at the same speed. These claims are against eachother.


Vincent you obviously dont understand how the computer works, or the physics of the wheel. True the ball does not fall at the same speed every time. Sometimes it will miss all diamonds, sometimes clip a horizontal diamond, sometimes a vertical diamond, and different parts of the diamonds can be hit with different effects. So correct the ball doesnt hit the rotor at the same speed every time.

My statement was "Mark's computers and forester's IQE6 all assume the ball is going to hit the rotor when the ball reaches a certain speed. Does it really happen like that? No. You need to take into account mild drop zones, and ball-diamond interaction.". I'll elaborate. Mark's and Forester's computer assume that when the ball is CALCULATED to reach a certain speed (not necessarily when it actually reaches that speed), let's say at point A on the wheel, that the ball is going to strike the rotor at that point. Is that how it really happens? NO. That was my point. My computers have the capability to know not only which diamond will be hit, but if the ball will miss a diamond, hit a horizontal diamond, hit a vertical diamond, and if hitting a vertical diamond, it can determine which part of the diamond will be hit within a reasonable degree of accuracy. How accurately? It varies between wheels, but usually between 1/3rd of the diamond on older wheels, to 1 diamond on the most modern wheel. Why only 1 diamond on modern wheels? Because the diamonds are usually smaller (often 1/3rd of the size) and it's a smaller area to target.

Additionally, both Mark's and Forester's computers assume the wheel rotor is going the same speed when doing a scatter analysis. None of Forester's computer really does a scatter analysis though - it is more like you create the chart on a piece of paper then determine the offset to tune. But that "manual analysis" is still assuming the wheel is the same speed every time. I am not referring to rotor strike point in this case, I am referring to the ball behavior and bounce and the differences between different wheel speed. Did you know on some wheels even a 500MS wheel speed difference can mean the ball bounces an extra 12 or so pockets? As for Mark's computer, his earlier computer has in-built scatter analysis (his recent ones dont), but it does the same thing wrong as forester's "manual analysis" - it assumes the ball bounces the same way each time. Sure such a basic scatter chart is good enough for some wheels, but on other wheels accuracy is seriously degraded.This is all assuming the rotor strike point is correctly predicted, in marks case it is way off for many reasons. If you were interested in playing for a living, I know I'd prefer to use technology that did the job right. Both of their computers have major problems, but I'm not interested in giving them full details of the problems and how to overcome them. Truth is neither Forester or Mark have the vaguest idea of how sophisticated some of my technology is, and I don't just mean my standard computer or even the hybrid for that matter. But specifically comparing my most basic computer to their most sophisticated computers, they are worlds apart. Where their computers get random results, as Barnett found with Forester's computer, my basic computer can achieve hit rates of even 1 in 15. I cant help but get the feeling that mark and forester are following this thread closely, and I'm sure they are, wondering how on earth my claims could be true - especially forester thinks he knows everything, and that if he cant do it then no-one can. He has changed his mind about so much as he continued to develop his computers. At least mark uses polynomials but his use of them is completely wrong. According to forester, everything he does and everything he developed is the "best" like it is a competition about having the biggest penis. At least it is the best, and mine is the worst, until he changes his computers to more closely resemble mine.

My claims are not against each other. You just didnt understand. Feel free to be a monkey on my back - I have bananas for you.

You said:

Quoted Text
What average hit ratio can i expect on the computer?
When will the demonstration video be done? What is status on the huxley?


Hit rates will vary from 1 in 10 to 1 in 25 depending on the wheel and settings.

I'm waiting to hear back from Huxley regarding the mk7 wheel.

Vincent I am not going to ban you for asking questions or asking me to address specific points. If I banned people for something like that, I'd be banning quite a few people. Just because I moderate doesnt mean I'll abuse it.
Posted by: Wally Gator, November 7, 2008, 11:34pm; Reply: 92
Steve,

Thanks for all the information, and what appear to be very frank and honest answers.  To me, what you do is provide education.  It's no different than any other walk of life, really.  We commonly pay (very well, I might add) for a good, and sometimes not so good, education.  I have 2 kids in college and another starting next year and it's costing me $100's of thousands of dollars.  And, for what?  So they can say they went to x university.  No question the universities have done a phenomenal job at marketing their product.

That all said, perhaps I may be able to use one of your systems to recoop some of my cash going to these universities.  I am most interested in a consistent system that will allow me to make a significant income and be able to "fly below the radar".

I am eager to hear the results of all this testing ....

Gator
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 10, 2008, 7:11am; Reply: 93
Steve it will be interesting to see, to see if the bear, is a bear and not a duck. Much of your text is just convincing text.
Anyway have a good day.
Posted by: Steve, November 10, 2008, 7:37am; Reply: 94
Vincent, convincing text is convincing text because it is the TRUTH.
Posted by: Steve, November 10, 2008, 7:50am; Reply: 95
Wally, with either the system or the computers, they are just tools - nothing more. They are effective only in the hands of someone that knows how to use them. To people that dont know any better, I MUST be some kind of scammer because they believe roulette is not beatable, and they think if it works I wouldnt be selling it. But to those that DO know better, even just part of what I teach is well known to be effective and it's really no big deal. Indeed a large part of what I offer is plain knowledge/education, which is still a tool.

After years of false accusations of being dishonest from competitors and people that have no idea what they're talking about, I cant be anything but 'frank' with my responses. I'm extremely tired of ignorant people. There are many examples of ignorance I can use but one is people believe if the system really worked, I would just use it myself and never sell it, so I MUST be a scammer. The truth is very simple - I have much better technology than the system and have no need for the system anymore. But that doesn't mean I'll let it sit unused. Of course I'll sell it for additional revenue.
Posted by: Steve, November 10, 2008, 8:22am; Reply: 96
Wally, this is a little off-track but anyway: my thoughts on the education system are varied. Of course you need to give your kids the widest range of options possible, which includes the most "recognized" universities etc. My two are too young for school, and while I intend to do the same for them (so they have more available options), my feelings about the entire "education system" are mixed. School teaches them invaluable skills ranging from basic social skills to knowledge for life. A good education is knowledge that is used throughout life - you can never get enough knowledge. But I feel the "education system" is not all about knowledge - there is too much focus on getting qualifications to get a job, then you spend 50 or so years of your life working 5 days a week, 9am-5pm, too tired to enjoy life at 6pm when you return from work through peak hour traffic, plus the tax man steals half of what you earn to do things like fight wars you dont agree with, all for a bit of time on the weekend with your family. To me that sounds crazy and unacceptable, but everyone is different. To me the "education system" is like a railroad to "subtle slavery". I refuse to believe "thats just how it is" as most people tend to believe - life is EXACTLY we make of it. Nature already gave us everything we need - we as a species seem to have changed our environment to suit us, rather than fit in with nature. In doing so we are destroying the planet and making our own lives hell. I dont mean we all should run around with spears chasing rabbits - i mean we need a blend of technology and nature. We're getting there, but perhaps too slowly. Absolutely unequivocally BALANCE always, always occurs. The balance that will eventually occur, if we dont balance it ourselves, is our planet will become far less hospitable, whic may very well cause deaths of millions, which would actually benefit earth the way people treat it - that is the balance. Again I don't mean I wont send my kids to the best school possible. Just that I want to make them aware of all options.

After high school I did one month of applied physics at RMIT, because I wanted to learn physics. I quit for two reasons - firstly what I wanted to learn was not being taught by "modern physics" (I was after new knowledge), and secondly I didnt want a "career", I wanted a life. For some people, career is life, and acknowledged that everyone is different. Anyway just some of my idle thoughts..

My wife said it brilliantly once. We were walking in a park and looking at ducks. I said to my wife "imagine being a duck. All you'd do is eat, sleep, crap and ****. ". In retrospect, it was a stupid comment. My wife replied, "that's pretty much what we do, except we're the ones stupid enough to work in between..."
Posted by: lanky, November 10, 2008, 10:12am; Reply: 97
This is a copy oth Email I have just sent toe Steve & Iwonder.

Hi Steve & Iwonder & Forums.

I am sorry but I have just come back from the Drs. and I regret that I will have to withdraw from the Challenge completely as of Now.

I have 2 more appointments on the 17th & the 18th October to go to and another 3 Specialists to see before Christmas.

I have sent the package back to You Steve by Registered post the Number is *******.

I have not looked at the CDS so I cannot comment any further on the matter.

I am sorry if I have let anyone down but I am sure You can Respect My discission to do this as My health comes first.

Yours Faithfully.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, November 10, 2008, 10:32am; Reply: 98
The following was sent to Lanky and Iwonder:

Hi Lanky, no problem at all. Sincerely sorry to hear about your health and hope all works out ok.

Iwonder, we are still ok to proceed with you if you are happy to do so.

Either way, can either of you suggest someone else that may be suitable? They need to be "normal" people, well known and trusted on forums (essential), trustworthy, and have at least moderate knowledge of roulette. I'll email Victor from VLS to see if he's interested but any suggestions are appreciated.

Best Regards,

Steve | Management
Roulette Wheel Analysis Group
ACN 090 739 754
Skype: rouletteanalysis
Ph. +61 3 9727 2211 (Australia, +10 GMT, 9am-5pm)
Calls from the public must be on Thursdays. Calls from players can be other days, but must be scheduled via email to guarantee availability of consultants.

Roulette system (no electronics):
http://www.genuinewinner.com
Looking for proof of effectiveness? See http://www.genuinewinner.com/proof.html

Electronic cheating devices:
http://www.roulettecomputers.com
http://www.hybridroulettecomputer.com

Our Energy Research / Non-profit Organization:
http://www.universalsymbiosis.org
Posted by: Steve, November 10, 2008, 10:36am; Reply: 99
If anyone is interested in replacing Lanky, please email me (nospam AT genuinewinner.com).

The ideal candidate:

1. Well known and trusted on forums (no point in being someone whois not well known)
2. Adequate time and will to test things, and visit me in person (I'll pay expenses etc). The person needs to be 100% willing.
3. Trustworthy - I'm going to teach you secrets which will help validate my claims, and you need to keep them to yourself.
4. At least moderate knowledge of roulette - you should be at least familiar the basics of typical advantage techniques.
Posted by: Steve, November 10, 2008, 12:35pm; Reply: 100
For those who just found this thread or received the email about the challenge, Lanky and Iwonder are well known on various forums, not just this forum. They are best known on VLS roulette forum.
Posted by: Wally Gator, November 12, 2008, 3:15am; Reply: 101
Steve,

Your wife is a brilliant woman !!!  Right on point.  What's obvious to some is shunned by most.

As for school, having been to graduate and post-graduate school more than once, I now live by the following observation by one of America's foremost business philosophers, Jim Rohn:

"Formal education will make you a living, self-education can make you a fortune".

I made a living for too many years.  While I no longer 'work for the man' I am still searching for that self-education to make a fortune.

I think for most playing roulette on a consistent basis to earn a living would be viewed as something that would need to be held almost as a 'secret' in their life.  Do you find that to be the case with your players?

I ask because, living about an hour or so from 2 very large land based casinos in the US, I would think anyone would like to be able to do that, but could never tell their family and friends as they would be ridiculed.  Although, I must say, it's very appealing.  With that in mind, what is the training process in your system-based program?  How long does it take to get familiar enough so that you begin making money on a consistent basis?  Do you have players who literally learn the materials, record spins, talk to you and begin making money right away and continue to do so for prolonged periods of time .... say years?  How long has the longest player been consistently making money with you and your system? (I am referring to non-computer systems ... I can't use the computer in the US)
Posted by: Steve, November 12, 2008, 8:03am; Reply: 102
Wally, great quote from Jim Rohn - very true. When I had a full head of hair, I worked "for the man" for about 1 year before realizing it wasn't the way to do things. It wasnt a lifestyle - it was more like slavery.

I've been involved in countless business ventures - everything from gemstone dealing, to offshore investments, advertising and of course gaming-based enterprises. I still operate numerous companies in different markets - i do a lot more than roulette. The "easiest" way I've ever found to make money is using the bank's money to acquire assets. For example, taking a loan based on a good credit rating to buy something like real estate. A good property will double in value over about 10 years. You can buy property below it's value too. You can focus on property that will benefit from relatively inexpensive modifications that increase value. You pay an interest-only loan, and by the time you sell the property (if you sell it), you end up paying about half price for a property. But you need money and good credot rating before doing that in the first place, and there is a lot of paperwork that go with it, plus not to mention you pay ridiculous things like stamp duty and government taxes.. and you thought you already paid your tax.

The "best" overall way I've ever found to earn money is roulette computers, without a doubt. You get to screw over casinos (the man himself), and dont pay a cent tax (in most cases).

As for the system, it's good but has limitations. Not all players succeed with it, for varied reasons. The most common reason is the player doesnt understand it well enough. In such a case, they may not know which of the techniques are suitable for their specific wheels, and how to adapt the system to specific wheels. But they only need to get adequate support from me to understand all this. Most players dont bother speaking to me and like to go their own way, which is not the best thing to do. There are so many different situations players are in. Some have literally won over $1m, some havent won a dime. The players that do best travel to jurisdictions/casinos where conditions are best. That can mean the difference between no profit, of literally $50,000+ per week. So the methods are more for the serious player, not the player that wants to spend 15 minutes in the casino, once per week, and expects to be a millionaire overnight. But there are of course other players that are happy with a few thousand profit here and there it can be achieved realistically with a few hours per week, assuming the conditions are suitable in their casino for quicker play methods, which is usually the case. There are many legitimate methods to beat roulette I teach - some are quicker but "skill" is required, and some mean long tedious hours in the casino but are easier to apply. Some can be applied on virtually ANY wheel, and some need specific wheels. In my experience any wheel can be beaten, but some of the most modern wheels need the player to have a better understanding of my methods. But it makes sense to play on wheels that are easier to beat, rather than play the first wheel you find as many players do.

As for the training process, generally it starts with you receiving the primordials document which is the basic of basics. After players read it and visit their casino a few times to study points raised in the primordials document, they call or email me explaining everything about the wheels they play on etc, and I advise them personally. It would be impractical to create one massive document that contains every little piece of information. If I did it that way, players would be as confused as hell, especially in light that many players struggle with even the most basic concepts outlined in the primordials document. Every player is different - some grasp the basics and rapidly progress to more advanced methods within a few weeks. Some cant seem to get their feet off the ground. Usually players who dont speak english well progress much slower. Thats because we can literally spend an hour on even one simple point when on the phone. so how long would it take before you start profiting? Days, weeks, or maybe months - it varies incredibly between different players. Realistically, if you visit me, or spend enough time with me via phone and emails back and forth to learn everything, it is a matter of a few weeks to stand on your own two feet without needing much more guidance from me. You can do all you need with specific techniques, or use the software I provide for wheel analysis.

I have many players that have been earning consistently from the methods I teach, for years. But at the same time I have players that have achieved nothing but frustration in years - but I perhaps hear from such players once every 2-3 months if at all. Really all I do is give you the tools - you must use them. It is hard to say how long players have been winning consistently because I dont keep in contact with all players and dont always know what they've been up to - I try to teach players to be independent. “Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach him how to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.” Previously if a player used custom variants, they relied entirely on me for analysis which took up way too much of my time, which is why I made available a lite version of the wheel analysis software I use, and many players use it to earn a living. On the whole, you decide how quickly you'll stand on your own feet and earn consistently. All I do is provide the tools - players must seek support rather than rely on me chasing them. On occasions I emailed all players asking for updates on their progress, and I was so surprised how many people had questions but couldnt be bothered to ask. On the whole, if you are motivated, willing to learn and actually seek support as needed, and dedicate time frequently (not just once per week), then you can begin earning consistently very quickly.
Posted by: solobear, November 12, 2008, 7:59pm; Reply: 103
Hi Wally,
I wanted to add note from a professional player’s viewpoint, one who also happens to be a very grateful student of Steve’s non-computer system.
One of the main themes of Steve’s teaching is to first grasp the concept that you are playing the wheel, & NOT the table. I can see the reason for Steve’s frustration here. Most of the Tete d Tete on this forum and other venues revolves around outside betting, which will never and can never achieve the kind of results that Steve teaches.

I see these new so called: “systems” or “sector bets” on these forums. Or, “just follow my magic formula for betting on thirds” over and over again.
I watch each of them go on for a few weeks, grasping for the magic. Lured in by the possibility that someone has finally found it: “Eureka!”
Then only to find a few weeks later that the damn thing had no legs. Of course it has no long term legs, or appeal.
It is based on random events. Numbers with no memory.  Even a basic High School statistics class will teach you these unfortunate, but true facts. It takes a minimum of 10,000 spins for roulette patterns to level out- Red, Black Odd- Even.
They are more likely to occur in random strings or sequences, only getting to the 50-50 level after thousands of plays.
That is why Fibonacci has not longevity.
That is why a 50-50 or outside 3rd’s bet will only get you into trouble eventually.
You cannot hope for success if you do not attack the physical and mathematical aspects and flaws of the game.
Steve teaches many brilliant ways to overcome that edge. I live in the states also, & used to be incredibly frustrated with double zero U.S. wheels. However, double zeros pay up also, if you know it is time to bet on them.
G.W. roulette physical systems show you at least 9 different ways to make that extra 3% house edge go away. Those two zeros do not matter any more.
In fact, I love having 38 slots, when I know that those zeros are in my predicted sector.
Roulette is the 3rd  lousiest percentage edge for the house out of all American. casino games.
Baccarat is #1, Craps #2,  and Roulette # 3
(Some may dispute the order, but not the games and this is not counting skilled poker or blackjack edges)
You only have to get over a 2-5% winning ratio-This is not hard if you know where the ball will land 60% + of the time. For me, Roulette is by far #one, because I can physically and logically tilt the house edge to my advantage.

Another fact: the wheel can be the most modern model out there-
The dealers are still the house’s biggest vulnerability (in my opinion).
Dealers are also my Heros, I never want to beat them up.
In most U.S. Casinos, they want you to win and love high rollers, as long as you don’t make them look bad. When they hold that little ball in their fingers and spin the same way each and every time. Or, when they stop the wheel and spin in one motion – they create predictability very far from randomness. That is, when you know what you are looking for.
Using GW strategies taught me what to look for. This kind of knowledge completely separates you from 499 out of 500 players that will sit next to you at a live table.
They all stare at the numbers on the table. They all do there little groupings and circle those “hot” numbers-Never glancing at the real culprit, the wheel.
You just need to be willing to do the work, treat this like the skilled occupation that it is, and never blow your wad. No progressive nonsense, just steady percentage winning. This is where even the wealthiest high-rollers go wrong.
When you pay attention to everything, spot every flaw, watch every movement, and play with extreme discipline; you’re there. The house edge will melt away. It is not rocket science as they say, you only have to shave a few points off that edge to get paid almost every time you take that magic seat. Nobody else wants to give you this information. Certainly not the house. Certainly not other pros, unless your teaming up with them.
I made the cost of the non-computer training system back in my first week of play. It has been all gravy ever since that week.
There is a guy on one of the G.W. Mpeg-testimonials that ends with “why don’t you charge more for this stuff?”  I am in complete agreement. However, I also understand, as Steve does, how many maniacs there are in this industry. It does not always attract the most sensible or trustworthy types. After all, Casinos are not-morality based enterprises.
On the other end of the argument is the fact that level-headed people tend to do exceptionally well at the game- Go figure?  
The hard part? Steve has the difficult part- dealing with maniacs and con-artists on a regular basis. We’ve got it easy. All we have to do is read, listen, learn and win.
As for me and my job? I find winning on a regular basis a fine way to make a living.

And no, I am not Steve’s cousin or long lost American brother (so many pessimists out there?)
I agree that in most cases, it pays to be cautious. However, not in this case.
This is gambling we are talking about here.
Casinos are controlled by the most money-grabbing owners on the planet today.
No real product, just suckers.
They need, no, they deserve to be taken down whenever possible. After all, somebody has to win in this world: Why not us?
When you approach it realistically, that 5-6% edge ain’t much. True believers can wipe these kind of odds out by just a small amount of listening and learning.–Steve gives you a lot more than that.

.













[face=Arial][/face]
Posted by: Wally Gator, November 13, 2008, 10:53am; Reply: 104
Solobear,

Thanks for your post.  And, I am a believer.  A quick question for you: why do you believe you have been consistently successful and others fail using the same information and/or access to that information?  If 10 people were given the same test over and over and only 1 initially got all the answers correct, it would only be a matter of time, provided the information did not change, that the other 9 realized the same success.  What am I missing here?  Emotion?  Inability to follow instructions? Too difficult?  Too easy?  Lack of discipline?  Lack of time?  No patience?  What?  We're talking about losing money here if you don't eventually "get it", and you've spent a considerable amount for the investment.  Maybe I'm naive, but I keep scratching my head when thinking of this.  Appreciate your thoughts.  Thanks.

Gator
Posted by: Steve, November 13, 2008, 12:51pm; Reply: 105
Wally, Solobear may have his own opinions on this but I can tell you the reasons are quite varied. Below are points for consideration:

1. By far the biggest reason a player may not be successful is poor communication with me. Unsuccessful players tend to have poor English skills. For example, Bago refused to speak with me via phoine because he said he didnt speak english well enough. Bago is really thick-headed though and I would have expected someone with poor english skills to at least know not to apply a precise timing device on a skipping DVD. He has enormous misunderstandings of even the most basic features. Out of over 500 players, of course a few are bound to be like him. Either way, anyone who sees the computer either in a demo or by being a player would know how twisted and inaccurate his claims were. When other players tried to correct him on the player only forum, he attacked them too, trying to tell them about their own business. We all think he's a much of a "dickhead" as they come. You most certainly find more nuts in this industry than any other. A few spanish players have also refused to speak with me via the phone for the same reasons as bago.

I shouldnt need to chase up players to support them - it should be the other way around.

2. Differing levels of intelligence. Some people just dont "get it".

3. Some people had unrealistic expectations of it all being so effortless and easy. As my site clearly says, even a winning system is still work - it is not effortless money from the sky.

4. Some players aren't comfortable in real casino conditions. Some don't give any effort to focusing on the better wheels to play, and will just try the first wheel they find.

5. Many players dont have anywhere near the patience or discipline. They are accustomed to red/black, or dozens systems where application can be explained in a few lines of text. Such players tend to have very unrealistic expectations. The methods I teach are not difficult, but players that are accustomed to betting red/black may disagree. To professional players, the techniques are perfectly practical and reasonable.

6. Once I emailed all players asking for updates on their progress. I was shocked to see so many people come forward with questions, and they never bothered to ask me them before. Some people just can't be bothered with it all. The players that actively seek support are the ones that succeed. Ask any legitimate player and they'll verify I work very hard to ensure your success and I sincerely do care about your success.

Wally it is not merely a mater of someone being correct or incorrect. There are many, many variables and reasons why one player may succeed while another fails. But you can be absolutely sure that when someone calls me a "scammer" and that my methods don't work, they sincerely have no idea what they are talking about. Either that or they have something to lose from me being honest.

The bottom line is if you are dedicated and actually seek support as needed, and actually take the time to seek support, I mean proper support like speaking on the phone, you will almost definitely achieve success. You may think if the system works, wouldn't almost EVERYONE be successful. I thought that should be the case from the beginning too, but it didn't turn out that way. But it has nothing to do with the system - it is the player and their use of the tools. Remember all I do is provide the tools (the system), and it is just about as perfect as it's ever going to get. But like any tool, it is only effective with correct application. Some players have attacked me for their own incorrect application of the tools - it's so much easier to blame me than themselves for making mistakes. While all this may not be what you'd want to hear if you are considering being a player, but it is the TRUTH and that's all you'll ever get from me. I pride myself on being 100% honest and believe lying for any reason is like hiding from yourself, and that's not what I do. That's why I get "cranky" when I'm accused of being dishonest. Although the people accusing me of being dishonest are usually competitors because they want to compete. There are a few real players that have accused me of it too. One player, after never even having applied the methods, read rubbish on Mark Howe's web sites and demanded a refund saying he found out I was a fraud. Well, he reported me to the ACCC, and because I trade as a corporation, they have a mandate to investigate false advertising. They did their investigation, I validated my claims, then the player ended up apologizing to me. Bare in mind this was one of my own players. He had exactly what I claim under his nose but was too ignorant to see it. Really ever since I began teaching others the techniques and distributing my computers, I've been attacked like you wouldn't believe from all sorts of people. But the people that know me well know the very simple truth - I am completely honest. Although some of the stuff said no doubt pisses me off, I still have a lot of patience and faith that the truth will EVENTUALLY come out and be widely known. In the end though, anyone can either visit me or do their own thorough research and decide for themself. Speaking of which, Huxley assures me I'll have the new wheel within 2 weeks. Then I'll set dates for another public demonstration. Everyone is invited but I keep demos to no more than 15 people at a time, or it is a lot less personal and the message isnt conveyed as clearly. I may conduct more than one demo depending on demand.
Posted by: Steve, November 13, 2008, 3:38pm; Reply: 106
PS - For those that think Solobear must be me, recorded conversation with him is at http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial7CSUSA.wma - starting from $40 and profiting over $800 with $1 units... it has nothing to do with luck.

Anyway I'll keep everyone informed about the upcoming public demonstration. Anyone can attend and see the truth for themselves. I'll make at least some video and/or audio from the public demo available, but you'll see a hell of a lot more if you actually attend for yourself, rather than base opinions on hearsay as most ignorant people tend to do. Ignorant, or perhaps pessimistic people tend to ignore anything that is positive about me and focus on all the negative rubbish. For clowns like Bago, he claims the positive testimonials are from people that probably work for me or that I paid. It's either that, or Bago was wrong and he actually is a moron - he wouldnt want you to believe that of course. Out of 500+ players, is it realistic to believe everyone knew what they were doing? Many people dont even bother to get support. It is not coincidence that my most successful players have spoken to me at length a good ten or so times - and the players that aren't successful tend to never have spoken to me before, or at the most once or twice. Not at all a coincidence. Many player base their efforts on what they read in the primordials document alone, the basics of basics document - what you pay for is largely in my head, not a document. There are many ways to beat roulette, and why I didnt put them all in a singular document is already explained.

The ACCC already investigated me after one player's complaint, and like I said, after my validations the player himself ended up apologizing to me. If I was concerned about being investigated and having to validate my claims to government authorities, and if I had any doubts about the accuracy of my claims, I wouldn't be trading as a corporation, because corporations are heavily regulated. If I was dishonest, I'd trade as something like a standard business name, just like 99% of system sellers. Anyway enough for now. We'll just see how the next public demos go as it will have broader publicity - again, anyone can attend. If you want to know once and for all the truth, the door is open: apply at http://www.genuinewinner.com/conference.htm
Posted by: Wally Gator, November 14, 2008, 5:44am; Reply: 107
Steve,

I have a few questions for clarification on the audio with solobear.  You or he can answer, doesn't matter.  Questions are based on the following:  He arrives with a $40 BR, gets up over $1400 using $1 chips, loses $600+ then leaves with $800+, right?

1.  Let's say he begins on the downside of this run.  Now he is $-600+ from the beginning (in his case he has to leave the casino because his BR is only $40).  Similar to an hour long video on your website where it loses and then comes back.  Question is, do your strategies provide for when to leave?  Had solobear stayed for 8 or 10 hours as opposed to 2 or 3 hours would he simply have ridden a rollercoaster of ups and downs or would he have consistently increased.  The $600 loss is significant using $1 chips.  Did he increase his bet size once he reached a certain $ of wins?

2.  Was he using only one (1) strategy?

3.  Using your system, do players employ more than one strategy per session?

4.  Is it common for your players to begin with such small BRs?

5.  Do your players stop playing when the dealer is changed?  I ask this because it appears that solobear was not using the system described on your website as a custom variant on that wheel.  I am assuming that if you have the spins required to use a custom variant the dealer has little to do with success.
Posted by: Steve, November 14, 2008, 6:52am; Reply: 108
Solobear did not use any progression at all - he says this in the audio. Ups and downs will always occur - there is no way around it. But the overall trend is up, just like the overall trend is down if you do not overcome the house edge.

Despite the draw-down, $800 profit with $1 units using only flat bets is significant. It is repeatable.

None of the strategies need you to leave at any point. The more you play, the more you earn.

I believe he used a blend of two strategies.

Using more than one strategy is called a custom variant.

Yes I always advise players to start with small bankroll. Many players increase bet size on the casino's money which is fine, provided you have adequate bankroll to do so and overcome the inevitable losing streaks.

Sometimes you pay attention to the dealer, other times they make no difference at all. You learn numerous legitimate methods to beat roulette and each work on different principles. When you combine those various principles, it becomes a custom variant.


Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 16, 2008, 5:54am; Reply: 109
Steve, have you met richard marcus?
Posted by: Steve, November 17, 2008, 5:51am; Reply: 110
No but I believe he knows one of my hybrid roulette computer teams.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 17, 2008, 7:33am; Reply: 111
o, rly?
Posted by: Steve, November 17, 2008, 9:01am; Reply: 112
He said in his blog that he knows one of my hybrid teams, and that the hybrid works well etc. I dont know which team he knows but they shouldn't be even disclosing themselves as players.
Posted by: Steve, November 17, 2008, 2:38pm; Reply: 113
Update: the mk7 wheel is in transit and I'll have it within 48hrs. Assuming it is not damaged or anything, some time this week I plan to start organizing the next public demo.

It seems I'm having trouble finding a suitable person for the validations - ie to replace Lanky. I havent heard back from Iwonder regarding testing, and Lanky withdrew due to health issues. There are a few possibilities for replacements though, one of which is someone who's actually visited Mark Howe - he is well known on Gamblers Glen, but not here or VLS. I might add he believes Mark is mentally ill too. He'll be ready for possible validations around 15th January though, and I plan to conduct another public demo before then.

There are plenty of people who want to attend the public demos, so here's everyone's chance to attend again. Of course you can always come for a private demo, and you'll see more in private demos anyway. Public demos are more for the people that are curious - the more serious players who have intentions of becoming players and their team see me alone. Either way at either type of meeting/demo, you will see everything you need to know how full it it people like Bago, Mark Howe and Forester are.
Posted by: coolpaddy, November 18, 2008, 7:18am; Reply: 114

Hi all,

Some very interesting discussion. Solobear, be fair to the members of what are a free discussion forums, methods posted by them are there to be tested, analysed, discussed and developed before risking hard cash - they are theoretical and the knowledge/information on offer is free. Contrary to what you say some do stand the test of time - very few admittedly. The same statistic holds true for the vast majority of systems offered for sale, very few have stood the test of time. It's good to read some positive, informative contributions on the systems/methods under discussion here, hopefully the original challenge will be resumed soon and we will all be wiser and better informed in the very near future.


                                                                     Best regards



                                                                            
Posted by: Steve, November 18, 2008, 9:37am; Reply: 115
Coolpaddy, if every successful player published information about their experiences, the general population on forums would feel very differently about me. But generally successful players understandably want to keep it to themselves. Plus as per the terms on my site, players arent even permitted to disclose themselves as players. I do allow rare exceptions like Solobear, as he recently gave an audio testimonial. In actual fact there are many members even on VLS forum that dont say a word and just read the rubbish said about me. So who mainly writes about me on forums? People like Mark Howe under fake names. Competitors like Forester. Morons like Bago who didnt have any idea what he was doing. This creates a convincing illusion that just about everyone who's dealt with my is unhappy. There are of course a few players that havent had a good experience with me, but it is by far the minority of players. Out of 500 or so players, of course are few wont have a clue what they purchased. 5 or so people that have said negative things about me then the word spreads, versus HUNDREDS of others who know otherwise but arent going to let the cat out of the bag... not a comparison, but people judge based only what they see - not what reality actually is.

There is unbelievable trash written about me, and many people are taken in by it. According to Mark Howe, at a bbq with my neighbors I got really drunk and told them I built a machine to speak to aliens. According to Mark, a neighbor of mine contacted him about it. Read it for yourself at Get Mark Howe's roulette computer scam for FREE - see top link at roulettecomputers.com. How can I compete with such irrefutable evidence that my computers are not effective?? It doesnt stop with alien communications, no, it goes so far beyond it I cannot fathom how such people function. As for this claim of Mark's, firstly he doesnt know where I live as already addressed in detail in this thread, and secondly I've never even had a bbq with my neighbors where I do live. Ok so we know how much of a joke Mark is, but what about legitimate players like Bago? FORGET ALL THE ALIEN COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ABSOLUTE NONSENSE AND CONSIDER WHAT MAKES PEOPLE LIKE BAGO CLAIM I'M A SCAMMER? The most important claim that he made was that my computer gives random predictions with Forester's different diamond test. The idiot used the computer on a skipping dvd player - he sent me the video of his test. Other players corrected him but he attacked them and said they were wrong as if they'd never tested the computer for themselves. Forester latched onto Bago's false claims, and so did Mark - it didnt matter what the truth was. So what's the next logical step for me? I release a video demo of me doing the test. What did Forester day? He claimed I must have manually inputted the prediction. So what I do next is another video where the phone is never moved from the screen. What did Forester say then?.. that I programmed the phone to predict a few numbers. I am not a programmer. No matter what, he will keep making excuses. Besides, this test is done in all public demos to show of full of it forester and bago are, then the same computer is used for the actual demo on real spins. I sent a computer to both lanky and iwonder to do the tests until the keys wear down. I would not have done this if I was not 500% confident they would validate my claims. To confirm the computer is not rigged etc, they can do whatever tests they want, anything at all. Why on Earth would I take a suicidal step to send them a rigged phone?

Everyone needs to keep in mind many people have a lot to lose by me being honest, and them being wrong. Forester would have one red face, everyone would know Bago is as stupid as he is incompetent, and Mark, well Mark can go on making claims about alien communications.

Honestly whoopie-do that my technology works - it is really not rocket science. I am not the first or only person that knows how to beat roulette with legitimate techniques and technology. It's just that complete morons for various reasons unjustly attack me and I want to set the record straight.

So what matters here? The color underwear I wear on Tuesdays? No. If anyone wants to get involved in all that, and all the bickering rubbish going around, you'll get lost in the maze. the truth is beneath a mountain of rubbish. But stick to what really counts, and the truth is extremely simple, and it is very easily established for anyone that has the computer. Thats why i sent a free computer to two people. It is not my fault that lanky had to send it back due to health issues (not related to the computer of course), and iwonder just hasnt had time to test it yet.

Either way, the next public demo is coming up soon. I'll have the new wheel likely tomorrow - a 2008 model mk7 wheel. Anyone, and I mean anyone can attend and find the truth for themselves. They can spin the wheel for themselves, check for magnets or whatever. Of course, as previously, people like forester will say probably only my family attended which is the excuse of an embarrassed man. But like I said, such people will NEVER, NEVER admit they were wrong because they know they are wrong. And regarding people that may not even know they were wrong, these are not the type of people to admit they were wrong and say SORRY. Can you imagine Bago saying "sorry steve, youi were right and I just didnt know what I was doing"? Especially I have attempted to correct foresater many, many time,s but he is not interested in the truth because it does not suit him. He misleads people to increase his own sales, and to boost his ego making everyone think he is king - again like I said, he treats it like a penis measuring contest.

Then there are morons like bago who never even purchased my system. All he got was an introductory document of the system and is telling everyone all I teach is dealer signature. The document explains the very elemental way to use what many call a correlation chart - that's why its called a primordial. Bago didnt even know what it was at the time. Clowns like mark and forester all jumped on the bandwagon, and none of them knew the first thing about my methods. Morons like bago will call anything associated with me a scam - they dont tell you that correlation charts are the basis of forester's computers, mark's computers, and visual ballistics - of course they dont want to say that because it doesn't support their claims that I'm a scammer.

All truth will be revealed eventually, and I have absolutely no doubt of this. Truth is so much more powerful than utter rubbish.

PS - I've been told Bago, Forester and Mark (under fake name as usual) are continuing to attack me on one of the other forums. The three stooges at it again. Stomp your feet and state your cases all you like guys, but sooner or later you are all going to be very embarrassed. Perhaps that's the reason why they all go on and on instead of having a more mature "we will see" attitude - they are scared of what's around the corner.
Posted by: coolpaddy, November 19, 2008, 12:09am; Reply: 116
Hi Steve,

Are your systems/methods good? Outstanding? Average? Usless?

That is the question for me.

You have indeed been subjected to an awful lot of vitriol and malicious comment during the few years I've been attending the forums. The real shame of it is that most if not all the comment is unqualified and inspired a lynch mob mentality which has nothing to do with fair play or justice. I was and remain keenly interested in the challenge and presumed that the more senior members who know and trust Lanky implicitly would join in the spirit of the project with constructive comment and suggestions. That was a mistake, a very big mistake on my part. Quite a few of the one liner comments displayed extreme prejudice and a refusal to even consider the possibility that your systems are bona fide and everything you claim them to be. Bago's input/language at vls forum was disgraceful and should have been censored.

I was impressed by the fact that you took the initiative with the challenge, that was a bold move and indicates confidence and self belief.  Lanky would have told it like it is - we would all have been much wiser in the end.
It is a shame that his health does not allow him to continue with the challenge. He is a man of integriy, courage and compassion. A great choice to test the systems in the first place.

Where is the challenge now? How many members of all the forums really want to know the truth? Does it suit the administration of the other forums better to have you casted as some kind of arch villain selling faulty goods?  Is it compatible for them to have a senior member test and maybe endorse your systems fully on the one hand, and give free rein to a foul mouthed scumbag like Bago to slander, insult and villify you on the other hand?


I am still in the dark regarding your systems, but I have no doubt about the courage and honesty of original challenge.



                                                                     Best regards
Posted by: Steve, November 19, 2008, 7:55am; Reply: 117
Hi Coolpaddy, it really is a relief to see there are "reasonable" people on forums. The reality is the Internet, and certainly gambling forums are full of absolute morons. You said:

Quoted Text
Quite a few of the one liner comments displayed extreme prejudice and a refusal to even consider the possibility that your systems are bona fide and everything you claim them to be.


Absolutely. It is not mere ignorance though. For example, I announce another public demo and this challenge, and the three stooges come out of the gates attacking me - talk about desperate and scared. On GG there was forester, mark (under fake name as usual) and of course Bago. As I have said many times, these three are not interested in the truth because is would make them look stupid. They twist information enormously to suit themselves and proclaim it is the truth.

Consider for a moment what kind of people are we dealing with. There is Bago with the mind of a child, and he is barely out of his teens. He acts like his 8 years old though. In his last post he said to me "HAHAHAHA YOU ARE TOAST STEFANO! SAY HELLO TO YOUR CATS ROLLING ON YOUR FUCKING OLD WHEEL AND YOUR BLACK LABRADOR HAHAHAHA!!!!LOSERRRRR!!!!" I mean really, I don't think he understand how much of an idiot he makes of himself. Then there's forester who I've spoken to once man to man (well I tried) to explain the truth in detail, and I've sent him numerous emails - he acted like a child and completely distorted information. He is a liar and twists information to suit himself. One example is he blantly lies to people telling them I offered to buy his algorithms. He is an absolute bullshit artist. Where did this claim originate? I asked if he would like to partner and attack casinos together - as part of the partnership, we would collaborate and share information. Is that offering to buy his algorithms? Hell no. I told him his algorithms were simplistic, and the only thing good about them is they dealt with clicking errors well - in fact better than my computer at the time because my algorithms were designed for the hybrid and precise timing instrumentation. Another example of Forester twisting information: on roulettesystemreviews.com I had a review of his computer, which was reasonably positive - the review was based not on me having his computer, but the concept of visual ballistics being s valid principle. The review clearly stated at the time I didnt have his computer. Then I was sent his IQE6 for free by an unhappy purchaser, I found what nonsense it was. I didn't care about updating the review because I had better things to do - if I really wanted to harm him I would have published my findings a long time before I had his rubbish. But when forester started making bullshit claims, I updated the review. Forester lies saying I changed the review to negative as if everything I said was a lie. But even Barnett confirmed it all too. Forester wants everyone to think I am lying about his device, but the difference between the two reviews is one was written when I didnt have IQE6, and one was written when I was given it free. Perhaps this is one of the reasons he's so pissed off at me, but pissed off or not, he lets his discontent get in the way of truth, just like the others do.

Did my computer ever give random predictions like Forester claims? Hell no - doing the different diamond test, all predictions were within a 8-12 pocket arc - this isnt bad, and to get any edge at all it needs to be in about an 18 pocket arc. Mark's computer is all over the place. With Forester's IQE6 you cant even see the prediction with enough accuracy. The hybrid doing the test is within 1 pocket arc, without the player even needing to looking at the wheel. But later my standard computer algorithms were modified to be more suitable for manual clicking - the result is all predictions are within a 3 pocket arc. Forester is absolutely full of it. Even after I corrected him about the most basic features of my computer, he completely ignored it although the truth was as plain as day. Why? Because it made him look like an idiot that really had no idea what he was talking about - it was obvious he never even saw my computer and merely passed on misunderstandings from others like Bago. He went on and on during a phone call about players of mine he knew. He refused to give names of course, but I narrowed it down to specific players and I kept asking him repeatedly to ask the players for himself what they thought. My point is he really had no idea that the players he was referring to have every confidence that my computers are what I claim - he of course ignored my request to ask the players for himself. There is one exception though of course - his croatian friend who broke the contracts and got exactly what he should have expected. And then there is of course Mark, the one who claims I live with my parents next to a homeless hostel, oh and then I lived in cheap rented accommodation, on and then I lived at 2 warrior crt lilydale. Bago simply repeated these claims. Even Forester jumped on the bandwagon saying I lived in a cheap area. None of them have the vaguest idea where I live. See http://www.roulettecomputers.com/rent.jpg and contact the real estate agent if you want. what about Bago? No doubt still lives at home with his parents. Bago was selling his own systems before - even Forester will verify this. A big wealthy man with his sound knowledge of roulette? Nope. And Mark? We already know his girlfriend kicked him out of the house and he literally ran off to Norway with the babysitter - this was all confirmed when the police visited his old residence. He claimed to own the house, but never owned even a part of it. It's all at http://www.genuinewinner.com/markhowe.htm - as for warrior crt, so do I pay $450 rent/week to live there, a nice high rent, or am I just the landlord? Take your pick, but either way is in my favor as I'm either wealthy enough to pay such high rent, or wealthy enough to own the property. Truth is I own it, and Mark obtained the address when attempting to deceive my wife and I, but he didnt realize I never release my home address and I use the warrior crt property with a mail redirection service. As for forester and his residence, his address has been published but I really dont care. I honestly dont care about where these people live and it's not even relevant. So why do I even mention this? Because these 3 criticize a property I own and claim it is proof of anything, although the information is wrong anyway - after all it's from mark howe, the most accurate source of information, right? I am extremely tempted to show inside my residence, but it really is none of anyone's business. There are photos released of me and/or my wife, and people like mark say it's all cheap stuff in there. Sure, the Sony Bravia in the background - real cheap stuff. They assume it is my residence though, which it is not. I'm surprised especially Mark doesn't take a photo of a $200 Datsun and claim it is my car - if he did, Forester and Bago would jump on the bandwagon like idiots too, because the claim would suit them - whether or not it's the truth. Anyway, as said previously the 3 stooges will always continue to attack me and they are not interested in the truth. They will always come up with excuses.

PS - I'll have the new wheel today. As for the other wheel and Bago's claims that it is easily beaten, anyone can see the drop zones in the videos online and see they are no stronger than the average wheel in today's casinos. With Bago's extensive experience that he claims to have, he would know this. As for my claims of hit rates of 1 in 15 on starburst wheels, they are accurate. Bago doesnt believe it is possible because he looks only at ball behavior and resulting scatter by assuming the wheel is the same speed, and ball bounce is the same every time. So he doesnt know different wheel speeds make the ball behave differently. Real expert of you Bago. My computer deals with different ball behavior with different wheel speeds. Speaking of which, forester's computer needs manual creation of scatter charts - real covert there. Mark's latest computers are the same - no in-built scatter charts. Their computers are not exactly the best money can buy - that is why I was sent both of their computers for free. My computers have the typical scatter charts plus something much better that enables the player to bet in the optimal sector based on wheel speed and the actual ball behavior at specific speeds. Thats one of the many differences between our technology. Let's not get into other areas like how other computers still need you to look at the wheel - the differences are profound yet these morons have the audacity to claim their rubbish is superior. i can scarcely begin to tell you how many problems their computers have. They all stupidly assume the wheel will strike the rotor where the ball reaches a certain speed. They dont even take into account mild-drop zones. Forester's hardware cannot even hold the data to beat modern wheels. He even admitted recently his computer cant beat the modern wheels. He says it's impossible. Perhaps for his computer, not for mine. Given the simplicity of his algorithms it's really not surprising. He and his misled followers on his forum really have a lot to learn - even my system (no electronics) can perform better on many wheels that his computer and I intend to prove this. As for mark's computer, it really is something that can be written in a matter of hours - it's not just poor like forester's, it is an absolute scam. Everyone that attend the next public demo will see this first-hand.
Posted by: Ronjo, November 20, 2008, 4:18am; Reply: 118
Hi Steve,
Check your PM box over at VLS.
Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, November 20, 2008, 6:32am; Reply: 119
Hi Ronjo, thanks and I'll respond in a few minutes via email.
Posted by: Steve, November 20, 2008, 7:15am; Reply: 120
Just letting everyone know I now have the new wheel. Today it is being tested for bias etc, and will be certified as acceptable or not acceptable for use in Australian casinos. Why? Because clowns like Bago will say the wheel was biased or some similar rubbish. With certification, it will be his word against the authorities. He wont have any legs to stand on. I have no doubt it will pass the tests as I've already done my own tests. Even IF it were not certified, anyone seeing the spins and inspecting the wheel will know quite clearly that the wheel perfectly represents the average casino wheel. On the scale of difficulty to beat, it is one of the more difficult to beat wheels. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being almost impossible to beat and 10 being extremely easy, it is about a 7-8.

And Forester who is also reading this, I have no interest in attacking you or your site - the world doesnt revolve around you and I told you I want nothing to do with you.

Ronjo is interested in taking part in the validations, and so is Cloud from GG (cloud is one of the people that visited mark howe). I'll speak to them both in detail soon. No word yet from Iwonder though so I emailed him again asking for an update.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 21, 2008, 5:47am; Reply: 121
Steve, send me some pictures of the new wheel.
Posted by: Steve, November 21, 2008, 6:28am; Reply: 122
I'll publish them soon. If you want to see what a mk7 looks like for now, see the john huxley website.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 21, 2008, 9:39am; Reply: 123
Steve if you are cocky now. Why not show your computer beating the new wheel.
Posted by: Steve, November 21, 2008, 9:51am; Reply: 124
Vincent, dont confuse cocky with confident. if I appear "cocky", it is because I have put up with abuse and attacks from absolute morons, for years. Everything from utter rubbish, twisted facts, copyright violations, harassment, and even death threats. You don't see what I've had to put up with. If I take a bit of satisfaction from taking a bit of a stand, I think I'm entitled to that. If I come across as "cocky", it is not my intention - I am speaking to the stooges, not the general public. The stooges are the ones who have been saying for years my computers are inferior when it is far from the case. If you had put up with what I've put up with, for years, would you feel the need to just say what you really think, or would you still be nice as pie to even the biggest morons as I've been for years? Most people would have flown off the handle with 1% of what I've put up with, but I even tried to speak to them man to man, on numerous occasions - it just didn't work and it was clear they didn't care about the truth because it didn't suit them.

I have already done a video of testing. I'll publish it in due course. but I may do a different one where trade secrets are not released. The video I did yesterday was more for my players.
Posted by: Steve, November 24, 2008, 8:26am; Reply: 125
FORESTER: Just to let you know, I'm going to have your new site shut down too. Like I said before, it's not like I'm hacking your sites - you are doing many things wrong and it is easy to have your site shut down. Dont host rubbish, and your sites wont be shut down. Is it really that hard to understand?
Posted by: Ronjo, November 24, 2008, 1:58pm; Reply: 126
Hi Steve,
I tried calling you today 5-00am SA time which is about 1-00pm Australian time but you were unable to take the call.would you be in tomrrow if I called the same time or should I call earlier in the morning.
Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, November 24, 2008, 3:41pm; Reply: 127
Hi Ronjo, 1pm tomorrow my time is fine. Hopefully chat to you then.
Posted by: Steve, November 25, 2008, 10:02am; Reply: 128
FORESTER: Your NEW web host said "Thanks we don't allow such material on our servers and I will send this to the client and give him 24 hours to remove it from our servers, if he does not comply we will terminate his account."

How many times do we need to shut your site down? Perhaps like mark's sites, I'll stop having them terminated because anyone who actually follows the truth understands manipulation is how you compete. Since you heard about this public validation, you, bago and mark have gone nuts. What is so scary about it?
Posted by: Steve, November 25, 2008, 1:51pm; Reply: 129
Everyone, just a recap and update on everything: When Lanky withdrew due to health issues, I asked Victor from VLS forum who he suggested might be an appropriate person to take his place. Specifically I needed to find someone that is well-known and trusted by the other forum members. After all, it makes no sense to have a brand new forum member. Ronjo was on the list, and I just spoke to him on the phone.

Ronjo appears to be an ideal match. He is from South Africa. He is an experienced visual ballistics player. He understands what he is talking about so I have no doubt he will be able to competently conduct testing of the computer. Before I proceed with him, I just need to do some background checking but I'm sure it will be fine. I will then send him a computer to evaluate. I'll send him footage of the mk7 wheel, the other wheel, and a test dvd for him to do additional testing. He may also apply the computer at one of his local casinos. While he will be able to verify my every claim, what matters most is actually one of the most basic things for him to verify. Specifically, he will verify my claims about the 6 and 3 pocket arc. Most of you reading this will know what this means, but I'll explain again just in case:

Forester, Bago and Mark all claim my computer gives random predictions when you attempt to predict the same spin repeatedly on dvd, but use different reference points. The theory behind this is that even when different reference points are used, the prediction will be in the same area. Forester claims this is the hold grail of testing to determine a computer's accuracy, which is absolute nonsense but we'll do the test anyway. My claim is that after the initial sample with my computer, all predictions are within a 6 pocket arc. But when the computer is fully tuned, they should all be within a 3 pocket arc. Perhaps not ALL, but certainly most. Ronjo will also do a series of tests to determine whether I merely cheated by loading the phone only with specific numbers. The tests will be explained in detail in due course, and to anyone that understands them, it will be clear that my claims are accurate.

As for the system, because Ronjo understands roulette prediction well, I only need to explain to him some of the basics of my system. From this alone, he should know whether or not my techniques are the real thing, or if I'm just full of it. But we'll do the computer validations first, then the system. For the sake of being thorough, Ronjo will be shown more than what he needs to see - same with the computer. Perhaps it is overkill, but no matter.

Before too long, any reasonable person will know how full of it Forester, Bago and Mark are. But like I keep saying, they will never admit they were wrong. But I don't need them to because everyone following this challenge will know it. The truth will be clear no matter how much the stooges stomp their feet. Certainly they will be embarrassed and will try harder to harm me, but that has never been my intention.
Posted by: Steve, November 26, 2008, 12:43pm; Reply: 130
Here you go guys. It is the scientific measurement device for roulette computer effectiveness:



Let me guess, I need a bigger ruler, right?
Posted by: Steve, November 26, 2008, 3:22pm; Reply: 131
Just a note it has been decided for sure that Ronjo will do testing. His computer is ready for shipping. I still may proceed with Cloud, who is one of people who actually visited Mark, but it is uncertain for now as Ronjo will cover everything anyway.

Not long now, my fury little friends... (Bago, Forester and Mark). By the way, did you guys want a photo of my curtains? I'm certain we can arrange it. Did you want some kind of validation that they are my curtains? They aren't barcoded or anything, but perhaps I could wave a friendly finger in front of them. I'm extremely tempted to send some photos, of a few things, but I think I'll wait for that.
Posted by: Steve, November 27, 2008, 6:25am; Reply: 132
MARK, you really never learn. Your website:



Once again, I do not want to harm any of you or your websites. But if you host rubbish, I will of course defend myself. Maybe though from now on I'll stop having your sites shut down because they tend to discredit you more.
Posted by: Steve, November 27, 2008, 9:08am; Reply: 133
FORESTER: your host says you're cooperating. Whether or not you're happy about it, thankyou. If you want me to remove any of my material, ask away. It's unlikely that we'll ever play xbox or shower together, but I hope we can at least be civil to each other. Out of the three of you, Forester you are the most reasonable but still you and I love each other much the same amount. Still though, I'm borderline between believing you deliberately lied, or that you sincerely didnt know what you were talking about. I mean even just the point about you not understanding the risk feature and wheel speed, even after I corrected you but you ignored it, makes me think you lied on purpose - either that or you just passed on a player's complete misunderstanding of the most basic feature. Even Bago had no idea how to make risk called 0% of the time - how well can you understand something if you dont understand even the basics?? Also like how you tried to tell me about my own players and what they thought - and I just pleaded with you to ask them yourself to confirm what i said - you ignored it. Overall I think it's a blend of ignorance and deliberate attacks, but hey it's better than Mark's rubbish. According to mark, i lived next to a homeless hostel. Boy his lies are funny.

MARK: Many months ago when we were negotiating removal of our websites about each other, although you agreed to remove your rubbish, you kept posting absolute trash under fake names, this time on youtube. It was clear you had no intentions of working things out like adults - like I said you are a lost cause and truly believe you are mentally ill with the rubbish you've said and tried to do. In addition you denied owning roulettesystemsexposed when even your host acknowledged your owned it. Take your web sites and the material all down voluntary, without me having to do it for you, then I'll remove my web sites too. Look I know what sites you own, you must have rocks in your head if you think otherwise - hang on, you do. Every email ever sent to each other was sent to the police so they could evaluate the situation. Know what was clear? For many months after you found out i also sold computers, you attacked me relentlessly on gamblers glen. In many emails I asked and asked you to stop, and told you I didnt want to waste time responding to your rubbish. You were telling people my computers were ineffective before I even released ONE. You and I know how bad the rubbish was you were saying. In all our email correspondence, it was clear I never posted anything about you until I got fed up with me asking you politely to stop posting nonsense - so you pushed it, not me. Prior to that the only reference I ever made to you was saying another computer I purchased was found to be quite ineffective. Was I lying? No mark, you know it was true - still is, even your latest version. You know this, so be a man and dont attack me for stating truth. You really are screwed up as far as I'm concerned, how your lies are not just lies, they are way over the top. You are also ignorant though and dont know what you are talking about - i have no intentions of bragging but you have no idea of wealth. In all, I believe you are just a lost cause mark. i would love to be proven wrong though.

And Bago my dear friend, I dont know if you are plain stupid or what. You never had any idea about anything. When other players were earning hundreds of thousands, you were still wondering what I meant about vis a vis and multiple peaks. You are not the type of person to admit you were wrong though. I've never known someone to be so convinced they were right when they were so wrong.

Can't we all just get along? While I would like that, again I dont think it's likely to happen. No matter what the outcome of the challenges, you will all attack me, but given the results, it will only make you all look desperate.
Posted by: Steve, November 28, 2008, 9:16am; Reply: 134
Bago issued a challenge to me that he can prove he doesnt live with his parents. Bago I just dont care. If I didnt know your date of birth, because of your immature behavior I honestly would not be surprised if less than 10 years ago you still wore nappies. Really you act 13, or close to. The only challenge that matters to me is this one here, because it is relevant. Go out and play roulette with the extensive experience and knowledge you profess to have.

Forester, you still havent removed much of the material. Your host will remind you to stop wasting everyone's time. Just get on with your own life. Regardless, soon the people you deceived will know all about your lies. And bago, everyone will know how you didnt even understand the most basic concepts. Mark, I better mention you too, my feelings are deep for you.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 28, 2008, 9:18am; Reply: 135
Any pictures of your "purchased" wheel?
Posted by: Steve, November 28, 2008, 9:29am; Reply: 136
Mark...7:



Excellent condition and like I said, it is being tested for bias and drop zones to Australian casino standards.

I've tested my standard computer on it, mark's computers and forester's IQE6. I have already done videos of the tests. IQE6 and Mark's computer were basically just as poor as each other - virtually random, just as Barnett found too. but the results were poor for different reasons. My computer produced very good results and you can analyze the video of testing for yourself and verify even when the ball didnt get a direct hit, the ball landed at least close to the prediction. Kinda hard to fake such obvious peaks. The tests of mark's and forester's computers have my clicks visible and all the startup procedures so it can be verified I didnt deliberately poorly apply them or something.

Forester says he wins in australian casinos. My arse he does, not with his computers unless he's playing a wheel with heavy drop zone. He claimed the dealer "screamed" at him asking him to not look at his wheels because he was winning too much. Do I really believe that? Um, no. If he drew that kind of attention and was actually winning, he'd be out the door in a tick. The bottom line is what they sell is complete rubbish and can only possibly be effective on older wheels, or with strong drop zones. But I'm not interested in harming you two, forester and mark. Just work on  your own computers instead of lying about mine. Like I have said from the beginning, you guys have your computers all wrong. The only thing mark does right is polynomials, if thats what he uses. Forester, you NEED polynomials for many reasons. Even the smallest air pressure variation may make the ball move 90 degrees extra in 30 mins, then you can say bye-bye to accuracy because you have no way of knowing ball behavior. Mark I explained to you what my algorithms do once. I would honestly given you both the algorithms if you werent such morons. But forester your hardware wouldnt be able to support them anyway. I know I know, you think you know better. Yes you said zap was best before too. Mark you need to address a hardware problem before you can get anywhere near accurate enough. Based on your mobile prophecy version, it was clear you didnt do even close to required mods.

Also Ronjo, as per our phone conversation, i'll send you video of tests on the new wheel and you can apply the computer for yourself so see you get much the same results. You can also begin application from anywhere in the dvd. You can use 100 different spins to do the different diamond test. You can do whatever you want. I bet would honestly bet my life that an experienced player that conducted any testing they want could validate my claims. I also bet my life that the same tests with both foresters and mark's computers would show virtually random results.
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), November 28, 2008, 9:42am; Reply: 137
Cool, video?
Posted by: Steve, November 28, 2008, 9:55am; Reply: 138
As explained earlier, the videos done show elements that are trade secrets - they are for players only. I will do "public" videos later some time after I get the wheel back - it is being tested and I'll have a report about it pertaining to australian standards.
Posted by: Ronjo, November 28, 2008, 1:06pm; Reply: 139
Hi Steve,

Did you recieve the documents?I cant wait to get started,

Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, November 28, 2008, 3:46pm; Reply: 140
Hi Ronjo, assuming it was your fax, all of the pages were completely blank. Not sure what the problem was - I'll email you a copy of what I received. I cant wait for you to get started too!
Posted by: Steve, November 28, 2008, 3:49pm; Reply: 141
Also I've created a new website:

http://www.roulettewars.com

It's far from complete though. some of you may find it funny, but others may not. And Mark, dont fret about the photo, try to see the light side of it, although I still do think you are a bonafide nutcase.

And seriously guys, lighten up.
Posted by: coolpaddy, November 29, 2008, 2:42am; Reply: 142

Hi Ronjo,

I'm looking forward to your evaluation of the systems. This time last year you were at the heart of the charity competition as adjudicator together with Lanky. I couldn't wish for two more upstanding and knowledgeable people to conduct a fair and unbiased trial on a system which has intrigued me and many others for so long. It's a shame that Lanky is unable to continue this time also, but I know that your skills and judgement will ensure a successful trial.


                                                                      Best regards
Posted by: Ronjo, November 29, 2008, 4:36am; Reply: 143
Hi Steve,

Sorry about the delay,I have sent them again,let me know if they came through.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Ronjo, November 29, 2008, 4:46am; Reply: 144
Hi Coolpaddy,

Great to hear from you again,yes I assure you and the rest of the roulette community,that I will try my best to do this evaluation to the best of my ability,and people that are close to me know that my integrity is important to me and always kept intact.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: lanky, November 29, 2008, 7:04pm; Reply: 145
Quoted Text
I assure you and the rest of the roulette community,that I will try my best to do this evaluation to the best of my ability,and people that are close to me know that my integrity is important to me and always kept intact.


Never ever been any doubt about that My Friend.

Your as straight up & down as they come Mate & You tell it like it is.

Your the right person for the evaluation My Mate.

God Bless You Cobber.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, December 1, 2008, 6:42am; Reply: 146
Hi Ronjo, fax received, thanks. Also you are probably going to find a lot of people will attack you. Actually probably not a lot of people, I mean people like Bago (Tony Duhamel) who spend day after day on forums attacking people to defend his ego. And of course mark howe and his many fake names. There are a few people that really have something to lose from all this. I suggest ignore any pressure they may put on you and just tell it like it is.

Whoever attacks you and your findings will probably accuse you of of being incompetent, or that I somehow used smoke and mirrors to fool you. For example, when it comes to the different diamond test, forester has already said I could just load the same numbers into the phone to cheat. Of course that's a stupid claim because you can do whatever test you want to show it's not the case. But anyway, what I want to do is send you a dvd with a TOP view of the wheel, so you can do the test with virtually any spin, rather than just one spin. The new wheel is being tested for possible bias etc and I should hear back this week. When I get the wheel back I'll do the top view video and send you everything.

Also Lanky, Iwonder seems to have fallen off the face of the planet. Please contact him and ask him to respond to me. Weeks have passed and he isnt responding to my emails. I called him at work, and just left a message, but I dont want to intrude by calling him at work. At the same time, I'm not going to put up with lack of response for weeks. It's not a problem if he hasn't had time to do any testing, but if he hasnt got time, then I want him to send the phone back so I can send to Ronjo. As I'm low on stock and someone else now has the phone you returned, I may need Iwonder's phone back to send to Ronjo.
Posted by: 1893 (Guest), December 1, 2008, 2:06pm; Reply: 147
Hello. I would just like to say I recent met steve. I live in NZ and flew over for a day to meet him and see a few things. My opinion of him is he is a very sincere guy. I am a good judge of character and no mans fool. I know I am not known here which rules out me being part of this challenge. Do not believe the stuff going on about steve. he really is a great guy. Ronjo I hope you get to meet him so you can tell the truth about everything. It really is quite bad how so many people have attempted to shoot him down. i wanted to say my part and wish i could say more. I look forward to seeing the outcome of all this but I know first hand what the truth all is.
Posted by: Steve, December 1, 2008, 2:37pm; Reply: 148
Thanks hawk.

Ronjo & everyone: as Forester claims the ultimate test of a roulette computer's effectiveness is the different diamond test, it will be a major point to focus on for Ronjo. Lanky and Iwonder had concerns that doing such a test on my dvd may not be considered "independent". So as I stated above, I'll send Ronjo a dvd of spins where the wheel can be seen from the top. That way, he can choose any spin he wants to do the test. It only needs to be a spin where the ball doesnt do something like skip, but it would be very rare anyway.

No matter what tests Ronjo does, they will be criticized by people like Bago and Forester. So what we need to do is figure out possible ways I might be able to cheat in such a test, and close the possibilities so the validations are clearly authentic. In other words, I dont want the morons to have a leg to stand on or to have any potential excuse. Anyone have any additional suggestions?
Posted by: 1893 (Guest), December 1, 2008, 3:16pm; Reply: 149
NP steve!

I add that I thought I knew a few things about roulette, until I met you. Your knowledge of roulette is astounding. You once said people that know you well say you might be the worlds foremost expert in roulette. I believe it now I really do.

In the few hours I met with him he taught me more about patterns of wheels than I imagined would be possible. I do wish I could say more to others but steve really is the real deal. I hope you see everything I saw Ronjo.
Posted by: lanky, December 1, 2008, 7:58pm; Reply: 150
Quoted Text
Also Lanky, Iwonder seems to have fallen off the face of the planet. Please contact him and ask him to respond to me. Weeks have passed and he isnt responding to my emails. I called him at work, and just left a message, but I dont want to intrude by calling him at work. At the same time, I'm not going to put up with lack of response for weeks. It's not a problem if he hasn't had time to do any testing, but if he hasnt got time, then I want him to send the phone back so I can send to Ronjo. As I'm low on stock and someone else now has the phone you returned, I may need Iwonder's phone back to send to Ronjo.


Hi Steve I made contact with Iwonder today Mate.
There has been a very good excuse for any delay from his side.
In fact one of His employees was in an accident & the news is not good.

He is going to contact You Mate.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, December 2, 2008, 7:16am; Reply: 151
Thanks Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, December 2, 2008, 11:52am; Reply: 152
MARK: Like I said would happen, three more of your websites are now down. Really I'm not interested in your sites or harming you, but I'll just keep taking your websites down if you host rubbish. You can move to a new host each time. But each time you do it, you run the risk of losing your domains for good. I suggest read the policies on repeat offenders. Just get on with your own business instead of trying to harm me. I've been trying to mind my own business for years and just get on with work.
Posted by: Steve, December 5, 2008, 6:42am; Reply: 153
UPDATE: I've been informed Iwonder is sending me back the phone today, so I'll have it some time next week.
Posted by: Steve, December 8, 2008, 6:26am; Reply: 154
I've just been alerted to the fact that Bago published a video of him doing the different diamond test. When he first sent me the video (years ago), I was disappointed that I didn't save it for future reference. That's because later I wanted to prove he used a PC DVD player which are notorious for skipping. But now you can see it for yourself at:

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=UYVjPGMPkE0

You can clearly see he's using his PC computer DVD player, contrary to my advice. Google skipping pc dvd players and read through the information. This is one of the things Bago refuses to acknowledge when he tested my computer. He's just toop proud to admit his mistake.

But anyway, Ronjo will do all the tests he wants to show facts. Specifically Ronjo will have a top view of hundreds of spins, and he can choose any of the spins to do the test. I'm sure Ronjo knows better than to use anything but a proper dvd player. Despite verification of my claims on this point, does this test prove the effectiveness of a computer like Forester claims? Nope, there's a lot more to an effective computer than this. But almost all (90%) of foresters claims fall apart when the test is done and Ronjo can see for himself.
Posted by: Steve, December 8, 2008, 6:50am; Reply: 155
PS - Bago, you are doing the same thing Mark did. He busted his butt to try and harm me, but fell flat on his face every time. Why? Because you are trying to discredit an honest person and trying to invalidate TRUTH. You just can't invalidate truth anymore than you can try and prove that 1 + 1 = 9. In the end Mark just relies on blatant lies to try and harm me, but that ends up discrediting himself when people learn the truth.

Again I'm not interested in harming any of you. Do we really have to go through this again? Grow up. Bago you have the same mentality as mark and forester - you keep trying to get the better of me, and when you fall on your face, you stomp your feet like a child and try even harder, but the same thing happens and you get even angrier and it all repeats again. Give up. Get on with your life. You are trying to invalidate truth, and in the end the more you try to do that, the more you'll look like an idiot. I know you wont take that advice, none of you do.

Also again I'll say clearly the universe most certainly does have an in-built BALANCE mechanism. You can call it Karma or whatever, but it's absolutely real. No matter what you try to do to harm me, you end up harming yourself even more. Don't believe this "hippie-talk? I am telling you that one day you will KNOW it is absolutely real.

Honestly Bago, some of the rubbish you write sounds an awful lot like you are Mark Howe, like how you end messages with "LOL" etc like you are really laughing. Who are you trying to convince? Grow up.

Posted by: Steve, December 8, 2008, 1:48pm; Reply: 156
I just received this email. It reeks of Mark Howe:

How come you work unloading stuff off boats for cash in the hand if you are really a millionaire like you claim,say hello to the tax man and Gary :-)

LOL


1. The return address was of course fake.

2. Mark is the only one that ever uses the words "if you are really a millionaire like you claim". Sorry Mark if you really can't handle it. You know I actually never said anything about my wealth until you made bullshit claims like I lived with my parents next to a homeless hostel.

3. Mark frequently contacts me under fake names and says rubbish like "say hello to bob". They are just random names. He hopes I'll actually know someone by that name.

4. Mark has reported me to numerous government agencies before with bogus claims in the hopes he'll somehow harm me.

5. Only two morons use LOL like punctuation: Mark and Bago. Perhaps it makes them feel superior, or that we actually believe they are laughing, who knows.

6. The statement about the unloading boxes is complete rubbish. I don't know what goes on in Mark's head when he says this stuff. The best I can figure is he's attempting to tell the tax office I am evading tax and am paid cash at some kind of shipyard job. What a complete and utter knob this man is.

What on Earth has all this got to do with anything? Nothing, it's just some of the rubbish mark does because he doesnt have a life and desperately wants to harm me. Mark you are a very sick man, you really are. Not long now. Feel free to send more as it all goes to the police and helps. Or maybe Mark, GET A LIFE. I know you accused me of ruining your life, but you did it all to yourself. Besides, if all the rubbish you say about like how you made 8m gpb playing roulette before being banned was true, then you I wouldn't have been able to ruin your life, would I? Again Mark, it was not me, it was all you - I just defended myself. I suggest focus on taking care of your child and the babysitter you ran off with and get on with life. I want nothing to do with such a pathetic person. You have no idea what I know about you Mark really, but I haven't bothered to release any of it because I really dont care. Do you really want to tempt me though, or should you listen when I say piss off?
Posted by: Steve, December 8, 2008, 2:34pm; Reply: 157
By the way Mark, listen to http://www.genuinewinner.com/dopey.wma

Does the voice sound familiar? Yes Mark, when you call under fake names, I know it is you - I just go along with it, and it's all recorded. Like when you called pretending to be a Canadian man with the female name "Rose", with a British accent. Mark I am truly astounded by how screwed up you are. You have called me under fake names many, many times - the last one was a few weeks ago. I have literally almost 1000 emails from you. It's all part of the harassment case against you. You my friend are much, much worse than Bago and Forester combined, and that's really saying something.

You have even called relatives numerous times. To say you are f***ed-up is an understatement. You really do need help my friend, but I think you're well and truly beyond that point.

The general public may not have a full idea of how screwed up you are (or how far you've gone to try and harm me), but anyone that has actually dealt with you knows. Like Randy who visited you and saw your failed demo, but bought your rubbish anyway and found it was a scam. But then he bought my computer and was very happy. What about Adam who found out your computer was a scam, then you wanted to charge him money for you to test it to see if his claims were true? Yes I have all those emails. Or how about Cloud and when he visited you? There is so much more. I could go on and on forever about you my friend, but I have better things to do. I have not published everything I know because I'm just not interested in harming you - I have better things to do. Please don't tempt me. For your own benefit, keep to yourself. If you are bitter about yours sites that keep coming down, consider not hosting rubbish and they wont be touched. Is it really that hard?
Posted by: 1619 (Guest), December 8, 2008, 9:36pm; Reply: 158
Dream on
Posted by: Steve, December 9, 2008, 6:15am; Reply: 159
Everyone meet Mark under a fake name (Vincent). As usual Mark, I knew quite early on from the rubbish you said at the start. Just like how you once pretended to be a female stripper named Peta Hansen, and you wanted to buy a gazillion roulette computers for you and your stripper friends so you could quit the stripping industry - it was obvious who it was after the first email or so. I dont know what's wrong with you mark, but you really are a screwball. Indeed you are a joke to everyone, which is why you never show your real name on forums. But let's stick to what counts and that will all be addressed in time, but like everyone doesn't already know how full of it you are.
Posted by: Steve, December 9, 2008, 7:01am; Reply: 160
UPDATE: My wheel is on it's way back. The result of the testing was that the drop zones were fine, which is the main thing for testing computers. There wasn't absolutely no drop zone - it was very weak, which makes it like 95% of other wheels. The bias test showed a possible slight bias in some pockets, but no more than the average wheel. Rotor deceleration etc was also checked. With huxley's software, there are green, orange and red wheel ratings. Red is biased and removed from the floor. Orange is pretty much average, where there is a possible slight bias but nothing to really worry about. And green is no sign of bias, or very slight. My wheel is in the orange zone. Most importantly it still passed a chi test so it is acceptable for australian casinos. It is important to understand that even if the wheel failed the chi test, it wouldnt be relevant because the predictions from the computer are never on the same numbers - this will be clear in video demos I release. If anything, a bias would actually decrease accuracy of predictions with computers because they do not account for bias. But even if they did, it wouldnt make much of a difference at all because bias occurs over thousands of spins. A demo of a computer is effective over even 100 spins because you dont just look at direct hits - you look at how far the ball landed from the prediction. This kind of thing is virtually impossible to fake. However the surface of the pockets may still be changed - that is the red and black plastic inside the pockets. This increases the bounce of the ball and will actually make predictions less predictable, but it is not as nice to look at. I may get the plastic replaced but it is easier to just remove it.
Posted by: 1918 (Guest), December 9, 2008, 8:42am; Reply: 161
Hi long time listener, first time caller. Just wanted to say what you are doing is great steve and I look forward to seeing the final outcome. I can see how the people that say bad things about you are concerned about what you are doing here like you said they are. Just a suggestion though you should just ignore them. They are not worth the time.
Posted by: Steve, December 9, 2008, 9:00am; Reply: 162
Tom, thanks for your support. Clowns like Mark have wasted my time, but a lot more of their own time. The very point of this challenge is so I dont waste further time on them. I'll have it all at http://www.roulettewars.com and anyone can just read the information and decide for themselves. Franky if they arent prepared to do the required reading, I dont want to bother with them. This is not merely about promoting and increasing sales - that is actually secondary. This is primarily about having the truth known and justice. Someone I once spoke to said it is probably the recognition I'm after, which is part of it.

For mark it is about sales because his rubbish doesnt work - but it largely about revenge for mark, really he is desperate to harm me and I'll give details in Episode II. Revenge for what? For just defending myself and making him look like an idiot. Like I said before, looking through all ancient emails between him and me, it was clear he was attacking me on forums for many months before I ever said a word about him. I kep asking and asking for him to stop and be reasonable, but he just wanted to compete and didnt care about truth. When I finally defended myself, many months later, thats when he lost the plot. Many of my players that know about it all cant believe how screwy he really is. I mean he is literally mentally ill, he must be. I have likened him to a monkey in a cage throwing bananas at me because try he cant really do anything to harm me and that enrages the sociopath - being powerless. A sociopath wants to feel powerful, which is why he does stuff like claims he has 24hr video surveillance on me,.. when he doesn't even know where I live. Like how he says rubbish like "say hi to Gary",... when I don't even know any Gary. Yes I do tease the sociopath monkey. Perhaps I should fight the temptation. Honestly that man would say I prefer peas to corn if he believed it might harm me in some way - he is desperate. You cant reason with him though - his motives have nothing to do with the truth. Same as forester and bago.

There will always be people attacking me and I'm ok with that. I'm just interested in the average "normal" person out there. Any "normal" person that does their research thoroughly knows the truth, and people like mark who lies their butts off are exposed for the clowns they are. My aim of this challenge is to make the truth even clearer to see, and to separate what counts from the nitty gritty rubbish that competitors do to divert attention from what matters. That's why there are episodes I and II on roulettewars.com. From this point on I'll just save the nitty gritty for my star wars website. Honestly though I actually do enjoy writing about the nitty gritty stuff, despite it being a waste of time. Why? Because it truly astounds me how outrageous the lies are, especially from mark. Not exactly a productive hobby though I know.
Posted by: Anandram, December 12, 2008, 7:11am; Reply: 163
Hi Steve,

Im new here, but who cares :) I am yet again going to say the same thing iv said from day dot - people want to beat roulette but when someone claims they can, you WILL get shot down.

I am GENUINLEY interested in your system and would like further information, cant get onto the links you have on the first page though :(

Could you elaborate on your system please? I am interested to take advice from a professional roulette player - if this is indeed what you are, many people here are singing your praises, and i would like the oppurtunity to do the same, if not have and own a winning system.

IM not a desperate fool in love with gambling, im by no means a gambler, i want to WIN, and WIN CONSISTENTLY. Even £20 a day is fine with me, profit is all i am after. I want a solid system that WORKS. I need to read up on your system so please if you would oblige...?

Im not interested in stupid feuds with "rivals", i will be the judge of you (and your system)and if others do the same - the world would be a better place in general - never mind roulette :)

I AM the "normal" person you speak of and im interested.

I know i dont know you buddy - but i would say this - keep your mind on the game and not the haters and clowns. There's too many of them, they will keep flocking to you, just bypass them and be the better person.

THank you for reading...
Posted by: Anandram, December 12, 2008, 9:41am; Reply: 164
Steve can your roulette computer  work on real physical live wheels online?
Posted by: Steve, December 12, 2008, 11:00am; Reply: 165
Anandram: my site is just being upgraded. It was drawing too much bandwidth from video downloads. The transfer will be complete today. What additional information do you want to know that isnt already at my website?

Also you are better to just email me directly, or even better just call me.

And no, my computer doesnt work online because the footage is way too poor, and you cant bet after ball release.
Posted by: Ronjo, December 12, 2008, 1:16pm; Reply: 166
Hi Steve,

Are we still going ahead?

Regards,
Ronjo.  
Posted by: Steve, December 12, 2008, 1:51pm; Reply: 167
Hi Ronjo, hell yeah we're still going ahead. I'm just waiting for:

1. Iwonder to return the phone so I can send it to you (OR for my technician to complete another batch of phones). Lanky said Iwonder was shipping the phones the other day, but they havent arrived yet and he wont contact me to let me know if they've been shipped or not.

2. Repairs on the mk7 wheel to be done so I can do the video (top view)

The mk7 had an orange rating indicative of a difference in bounce in different pockets. It can happen if the glue beneath pockets comes lose even marginally. So all the plastic parts (in pockets) have been removed. But it might need replacing because the metal part beneath the plastic is not identical between pockets. I know the computer isnt looking for bias, and difference in pocket bounce will actually decrease computer accuracy, and the bias is so small it's no different to the average wheel, but I dont want morons to have a leg to stand on.

Dont mistake things being quiet here for nothing much going on. We are very much still going ahead.


Posted by: Ronjo, December 13, 2008, 4:43pm; Reply: 168
Quoted from Steve


Dont mistake things being quiet here for nothing much going on. We are very much still going ahead.




Hi Steve,

Thats great to hear,and I cant wait to get going,and post my findings which I have no doubt in my mind that all will be as Steve says it is.

Regards,
Ronjo.

Posted by: Anandram, December 13, 2008, 8:50pm; Reply: 169
Quoted from Steve
Anandram: my site is just being upgraded. It was drawing too much bandwidth from video downloads. The transfer will be complete today. What additional information do you want to know that isnt already at my website?

Also you are better to just email me directly, or even better just call me.

And no, my computer doesnt work online because the footage is way too poor, and you cant bet after ball release.


Steve - I wanted you to explain your system a little (without giving it away), because your website wasnt working - but looks to be up now so no drama. Im reading up on your site, so will be in touch. Why is it better to email/call you direct? I have family all over australia, (darwin/adelaide/perth/sydney), might get one of them to come check your system out :) Iv been to darwin - lovely place and people.

Dont think ill be calling just yet - i live in the UK (tarrifs and cost and all that - hopefully with your system that can be a worry of the past). Ill email you if i have anything i feel you wouldnt want to discuss  on a forum.

So you would say your system (not the computer) is effective for online gaming? I guess the answer your going to come out with is obvious - but im just curious on your thoughts about your system.
Thanks for yor time.
Posted by: Steve, December 15, 2008, 6:16am; Reply: 170
Anandram, please either email or call me about me system. As for information you request, my site already has the answers you are after.
Posted by: Steve, December 15, 2008, 12:28pm; Reply: 171
Lanky do you know if Iwonder has actually sent back the phone yet? It hasnt arrived and he's only in melbourne.

PS - I'll just add today's tests on the mk7 wheel achieved 1 in 10 exact number hit rate. This is with predictions 15 seconds before the ball falls. Results may not always be that good but it's a good start. But the exact number hit rate isnt the real proof, it's more how far the ball landed from the tuned prediction.
Posted by: lanky, December 18, 2008, 8:11pm; Reply: 172
Hi Steve.

As far as I know You would have recieved it Yesterday Wednesday our Time by express post.

Your Friend.

Lanky.
Posted by: Steve, December 19, 2008, 12:01pm; Reply: 173
Thanks Lanky but it definitely isnt there. Please check with Iwonder to confirm it was actually sent. Thanks.
Posted by: Anandram, December 20, 2008, 10:55am; Reply: 174
Quoted from Ronjo


Hi Steve,

Thats great to hear,and I cant wait to get going,and post my findings which I have no doubt in my mind that all will be as Steve says it is.

Regards,
Ronjo.



so when is this actually going ahead people?
Posted by: Steve, December 22, 2008, 6:39am; Reply: 175
It is going ahead once I receive the computer back from Iwonder, then I can send it to Ronjo.
Posted by: 1894 (Guest), December 25, 2008, 12:58am; Reply: 176
Hi Steve,
From what I can see you spend too much time "defending your self" from these childish attacks, have you considered people can see through the attacks and that you are in fact a genuine person, I do, I don't need to keep reading about how this guy did this this guy did that. Its no dig at you mate, I'm just saying don't waste your energy even aknowledging them, let alone defending yourself against their stupid claims. To respond to all of it the way you do is half of what they want. Half is to discredit you, and half is to piss you off. You may not be discredited, but you sure do sound pissed off. Don't let them do either
Posted by: Anandram, December 25, 2008, 3:18am; Reply: 177
Quoted from 1894
Hi Steve,
From what I can see you spend too much time "defending your self" from these childish attacks, have you considered people can see through the attacks and that you are in fact a genuine person, I do, I don't need to keep reading about how this guy did this this guy did that. Its no dig at you mate, I'm just saying don't waste your energy even aknowledging them, let alone defending yourself against their stupid claims. To respond to all of it the way you do is half of what they want. Half is to discredit you, and half is to piss you off. You may not be discredited, but you sure do sound pissed off. Don't let them do either


I agree with 99% of your post poit, but at the end of the day some people can see through it and some just can't. Maybe it makes Steve feel better by writing out his frustrations. I know when im pissed, all i gotta do is write it in an email, and half the time i dont even want to send it thereafter because iv let it our through writing it. People who cant be bothered to sit there and read through masses of info NEED to see the things that Steve writes, otherwise i feel if he doesn't respond, he WILL be discredited. Yes the truth outshines all lies and liars come out to be shown just as that, but there's nothing wrong with Steve defending himself in the meantime i think. Most things that are written about him deserve a response, otherwise people will say "oh he's not responding because he is guilty", so as you see, he really cannot win, but probably does MORE good for him to respond to the more harsher attacks.
Posted by: Steve, January 5, 2009, 9:28am; Reply: 178
Yes I do spend too much time defending myself from strange people. For about a year I virtually ignored them, but lack of response meant these people had free reign to say whatever they want - this is what misled many people about me. Just about everyone that took the time to call me and/or do thorough research knew how full of it people like mark and forester were, but many people are lazy and base their opinions on hearsay and fake negative reviews from people like mark under fake names. Then I finally started defending myself, it embarrassed them, and it became their mission to harm me. When someone is shown to be a complete liar, of course they'll be embarrassed. I never aimed to embarrass anyone - all I did was defend myself like I'm doing now.  No matter what the outcome of this challenge, and I already know what it will be, of course mark and forester will continue on. But those following the challenge will know the basic truth.

The primary aim of the challenge with Ronjo is to provide everyone with a simple single resource where they can learn the truth for themselves. That single resource is http://www.roulettewars.com - if someone genuinely reads the site, the truth is very clear, and it will be even clearer once everyone is done with Ronjo.

PS - On Forester's forum he said:

Quoted Text
By the way one day I was driving to Healsville, national park, when I was in Lilydayle I turned and pass next to Stefano’s house. There was old ironing table chucked out in front of the house as rubbish. I hope his lady as replacement got better quality one since this one was the cheapest version from reject shop $12


Forester really wants to focus on ironing boards?? Firstly, I dont live there - it is a rental property and he visited my tenant (www.roulettecomputers.com/rent.jpg). Secondly, although I've been sent his address before I'm not in the least bit interested. Thirdly, if he was in my area, why didnt he meet me? He keeps avoiding meeting me because he's concerned with what he'll see. If he had called me I would have met him - I'm 5 mins from where he was. And finally, although forester made it a point that he was traveling with his computer, the result was he lost. So did his other player on the same forum thread. Thats what happens if you use his nonsense on a modern wheel. But instead of improving your device, ok forester let's focus on the old ironing board of a tenant.
Posted by: Steve, January 5, 2009, 9:39am; Reply: 179
Lanky, still Iwonder's computer has not arrived. Chances are it has not been sent yet. I cant get in contact with Iwonder so please follow-up for me so we can get this challenge done.
Posted by: Steve, January 8, 2009, 12:53pm; Reply: 180
UPDATE: I now have the computer back from Iwonder. Ronjo, let's finally proceed. Ronjo in the videos I'll send you I want to be using the actual computer I'm sending you - that is the computer Iwonder just sent me. This is because the computer will have learned the wheel and the data will already be on the computer for you. Then you only need to test the computer and can be assured the settings are correct. But you dont do the different diamond test with it at that stage, because unlike typical computers, my computer doesnt consider the prediction merely where the ball reaches a certain speed. To do the different diamond test, reset the computer and start from scratch - you need the right settings for this test too which I'll explain later - ie you have to tell the computer that the wheel is 'perfect", which it is of course not, but for the purposes of the test we'll consider it perfect. You take your sample and do the test with ANY of the spins in the DVD - this will clarify that the computer is not rigged. The DVD will have the wheel spin for a bit before ball release so testing on any spins is made easier. I'll create the DVD this upcoming week and plan to ship by the end of next week (16th Jan).

NOTE: Although the computer will be setup and all ready to go, you will still need to delete all the data and do everything again, so you can verify everything for yourself. If you want, even start application from half way in the dvds or whatever. I fully encourage you to use your own initiative and experience to run tests to validate my claims. I know my computer better than my own wife, and I know any test you do, if done correctly, will validate my claims.

What will the 3 stooges say when this is all done? Who cares. Maybe that I own a cheap ironing board - anything to distract attention. I think most people now know not to believe rubbish from them anyway. As I've said numerous times, the stooges will still attack me no matter what. We all expect that. But what I'd like from anyone interested is ideas on how to make Ronjo's testing bulletproof - i.e. tests to determine if the phone I've sent him is somehow rigged. Why? Because I don't want the stooges to have a leg to stand on. Perhaps they already dont which is why they discuss ironing boards of my tenants, but I'd like to be thorough anyway.

Ideas anyone? An example is for the different diamond test, to establish that the phone is not merely loaded with only specific numbers, Ronjo will have a DVD of spins with the top view of the wheel. That way he can use any spin he wants for the test.
Posted by: Steve, January 12, 2009, 7:25am; Reply: 181
Just confirming the following:

Ronjo had a problem with his account. For some reason he couldnt login. So I created a second account for his with same name, which is NOT supposed to be allowed to happen. Anyway I manually set up Ronjo's account, and logged in to test it. I just forgot to logout of his name and accidentally posted under his name. Sorry for the confusion.

Ronjo you can verify to whoever you want that you are you by confirming it via vls or email.
Posted by: 2008 (Guest), January 12, 2009, 7:48am; Reply: 182
Thanks Steve all sorted I was a bit worried.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: 1893 (Guest), January 12, 2009, 10:33am; Reply: 183
Wow you destroyed them :)

If it helps I would be happy to allow a phone recording of discussion with myself.
Posted by: Steve, January 12, 2009, 11:02am; Reply: 184
Thanks Hawk but no-one knows you well enough for it to have the desired effect. Ronjo was chosen because he is well known and trusted by the majority of people. He appears to be a very decent guy.

By the way, Ronjo now has his old account back. In settings I just had to use a feature that re-established the member list. I dont know exactly what the problem was, but it is fixed anyway. I removed his newer account to avoid confusion.
Posted by: Ronjo, January 13, 2009, 3:41am; Reply: 185
Thanks Steve,all is back to normal,it would be absurd that anyone would think that you and I are one person all they have to do is go to VLS and it would be confirmed that I am Ronjo.Although I hit a panic button a couple of days ago as it did appear that way,but there was a problem with me logging on for some reason I dont know why,and you made a new account for me which really confused things.Anyway its back to normal thank goodness for that, now we can proceed as normal.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Anandram, January 13, 2009, 4:04am; Reply: 186
Have my posts been deleted from this page by purpose or....? It was the one in response to why ronjos name appeared twice etc. Or was it to simply clear up confusion?
Posted by: Steve, January 13, 2009, 7:10am; Reply: 187
Anandram, I removed some posts from here as they werent relevant anymore.

Also Ronjo, Bago doesnt believe you and I are different people but I really dont care what he thinks - others know better. Actually he probably knows you are someone else, but he's reaching for excuses and making irrelevant and twisted comments in CAPITALS etc. By the way Bago, I'm not interested in making morons $30k. Eventually you will learn what I have achieved, and continue to achieve with my own teams, and I dont doubt it is beyond what people like Basiex have achieved. To anyone that sees the hybrid, it is very impressive - but to you who barely even knows squat about the standard computer thinks the notion of an automated roulette computer is silly? Yes you really are a pro Bago. I'd love to further pull apart your ridiculous comments but I just dont care. Your comments are so far off track and childish they are not worth response. Already people think you're an idiot anyway. Just like your assumptions with Ronjo, the rest of your assumptions are way off-track. Your last comments are like something out of a kindergarten - did you want to poke your tongue too?. Bago if you were trustworthy or had any kind of integrity, I would explore ways to demonstrate the truth to you. But you are a child, you are extremely immature and have as much integrity as mark howe. Relax Bago the challenge will be over before you know it, then you can make all the excuses you like.
Posted by: Anandram, January 17, 2009, 4:47am; Reply: 188
i tell you what Steve, you are either
a) A great liar, writer and talker
b) Very confident and know your system(s) are every bit as effective as you claim.

I cannot see you busting your a** to proove this and that, to risk your credibility, and everything else that goes with it if you did not have every ounce of faith in your system. You are trying to proove so much whilst your competitors proove nothing other than they can run their mouth. Isnt it obvious to all who is telling the truth and who isnt? WHy would a man risk so much and go to such lengths to proove it, if he was not 100% confident?? Its not to generate sales, because noone would be as stupid to get an independent party to test each aspect of a system knowing it would fail. Someone tell me what the purpose is of paying someones fees to go over to Australia, knowing the methods/system you have been defending are rubbish? Steve, you are obviously confident in your work if applied correctly to produce the desired results, anyone who cannot see what goes on with your clown competitors would probably not even use your system/computers effectivley/correctly anyway, and as a result would end up  blaming you.

Neutral parties need to use their brains, and THINK. just add 1 and 1 together for christ sake.
Posted by: Anandram, January 19, 2009, 2:45am; Reply: 189
How are things coming along ronjo/steve?
Posted by: Steve, January 19, 2009, 8:39am; Reply: 190
Thanks, yes I am very confident with the challenge. Before anything I just want the truth known. I know most people now know the truth, or lean towards that the others are lying. Still I want to leave absolutely no doubt.

Ronjo, the video is done. There are 150 spins, top view of wheel etc. Exact number hit rate is 1 in 21 and I'll release chart which displays distance the ball landed from actual prediction. Predictions are approximately 15 seconds before the ball falls - I wanted to make it clear that even on a distorted ball track, predictions with the computer can be very early. Of course later predictions would have been much more accurate, but I didnt want to make things too easy. The risk feature is completely disabled, so predictions are given on every spins. Based on all the testing I've done on the mk7 wheel, 1 in 12 hit rate is consistently possible with stricter settings. You can see the wheel is pretty much perfectly semi-tilted so it perfectly represents 95% of wheels. The ball frequently hits horizontal diamonds, floats around the rotor etc and does all kinds of "unpredictable" things.

I'll try and fit all the footage on one DVD, but it may be two. Today I'll be compiling the DVD and plan to ship tomorrow or later today if I have time. You can begin application from anywhere in the video to confirm the computer is not rigged, but of course the computer needs to be tuned to a wheel before predictions become accurate. With the top view of the wheel, you can do the different diamond test, which is about 95% of what needs to be done to show everyone what liars there are around.

PS - I've already tried to apply both mark's latest computer and forester's iqe6 against the mk7 with basically random results. But I'm going to apply their computers against the exact same 150 spins to see results. Based on the fact alone that the ball is just as likely to hit a vertical diamond than a horizontal diamond, you can plainly see their computers have it all wrong.
Posted by: Steve, January 19, 2009, 1:36pm; Reply: 191
Ronjo I managed to fit it all on one DVD, but the compression is heavy and the footage quality isn't as good. So what I'll do is send you a DVD of all spins, plus two dvds with the same thing, but better quality - all for the mk7 wheel. I'll also send two other dvds which are for the mk2 wheel.

Because the mk7 footage is all top-view, you'll find it very easy to do the different diamond test, and you'll quickly see how full of it the stooges are. That's really the main test to do, but from how the ball falls on the mk7 you'll know why the different diamond test is a very poor way to gauge computer effectiveness. Forester says otherwise, but that's because his computer assumes diamonds dont exist.
Posted by: Ronjo, January 19, 2009, 1:41pm; Reply: 192
Hi Steve,

Thanks Steve,looking forward to working with you.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, January 22, 2009, 10:37am; Reply: 193
Ronjo I'll have to send everything tomorrow as I havent had time. Also I will be doing another dvd today because in the previous two the zero is hard to see. This is because the plastic in the pockets was removed to eliminate a potential type of bias, and the clear green is no longer there - it's just all chrome. So in the new video I'll do something to make the zero easier to see, and I'll include this dvd. I'll of course send the other dvds too.

I've done the different diamond testing on the videos and most spins are fine - just avoid using spins where the ball jumps or does something similar. You should have no problems achieving most predictions within a 3 pocket arc.
Posted by: 1894 (Guest), January 22, 2009, 10:38pm; Reply: 194
Hey Steve,
I read somewhere that you are a "convicted criminal" is there any truth to this claim what so ever? like did you get in trouble for not paying a parking fine or something stupid like that?
Posted by: Anandram, January 23, 2009, 4:43am; Reply: 195
Quoted from 1894
Hey Steve,
I read somewhere that you are a "convicted criminal" is there any truth to this claim what so ever? like did you get in trouble for not paying a parking fine or something stupid like that?


Although im sure Steve will respond to you, ill start by saying that people should do some research. Im surprised poit that you have been on this forum for so long, challenged Steve regarding his challenge and have never had any curiosity as to who this steve really is, especially when he claims his system does so much.

I had the above curiosity and done my homework, like anyone should, im sure Steve will point you towards http://www.roulettewars.com (the faq's page) for you to read up on his "crime". Although this does not bear any relevance on his system (in my opinion) and its effectiveness. However one might say that it does to an extent in regards to trust, but personally it doesnt bother me because if you take the time to speak to the guy, he is indeed a very normal person. We've all fcuk'd up, intentionally or not.

Excuse if i sound like i am licking arse here, im not - it just prooves that people really do not do any research.

Not a direct attack on you poit, im just surprised that you didnt look it up before posting your comment thats all.
Posted by: 1894 (Guest), January 23, 2009, 9:06am; Reply: 196
Quoted from Anandram


Although im sure Steve will respond to you, ill start by saying that people should do some research. Im surprised poit that you have been on this forum for so long, challenged Steve regarding his challenge and have never had any curiosity as to who this steve really is, especially when he claims his system does so much.

I had the above curiosity and done my homework, like anyone should, im sure Steve will point you towards http://www.roulettewars.com (the faq's page) for you to read up on his "crime". Although this does not bear any relevance on his system (in my opinion) and its effectiveness. However one might say that it does to an extent in regards to trust, but personally it doesnt bother me because if you take the time to speak to the guy, he is indeed a very normal person. We've all fcuk'd up, intentionally or not.

Excuse if i sound like i am licking arse here, im not - it just prooves that people really do not do any research.

Not a direct attack on you poit, im just surprised that you didnt look it up before posting your comment thats all.


Well I figure anything I find could just be more crap any way so I best ask the person him self
Posted by: Steve, January 27, 2009, 6:30am; Reply: 197
Poit, yes it's true but you've probably read rubbish about it from people trying to discredit me, or articles that never tell the accurate and whole story. Competitors distort everything to make me appear like I'm charles manson, when the truth is it was one of many promotions from my company - I never had problems with the others. Full details are at http://www.genuinewinner.com/rentech.htm - It has no bearing on anything here. If I wanted to hide it, I wouldnt be using my distinct surname. Almost all my players already know about it, they just dont care - it has been openly discussed on my player forum many times.

Ronjo I forgot about Australia day (public holiday) so everything was closed. Everything is ready to go though and I'll let you know when it's on the way.
Posted by: Ronjo, January 27, 2009, 1:30pm; Reply: 198
Hi Steve,

I am ready whenever you are,I know you are a busy man with a lot on your plate.If you are shipping the goods across it will probably be here in about ten days,unless it is priority mail, it will be a couple of days.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, January 28, 2009, 7:22am; Reply: 199
Ronjo check your PM. I want to arrange a call between you and one of my profit split partners. I dont want the jurisdiction released though. Yes according to the stooges I dont have such partners, and you'll learn a whole lot of other things from the stooges that just arent true.
Posted by: Ronjo, January 28, 2009, 1:59pm; Reply: 200
Hi Steve,

Thanks I have read the PM.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, January 28, 2009, 3:18pm; Reply: 201
Scatter chart from one of the dvds:



It's a hit rate of about 1 in 17. This is on the mk7, with the prediction 7-8 seconds before the ball falls. Only average accuracy settings were used. I was using the teflon ball which is lighter. Some of the videos Ronjo will have will be published online, but not all to maintain secrets.
Posted by: alarian, January 31, 2009, 12:37am; Reply: 202
Ok, I've read through almost every post in this thread... Except for the 2 million words ones where you (Steve) waste time on defending against these Mark, Forester and Bago whom I don't have any interest in following up in any way...

I am a bit shocked though since I thought the test was going to be in November when you got your Mk7 Wheel...
The reason I'm shocked is because I thought it would already have been done by now!

Well... I understand the problem with Lanky's health and all... But I regret to say I'm a bit confused here.
Is Ronjo going to come visit you in Australia or not?


I'm developing a dynamic system program for automatic betting on specific online casinos. I've made about $1000 in 3 weeks after losing some $300 in the beginning, when the program was in early stages of development...

It's not 100% solid though since you can't beat a RNG in the long run. It abuses the fact that some of the so called Random Number Generators that are used in some of the modified versions of the Licensed casino software (Playtech, Cryptologic and Chartwell) aren't infact entirely random.

When I get enough cash I am definitely going to get in touch with you, providing Ronjo approves your claims and all...
I love beating the man... Bwin closed my account when I Was going to cash out €900 and refused my withdrawal making up false claims that I had provided false birth date information...
If I could beat the real man in real life, making money from it, that would be even more wonderful.

Rob the robber
Con the conman
Scam the scammer
Posted by: Anandram, February 1, 2009, 6:28am; Reply: 203
Just so everyone knows in Steves absence. The above post i am 80% sure is either Mark Howe or Tony Bago (ex french player who didnt comprehend the system)
Below is quoted from Steve's roulette wars site.

Quoted Text

The bottom line is he had an extremely poor understanding of both my computer and system. His understandings were in fact so poor, that I insisted to speak with him via phone to help him. However, he refused my call claiming he didn't speak english well enough


This MammoL character's bad english to me suggests he is Tony Bago.Ignore this idiot.
Posted by: Kelly, February 1, 2009, 7:07am; Reply: 204
Its pretty  easy to see who it is, and its not Mark.  Apart from that, the system that circulates is far from being the best way to track the fingerprint of a dealer/wheel/ball ensemble.  Its nicely written but the basis is not maximized, worst case scenario is that you end up betting between two moving maximums.
Posted by: Kelly, February 1, 2009, 7:06pm; Reply: 205
The weakness in the system is contrary what many thinks that the definition of the peaks is based on larger samples rather than smaller. When its based on larger samples, there will also be higher degree of new physical changes embedded.

Finding 1 half with a higher probability rather than the other half is what we all at some point has tryed to find. So that part is not new. Using 11 numbers as sector size rather than 2 - 6  numbers (using vis - a - vis, when there is no vis a vis 1 , 3 or 5 numbers) means that you won`t be able to react quickly to new physical changes but will be stuck with a large sector bet on the wrong side of the wheel based on a large spin sample, which is way more expensive than chasing high probability sectors with smaller betting sectors. A rule of thump in dealer signature, is that every third spin is a chaotic spin where randomness is taking over rather than the monotomity of the wheel/dealer ensemble.

1 Simple improvement would be to implement the rule where 80% of all spins should be not ONLY in 1 wheel half, but also could be in two 1/4 of a wheel directly across from each other, like a X instead of a -
Posted by: Anandram, February 1, 2009, 8:55pm; Reply: 206
Quoted from 2004
Now anandram will have to find another excuse in order to explain why people purchasing Stefano's system only lose money.
Oh stop, he will claim Kelly is Mark, Bago or Forester discrediting Stefano once again.

I told you anandram that smart roulette players reckon that Stefano's system is a joke to beat modern wheels, it is very obsolete, that's why people are distributing his ebook for FREE. Stefano's players do not represent concurrence, believe me.

Now please find other excuses, independant players are claiming the same as me, IT SUCKS. Do you understand my poor english?
Yes, i guess, otherwise you would not answer with your pathetic excuses and lies.

ps: already 46 people have downloaded the sh*t, i'm proud of myself, it means Stefano won't receive 46*2,500=115,000$, you will get no commission poor anandram.



I told you before that i dont get any commission from anything. I dont have Steves system. At least this other chap Kelly is presenting some sort of explanation as to why he believes the system is not very effective, you Mr Bago just sound like someone who didnt "get it" in the first place and have relied on third party information to conclude your understanding of his system. Noone can take you seriously Bago because you present your opinion like an immature little baby, which leads people to believe you simply couldnt comprehend Steve's system.

Consider this: When you buy a brand new product from a shop and get home and use it - if you thought the product was brilliant and understood how it worked etc, do you ring up the shop and express your satisfaction - no you dont. If you were displeased in the slightest, do you ring up the shop and express your distain, yes. This is all you are doing.

I am interested in Kelly's interpretation of the system but have no room for crybabies (bago), but figure Steve will correct you because i am not going to pretend i know his system inside out, because i dont. You sound like you know what you are talking about Kelly, and will look forward to Steve's response to you "disapproving" of his system? Kelly - i would also like to know your opinion on how you might explain Steve's online videos/other videos regarding proof where profits are clearly soaring with application of his system? In theory your counter-argument to Steve's system sounds very fancy and correct, but the proof suggest otherwise...?
Posted by: Kelly, February 1, 2009, 11:49pm; Reply: 207
I have made plenty spin samples using VB on private wheels where some of them were better than averager and some of them was worse than average and some of them extremely good.


By posting a good spin sample you are more like showing how the system works when it does well, and obviously that is what you want when you wanna present something. There would be no point in publishing a bad streak because people would say, hey i can do that in a random game.

Some call it manipulation, but its not quite fair and not a discussion i wanna be a part of,  because if one finds a wheel with that environment, it can actually be played successfully. Critics will argue that the conditions are too fabricated to match real conditions, which is in some areas correct, but in other older casinos you might actually stumble over such conditions.

I hope you understand that i won`t take any side of either Steve nor Forester/Bago  nor Mark. A critical reply of Steve can easyli be taken wrong by Steve and used for reference to one of the others. All participants has in my opinion some weak points and personally i play something entirely different that has a basis in Scott but also an element of Caleb Johnson. I don`t think anyone is playing quite like that and that is not a critic of either Scott or Caleb, it just shows that many components can be added up to a personal system. For instance not many uses 2 reference diamonds when they play semitilted wheels and uses the second diamond for pinpointing the drop diamond and you won`t find any instructions on the net for it.  

Please keep me neutral, because i simply don`t have time for scimming the net for new abuses everyday as in Steve/Mark/Forester/Bago style. We should all be in the same boat, but because of business and personal issues, we aint.
Posted by: Anandram, February 2, 2009, 12:06am; Reply: 208
Quoted from Kelly
I have made plenty spin samples using VB on private wheels where some of them were better than averager and some of them was worse than average and some of them extremely good.


By posting a good spin sample you are more like showing how the system works when it does well, and obviously that is what you want when you wanna present something. There would be no point in publishing a bad streak because people would say, hey i can do that in a random game.

Some call it manipulation, but its not quite fair and not a discussion i wanna be a part of,  because if one finds a wheel with that environment, it can actually be played successfully. Critics will argue that the conditions are too fabricated to match real conditions, which is in some areas correct, but in other older casinos you might actually stumble over such conditions.

I hope you understand that i won`t take any side of either Steve nor Forester/Bago  nor Mark. A critical reply of Steve can easyli be taken wrong by Steve and used for reference to one of the others. All participants has in my opinion some weak points and personally i play something entirely different that has a basis in Scott but also an element of Caleb Johnson. I don`t think anyone is playing quite like that and that is not a critic of either Scott or Caleb, it just shows that many components can be added up to a personal system. For instance not many uses 2 reference diamonds when they play semitilted wheels and uses the second diamond for pinpointing the drop diamond and you won`t find any instructions on the net for it.  

Please keep me neutral, because i simply don`t have time for scimming the net for new abuses everyday as in Steve/Mark/Forester/Bago style. We should all be in the same boat, but because of business and personal issues, we aint.


Agreed regarding the netural comment.
I still find some slight flaws in what you refer to in regards to "manipulation" though. In a nutshell you say that the videos may just be the "best of the best" in regards to Steve's system effectiveness. However, Steve quite clearly  shows his system which goes through a losing streak and then recovers, so im not sure how your above comment applies?

The comment you made about "posting a sample of how the system does when it does well", isnt this the point of an effecvtive system and indeed the point of "proof of effectivness"? I think the point which should be considered is that the system DOES do well (yes) when applied correctly and in the correct conditions - but this should be a fundamental awareness for players.

Im just confused as to why you believe that he should post a sample of how the system fairs when NOT applied correctly and therefore have a video showing loss in profit.

The point is that people want to see that when applied correctly and in the right conditions, profits can be gained? Which he shows on three different samples.
Posted by: Kelly, February 2, 2009, 1:20am; Reply: 209
Well, that is what he shows. A streak that does well, the minor draw down is not what i consider a bad streak. A bad streak usually feels like you are being skinned alive because everything you do is done correct, but you keep losing.

Im not saying he should post a bad streak, but im saying its hard to post something that won`t be used AGAINST him by the other vendors. Its either too good or too bad, you can always take a stand against him and so can he against them.

My opinions on his systems is based on my own knowledge rather than on Steves knowledge. Steve has given his directions in the script, and i know that it can be done better because his basics has been testet extensively in Europe already in the 90`s.

I have worked a LOT with dealers signature before the Starbursts hit our Casinos. I have spun private wheels with a friend of mine who used to be a dealer, but now works in surveillance and we set up all kind of environments and you can easyly create a winning environment in the living room that you won`t find in a casino.  

Thats why i don`t consider it a some sort of a proof that he posts a video. You can "easyli" lose 100 units even though you know at this point you actually has a 20% edge and that the scatter is simply playing tricks on you.  A significant proof is extremely hard to provide if you want it to be solid and would probably take 3 - 4 days with 500 spins each day and a neutral controller present before it could be considered mathematical sound. If it should also be monitored by camera, well, it will never take place.

I played with a well known team for 3 months a couple of years back, and my profits weren`t considered skill based before they broke throgh the 3 standard deviations benchmark at around 2100 spins if i recall it correct.  
Posted by: Anandram, February 2, 2009, 1:52am; Reply: 210
I have been informed (not by Steve) that his methods are a lot more than Dealer sig. Not everything he teaches is in that document, my point being that not to judge his knowledge by one document.

I believe he purposely leaves out the finer details because of people like Bago who may do exactly what Bago done yesterday (publicly release the doc). I believe you have to contact him once trust is gained in orde for him to explain the finer details.


Aside from that and regarding the proof, ok, forget the video demo, how would you dissapprove of the online videos he has of large profits in around 1hr? "controlled environment"?? No. it clearly shows the effectiveness does it not?

Are you saying that the information/methods in the primordials document is not effective?
Posted by: Kelly, February 2, 2009, 2:30am; Reply: 211
Well, they might be effective in some environment, all im saying is that there are better ways, that works in controlled but also not so controlled environments  as the ones in the demos.  I know for a fact that in many of the european casinos, he won`t make a lot of money with the download method. In a lot of places he won`t even be able to track a wheel that qualifies. And IF a wheel qualifies i believe he will soon be in trouble. On the other hand, im not saying they don`t exists in Europe, they are just hard to find. For example in San Remo, Italy, they have some 50 - 60 wheels but change the dealer every 12 - 15 minutes and you will only be able to track 8 - 10 spins with that dealer. In germany a dealer lasts 1/2 hour but they have a slow modus operandi and you still wont get more than 8 or 10 spins in each direction in each shift. You need a faster, different and more precise tracking method for that kind of game.  On top of that, the ball types is a bit more alive than the ones in the videos.

All i can judge is the documents i have seen. He might have better, i don`t know.  

Having said all this, i think the document is well written and is basicly better than most other methods discussed on the boards because it takes physical components in consideration.
Posted by: Anandram, February 2, 2009, 4:48am; Reply: 212
Quoted from Kelly
Well, they might be effective in some environment, all im saying is that there are better ways, that works in controlled but also not so controlled environments  as the ones in the demos.  I know for a fact that in many of the european casinos, he won`t make a lot of money with the download method. In a lot of places he won`t even be able to track a wheel that qualifies. And IF a wheel qualifies i believe he will soon be in trouble. On the other hand, im not saying they don`t exists in Europe, they are just hard to find. For example in San Remo, Italy, they have some 50 - 60 wheels but change the dealer every 12 - 15 minutes and you will only be able to track 8 - 10 spins with that dealer. In germany a dealer lasts 1/2 hour but they have a slow modus operandi and you still wont get more than 8 or 10 spins in each direction in each shift. You need a faster, different and more precise tracking method for that kind of game.  On top of that, the ball types is a bit more alive than the ones in the videos.

All i can judge is the documents i have seen. He might have better, i don`t know.  

Having said all this, i think the document is well written and is basicly better than most other methods discussed on the boards because it takes physical components in consideration.


Correct, people can only judge what they have seen, but i know that there is more to it than whatever is in the document. You are also correct in saying the methods are effective in the some environments, but Steve does not hide this fact. Most of the testimonials and his text on his site state that you need to find the right conditions before playing, so this is no secret.

There may well be better ways and these ways may be the ones not documented by Steve to preserve his secrets. Im assuming this is one of the main reasons why Steve advises that contact with him is the number 1 key to any kind of success with his methods.

Good to be able to converse about this instead of having to deal with erratic child like posts.

What are these "better methods" you speak of anyway?
Posted by: Steve, February 2, 2009, 7:09am; Reply: 213
I have said a million times that dealer signature and the primordials are only a small part of my methods. You have clowns like Bago trying to convince people of otherwise. I see Bago is trying to distribute a document telling everyone this challenge doesnt need to take place now. Bago what are you afraid of? If you want to see an outline of what I teach, download http://www.genuinewinner.com/gw.zip

By the way Bago, many people who see the primordials document, even an older one, tend to increase their interest in my methods because they see it is based on real science, not hocus pocus. You may actually be benefiting me.

Yes it is obvious who Mamool was - Bago, who doesnt have a clue what he's saying. Really some of what is being said here is so far off the mark that it is not worth correcting. I get very tired of it. Like for example Bago is saying I'm wrong for covering 19 numbers in my video. Actually Bago, with many methods, covering more numbers wont increase your edge, but it increases your winnings. Bago really doesnt have any idea what he says. Bago in his infinite wisdom should know in reality players cover anywhere from 1 - 11 numbers, and very rarely more.

Indeed there have been players that have struggled. Is it really my doing? Consider this: when a player like "highlander" has access to virtually every proven effective method including but not limited to visual ballistics, but they cant make it work, does that suggest I'm a scammer, or the player has no idea what they're doing? Kelly, how would you feel if you were trying to teach someone VB and they couldn't understand even some basic concepts, then they call you a scammer? By the way, Uchimata is well known on my forum - he was banned as a player. Before he was banned, he announced he won over $100,000 with bias analysis. So why was he calling me a scammer? I'm not sure about that - he wins a huge amount then attacks me for it. He argued that the primordials dont work. Actually they do, but even if they didnt, then why not just focus on another method I teach? Is it really that hard?

Kelly, on one hand you have a few morons like Bago. On the other hand there are players that know better and swear to be succeeding with my methods. Some have posted here, and one of them even gave the testimonial at http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial7CSUSA.wma - is the testimony of all people Bago credible? Considering he recently clearly demonstrated confusion between correlation charts and bias analysis, a colossal mistake, I'd say it's safe to say Bago is an amateur, and he's defending his honor like a child. True Kelly you can only judge what you know, but you know only a fraction of the whole picture. Specifically with the primordial 1 which Bago terms dealer signature: while I have clearly stated many times it is most certainly not my most effective method, does it not work or something? Read and understand it, and you'll see an edge can be achieved. The question is more can such conditions be found? Yes, but they are rare. Everyone that is a genuine player knows I tell them to avoid primordial 1 because it has very strict rules that are hard to come by. So what do I teach players:

1. Everyone starts out with the primordials document sop they can understand what a correlation chart is, and the basic dynamics of ball ballistics.

2. Once the player has read and understood the basics, based on where they play and what is possible, they begin to learn what they'll actually apply. This can be anything from visual ballistics to custom variants. I teach virtually every advantage method there is.

Sure, you heard from Bago that custom variants dont exist. Like I would ever trust such a child with such methods. CVs are simply a combination of techniques and pattern types for a combined overall edge. There is nothing odd or magical about them - it is plain science. They are only mystical to morons that dont know any better. Kelly if you want to get involved, we can involve you too, then you can see for yourself what I've been saying.

What still amazes me is that the same idiots attacking me are praising techniques like visual ballistics and bias analysis - which are only a part, but still part of what I teach. Why do they attack me? For varied reasons. Bago, highlander and uchimata, I'm not exactly concerned that you want to start some big wild case against me. Highlander, if you are who I think you are, where we left things last, I asked to speak with you via the phone about some matters, mainly that you have a very poor understanding and I want to support you, but also about some things other members have told me about you. Uchimata, you were banned for good reason. Dont forget to tell the ACCC about your $100,000 winnings. Bago, hi - with you extensive experience, dont forget to tell the ACCC how evil and scamming advantage techniques are. Or perhaps you should realize to report someone, they actually have to have done something wrong. Specifically with you Bago, if I were at all dishonest, I would have kept your money but instead I refunded it as I didnt want to deal with such a child. It had nothing to do with your complaint, and every one of your complaints is addressed in detail at http://www.roulettewars.com/bago.html so everyone knows what an idiot you are. You think it was because of Mark's site, when now you know I could have had it shut down anytime. Let's look at Highlander, Uchimata and Bago - all three of them refused my support calls on the basis that they didnt speak english well enough. Coincidence? I dunno, what's the standard deviation on that? One player once reported me to the ACCC, and I provided the ACCC with all the information needed and the player ended up apologizing to me. Why if I were dishonest would I trade as a corporation when the ACCC has a mandate to pursue dishonest corporations? Perhaps I'm just honest, and perhaps my methods do work.

Anyway, let's stick to what counts: validating my claims about the computer will be very easy for Ronjo. There are many dvds to choose from, and on any one of them he can do the different diamond test where he'll see virtually all predictions within a 3 pocket arc, then bye-bye to false claims that my computer gives random predictions. This is not just a minor point - it is major, and it seems like Bago is still busting his butt to discredit the challenge and steer people away. That is why he publishes documents and tells people not to follow this challenge - he's afraid of looking like an incompetent moron.

As for the system, anyone with a neutral perspective like Ronjo need only have a few things explained to them for them to know the majority of methods I teach have nothing to do with dealers. Yes of course dealer signature has a lot to do with dealer signature, but I'm not talking about that. Bago just wants everyone to believe that. Dealer signature does indeed work though, but it is not the most practical or effective method - I have said this a million times.

Rest assured, everything will be covered with Ronjo - fromt he computer's different diamond test, to methods I teach that have nothing to do with dealer signature. In the end, all clowns like Bago can do is claim I'm Ronjo, which they already have.

With all the scammers out there that tell you that you can win millions against RNG spins betting on dozens with some secret bet, why do a few people want to focus on me? Gee do I claim to beat RNGs or something, or do I very clearly say to focus on the physics of real wheels? People attack me for varied reasons, and from this whole thing I have learned the more you are in the spotlight, the more people want to tear you down. Reality it is it is actually not a lot of people that attack me - it is only a few and they post a lot of messages. If you do thorough research you'll see a hell of a lot more people support me than attack me, but people tend to focus on the negatives. Many of my players are offering to give audio testimonials which address the rubbish Bago wants everyone to believe, and I just might take them up on that offer. At the very least, I'm putting Ronjo in touch with some of my players so he can speak to them for himself, and see what a clown Bago is.

Ronjo, I'll try and get out today to mail everything so we can conclude this. For every 1 moron like Bago that attacks me, there are literally about 50 others that feel the complete opposite, and support me. I specifically ask my players to avoid these discussions for numerous reasons. Whatever is being said, whatever is being done to attack me, whatever. All truth comes out eventually.
Posted by: Kelly, February 2, 2009, 2:29pm; Reply: 214
Don`t get me wrong Steve, i know what i need to know about Bago, do need to go deeper ?  I also stated that i can only judge what i have seen, i don`t really gives a rats a** what the rest of the vendors says about you, and i also don`t give a rats a** what you say about them, its a war you guys have to fight alone.

Like i said we should all be in the same boat but all those issues comes in the way. It has come to a point where i don`t really wanna discuss things on boards, not even in e mails, because some people feels they can intimidate one by displaying stuff that was meant for the receiver of the e mail  only.  Well they can, but only once and the damage is not the intimidation but the info that is suddenly public knowledge. And for what ? Hee look at me, see what i can post.   Idiots.

There are some genuine players around and i will stick to them although i have been inactive for almost 3 months now. My critic of your system is what it is, its based on the free documents only and obviously i can not and will not comment on anything else.  The critic of the system is no worse than it can be boiled down to bee too unflexible and too heavy to steer round on the wheel when played on a more modern and alive wheel with a higher spread.

Its true that the winnings can sometimes be higher despite a lower edge but a wider sector, but usually, if the edge is still there after the wider sector has been inforced, we will just get a more steady flow in the cash in/cash out stream, not more winnings. In fact, you might actually get less winning units if the sector is extended from 9 pockets to 19  The problem with the wider sector is that the loops between the higher probability sectors are also covered, which means that not only the 1/25 prob. pockets but also the 1/40 prob. pockets are covered and that cuts the edge and if the sector is wide enough, also the amount of profit units. But again, its individual from wheel to wheel.
Posted by: Steve, February 2, 2009, 3:34pm; Reply: 215
That all depends on the scatter you get. Often a 5 number arc is optimal, sometimes it is half the wheel. In most cases, it is half the wheel. As for the other stuff, again you can only judge what you have seen. Anyway the offer to participate is here, but Ronjo will see all he needs anyway and most people are aware of who he is etc.
Posted by: alarian, February 2, 2009, 9:51pm; Reply: 216
Now there's so much bla bla bla about these Bago, Forester and Mark...
Why don't you just drop it? Noone who reads this forum gives a crap about their opinions and I doubt anyone has the energy to read your constant essays about them.
I'm not trying to be a negative critic here but you're wasting your time Steve.

It seems that all this talk about ridiculous matters has also taken away the focus from what's actually worth reading in this topic.

THE TEST!

Please read my post from 30 January 2009, 2:37pm.
Posted by: Steve, February 3, 2009, 6:17am; Reply: 217
Patience Alarian, Ronjo's package is on it's way. Ronjo I suggest start with the different diamond test and put an end to this part, then we can take it from there. If I havent sent you the instructions I will today along with the parcel tracking details.
Posted by: Steve, February 3, 2009, 9:23am; Reply: 218
Ronjo, the scatter chart of the main demo I sent you is below. This is not from the tuned prediction though, it is from the raw prediction. I'll have to manually do the scatter chart from the tuned prediction, but effectiveness is clear anyway. One important thing to note is the accuracy of the computer with respect to which diamond is being hit - it is almost always correct. Anyway I'll email you more information soon. I've opted to use the simpler settings so although accuracy is not maximized, replication for you will be easier. If you do exactly what I do, you should have much the same results. But still anyway, the main point is the different diamond test, and you have plenty of spins to use. To me this challenge is more about showing everyone what incompetent morons, and plain dishonest people are out there attacking me. I have no intentions of releasing trade secrets to achieve that goal, and I dont need to anyway - that is why the different diamond test is a point to focus on.

  0:
  1: X
  2: X  X  X  X  X  X
  3: X  X
  4: X  X
  5: X  X  X
  6: X
  7: X  X  X  X
  8: X  X  X  X  X
  9: X  X  X
10: X  X
11: X  X  X
12: X
13: X
14: X  X
15: X
16:
17: X
18: X
-18:
-17:
-16:
-15: X
-14: X
-13: X
-12: X
-11: X
-10: X  X
-9: X
-8:
-7: X
-6: X  X  X
-5: X
-4: X
-3: X  X
-2: X  X  X
-1: X  X

Again this is a mk7 wheel - Huxley's current model, and it is perfectly semi-tilted so it represents about 95% of wheels out there. Predictions are quite early so there is ample time to place about 5 chips (5 numbers). The lighter teflon ball is used, not a lead sinker. Eventually I'll release the video, so everyone can see how the computer distinguishes between diamond hits etc. You can see quite frequently a horizontal diamond is hit, deflecting the ball around the wheel, so you get all the typical behavior of modern wheels. Barnett said it couldn't be done, but he can remain convinced until he sees the video for himself. Not long now.

PS - Ronjo I'll contact a few players to see if they're willing to speak to you - both system and computer players. I'm sure what they have to say will make you see clearly what fools people like Bago are. I've always said for every idiot like Bago, there are tonnes of other players that will say the complete opposite to him. Dont just take my word for it, I have every intention of arranging for you to speak with real players - both profit split partners of mine, and players that purchased from me. On this note, if any of my players reading this would like to speak to Ronjo, let me know. Ronjo will have a much better idea about me and my technology / system from people that know the difference between bias analysis and correlation charts, right Bago? For system players, I especially want whoever speaks to you to focus on the fact that just about every one of my players ignore the dealer. At most, they may stick to dealers that dont spin the wheel at warp speed. My system does not rely on dealer signature. Sure it uses such patterns if they are present and why shouldn't it. Just like custom variants use bias IF it is present. Only to the layman, someone trying to discredit me, or someone that just doesnt know any better is my system about dealer signature. If you find children like Bago credible, I am Satan himself. If you speak to "adults" that have worked with me, that have been trustworthy enough to be privy to deeper levels my non-computer prediction methods, then you will see a very different picture to what is portrayed by stooges.

To the stooges, by all means continue your desperate crusade - it's your word against people with far more integrity, plus there's a lot more of them than you.
Posted by: Steve, February 3, 2009, 10:35am; Reply: 219
Also Kelly, when you listen to what Forester and Bago have to say about my system, you are listening to people that really have no idea what they're talking about. There are so many misconceptions and idiots out there that have their own take on what my system is about. On one point about 333,666,999, it is because one of the pattern types uses multiples of 3 is all. If you had 334 spins it is no big deal at all. Forester doesnt know what he's on about. I'm not going to disclose all my secrets just to prove a point - I rightfully keep it to myself. At the end of the day what matters is many of my players are doing extremely well, and yes including players that use format 1. Things tend to not make sense when you dont have the full picture, or if you dont understand something. Anyway I'll address all the rubbish points from people like forester in time - but we're starting with the computer and different diamond test. After that, the stooges will lose quite a lot of credibility but it would still be far from over. Granted, a large part of forester's ravings are plain misunderstandings, lack of knowledge and ignorance. But he's so pigheaded to even consider that he is wrong, plus he gets his information from similar idiots like Bago so of course he wont get accurate information. What forester does is takes elemental (primordial) theory from a small fragment of my methods, then tries to attack it. Is he qualified to judge something he knows very little about? Is it "correct" to look at the paint job of a car and say yay or nay that the car will drive? Of course not but that's what he's trying to do, and he's trying to convince people he actually knows something about my methods. Will he ever admit he is really just speculating? Of course not - he wants to be right, and be seen by others as right - if forester was interested in the TRUTH, things would be very different. for one thing he would have agreed to meet me where he would be proven wrong, but instead he runs and hides lying to people saying I avoided meeting him. The clown has only ever seen a primordial doc and he gets information from people like bago, and two spanish players that were banned - I might add again I tried to speak to all three of them to support them, and all three of them refused because they didnt speak english well enough.. Well, it's not a coincidence - I always say the biggest factor in a player's success or failure is their communication with me. If I cant even get a player on the phone and need to chase them to support them, what hope do they have. As for Forester, yes we'll all see just how much he knows about my computer very soon, and the system will be addressed in time. Anyway I'm just saying hear it directly from me, not fourth-hand information and speculation. If you listen to idiots, you end up taking on their misunderstandings. If you want an answer to anything about my methods, you are best to ask myself directly. I am supremely confident though kelly if you did join Ronjo in the validations, that you will see just how format 1 can be used to beat modern wheels, with no attention being paid to the dealer. Based on your comments, it would be new information to you. I know that you have sound knowledge of roulette, but respectfully you dont know everything.
Posted by: Steve, February 3, 2009, 12:12pm; Reply: 220
Ronjo, below is scatter from tuned prediction. The chart INCLUDES the qualification spins, which are still when the computer hasnt learnt the wheel. It's not as impressive as it would be if the wheel was an older design, heavily tilted and with a lead ball, but the edge is clear. The conditions used in the video are what the "experts" like Barnett claim are impossible on modern wheels, so bare this in mind. You can verify the scatter for yourself. Despite the difficulty of the conditions, the results are still actually better than Mark's computer on his heavily tilted Monte Carlo wheel with a lead-weight ball. As for Forester's computer, it wouldnt have a chance of knowing which diamond will be hit on a mk7 wheel, and with his device, predictions are random on modern wheels, just as Barnett found too. Maybe that's why Barnett doesnt believe it - because he tested rubbish while looking to steal other people's designs, claiming it was some sort of public test. Hmm. Anyway you can see some of the major problems with forester's computer at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/comparison.htm - and Forester calls me the scammer.. Really I'm not interested in attacking the moron though - I just want to defend myself.



Again although you wont have problems replicating it, the main thing to do is the different diamond test. Upon reviewing the dvd, the ball is harder to see when it spins very fast, but the ball becomes clearly visible around about where you start your clicks anyway. Some of my clicks are terrible as you'll see, so you may even do better than I did. I'll write you an email shortly with more information.

Ronjo I know you are no fool, and if I were attempting to fool you with magnets or some form of trickery, you will see it. No doubt you will be accused of being incompetent, or even being me (as you already have). No matter what, the stooges will attack what you say if it is even remotely positive. I dont think you're the type of person to really care what they say anyway - just tell it like it is. As I said from the start, I'm not interested in what the clowns will say at the end of this all because we already know what they'll say - the truth doesnt suit them. Essentially what is about to take place is the clowns will be trapped. The truth will slap them in the face, but we know they wont change their stance. Their reaction to the obvious truth says a lot about their characters. Is there anything that will make them admit the truth? Nope. Even Mark, after I released video proof, was forced into a corner and his last resort was to claim I was actually using his computers in videos. He's changed his stories many times though. Bago and Forester are no different - cowards running from the truth because it makes them look stupid.
Posted by: Ronjo, February 3, 2009, 1:05pm; Reply: 221
Hi Steve,

I am ready and I would love to talk to your players,it will be a pleasure.And as for anyone to think that Ronjo and Steve are the same person would be ridiculous.There are plenty of reliable forum members here on RR and @ VLS who know who I am,and when the time comes I am sure they will back us up 100%.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, February 3, 2009, 2:38pm; Reply: 222
Hi Ronjo, check your email and another one coming shortly. I wouldnt worry about people accusing you of being me - it is only the stooges that say that anyway because they must. I haven't seen anyone else question your identity. Everyone at VLS knows better, and so should everyone here. And besides, you are part of a group of people that know each other. For example, you know Lanky well and have spoken to him. I'm sure there are many others that know beyond a doubt we aren't the same person. So it's not just you people will listen to, it is numerous well known and trusted members in the roulette community. This is precisely why you were one of the ideal candidates. If it were just you and you alone, then I could understand if people might question who you are. Either way at the end of at least the computer validations, I'd like to speak with you via phone and record the call.

As per my recent email, in the DVD of the MK7 wheel you need to verify the following:

1. Footage is continuous and uncut.

2. Predictions are approx 8-9 secs before the ball falls

3. Predictions are virtually instant once the button is clicked for the last time. There is no 1 second delay or such rubbish like Forester claims.

4. It is a mk7 wheel. You can tell by the diamonds and pockets mainly. NOTE: The plastic in the pockets was removed. This means the ball bounces on metal, not plastic so bounce is even greater. The zero pocket is actually blue, not green, not that it makes a difference though. The missing green made play too difficult via dvd.

5. It is a semi-tilted wheel. So there is a slight drop zone, but it's nothing like the ball hits the same diamond almost every spin.

6. Frequently the ball hits a vertical diamond, and/or clips another diamond etc, so the spins are indicative of a modern wheel.

7. The ball used is 5/8" teflon. It is the light bouncy variation, not the heavy bugger that drops straight down. This is important because the heavy variation will drop even if it hits a horizontal diamond. This is not the case with the light teflon ball because if a horizontal diamond is hit, it can easily skate to the other side of the wheel. I didnt use the 3/4" ball because it has less scatter - the bounce is more predictable. I didnt want to make it easy. Additionally a lighter ball is more affected by air pressure variations. Normally it doesnt happen so quickly, but due to melbourne's recent crazy weather, the computer needed to adjust for air pressure and ball deceleration variations at least twice I think and this was in the same hour. I mention it when it's happening in the video but it happens seamlessly anyway. Usually you dont notice it and predictions are given as normal.

8. You clearly see the computer, and the predictions on the computer's screen. The predictions are authentic and not merely voiceovers.

9. You can replicate the results achieved in the DVD and the results I achieved were not merely luck

10. Throughout the video, I show you the computer's scatter chart, and the peaks at the start of the video are in the same place at the end of the video. in other words I dont do what Mark does, which is showing raw predictions, choosing a peak then claiming that's where the edge is.

11. The scatter charts displayed above are correct.

12. Absolutely no video recorder (60FPS) is used in setting up on the wheel. The wheel is learnt exclusively from your clicks. This is important because Forester, who knows oh so much about my computer, has long claimed my computer needs to video record a spin for setup.

13. The computer is almost always correct with respect to which diamond will be hit (I forgot to add this one in the email I sent you). If you recall, Mark, who was "Vincent" on this forum, simply didnt believe it was possible. Well no, not with his junk, but my computer is a bit different.

14. The ball track has significant distortions. You can frequently hear the ball rattle, which makes ball behavior more "chaotic" and less predictable. But still predictions are accurate. I wanted you to hear the distortions which is why I used that room in the video - it echoes a lot. The room is my basement. You cant hear rattles in a real casino but it doesnt matter anyway. (I forgot to add this one in the email I sent you)

15. Most importantly: you conduct the different diamond test on multiple spins, and verify that when using the same spin, most predictions are within a 6 pocket arc after the first sample, then soon after a 3 pocket arc. If you use more clicks and become skilled at clocking, then you can comfortably start out with almost all predictions within a 3 pocket arc

Anything else you do to validate my claims is up to you. Please be very careful about what is said about the computer here - you are best to contact me directly with questions/comments while you are still getting the hang of things.

The computer in the video is the exact computer i sent you, as you can see in the scatter chart. So you can even use the computer on the dvd right away if you go into play mode. But to do the different diamond test, because my computer takes diamonds into account, you need to use different settings for the different diamond test as per my email.

Did I miss anything? And please ensure the dvd doesnt skip. Sound is NOT an indicator of whether or not a dvd skips. Bago made this mistake and was actually stupid enough to use a pc dvd player. All this and a few other things are covered in my last email, but the list of what you need to look at is here for others to see.

So it finally begins.. but it is far from over even after the above points are confirmed. After all is done, I expect there will still be doubters but I really dont care. Anyone that wants can investigate everything for themselves and decide who's been honest, and who is plain full of it.

PS - The chainsaw in the background is the neighbor cutting down trees at a bad time. He has some big trees too close to his house which is bad in bushfire season. And the thumping at the end is my wife on the floor above - she thumps 3 times when she needs help with something. I ignored her so she kept calling my phone. What a ball-breaker.
Posted by: Steve, February 3, 2009, 4:05pm; Reply: 223
PS Ronjo I'll send you another DVD but this time with the ivorine ball. Thats because it completes more revolutions and is easier to conduct the different diamond test - it's easier to see than the small teflon ball too. I'll try and send it off within the next day or so.
Posted by: Kelly, February 3, 2009, 4:09pm; Reply: 224
I try only to comment on what i read. Forester and Bago has their opinions, they don`t influence mine. You also have your opinions, they don`t influence me either. Wether Forestes device works or not i don`t know. I know one of his buyers and has seen the device, he also offered me to borrow it so i could test it, but i was really not interested. The buyer said he hadn`t been able to make it work. He was gonna get a new and impoved model and he promised to come and see me when he had bought the new BMW he was expecting to win. Well he haven`t been here yet.

All i have read is the download and the page with the 1, 2, 3 spin format. Spin format 1 didn`t make sense. In fact, you should be able to win your own contest with that method. Format 2 and 3. Well i don`t know the rules except for what is written and i gave my opinion to that on the other board.
Posted by: Ronjo, February 4, 2009, 2:05pm; Reply: 225
Hi Steve,

I have recieved the e-mails thanks,and will let you know when I receive the package.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, February 10, 2009, 8:45am; Reply: 226
UPDATE: As of the 9th Feb, Ronjo's computer is in South Africa just awaiting delivery.

Ronjo, I havent had the chance to do the extra dvd with the larger ball so it's easier to see, but still will soon. You should be fine with the dvds I sent though.
Posted by: Steve, February 18, 2009, 12:08pm; Reply: 227
Hi Ronjo, still hasnt arrived? The tracking says it's still waiting to be released, but sometimes the tracking is a bit behind. Also I need you to check the version you have in global settings. I may send you an updated computer with the latest version. It isnt a difference for demo purposes, but the later version achieves higher accuracy sooner than the version you have.

On another note, Bago is going all-out attacking me on random forums now. Bago, you can go on and on and on, but in the end the truth will catch up with you, and the others. Who knows what you'll do then, who cares, but you wont admit it because you cant bare to be seen as stupid. You should rethink calling yourself the "truth seeker" because like the others, you aren't interested in the truth because of how it makes you look.
Posted by: Steve, February 18, 2009, 3:56pm; Reply: 228
UPDATE: Ronjo I completed the new DVD with the ivorine 5/8 ball. Footage is good. Below is general information:

1. There are 100 spins.

2. Predictions are about 13 seconds before the ball falls

3. the ivorine ball is very bouncy and erratic, especially since I removed the softer plastic from the pockets, so the ball bounces on metal instead of plastic.

4. Exact number hit rate of a bit better than 1 in 20.

5. Only basic settings are used. As there are 100 spins, that's plenty to play around with the settings to see how accuracy improves.

6. The wheel is perfectly semi-tilted. The ball track has moderate distortions, and you can hear the rattle of the ball - it is quite significant. i used an "echoey" room so you can hear it better. The distortions significantly reduce accuracy. There are 3 dominant diamonds which are at 90 degree intervals. So there is one diamond, then 90 degrees across another diamond, and another diamond at another 90 degrees. Again it's a mk7 wheel, and it perfect represents 95% of wheels in modern casinos.

I'll try and ship the dvd tomorrow, but tomorrow is my call day (Thursday) so it may need to be Friday.

I deliberately didn't release anything overly sensitive in the video, so I can show it to others. If anyone wants to see it, let me know but there needs to be a reasonable level of trust - I wont just send it to anyone. Then you can have a good laugh at Bago and his claims about random predictions.

If any of forester's or mark's purchasers want to test with this footage, let me know. Their computers wouldnt have a hope of achieving such accuracy. And bare in mind I show the scatter chart at various parts throughout the demo so you know it is real, not just luck.
Posted by: Ronjo, February 19, 2009, 2:51am; Reply: 229
Hi Steve,

Yes the goods have arrived at the Durban Airport with customs and waiting to be released,the post office staff tell me this could take 2-6 weeks to to be released.I am very keen to get started.I will let you know as soon as it is released.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, February 19, 2009, 6:37am; Reply: 230
Bugger that's a long wait. It took no more than a week in customs for others. UK customs are the worst though. Keep an eye on your email for parcel tracking on another computer I'll send with updated software. It is very similar but is better for demo purposes as accuracy is higher earlier. I'll include the new dvd, plus an older one which is for tilted wheel. The tilted wheel one is for the older wheel. In both cases, very basic settings are used. Usually I do it that way so players can play around with the settings and see how accuracy is maximized.

PS - I checked and predictions are actually about 10 seconds before the ball falls. You can actually get earlier by a fair bit but in most cases you dont need to anyway.
Posted by: Anandram, February 19, 2009, 7:10am; Reply: 231
Just my tupence, UK customs normally give utmost worst case scenario. It wont take that long as chances are the Post office staff are giving a rough guestimate. Much like most staff in the UK for any company (without generalising), they tend to guess alot.
Im from the UK and i have experienced this many times.

"your parcel will be with you within 1-14 working days.", and i receive it 2 days later.
Posted by: Steve, February 23, 2009, 6:13am; Reply: 232
Bago published a web page trying to discredit me. I updated the page at http://www.roulettewars.com/bago1.html to help him. Even now mark howe is emailing people about bago's site. Doesnt this all seem desperate? I think Mark forgot to tell everyone that Bago got mark's computer for free and believes it's a scam. I think he also forgot to tell them bago doesnt know how to read a scatter chart. Anyway see the info at the bottom half of http://www.roulettewars.com/bago1.html

I really dont know what's wrong with especially people like mark and bago. Some people are extremely screwy. Anyway here's a part of the text:

======================

To the layman, Bago's claims may appear like irrefutable proof that I'm the "scammer" he claims. To understand how manipulative he is, you need to carefully review the following:

1. He showed only HALF of the video, which is about only 50 spins. Why? Because the other half has a more favorable scatter chart, and he doesn't want you to see it.


2. In the half he did show:

a. There is indeed a peak, although it is not as clear as usual. This is exactly why he chose to show only this half of the video.

b. A level wheel is used, not an easily beaten tilted wheel.

c. A very light teflon ball is used to maximize ball bounce, and make where the ball falls from the ball track more difficult to predict.

d. Only the most basic settings are used. Why? So players can see accuracy with only elemental settings, and see how more advanced settings increase accuracy. The most advanced settings can achieve exact number hit rates of better than 1 in 15, and with predictions 10+ seconds before the ball falls.


3. Bago doesn't tell you about the freely available roulette computer videos already on my site. Why? Because they are conducted over 100 spins, double the amount of spins he shows, and the scatter chart of the computer is shown throughout the demonstration. To prove it is not merely coincidence, in one of the videos, half way through the video I reset the scatter chart and continue play. The footage is uncut. Continued play shows the peaks emerge in the same place, plus in both halves the direct number hit rate is 1 in 16. That kind of proof is nearly impossible to fake which is why I do it. Of course Bago doesn't want you to see it, or the other half of the video, or the other videos which have far more spins. Bago doesn't care about the truth because it doesn't suit him.


Now let's have a look at the chart that Bago calls "random". I added the blue line and red text to the chart:



Again while keeping in mind all the points raised above, such as the wheel being level, teflon ball is used, only basic computer settings being used, and Bago choosing the video half with the least favorable scatter chart, have a good look at the chart. You will notice the ball lands significantly more closer to the actual prediction (left and right sides of the chart). Additionally, the center of the chart has fewer values, because this is on the opposite side of the predictions, and it is no coincidence. Maybe Bago doesn't understand what he published. I believe it's both his inexperience, and that he wants to attack me relentlessly without a consideration for accuracy of statements. To anyone that actually understands the data, they can see Bago publishes data that supports me.

However, when you consider points like this and what Bago does to try and discredit me, you have to wonder WHY he has to rely on manipulating people. He is fully aware of his manipulation too. I could give many examples but one of my favorites is when he attacked my roulette forum under a fake name, his fake name was "STOPMAKINGSENSE". Bago, I'm sorry if truth makes sense - you are not just attacking me, you are attacking truth, but truth wins every time, eventually.

You can freely download a larger video with much more spins (100 spins) by clicking the image below. You can clearly see the scatter chart at various parts throughout the demo. Also bare in mind in this video too, a teflon ball is used, the wheel is level, and only the most basic settings are used. Accuracy is far greater with the more advanced settings, but still you can see even the basics settings produce high accuracy:


See video: http://www.roulettecomputers.com/demomq.wmv

NOTE: You can either order a DVD or download even higher quality footage for free from the roulette computer videos page.

Bago, again you are trying to fight against truth, not just me. Truth wins every time. I'm not interested in making you look like an idiot - you do that well yourself, and then it makes you want to attack me more. The other idiot that follows the same pattern is mark howe. I could say you both need to give up and stop wasting your life - I'm not interested in attacking you clowns. The main reason you keep attacking me is because you tend to fall flat on your face, but again this is not me - it is because you are trying to attack truth. I know neither of you will stop, because of your learning disability. Nevermind.

I REALLY DONT WANT TO WASTE MORE TIME EXPLAINING MORE RUBBISH FROM THOSE GUYS. WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF NEUTRAL TESTING THAT ADDRESSES ALL THE RUBBISH CLAIMS. WE'LL FOCUS ON THAT
Posted by: Anandram, February 23, 2009, 6:23am; Reply: 233
dont these guys have anything better to do rather than call you a scammer?
Posted by: Steve, February 23, 2009, 6:27am; Reply: 234
Apparently not. You dont know half of it Anandram. What these guys do to try and harm me. Especially mark howe. Really he is a sick person. It's one thing to say that but to see everything this clown says and does is astonishing. If I published every little detail, truly it would be like a full time job. PS - Now mark calls himself "Professor Mark Anthony Howe" on his site. Not sure what else to say about this sick individual, but he used to give himself the title ESQ too. If I told everything about mark and bago, I would just waste time but people would have a better understanding that both of them literally appear to be sick, and it is not an exaggeration. Forester is not a sick person, he is just arrogant and ignorant, and doesnt want to look bad by being wrong, but he has a lot more sanity and reason that the others so there is at least some hope for working things out with forester, but I dont think his ego will let him - I already tried to work things out like men by calling him, be he acted like a dickhead.

Bago and Mark, I'll give this to you both in terms you can understand: if you are playing roulette betting on red/black and keep losing, dont go back to the ATM thinking you'll win back your losses. You are just going to lose again. What you two are doing is like going back to the ATM more and more, but each time your bets are higher and more intense, like your efforts. But the result is the same. Is it smart to just cut your losses and walk away, or keep trying harder? There is nothing either of you can do to change truth. Yes you probably both know that, but truth isnt what counts to you clowns, is it? And I've said it many times, what you do to harm people comes right back at you. Yes yes I know, it's hippie crap that isnt true. Learn for yourself.

Each time you come up with absolute rubbish, and because you lie, distort truth or whatever, your claims are so easy to debunk. Then when your lie is exposed, you try something else. You guys have attacked everything conceivable about me, including tv and carpets in photos, and even they are addressed at http://www.roulettewars.com - when will it stop? When will you idiots get a life of your own? Probably never because you want to win like a pouting child. Trust me on this my friends, you are going to harm yourselves far more than you'll harm me. I sincerely wish you all the best, I really do, but am not so sure you reciprocate.
Posted by: Ronjo, March 3, 2009, 4:30am; Reply: 235
Hi Steve,

Just an update,still no package.But Iwill let you know ASAP when it arrives.

Best regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Steve, March 3, 2009, 10:55pm; Reply: 236
No problem. I've only had problems with customs once, but that was with UK services - notoriously unreliable. It eventually got there though but there's no hurry.
Posted by: Steve, March 4, 2009, 1:00pm; Reply: 237
Bago tried to defend himself with relation to the chart. I'll make this quick, and Bago, you only made yourself look stupid again:

1. Bago claims a high point should be 8 pockets, and a low pocket should be 8 pockets. WRONG. You look at HALF of the wheel, which is 18 pockets and 18 pockets (actually one needs to be 19 pockets because there are 37 pockets). Honestly Bago you keep doing it to yourself. The only way it would be an arc other than half the wheel is with completely different settings, but bago has no idea about even the most basic settings and certainly not anything more advanced.

Let's look at the chart again. The green sector is the wheel half with the prediction, and the red area is the wheel half opposite the prediction:



Again this is only with the most basic settings, level wheel, light teflon ball etc etc and Bago says it is easy conditions? Yes he must be extremely experienced. But anyway, so WHY did Bago try and say to look at 8 pockets? Because the data would suit him in that case, and he's a manipulative child. He wants to count only the unfavorable 8 pockets in the center of the red zone, rather than a larger and two times more relevant 18 pocket arc. I'm sorry Bago.. actually no I'm not.

2. Bago says he doesnt show half the video, then he says he showed the full qualification video. Hmm ok, the video has two halves. You admitted only to showing the first half without even realizing it. As I said previously, if anyone wants to see the dvd sent to Ronjo, plus the new video I'll do soon, let me know so you can have a good laugh at Bago, before I publicly released the video eventually. Again though there at least needs to be some element of trust with whoever sees it.

3. Bago completely ignores the other videos which are twice as long, and where the scatter chart is shown on the computer throughout the video. In the video on the site, and the one he's referring to, even though only the basic settings are used, the edge is very clear. Even mark and forester aren't game enough to claim the chart is bad, because if they do they know they'll only discredit themselves. Maybe bago is stupider than first thought. Mark mass emailed people about bago's site like a desperate fool, but of course he wouldn't dare try and analyze the chart because even he knows it shows a clear edge.

Anyway Bago, sorry but it is clear you dont want to quit but anyone that looks into it can see you are either an incompetent clown trying to invalidate truth, or a manipulative child stomping his feet trying to look "right" - reality is it's a bit of both. The only way he can look right is if he hides things like the 100 spins video at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/demomq.wmv and tries to convince people to look at 8 pocket arcs instead of 18 pocket arcs. If the chart looked ideal for him using 5 pocket arcs, he'd say you need to look at 5 pocket arcs instead. He's acting like a trapped wombat in the corner, biting and biting desperately without logic - talk about desperate. If even mark isnt stupid enough to analyze the chart, what does it say about Bago?

By the way Bago, I could have your site suspended without a problem, like what happened with foresters and mark's, on numerous occasions. I just cant be bothered pursuing it, and you only make yourself look stupid in it anyway. Have a good day bago. I'm truly convinced you have mental problems, it is not just your age. You have the same kind of impulsive and wacky personality as mark, but mark still takes the cake as king clown. And please dont call me a fat pig. That really, really, reeaaallly hurts my feelings. I think I'll go cry now. Just please dont stick your finger up at me, or I'll be devastated.
Posted by: Steve, March 4, 2009, 3:46pm; Reply: 238
Hi Ronjo, check your PM with regards to speaking to one of my partners.

He's one of many more you can speak to, but I suggest we start with him and if what he has to say isnt enough, we can arrange calls with many others. Overkill? Yes. You only need to have the computer yourself anyway.
Posted by: Ronjo, March 7, 2009, 10:01pm; Reply: 239
Hi Steve,

UPDATE: I have recieved the computer today,so I will spend the next few days going through the DVD'S and will post as I go along with the testing.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Anandram, March 8, 2009, 3:04am; Reply: 240
wohoo! Let the games begin.
Posted by: Steve, March 11, 2009, 6:49am; Reply: 241
Hi Ronjo, No problem. I've been away for about a week and just got back. I've got a lot of catching up to do with emails etc but I still have to send you:

1. New dvd on mk7 wheel with ivorine ball, demonstrating diamond hit predictions on near level wheel.
2. New version (which has a few improvements but nothing majorly different from version you have - it's just mainly more practical)

But you already have everything you need to at the very least do the different diamond test. With the ivorine ball and mk7 wheel you'll get even better results because the ball deceleration is smoother. Almost all predictions within 3-6 pocket arc is even easier with the ivorine.

Regarding speaking to one of my partners, I'll detail this soon. The one I mentioned so far is eager to speak with you, and he'll specify results he's been getting in casinos.
Posted by: Steve, March 11, 2009, 7:03am; Reply: 242
There is some debate on forester's forum about bago's chart. Kelly, I agree with you that the chart doesnt have enough spins for reliable analysis. I already said that in previous posts. That's why I referred to the video which is twice as large, with 100 spins at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/demomq.wmv - keep in mind this video shows the scatter chart. After 50 spins, I reset the chart then do it again from scratch. What is the result? Peak in the same place. Wow what are the chances of that? Bago ignores it, and a whole lot of other stuff because it doesnt suit him.

@ Kelly, if you want to get involved, I'll send you about 200 spins (continuous footage) where you can compare predictions and where the ball landed, then decide for yourself who is full of it. Regardless, forester determines computer accuracy with the different diamond test, and it is so easy to do with my computer. That test will show everyone what morons bago and forester are, and put to rest their ridiculous claims that predictions are random.

Like I also said previously, neither the video at my site, or the video bago has even shows maximum accuracy. I will send Ronjo (and kelly if he wants) a DVD of about 200 spins showing maximum accuracy on the mk7 wheel). I thought I made this clear and the reasons for it, but perhaps people like forester would like to focus on what suits them. Another consideration is Bago never knew even the most basic features of my computer and he never knew how to use it. I dont doubt Ronjo will do a lot better than him.

Anyway, Ronjo I'll send you the video with the mk7 and diamond isolation, and perhaps I'll send you forester's FF since there is debate of whether or not my computer predicts better than Forester's rubbish. Ronjo would you like to test forester's FF too to confirm what I'm saying? It's up to you, but either way I think perhaps I'll at least release a video of Forester's device predicting the same 200 spins, with my clicks visible, so we all know simple truth. Bare in mind so far one of forester's purchasers have already tested against same spins my computer was tested against, on the mk7 wheel, and his results were virtually random whereas my computer demonstrated very good results. It's a pity this player wont come forward out of fear from forester, but other players of forester's will see it for themselves when the footage is released for everyone to see. Forester cant say I manipulated the video because his other players can test his computer for themselves on the spins. However, I am not interested in telling forester how he can improve his device, except to say his first mistake is not using polynomials.

@ Bago, you are just an idiot. I'll let you have your site at least for now I just dont care. Even the other players considered you a complete idiot. As for all this talk about charts, you completely ignore the chart in the video at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/demomq.wmv among other things. Anyone that actually looks into this stuff sees how you manipulate. Go for it. Just PLEASE, PLEASE, stop calling me a fat pig. It is devastating my ego and I can't live with it much longer. child. I must say though bago, I do believe you have real problems with anger - I think you have problems beyond just anger management though. You are angry because you are made to look stupid, but you yourself said to me you have "issues". As always, despite that I consider you a complete tosser, I do wish you the best Bago, seriously although feelings aren't mutual. Can i just suggest though to perhaps meditate a little. Only someone unhappy with their own life can be as aggressive as you.
Posted by: Steve, March 11, 2009, 12:37pm; Reply: 243
Ronjo, I sent you a PM about speaking with the partner. As I said he's a new partner, and has tested in casinos so can tell you more about what you are going to find for yourself. There are many others you can speak to, but the one now arranged is most appropriate. Oh hang on, didnt Mark Howe say I don't have partners? Oh that's right, Mark is just a "richard", and he doesnt want people to know they can get my computer free instead of paying for his scam.

@ Bago, I'll just correct you on something. Betting 1 number gives you the highest EDGE, but betting more numbers gives you the highest PROFIT. What matters most? Why do you think computer players aim to cover more numbers? What is more relevant - a 18 pocket arc, or an 8 pocket arc? Gee I wonder. Anyway Mr Pro, I'll let you postulate in your armchair.
Posted by: Floatinboats, March 11, 2009, 11:13pm; Reply: 244
I have been watching this thread with great interest.
Can't wait to see the results.
Posted by: Steve, March 12, 2009, 7:43am; Reply: 245
In the end, the stooges will only say Ronjo is me under a fake name. Bago already did that in anticipation of the results, yes and he calls himself the "truth seeker" - more like a stupid kid wanting everyone to believe he's a pro. Most people know Ronjo well enough to know he certainly isnt me, which is why he was chosen. Poor Bago. Well he did bring it on himself.

Anyway, Ronjo just needs the access code for the games to commence. But as per my previous post, I will be sending him a better/clearer video with the mk7 wheel. Especially when it comes to the different diamond test, results are much better with the ivorine ball as deceleration is smooth, but even with the current dvd Ronjo has, he will easily be able to see results I claim for himself.

As for Forester and Mark, well when I get around to showing videos of their device's accuracy on the same spins, they'll have a lot to explain. Or maybe they'll worm out of it by claiming I used some invisible manipulation and they'll leave it at that. There is so much I could do that would embarass the hell out of them, but really I have better things to do - I just want the truth known about my own systems/devices.

Not long now everyone.

Posted by: Floatinboats, March 12, 2009, 8:59am; Reply: 246
If you do get around to showing their devices, i think it would be great to have all 3 going at the same wheel
at once to really see the effectiveness of them all.

Then again, some will inevitably say you fixed the results somehow.

Still, it would be interesting to say the least.
Posted by: Steve, March 12, 2009, 10:24am; Reply: 247
I can hook up the same cable to all three devices, but they all will give predictions at different times and have different requirements. Forester's device needs clicking within a time window, but mark's computer can take clicks wherever as mine can, so it can be done with marks' device. It could probably be done with forester's too provided the same sample spin was used. But to do all three at the same time wouldn't be simple. I also have to consider the input of the winning number, but neither mark's or forester's computer are capable of that - with their devices you need to create a scatter chart on paper then manually adjust the computer. Covert? No.

Anyway, eventually I'll demonstrate their devices too for a public video release. Of course they'll say I cheated somehow to give poor results for their computers and positive results for my computer, but I'll show all the clicks and correct setup procedures. Anyone who has any of the devices can test for themselves and see much the same results. In public demos, mark's computer is very clearly a scam after the first few spins. With foresters FFZ the zap's impracticality is very obvious. The FFZ algorithms are too simplistic, and they are shared by the FFA. I dont have forester's FFA though but if the algorithms are the same as FFZ, I only need FFZ. Honestly everyone that has seen a comparison of the computers in person knows very clearly which device is better. Worst of all is mark's. Forester's has merit but is not anywhere near as good as he claims. This is the simple truth, but forester goes so far to call me a "scammer". I've never called forester a "scammer" because that wouldnt be accurate - the terms "dickhead", "poor product" and "exaggeration" would be though.
Posted by: Steve, March 13, 2009, 10:32am; Reply: 248
UPDATE: Ronjo just needs the code to unlock the computer. Ronjo as per my message, you need to send me the code the computer states so I can send you the unlock code.
Posted by: Anandram, March 14, 2009, 7:08am; Reply: 249
take him to the cleaners Steve - his karma is about due i think.
Posted by: Steve, March 16, 2009, 7:44am; Reply: 250
If Mark had money, I would have taken him to court already. Anyway if I wanted to harm him, I could do many other things including pursue a very strong harassment case against him and have him charged, and potentially banned from Internet access. At the moment the police just require the last of the call logs and emails, and I havent had time yet. So I just requested they shut down another of his sites for now, which they did. Despite me wanting nothing to do with this clown, he appears to still be literally obsessed with me. The public doesnt know even half of it.
Posted by: Anandram, March 16, 2009, 7:48am; Reply: 251
He probably had a dream that he would be roulette computer master, but then you crushed it and now he's pissed. Think that sounds about right.

on a more comedic note - how the frig do they ban you from internet access?
Posted by: Steve, March 16, 2009, 8:39am; Reply: 252
It's like an intervention order. If they access the telecommunications device after being banned for whatever period, they can actually go to jail because it is breaking a court order. Of course they can try an internet cafe or something, but they run a serious risk for something petty. Speaking of petty, Bago has gone all-out publishing everything he can think of because I didnt give a toss about his website. But now I'll teach him a lesson. If I wanted to play his immature games though I'd be publishing copies of his passport and photos of where he lives with mum and dad, like the big pro player he is. If I wanted to play stupid games I'd also publish photos of mark's and forester's houses. But who cares, it is just kindergarten games I dont have time for. Thing is they do and say everything conceivable, and to me that just looks DESPERATE from idiots who cling to anything possible. Really they do it with anything imaginable, and this is not even considering the rubbish they say with what is actually relevant. Anyway Bago is just getting very desperate because he knows what's around the corner. Speaking of which, I'm just about to send Ronjo the access codes for the computer.

Ronjo, did you get my email about burning downloadable footage? Perhaps I can send you some spins with the ivorine ball for the different diamond test. You will find it much easier with the other test dvd because the ivorine ball on the mk7 wheel has much smoother deceleration. The results are also better too. The focus of testing should be the different diamond tests, because that shows everyone what idiots especially forester and bago are. But I'm going to the post office today so can send you a DVD easily too, but it takes a bit longer, and I'm eager to see the stooges publish everything they can think of to divert from embarrassment.

As I said previously I'm also going to send you a newer computer, so you can more easily test accuracy of diamond hit predictions. You will see how accurately the computer determines which diamond will be hit. For the mk7 wheel, it can target diamonds. For the mk2 wheel, it can isolate to both diamond and part of diamond. I'll also send you an older dvd of predictions on the mk2 wheel where you plainly see this. If I published all this information, it would flatten the stooges, but there are more important things than embarrassing dickheads. I'll publish them publicly eventually though.
Posted by: Steve, March 16, 2009, 2:05pm; Reply: 253
UPDATE:

1. Ronjo now has the unlock code and can start testing at his leisure.

2. Ronjo is also now in contact with one of my partners. He will be given the opportunity to speak with others too.

3. Some time this week I hope to send Ronjo a new video of the mk7 wheel with ivorine ball. I've actually done quite a few videos now, but feel a new one which specifically shows accuracy of diamond hit predictions would be best. More specifically, it will not only better demonstrate accuracy of diamond hit predictions, but this also reinforces the fact that predictions are anything but random. They are only random to clowns like Bago who wouldnt know his head from his anus - no offence Bago, love you lots xx

By the way Forester, where the ball strikes the rotor is one of many factors that contribute to where the ball will land. If that's all you look at, and it's obvious it is, you're only half way there. Your computer doesn't even predict where the ball will fall off correctly. I'm not going to tell you what's wrong with your computer, but I'll release a video of it predicting the mk7. I'm in no hurry as I dont really care.

Anyway there is actually a long way to do with the testing. We haven't even touched on the system yet, but one thing at a time.
Posted by: Ronjo, March 17, 2009, 5:09am; Reply: 254
Hi Steve,

Thank you I am all set now and ready tp play,I just need to get familiar with everything after a few practices In the next few days,yes Steve I got the e-mail about downloading the footage,but I think it would be better to send a DVD.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Floatinboats, March 17, 2009, 9:22am; Reply: 255
Take your time, we will be awaiting your observations/comments. :-)
Posted by: Steve, March 17, 2009, 9:42am; Reply: 256
No problem Ronjo.

Kelly and Forester are looking at the scatter chart Bago published. While they agree there IS an advantage, they also acknowledge the edge in that particular scatter chart is weak - I've said that already, but the edge is still clear and so are the profits. But still let me remind you guys once again, Bago chose the worst possible video, and only half of it. Of course he chose the QUALIFICATION video, where the computer automatically adjusts predictions and of course takes some time to do that. But anyway like I already explained, very basic features are being used in that video, intentionally so players can see how tweaking the settings affects accuracy. I do this in almost all of the videos for numerous reasons, including that if the videos ever leak, no overly sensitive secrets are disclosed. If it's the video I'm thinking it is, also I used only 2 or 3 ball clicks. 2 or 3 ball clicks for a level wheel, when I could use up to 8 provided the ball spins fast enough? its really not hard to understand

Kelly, you dont have something to lose here, so if you want to get involved, I will send you one of the videos I'm sending Ronjo. It will show you diamond hits and near maximum accuracy, on a near level mk7 wheel - with a rather bouncy ivorine ball. Predictions will be more than early enough too.
Posted by: Steve, March 18, 2009, 8:37am; Reply: 257
Now this one is hilarious, just had to say it: have a look at bago's site. Down the very bottom is a photo of the Lilydale property with an ironing board out front. Or see below:



This would have to be from forester, as he said there was an ironing board out front when he drove to this house. After he visited, he even made a statement on his site saying it was a cheapo ironing board, and I couldnt afford better. Hmm ok, so Forester actually flew down to Melbourne, visited the property and took a photo. So he sends it to bago to be published. Now I don't know about you guys, but here's what I think... WHAT A BUNCH OF ABSOLUTE TOSSERS... UNBELIEVABLE! Desperate enough to go to this property, take a photo, kneel down so an ironing board is in the shot, then publish it on the web. Many people have told me the mere desperation of these clowns reinforces the fact that my claims and technology is genuine. Really what they do is like what you'd expect from paparazzi in Woman's Day magazine! You are not only a bunch of scared little boys defending your honor, so desperate to be seen as "right", you are pretty much stalkers without a life of your own. By now you all well and truly know the truth, but you dont want to admit it because of how stupid you will look. Too damn bad for you. Grow up, and stop putting pride before truth. The fact that you COWARDS run from the truth shows you aren't men, you are children.

You know, I have photos of all three of the stooges (yes you too mark), where they live, and many more details. I dont publish them because I just got give a sh*t. Stooges, do you want me to take a photo of my curtains, my t-shirt collection, my TVs, what else do you have an interest in? There is no better word for you people than PATHETIC.

What on Earth has any of this got to do with roulette computers and systems? NOTHING. And why? Because you guys KNOW what is just around the corner and you are shitting your pants. You have to stick to rubbish like t-shirts and TVs because that's all you think you have. Like how mark says it's a small cheap TV, yes only a $6000 bravia, and I took a photo of another tv to show what idiots you are (at http://www.roulettewars.com/markhowe2.html). BUT WHO CARES ABOUT TVS? How about the cheap furniture mark speaks of. Yes the suede electric reclining chairs, cheapo stuff. BUT AGAIN WHO CARES? I even published the ad for the Lilydale property which is one of my rental properties (http://www.roulettecomputers.com/rent.jpg) - do you want statements from the real estate agent too?? BUT WHO CARES? What else do you want me to take a photo of? It wouldnt matter would it, because all you do is twist it around to make it look negative. When it comes to RELEVANT things, you do exactly the same thing - LIE AND MANIPULATE, because the truth sure doesn't serve your purpose does it? It is no different when it comes to things like TVs or whatever. In fact you lie about ANYTHING CONCEIVABLE - you all have your not so hidden agendas - to attack me by ANY means possible. When you find out one of my addresses, you exploit it like a bunch of paparazzi, and you cannot handle it is part of my wealth: http://www.roulettecomputers.com/rent.jpg - before all this, I had not mentioned one tiny bit of my wealth - it is not my intention to brag. Absolutely incredible how desperate you guys are.

Forester, the fact that you would even bother to visit that house is bad enough, but then you take a photo of it and send it to bago. Rubbish it was taken by a neighbor and that they tell you I walk the dog etc. You make a bluff statement like that in hopes it is true, just like mark does, but you fall flat on your face when it is wrong.

Anyway, am I going to respond showing where you live with your parents Bago? Am I going to publish your photo? Nah, I just dont care about that stuff. Really what you have done is just reinforce to everyone what absolute dickheads you and forester are. You have reinforced the fact that failing your attempt to stick to what is relevant (remember your embarrassing attempts with the scatter charts?), you will attack WHATEVER you can conceive of, including but not limited to t-shirts. Honestly when this is all over, you have made it even sweeter for me. And you, well you'll be stuck with nothing but photos of ironing boards that my tenant threw out.
Posted by: Floatinboats, March 18, 2009, 9:45am; Reply: 258
Are these people stalking you or what?
Talk about creepy.
Posted by: Steve, March 18, 2009, 9:51am; Reply: 259
Boats, you dont know half of it. They are absolutely desperate. Mark is the worst though. The way things are going, I'll be able to pursue harassment cases against all three of them if I want.
Posted by: Steve, March 19, 2009, 10:08am; Reply: 260
Ronjo, I sent you a PM regarding the wheel timings. Also I did two new videos yesterday - one is with 3 dominant diamonds, and the other is with 4 dominant diamonds. The one with 4 dominant diamonds is probably better though because one of the dominant diamonds is a horizontal diamond - ie makes things harder. It's 150 spins for the second dvd, but the footage doesnt fit without compression, so I'm trying compression methods to get quality better etc. Bare with me when it comes to the videos really I'm absolutely flat out with various work.
Posted by: Steve, March 23, 2009, 6:51am; Reply: 261
UPDATE: Ronjo your DVD is ready. I'll send you two DVDs:

1. DVD 1: This is an older version of the computer being demonstrated on the mk2 wheel. You can test on it or do whatever you want. The main thing being demonstrated is how the computer can predict not only which diamond will be hit, but which part of the diamond (upper, mid or lower). In the video if I recall correctly, I set the computer to call "risk" when either the ball missed the reference diamond, or if the ball hit too far up the reference diamond. Either way, the video explains the settings being used. The newer software version will be sent on a different computer (extra computer I'm sending with the dvds) and how to determine which diamond will be hit etc will be simpler to do. There are many other versions of the software, but the latest version I'm sending is better for manually seeing what is going on for validation purposes.

2. DVD 2: This is a DVD of the mk7 wheel with ivorine ball. There are 4 dominant diamonds, which are 3 of the vertical diamonds (90 degrees apart which covers a 270 degree arc), and 1 horizontal diamonds which is hit quite frequently. This video is generally harder to get accurate predictions for which is why I chose it. Ronjo I'll send you detailed instructions on things like exactly how to set the computer for the different diamonds. Some versions will do it automatically, but these versions dont show the data you need to verify accuracy is simply not luck - it is very clear and unmistakable. When you see the data, it will be perfectly clear your positive results are due to an accurate computer. I couldnt get all 150 spins on the single dvd, so I just fit whatever I could - I think it's about 100 spins.

As for the different diamond test, you'll find it much easier with DVD 2 because of the ivorine ball etc, plus you have something like 100 spins to choose from.

Anyway so now it's just a matter of shipping it to you, and I'll let you know shipment tracking details.
Posted by: Ronjo, March 24, 2009, 3:43am; Reply: 262
Hi Steve,

Thank you I will be looking forward to recieving the new DVD'S and computer, and doing the work thats needed, still  trying to get famililar with the whole concept,but I am getting there, and things look very positve up to now.I have had a three hour chat with one of your players on Sunday, on "Skype" and the  conversation we had was very constructive.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: 1935 (Guest), March 24, 2009, 6:51am; Reply: 263
Quoted from Ronjo
Hi Steve,

Thank you I will be looking forward to recieving the new DVD'S and computer, and doing the work thats needed, still  trying to get famililar with the whole concept,but I am getting there, and things look very positve up to now.I have had a three hour chat with one of your players on Sunday, on "Skype" and the  conversation we had was very constructive.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.


Hi Ronnie - you will remember me as "Hibernian". Hope you are well mate.

I have been watching this thread with interest for ages. For the record I just want to state for everyone's benefit that Ronjo is a genuine, trustworthy guy and he is definately not Steve !

No disrespect to anyone else who was going to be involved with this test, but Ronjo is definately the best person for the job.

At long last...."LET THE GAMES BEGIN" !     

P.S I wonder how our old friend John Ager is getting on ?!?!? LOL :-D
Posted by: Steve, March 24, 2009, 9:16am; Reply: 264
No problem Ronjo. Yes there is a lot of new information to learn, and often I take that for granted because it's second nature to me. Speaking of which, after I ship I'll have to write a lengthy email explaining some things about the computer's operation and the particular version I'm sending.

I'm definitely shipping today and will be in touch soon.
Posted by: Steve, March 24, 2009, 10:44am; Reply: 265
Ronjo your parcel is on its way. I've sent you an email with tracking information etc. The email also has a lot of information to digest. If you keep it simple and initially focus on the different diamond test, the lies from morons like forester and bago will be very clear, and you can report back on this when you have done enough testing to feel confident. From the start that part was the main focus because it refutes 90% of the lies.

The direct number hit rate is roughly 1 in 20 if you look at the sector of the wheel, not just individual pockets which can be a bar with 0 height, with something like a bar of 6 height next to it - areas are far more relevant. With the suggestions about accuracy in the email, you can achieve much better results but we'll perhaps get to that in time.

@ Everyone: I've also sent Ronjo statistical data pertaining to diamond hit predictions. The mk7 wheel has 4 dominant diamonds as previously explained. This includes 3 vertical diamonds (270 degree arc) and 1 horizontal diamond to shake things up a bit. The suggested settings I sent Ronjo give predictions about 6 seconds before the ball falls, but earlier is certainly possible. Again a bouncy ivorine ball is used, the plastic is removed from the pockets which increases bounce quite a bit, the wheel doesn't have something simple like a single dominant diamond etc etc etc. The point is the wheel is not easy to beat.

If you have a neutral viewpoint on all this testing, I have no doubt what Ronjo reports will validate my claims. The only people that will state otherwise are my 3 good friends, and we all know who they are.
Posted by: 262 (Guest), March 25, 2009, 8:19pm; Reply: 266
Hi hibsboy.

Quoted Text
I have been watching this thread with interest for ages. For the record I just want to state for everyone's benefit that Ronjo is a genuine, trustworthy guy and he is definately not Steve !


I can Vouch for that as well Mate.

Quoted Text
No disrespect to anyone else who was going to be involved with this test, but Ronjo is definately the best person for the job.


No Offense taken My Friend.

I said that about Ronjo from day one Mate.

Lanky
Posted by: farnsworth3, March 26, 2009, 12:50pm; Reply: 267
If you want to get those guys off your back, there's two ways you could do it.

1. If you really want them to take you serious, explain the formula that you use to account for the deceleration of the ball on the ball track, and how you account for the rotor.

Everyone involved in computer ballistics will immediately recognize whether the formulas you use are viable.
These formulas are not trade secrets.  They are common knowledge among users.  Also, specify how many data points you enter to account for the ball deceleration.

2. Another option would be to test the results over about 1k spins to see if the predictions can perform close to three standard deviations or better.  If the not, then you could continue testing until the predicted sector of three or five rises above three standard deviations.  The min. sample test should be about 1k trials.

-Farnsworth3


Posted by: Steve, March 26, 2009, 2:24pm; Reply: 268
Farnsworth:

1. What on Earth makes you think I give a damn what they think?  To them it is not about truth, it is about harming me by any means possible.

2. There is no chance in hell I'll give them algorithms for improving their devices. No, the equations and models are not common knowledge. The only common knowledge algorithms pertain to either perfectly level, or heavily tilted wheels - regardless, they have major problems, some of which are explained at the bottom of http://www.roulettecomputers.com/comparison.htm - what do you think they would do with such information if I gave it? Use it for themselves, then attack me further. You need to understand I've already shown very clear proof, numerous times. Did it change anything? No. Their motives are to attack me. The truth doesn't interest them.

3. When you say 1k spins: If you are referring to the computers, you do not need anywhere near 1k spins to establish irrefutable proof of effectiveness. If you are referring to the system, 1k spins is not enough - Ronjo needs to see working principles, which he will. We'll deal with the computer first as it's easier.

Farnsworth, I appreciate you may be trying to help, but you really don't know what you're talking about.
Posted by: Anandram, April 3, 2009, 12:29am; Reply: 269
Whats the PP on this at the mo with respect to the system?
Posted by: Steve, April 3, 2009, 6:12am; Reply: 270
First we're doing the computer as it's simpler.
Posted by: 1935 (Guest), April 7, 2009, 6:55pm; Reply: 271
Any progress chaps ?
Posted by: Steve, April 8, 2009, 7:03am; Reply: 272
Ronjo just received the dvd with ivorine ball.
Posted by: Steve, April 9, 2009, 9:04am; Reply: 273
Ronjo, I just sent you an email with additional data. Again your focus should be the different diamond test. You should find it very easy to validate my claims about the 6 and 3 pocket arc. After that part is done, then we can look at the accuracy at which diamonds can be predicted and overall accuracy.

@ everyone: Ronjo can test for himself the accuracy of diamond hit predictions, for both the mk7 wheel and older mk2 wheel. As I said previously, on the mk7 wheel you can predict which diamond will be hit comfortably the majority of times (about 80% depending on tolerance settings), but with the mk2 wheel you can predict it even to the part of the diamond. Ronjo has a dvd showing predictions on parts of the diamonds, which will probably be released before the mk7 videos.
Posted by: mattflann, April 10, 2009, 7:18am; Reply: 274
surely everyone knows roulette is a game of chance you can never prdict where the ball lands
Posted by: Steve, April 10, 2009, 10:02am; Reply: 275
Mattflan, are you sure about that? I think this is the wrong place for you. Either that or you have a lot of learning to do, not to offend you.
Posted by: Ronjo, April 10, 2009, 5:26pm; Reply: 276
Quoted from mattflann
surely everyone knows roulette is a game of chance you can never prdict where the ball lands


Hi Steve,

Yes everything is in order and working,it wont be long and I can post some results from my findings.

@ Mattflann I have to agree with Steve, and is correct in saying that Roulette can be predicted, and that is why the casino's have to apply anti-measures with undisireable players or advantage players.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: mattflann, April 11, 2009, 11:21pm; Reply: 277
not offended i hope your right but have tried various roullete systems on line casinos which rarely work hope you can prove yours does
Posted by: Steve, April 14, 2009, 7:42am; Reply: 278
Matt, you are probably accustomed to things like red/black or other outside betting strategies, and systems designed for RNG online casinos. That's why you havent had any success.
Posted by: NormanStanleyFletcher, April 14, 2009, 9:38am; Reply: 279
I've got an open mind about this and am looking forward to seeing the results of the test.  It's not something that i've ever looked into or studied so am genuinely intrigued!  
Posted by: Anandram, April 14, 2009, 9:23pm; Reply: 280
If you look into or study it + a little bit of logic would= you not really being THAT surprised of the outcome to this. I have 100% faith this will be successful because if logically addresses all aspects of why and how.

I find it really, really funny that people find it so difficult to believe that physics (or other avenues of physics) if applied correctly can yield very near to accurate results with roulette. The obvious trick is finding that method(s). Not all the time because it would be a pain in the butt trying to figure out where it exactly lands all the time, but enough of the time to do as Steve mentions - beating the house edge and in-turn winning consistently.

Seriously, people need to start adding 1 and 1, for real.

Thats not directed at you Norman, just in general mate.
Posted by: Ronjo, April 20, 2009, 3:59am; Reply: 281
UPDATE: It won't be long now and I will have some good news by the beginning  of next week,I will keep you all updated just in case you think I have eloped.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Floatinboats, April 20, 2009, 7:10am; Reply: 282
We are on the edge of our seats. :-D
Posted by: Steve, April 20, 2009, 9:10am; Reply: 283
No problem Ronjo, thanks.

By the way, again you are being accused of being me by idiots like Forester. Bago made that claim first, but it was an obvious despereate claim they'd make. Only a few sheep on forester's forum believe him, but most importantly just about everyone else knows better. Plus there are other similarly well known and respected forum members that will vouch for your identity - this is exactly why you were a suitable candidate - reputable and well-known. I know my computer well, so I know what you will find assuming application is correct. On that note if you find my claims are inaccurate, let me know and it will be addressed. Again the main thing is the different diamond test and claims about 3 and 6 pocket arc.

I believe it is very clear both bago and forester know you are not me. But they aim to discredit you because it means discrediting me. I don't know what's wrong with forester's head but he makes stuff up in his head. One recent thing he said is that I have no partners where they get my computer for free - he says I only offer this (http://www.roulettecomputers.com/partners.html) as a desperate cry to get attention. Hmmm, but Ronjo you actually spoke to one of my partners for about an hour, and you can speak to many more upon request. Really I dont know how on Earth Forester can make such a ludicrous statement. He is either absolutely blind and ignorant, or a very calculating liar.

Anyhows, nevermind the accusations about you. We dont really care what forester's sheep believe - they are the minority. Perhaps soon enough they'll learn who's been lying to them.
Posted by: Steve, April 20, 2009, 9:42am; Reply: 284
There's a new "moron" attacking me. He claims to have bought my system and it's all a scam, that I'm evil etc etc, ie all the usual garbage. Below I've posted full details about this person and correspondence between us. This is a good example of how I develop "enemies" that want to harm me, and they try to do that by calling me nasty names like scammer even when they know it's not true. It's a lot of information but you can see how idiots like these give me the label "scammer":

The person is "Yous" on Forester's forum. See correspondence from him (Yous) below. Basically he completely flipped when I wasn't on skype the first time he tried, when he didn't even let me know he was logged on (despite clear instructions - I dont use skype unless asked, but he could have called via phone). He first attacked me on forester's forum (steve-hater forum) saying I was a scammer, that i had scammed him for $2500 and my system doesnt work, which is all nonsense. So I asked him what on earth he was on about. His excuse was he knows what he said is not true - he just wanted to get my attention. He said I may be a genius with my methods but he just wanted to get my attention. You dont just go out revealing who you are and attacking me just to get attention. OF COURSE forester professed this player's testimony of me as even more proof that I'm the scammer he claims - yes a solid testimony, just like Bago's. So he broke the contracts doing this, and I dont want morons on my team. He showed no trust at all, and the contracts exist to enforce trust which is important to maintain secrets (ip) - so I banned him. I didn't ban him from spite, but he behaved like bago so I dont want him near secrets - it is my moral and legal right to protect secrets my players rely on. Now he's on a crusade to discredit and harm me. Yes another person trying to tell everyone that advantage play is an evil scam... but only when I teach it (despite my methods being much better than traditional methods). Yous (Rana) is now saying rubbish like my methods "suck". He had the primordials document for about 2-3 weeks, which contains only an outline of what I can teach him, and some very basic ballistic methods even I advise not to use because they are very elemental. Rana had never spoken to me before and he sure never came close to anything but primordial methods.

Anyway, here's the correspondence. Another kid like Bago. It's people like this that have given me a bad reputation (red text is from Rana (Yous) and blue text is from me). Without this basic information and correspondence, OF COURSE morons like Forester will exploit it all, twist the story and try to discredit me - as usual and without any regard for the truth. If I published every little detail from every clown I've dealt with, I would really have no time for things that mattered, and most people wouldnt bother reading it anyway - they base opinions on words like "scammer". Anyway here's the correspondence:

==============

FROM RANA (YOUS): Hey, steve, your a scam!!! ur online forum of players isnt up and i waited for a long time on thursday for u to come online but u didnt, u r a fucking scam, and if u were such a good company u would obviously employ more people to atleast pick up the phone for u ! i have talked to mark howe and myrulet.come guy and the both say they can help me get my money back from u ! transfer my money back and keep your shitty system cause these guys actually talk to me on phone whenever i want, and selling their computer for half the price!! and your custom variants are just sad. cause hnestly i didnt even get a chance to look at them. please just send me back my money.

==============

TO RANA:

Rana, see below:

You said:

Hey, steve, your a scam!!! ur online forum of players isnt up and i waited for a long time on thursday for u to come online but u didnt, u r a fucking scam, and if u were such a good company u would obviously employ more people to atleast pick up the phone for u ! i have talked to mark howe and myrulet.come guy and the both say they can help me get my money back from u ! transfer my money back and keep your shitty system cause these guys actually talk to me on phone whenever i want, and selling their computer for half the price!! and your custom variants are just sad. cause hnestly i didnt even get a chance to look at them. please just send me back my money.

My response:

First let's consider you are a new player and first received initial documentation (primordials) on 23rd March. It is now 10th April, so it's been just a few weeks. During that time, I stated repeatedly that due to some kind of security setting on your computer, your emails were being blocked by my firewall. So I requested you change email addresses so we could communicate better, and ensure none of your emails were blocked. Only today it seems you finally changed email addresses.

I have looked back at our history, which isnt really much of a history. All that's happened is I sent you the primordials document, informed you about an issue with your email, had very short and vague emails, and my last email to you was:

"Then you can use vb if you want. There are many forms of VB. Confirm whether or not this is what you want to focus on."

I had not received a response.

Now once you confirmed you want to focus on bets after ball release (visual ballistics), I was going to send you two DVDs of roulette wheel footage - one for a mk2 huxley, and the other for a mk7 huxley (huxley's current model) - this is for practise when I teach you various VB techniques. The dvds and shipping are not any extra cost - it's part of the support you paid for. Typically when a new player starts, they receive the primordials document which contains some basic ballistic techniques, and an overview of the techniques that are available to you. From there, the player lets me know which technique(s) they want to focus on, then they learn from me directly. Nothing in the primordials document is overly sensitive, because I know documents eventually leak, from people like you. Some people that have "acquired" a primordials document believe it must be my system and that it's all you get for $2500, but we can let these idiots believe that. The players know better.

As for starting to teach you your prefered choice of techniques, you've shown I can't trust you with anything sensitive, so we never got that far. Like I said, my last email to you word-for-word is above. And the next thing I know, you send me an abusive and threatening email. So you can imagine my surprise when I opened my email this morning.

See below points:

1. The forum has been temporarily down because of security issues. Specifically some players have not been trustworthy - just like you. It appears to be only 1 or 2 players, but it only takes the minority to ruin it for others. After discussing it with my partners, and other players, we felt it was best to disable the forum for now until the issues with information leaks is resolved. We are not yet sure how we are going to do this, but ultimately I feel it will be as simple as only well known and trusted players will have access. Why not every forum member? Because it only takes one individual, who doesnt have integrity, to ruin it for others. I dont have tolerance for contract breaches, and neither do my partners or the more experienced players. What you have done is blatantly breach the contracts and why? Because you couldnt get me on skype, and got upset, but I'll get to that later.

2. My company has been in business since 1999 - before that, we operated under another a standard business name which was also reputable. When it comes to specifically my roulette system, I care very much about whether or not a player succeeds. You never had the chance to find that out because you flipped and showed your instability of character - you broke the contracts. I suggest you re-read the contract so you understand both of our legal obligations.

3. Regarding calling me: my primary method for contact is email, and anyone can call me via phone any thursday. Often I am flat out taking calls on thursdays. Skype is secondary to phone, and it is usually reserved for the hour or so long support calls with players, which saves the player money. Generally if you need to speak with me on skype, you need only shoot me a quick email, or call me via phone briefly to let me know to log onto skype. Unfortunately as I'm one person, I cant take multiple calls at once. None of the partners will take support calls because I'm more experienced - players want to hear from me. Other staff are either programmers, or basic admin and wont be able to help you. If you couldnt reach me and needed to schedule a call on a day other than thursday, this is easily done.

4. You state mark howe and miro zirdum say they can help get your money back - they are deluded. I'm sorry but they have nothing to do with this. Those idiots have already said and done everything conceivable to harm or discredit me - at the end of the day, they are trying to discredit my computers and systems, but they simply cannot change basic truth which is why they struggle and resort to petty lies and manipulations.

5. Good for you if you get forester's or mark's computer for half price. Then you can learn for yourself why it is at the special low, low price of half price. I have two of mark's computers, and forester's iqe6. One of Mark's and forester's computers were sent to me for free by my computer players who know what a superior computer is - after all, why keep what you dont need to use. This appears to be a source of bitterness for mark and forester, good for them. Neither of them have even seen one of my computers - at best they have third-hand distorted information. Of course they say otherwise, so you need to research the matter.

6. Regarding custom variants, you said "and your custom variants are just sad. cause honestly i didnt even get a chance to look at them". Ok so you admit you know nothing about them, then say they are "sad"? Do you even know what they are? They are a culmination of every possible technique and pattern to beat roulette. Let's put this into layman's terms for you, a very simple explanation: a format 3 custom variant would be visual ballistics, but with avoiding bets on predicted sectors that have a negative bias in a quick and practical way - this is only a very simplistic example. If you want to call that "sad", it only shows how ignorant you are about what custom variants are. You are telling me the idea of taking individual techniques that may give a 1% edge, or a 2% edge, and combining them together to give an overall 3% edge is nonsense?

Rana, I'm sorry but you have showed absolutely no integrity - you broke the contracts, and have the audacity to threaten and abuse me. Like I said, as far as I'm concerned, I was just waiting for the word to send you the practise dvds before teaching you various VB techniques. But the next thing I knew, you sent me an abusive email, attacking me and accusing me of being a "scam", and I'm left wondering and scratching my head.

I'm sorry but you have made a mistake, but I have dealt with numerous unstable morons like you, and I dont have tolerance for people that clearly show they cannot be trusted with anything. It is people like you that many people believe I'm some scammer - because you post rubbish on forums, and because you've actually purchased from me, people naturally assume you actually know what you're talking about.

From here you have two options:

1. You can continue on your current course, calling me nasty names like "scammer", posting on forums and showing no integrity.

2. You remove your public comments, make an apology and make it known you've barely had any contact with me, then call me personally to sort the issues out and develop and understanding.

If you take option 2, I will accept you as a player, but I'll just let you know now damaged trust is very hard to repair, so dont expect to be taught any of my more powerful methods for some time.

You have to understand you clearly broke the contracts. By right I shouldnt have anything further to do with you. Where we go from here is up to you, but should you send me further abusive emails or make ridiculous threats I dont respond to, you wont receive a response.


================

FROM RANA:

You know what? mark and myrulet.com guy doesnt even know anything about your system, i didnt give them any details nor did I go to any forum and post anything about you, neither did i release any details or broke any agreements. secondly i never used any foul language you did, you called me a moron all i did was a prove a point. I REPLIED TO YOUR EMAIL ABOUT VB, BUT DIDNT GET ANY REPLY, and i was searching google for cheap computers and then i came across the forum, i did all this to get your attention!!! do you really think that if i have this much money to spend on your system, im an idiot or as u say a moron? im an elite and the top class for everything, but because you dont do anything for me, i had to get your attention!, if i can afford your system, i can afford your computers, your hybrid computer and everyother computer out there in the same times, im a multi-millionare, i dont even care about the mark or any 1 else, its all about you and me, and honestly steve, im a bit disappointed, i see why you got mad at me, but you had no right to call me a moron. i agree what i did was wrong to a certain degree becasue i started calling you a scammer, which i had no right and im sorry for that but all this .... you took it to the next level. My company is 10 times bigger then yours and i run multi national offices with more then 200 staff members, so please if you really think that im stupid enough to make any mistakes, think again. What pissed me off is that i didnt get enought of your attention, and i SAY AGAIN, YOUR ATTENTION, WHICH PISSED ME OFF. cause thats what i paid for.... and i have every right to get instant response, and you should even check up on me, AS A NEW PLAYER (ACCORDING TO YOU) just to make sure things are right, you might be a genius for inventin all this, but im a better business and always remember customers come first, and you second, and i think that is one of the reasons why your on all those forums with bad names and image, if you treat your customers right, this would have never happened.

Now because we are in this together, you selling me your precious system and me buying it for a resonable amount you should consider what to do next and tell me. and even if this doesnt go anywhere i promise you that i wont ask you for a refund or release any information about your system , because even if you do go through our history the very first thing i told you was that i wanted to have fun in roulette, LOGICAL FUN, and you said to you its about money. but yeah.. lets see what happens..


======================

TO RANA:

MY RESPONSE:

1. You said: "mark and myrulet.com guy doesnt even know anything about your system, i didnt give them any details nor did I go to any forum and post anything about you, neither did i release any details or broke any agreements."

Rubbish. You have lied and shown me again why I shouldnt trust you. Word for word you said at forester's forum:

"i was stupid enough to think that it might work and I BOUGHT THE SYSTEM FOR $2500USD!!! I GOT SCAMMED, THEN I WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED, u know SH, is the best scammer, he is actually cleveer, he talks about how he would give u special charts about his so called "Custom variant", he said he has a private player forum ( that doesnt work ) and he is only available on thursdays and he is the only 1 who runs the company"

Now at forester's forum, you have had all traces to this statement removed. This includes other forum members responses to your post. You dont have authority to moderate his forum, so you have obviously asked forester to remove your posts, and all traces of it in attempt to fool me.

I addressed the issue of custom variants in my previous email - again CVs are simply a culmination of patterns for a maximum overall edge. Only someone that didnt know what they were could criticise them. Perhaps you are unaware about a year ago I had elements of my custom variant system professionally tested - patterns you would know nothing about. The report was released, and results clearly positive, but I did not agree with the final statement because it was too inconclusive irrespective of statistical analysis.

As for me being the only person that runs the company, I am the director. It is my company. I have staff such as programmers and partners, many of which are ex-casino staff, but they very rarely take support calls and if they do, it is usually only for other partners. You can call me on any weekday, provided the call is scheduled. As explained to you, the player only forum is disabled for now, because of 1 or 2 untrustworthy players. The forum will reopen again soon, but only to more experienced and trustworthy players. As explained on the contracts, forum access is a privilege, not a right - it is not part of what you purchased.

secondly i never used any foul language you did, you called me a moron all i did was a prove a point.


You called me a scammer. I dont know what point you think you proved, but to me the only point you proved is your lack of integrity.

I REPLIED TO YOUR EMAIL ABOUT VB, BUT DIDNT GET ANY REPLY

At that point I had promptly replied to every email you ever sent me. If one was not received by me, it was almost definitely the issues with your email account I had notified you about numerous times, but you chose to ignore.

, and i was searching google for cheap computers and then i came across the forum, i did all this to get your attention!!! do you really think that if i have this much money to spend on your system, im an idiot or as u say a moron? im an elite and the top class for everything, but because you dont do anything for me, i had to get your attention!

So let me get this right: You accused me of being a scammer, and said you ran to clowns like forester and howe, ALL JUST TO GET MY ATTENTION? What on earth did you think my reaction would be?

A moron can be wealthy, but you already said on forester's forum that you are a student. You had those statements removed, along with your other statements, but not before they were saved. Sorry but you quite clearly come accross as young, but irrespective I have absolutely no interest in your financial status.

if i can afford your system, i can afford your computers, your hybrid computer and everyother computer out there in the same times, im a multi-millionare, i dont even care about the mark or any 1 else, its all about you and me, and honestly steve, im a bit disappointed, i see why you got mad at me, but you had no right to call me a moron.

i agree what i did was wrong to a certain degree becasue i started calling you a scammer, which i had no right and im sorry for that but all this .... you took it to the next level.


To a certain degree? Everything you did was wrong. I did NOTHING wrong, and you attack me, posting on forums, calling me a scammer, then having the posts and all traces of it removed in the hopes I didnt see it. It is inexcusable - I dont want to deal with people like you and can you really blame me?

My company is 10 times bigger then yours and i run multi national offices with more then 200 staff members, so please if you really think that im stupid enough to make any mistakes, think again.

I doubt it, but I dont know why you'd think I care anyway.

What pissed me off is that i didnt get enought of your attention, and i SAY AGAIN, YOUR ATTENTION, WHICH PISSED ME OFF. cause thats what i paid for.... and i have every right to get instant response, and you should even check up on me, AS A NEW PLAYER (ACCORDING TO YOU) just to make sure things are right,

Refer to my previous email. I have always answered your emails promptly, despite the fact that because of the problem with your emails meant I had to manually filter through the phishing folder in my email box to check for your emails (an issue I told you about many times, but you ignored until now when it's too late). Then on your FIRST attempt to call me, barely 2 weeks after receiveing the primorials doc, you call on skype, without letting me know you will be there. You could have called via phone, or sent me an email to let me know. Then you have a tantrum and post on forester's forum claiming I'm a scammer, and send me an abusive email accusing me of being a scammer, although you said you did all that just to get my attention.

you might be a genius for inventin all this, but im a better business and always remember customers come first, and you second, and i think that is one of the reasons why your on all those forums with bad names and image, if you treat your customers right, this would have never happened.

So first I'm a scammer, and now I'm a genius. But that's right - you didnt really believe I was a scammer - you just wanted to get my attention. Irrespective you still broke the contracts, and behaved in an untrustworthy manner. Understand the core issue here is trust.

Now because we are in this together, you selling me your precious system and me buying it for a resonable amount you should consider what to do next and tell me.

In my previous email I told you what you had to do, but instead you deceptively had your rubbish statements removed without any kind of apology and explanation. I told you if trust was to be built, you would have to apologize on forester's forum and explain why you attacked me and called me a scammer. If that is embarassing or unpleasant for you, consider it is your own doing.

and even if this doesnt go anywhere i promise you that i wont ask you for a refund or release any information about your system , because even if you do go through our history the very first thing i told you was that i wanted to have fun in roulette, LOGICAL FUN, and you said to you its about money. but yeah.. lets see what happens..

Yousuf, you have even attacked my blackjack computer on forester's forum. Forester of course attacked it too. You are fast becoming one of forester's forum sheep. As for forester, that idiot attacks everything conceivable about me - I couldnt care less about him and just want him to stick to his own life. You dont know the type of arrogant, malicious and dishonest person he is. Regarding my technology, he hasnt even seen my standard computer, and certainly not my microprocessor computers and hybrids. Neither you or forester know the first thing about my blackjack computers. Idiots like forester attack everything conceivable about me out of spite and jealousy, and some idiots believe him. It doest help with people like you that attack me for ridiculous reasons. Shuffle analysis is not new, and neither is card counting. The culmination of each of the methods for a combined overall edge is the same concept of custom variants.

At this point, you dont have anything sensitive about my system. You only have an introductory document (primordials), and I give it free to many people before they become players. It only has basic techniques that are very rarely used, and only the basics of various techniques (more like an outline) like bias analysis and vb are explained in it. Even forester has a copy, albeit much older, but he wants people to think it's everything to harm me. Like I said previously, you learn the techniques you use directly from me. You learn more over time as our relationship and trust develops. It will always be done this way because few people are trustworthy. As a result, nothing overly sensitive has ever leaked.

Looking at basic facts:

1. You clearly breached the contracts. Read the contracts to understand your entitlements.

2. You attacked me publicly, then deceptively had the comments removed, and all traces of it. However you did forget the blackjack thread on forester's forum, where he refers to you being "scammed" by me. Did you rectify the situation by telling Forester your attacks against me were not about what you believed? ie - they were just to get my attention. No you didnt. It seems clear you were just upset that you couldnt reach me the very first time you tried calling me on skype, when you could have just used a regular phone. Even http://www.genuinewinner.com/contact.html clearly says skype calls must be scheduled so I know to log on and take your call.

In my eyes you basically flipped over the smallest thing, then like an unstable and unpredictable child you go on a rampage sending me abusive emails, accusing me of being a scammer, and posting such claims on forester's forum. People like you are why some of the public believe I'm a "scammer". You broke the contracts, lied to me about posts on forester's forum, showed lack of integrity and trustworthiness. Now consider many of my players use my system to earn a living, literally some to support their families, and they rely on me to keep intimate parts of my system out of the hands of people like you, you tell me what you expect me to do. You must respect what the system means to many people. My teams use computers, so breaches for the system dont harm me directly.

PS - By all means buy forester's computer. Dont buy the zapper though, you will completely waste your money - you are better off with vb, but dont use forester's vb unless you can magically hover on top of the wheel and see the ball and all numbers 100% of the time. VB needs to be practical, and in a real casino environment you see only part of the wheel. His FFA has more merit, but dont expect it to beat modern wheels. Forester's algorithms were professionally tested by Mike Barnett, and even he said results were close to random. I found the same on my mk7 wheel, which I knew would be the case because of his device's shortcomings. I suggest you have a good read of http://www.roulettecomputers.com/comparison.htm for an explanation of why - especially the bottom. One day forester will rip up his computer and start from scratch when he realizes why microprocessors arent good enough. Thats why I dont develop microprocessor versions anymore. But it's all he knows to program which is why he sticks to them. Microprocessor computers are cheaper to develop, but if they were better, that's what I'd use for my standard computers. The hybrid uses many different microprocessors but not in the same way forester uses them. I'm not trying to sell you anything, I would not permit you to buy a computer anyway - I dont want anything to do with you.

Although you did apologize and admit your error, you did not do anything to rectify things. You did not publicly apologize, and you lied to me further about your posts. By right I should tell you where to go, but I WANT to give you another chance because I do want to help people. But you must also understand I owe it to other players to not have people like you on our team. Trustworthy people dont do what you just did, and in all honesty I would never feel comfortable trusting you with anything beyond the primordials.

In the end, what matters here is you clearly broke the contracts, you have lied to me further, you have not rectified the situation, and you have done and said numerous things that clearly show it is not wise to trust you. In this business especially, trust is essential, and I dont trust you, for good reason. Dont take it personally, but realistically it is unwise to deal with you further, so you can consider our relationship terminated.


================

Forester's version of all this is that I banned him for calling me a scammer, refuse his refund and tease him saying "well I was just about to give you something better". You're an idiot forester. The DVDs for VB are given to players who want to learn VB. It is typical of your ignorance, but then again you twist anything to negative anyway.
Posted by: Anandram, April 20, 2009, 9:52pm; Reply: 285
LMFAO - sorrry steve, its funny because it so ridiculous.

This guy is an idiot, and you can tell that by his emails. Jesus.

I feel sorry for you man... :) Having to deal with this shite, i admire your integrity actually saying that he could continue to be a player if he apologised etc, i would have told him to go fish.

Ban that clown.

This guy claims to be a multi-millionaire? Yes i too would be in a forum and also looking up roulette computers if i had that wealth /sarcasm.

Id love if he came here so i could ask him some questions, id have a field day with this guy. :)

I conclude that his main point was that he couldnt get in touch with you, with that i sympathize, because i too would be eager, and would feel i paid for your support as the bulk of the purchase, but he should understand that your busy, and that you answered his emails anyway!

Good luck with this...(i like how you put his name in red "danger") :)
Posted by: Floatinboats, April 20, 2009, 11:38pm; Reply: 286
wow....just....wow.
Posted by: Steve, April 21, 2009, 7:54am; Reply: 287
If you think he is bad, Bago is actually MUCH worse to the point I consider him to be borderline sick (http://www.roulettewars.com/bago.html). Bago is just on a rampage to discredit me but he has to lie, twist info and manipulate like the others. Last time he published that scatter chart and made a fool of himself because he actually proved effectiveness, so then he got mad and published a photo of my tenant's ironing board. Bago has tripped over himself many times and as a kid, he just tries harder to discredit me. In total there is around 5 people like this I have dealt with. Forester and Mark of course exploit people like this any possible way, because if they focused on anything accurate or relevant, the story would be very different. Oh the joys of dealing in this industry.
Posted by: Anandram, April 22, 2009, 12:59am; Reply: 288
THink your about to have a 6th person on that list.
Posted by: Tomas, April 22, 2009, 8:34am; Reply: 289
Quoted from Steve

My company is 10 times bigger then yours and i run multi national offices with more then 200 staff members, so please if you really think that im stupid enough to make any mistakes, think again.



I guess he meant to say his Dad's company...


And for the mistake-part: A 'hero' of mine, Anders Wall, a very successful businessman in Sweden, who was actually kicked out of a very fine business-school for cheating once said: "I make 50% mistakes, just like everyone else, but when someone less successful tries 50 times, I try 500. That's the only difference."



I'm afraid Ananananadram is right...
Posted by: Anandram, April 22, 2009, 8:46am; Reply: 290
Quoted from Tomas



I guess he meant to say his Dad's company...


And for the mistake-part: A 'hero' of mine, Anders Wall, a very successful businessman in Sweden, who was actually kicked out of a very fine business-school for cheating once said: "I make 50% mistakes, just like everyone else, but when someone less successful tries 50 times, I try 500. That's the only difference."



I'm afraid Ananananadram is right...


dont be afraid....
Posted by: Tomas, April 22, 2009, 10:52pm; Reply: 291
Quoted from Anandram


dont be afraid....



OK, I won't. Phew!
Close call!

Posted by: Steve, April 23, 2009, 9:06pm; Reply: 292
See, Tomas is EVIL. Look at those horns. I knew it all along. All those Swedish people are evil.
Posted by: Anandram, April 23, 2009, 10:36pm; Reply: 293
lol - easy Steve! That's borderline discrimination  - lol   :)

I think you should moderate yourself for that comment.


(im joking please dont ban me)
Posted by: Tomas, April 24, 2009, 12:15am; Reply: 294
Anandram: you are a moderator.. you are untouchable... :) You can say what you want. Freeeedoooooooom!


Steve: Yep, evil as hell.. and what they say about swedish women is true too...  
=o)
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 1:36am; Reply: 295
Quoted from Tomas
Anandram: you are a moderator.. you are untouchable... :) You can say what you want. Freeeedoooooooom!


Steve: Yep, evil as hell.. and what they say about swedish women is true too...  
=o)


Thats the devil inside you talking! *holds cross out at you* - although im not christian but whatever.
Posted by: mattflann, April 24, 2009, 5:54am; Reply: 296
has anyone heard of a guy called john ager or seen his system
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 6:28am; Reply: 297
Im pretty sure that has been discussed somewhere here before matt, i forget where though - maybe search the forum?
Posted by: hibernian, April 24, 2009, 7:02am; Reply: 298
Quoted from Anandram
Im pretty sure that has been discussed somewhere here before matt, i forget where though - maybe search the forum?


A couple of years back John Ager was being discussed on this forum in almost every thread !

Steve knows all about him and will be able to give the low down.....steer well clear would be my advice to you.

I sent Ronjo a couple of John Ager's systems a couple of years back, so he knows all about him too.

To change the subject - IS THERE ANY PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE RONJO TESTING CHAPS ???????  
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 7:13am; Reply: 299
^ this guy stole my pig! Think i might have to accidently remove you!  :)
Posted by: hibernian, April 24, 2009, 7:20am; Reply: 300
Quoted from Anandram
^ this guy stole my pig! Think i might have to accidently remove you!  :)


Tee Hee !

No, actually I have been using the Pig for a while, I have just been quite quiet of late.......so it was actually you who stole MY pig young man !!!!! ;-D
Posted by: Steve, April 24, 2009, 7:24am; Reply: 301
I heard John Ager loves me. In all seriousness, every system I've seen of his is rubbish and numerous people have complained to me about him.
Posted by: hibernian, April 24, 2009, 7:26am; Reply: 302
Quoted from Steve
I heard John Ager loves me. In all seriousness, every system I've seen of his is rubbish and numerous people have complained to me about him.


Don't think you will be top of Mr Ager's Christmas Card list !!!!!
Posted by: Steve, April 24, 2009, 7:32am; Reply: 303
The last I heard from Ronjo is he's testing and will reveal his results soon - by the beginning of next week. I'm not going to pressure ronjo to do anything by a specific time though - there really is a lot of information for him to get his head around. Speaking of which, forester recently said the time ronjo has taken and the fact that I sent ronjo a second computer is "suspicious". Yes forester turns everything negative. Anyway ronjo could have done the most important test with the other computer (different diamond test), but the new version would also make it easier for him to test accuracy of diamond hits - that was so he could verify my claim about my computer being able to predict which diamond will be hit on just about any wheel, but on some wheels you can predict both diamond and part of diamond. So he has a version that is more appropriate for testing. I even sent him a dvd of predicting parts of diamonds so he can test for himself. Yes yes if you believe what forester says, it must all be some kind of scam because he says mobile phones cant be more accurate than his microprocessor thing (ignorance), and me and ronjo are probably lovers. Forester needs to understand I have pure microprocessor computers - they cost me $500 to develop with technician fees and parts. The mobile phones cost me $1000 with technician fees and parts. So why on earth do I use phones? anyway enough of that - let's stick to what counts - the test.

To do the different diamond test and validate my claims about the 3 and 6 pocket arc is simple, but some of the other things is quite time consuming. The different diamond test though addresses like 90%+ of the false claims about me and my standard computer. Forester doesnt believe mobile phones can achieve accurate timings, which is his own ignorance, but he'll know himself soon enough without rubbish information from people like bago. This different diamond test can be done in minutes. But testing to see accuracy of diamond hits and doing tests to determine overall accuracy with different settings can take a while.

There is still a lot going on in the background, like for example ronjo spoke to one of my partners for about an hour.
Posted by: hibernian, April 24, 2009, 7:43am; Reply: 304
Quoted from Steve
The last I heard from Ronjo is he's testing and will reveal his results soon - by the beginning of next week. I'm not going to pressure ronjo to do anything by a specific time though - there really is a lot of information for him to get his head around. Speaking of which, forester recently said the time ronjo has taken and the fact that I sent ronjo a second computer is "suspicious". Yes forester turns everything negative. Anyway ronjo could have done the most important test with the other computer (different diamond test), but the new version would also make it easier for him to test accuracy of diamond hits - that was so he could verify my claim about my computer being able to predict which diamond will be hit on just about any wheel, but on some wheels you can predict both diamond and part of diamond. So he has a version that is more appropriate for testing. I even sent him a dvd of predicting parts of diamonds so he can test for himself. Yes yes if you believe what forester says, it must all be some kind of scam and me and ronjo are probably lovers.

To do the different diamond test and validate my claims about the 3 and 6 pocket arc is simple, but some of the other things is quite time consuming. The different diamond test though addresses like 90%+ of the false claims about me and my standard computer. Forester doesnt believe mobile phones can achieve accurate timings, which is his own ignorance, but he'll know himself soon enough without rubbish information from people like bago. This different diamond test can be done in minutes. But testing to see accuracy of diamond hits and doing tests to determine overall accuracy with different settings can take a while.

There is still a lot going on in the background, like for example ronjo spoke to one of my partners for about an hour.


OK Steve, thanks for the update. I am looking forward to hearing what Ronjo has to say.

For the record, I have stated previously and will state again - Ronjo is NOT Steve and he can be trusted.  
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 7:54am; Reply: 305
^ i dont believe you because you theive pigs for a living :)
Posted by: Steve, April 24, 2009, 8:13am; Reply: 306
Quoted Text
For the record, I have stated previously and will state again - Ronjo is NOT Steve and he can be trusted.


Try saying that over at Forester's forum and you'll have attackers from every angle. At first they all said Ronjo was me, and now they are saying it is his testimony against several others.. yes people like bago, and "yous" as explained in my last thread, not to mention forester who was embarrassed when bago proved he didnt even have my computer, oh the list goes on, real credible people.
Posted by: Steve, April 24, 2009, 8:13am; Reply: 307
Anandram, we'll sort out the pig thing. I understand you are distressed.
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 8:17am; Reply: 308
Nah thats cool *wipes tears away* - i understand. *sniff*
Posted by: Steve, April 24, 2009, 8:38am; Reply: 309
Alternatively you can use:



He's faster.
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 8:48am; Reply: 310
Nah im not that fussed...haha.

I got the natural evolution of pigs going on here - from wings to rocketpacks! He's defo coming with us to Utopia!

meh - i scoof in the face of any winged creature...
Posted by: Steve, April 24, 2009, 9:31am; Reply: 311
How long would BACON last on an island, especially with us violent bloodthirsty chainsaw machine-gun wielding people?
Posted by: Anandram, April 24, 2009, 9:38am; Reply: 312
Well id hope with a new mindset and utopia - it would too bring civilised people (minus chainsaw bayonets), PLUS you cant touch this bacon man, dude has a rocketpack remember?

Thats another point actually re the utopia thing - i guess you could argue that no matter what type of utopia people live in, the fact of the matter is - it is still going to be man that inhabits that space. AND as we know, it is MAN that is the fundamental issue here. My point is- im sure we'd fcuk it up soon enough....Man would find a way to find the smallest gap of imperfection and be an opportunist.

Suppose i should take this to the other thread really..lol. Im also not sure how bacon and utopia correlates in my mind but whatever :)
Posted by: hibernian, April 25, 2009, 2:45am; Reply: 313
Love the Rocket propelled Pig !

Posted by: hibernian, April 25, 2009, 2:48am; Reply: 314
Quoted from Steve


Try saying that over at Forester's forum and you'll have attackers from every angle. At first they all said Ronjo was me, and now they are saying it is his testimony against several others.. yes people like bago, and "yous" as explained in my last thread, not to mention forester who was embarrassed when bago proved he didnt even have my computer, oh the list goes on, real credible people.


Well as a completely neutral person I know 100% that yourself and Ronjo are different people....simple as.  

If anyone comes on here and disputes that then they will have me to answer to !!!!! (Keyboard hardman talk!)
Posted by: Anandram, April 25, 2009, 2:57am; Reply: 315
shay ello 2 my rocket pack myan.... (scarface)  :)
Posted by: Tomas, April 25, 2009, 6:07am; Reply: 316
Quoted from Steve
Alternatively you can use:



He's faster.



That's suitable, cause I heard from Anandram's girlfriend that he is 'the fastest one in town'...


Posted by: mattflann, April 25, 2009, 8:19am; Reply: 317
ya does it work
Posted by: Anandram, April 25, 2009, 10:17am; Reply: 318
Quoted from Tomas



That's suitable, cause I heard from Anandram's girlfriend that he is 'the fastest one in town'...




ha! The devil/bill clinton has a sense of humour! Your boyfriend told me you love scooping poop. :)
Posted by: Tomas, April 25, 2009, 11:46am; Reply: 319
Quoted from Anandram


ha! The devil/bill clinton has a sense of humour! Your boyfriend told me you love scooping poop. :)


The Devil is fine... Not too happy about the BC, though... Not that there's a huge difference.

And don't tell my girlfriend about my boyfriend... =o)
Or my wife about my fiancee...
Busy busy....


Posted by: Anandram, April 25, 2009, 11:54pm; Reply: 320
Quoted from Tomas


The Devil is fine... Not too happy about the BC, though... Not that there's a huge difference.

And don't tell my girlfriend about my boyfriend... =o)
Or my wife about my fiancee...
Busy busy....




Already told them both - both of them didnt care. :)
Posted by: Tomas, April 26, 2009, 12:41am; Reply: 321
Then I'm free!
*does Smeagol 'freedom dance'*
Posted by: Anandram, April 26, 2009, 4:34am; Reply: 322
lol.
Posted by: mattflann, April 27, 2009, 4:26am; Reply: 323
has anyone heard of the leveller ststem google it to see if it works
Posted by: Tomas, April 27, 2009, 5:25am; Reply: 324
Quoted from mattflann
has anyone heard of the leveller ststem google it to see if it works



Yes, I have a copy of it on my work-computer (don't ask).

Don't think it is any better than anything else, though.
(Unless there happen be more than 1 leveller system.)

Send me a PM and I'll share it.

Posted by: Steve, April 28, 2009, 12:04pm; Reply: 325
Update: Ronjo still hasnt got back to me but I'm in no hurry.

In matters related to the attacks against me, forester is in for an abrupt awakening. I tried to be civil with him when I called him man to man, but no dice - he was very rude, pigheaded and unwilling to listen to reason. Forester I'm sorry but what is about to happen is just the start. I never called you a "scammer" for your computer's shortcomings, only a liar for what you have spread about me, and my claims are accurate and easily proven. I am not interested in discrediting forester or his device. He says I published a negative review about his device as revenge for what he was saying about me. the truth of the matter is:

At roulettesystemreviews.com I published a review of Forester's computer, which was reasonably positive - the review was NOT based on me having his computer. It was based solely on the concept of visual ballistics being a valid principle. The review clearly stated this, and that at the time, I didnt even have his computer. Then I was sent his latest computer for free by an unhappy purchaser, and I found what nonsense it was. For a year or so, I didn't care about updating the review on roulettesystemreviews.com because I had better things to do - if I really wanted to harm Forester, or if I was concerned about him being a "competitor", I would have immediately updated the review. Only when Forester started making false claims about my computer, I decided to update the review and reveal the truth about his computer. Forester wants people to believe I changed the review from positive to negative as if I wanted to lie for revenge. The reality is his lies about my computer encouraged me to reveal what I knew about his computer, since the initial review when I had never even seen it. If Forester had not been lying about me when I wanted nothing to do with him, the older review would probably still be on roulettesystemreviews.com.

Anyway, details will be revealed soon.
Posted by: Steve, April 30, 2009, 4:13pm; Reply: 326
Forester likes to make a big deal about things and twist things to look bad. Here's yet another example. Recently he found an ad for my computer on ebay - now forester publishes the ebay ad on his site like a rash - he's so happy about it because it's another opportunity to twist things. He makes out it is another person I scammed or something. The truth? It is from a player that is happy with the computer, knows it does what I say etc, but he lives in the USA and recently ran into financial trouble and cant afford to travel overseas to play, so he is selling assets. You can see the DVD has NTSC on it in the image, which is the USA DVD format. Computers are not legal in the USA. Maybe forester forgets people sell his FFA too, not to mention send me his computer for free because they had my computer which is better.

Anyway Forester, any day now... and you'll see the justice that has finally been done, and no I'm not talking about this public test. No doubt you'll be pissed off, but like I said I never wanted to hurt you, and I tried to be civil, but you wanted to act like a moron. Blame yourself alone. Wish I could say more but hey, patience.

PS - Forester when you finally realize what has occurred, remember it is just the start. and I wouldnt be able to do all that if I was the scammer you claim I am, and if you hadnt done it to yourself. Although part of me wants to say to you "f*** you, you did it yourself", sincerely I never wanted to harm you and wish it had never come to this. I really did try to be civil with you and show you how wrong you were, but you were too pigheaded and ignorant.. or maybe you just never gave a sh*t about the truth in the first place.
Posted by: Anandram, April 30, 2009, 7:32pm; Reply: 327
Are people allowed to sell on your computers if they bought it Steve?
Posted by: Steve, May 1, 2009, 7:23am; Reply: 328
Only if they have permission first, and the buyer needs to sign required contracts. There's no point in selling it without permission because you need access codes.
Posted by: Steve, May 1, 2009, 1:46pm; Reply: 329
I'm going to get more players to do phone interview testimonials in time, but here's another for now:
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial8EIFrance.wma

Ronjo as you know I also wanted to record a call with you too at the right time. If all players were just permitted to speak openly, it would be very obvious I'm far from the scammer morons paint me to be, but it comes at a price of leaked secrets. I mostly want people to know the truth about all this business with the stooges, but I can't just openly release everything as then it affects all players.
Posted by: Anandram, May 1, 2009, 9:47pm; Reply: 330
Quoted from Steve
I'm going to get more players to do phone interview testimonials in time, but here's another for now:
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial8EIFrance.wma

Ronjo as you know I also wanted to record a call with you too at the right time. If all players were just permitted to speak openly, it would be very obvious I'm far from the scammer morons paint me to be, but it comes at a price of leaked secrets. I mostly want people to know the truth about all this business with the stooges, but I can't just openly release everything as then it affects all players.


5Gs in 2 months? Thats good stuff man.

This is the system he is on about correct?
Posted by: Tomas, May 2, 2009, 8:39am; Reply: 331
I actually read through this entire thread now... Man, I haven't had so much fun since we searched for grandma in the wrong lake...

Does anyone take the stooges seriously? Well, I guess there are people feeling that Lada is a better car than Porsche, so anything is possible... but still...
Posted by: Anandram, May 2, 2009, 9:11pm; Reply: 332
Quoted from Tomas
I actually read through this entire thread now... Man, I haven't had so much fun since we searched for grandma in the wrong lake...

Does anyone take the stooges seriously? Well, I guess there are people feeling that Lada is a better car than Porsche, so anything is possible... but still...


With my time here i find its more so people that dont research - they take things for complete face value, which to me is a little off.

Good one about your grandma...you find her in the end? :)
Posted by: Tomas, May 2, 2009, 10:26pm; Reply: 333
Quoted from Anandram


With my time here i find its more so people that dont research - they take things for complete face value, which to me is a little off.

Good one about your grandma...you find her in the end? :)



With an investment like this, it is weird that ppl just throw money in any direction. Then again.... one should never be surprised.

Yep, she was on the golfcourse like she always is...
=o)
Posted by: Anandram, May 2, 2009, 11:36pm; Reply: 334
Quoted from Tomas



With an investment like this, it is weird that ppl just throw money in any direction. Then again.... one should never be surprised.

Yep, she was on the golfcourse like she always is...
=o)


Some people have more money than brains, which begs the question, if they had no brains how'd they get so much money??

I may have just contradicted myself...  :oO
Posted by: Steve, May 4, 2009, 6:51am; Reply: 335
Yes they certainly are morons. By the way, forester is accusing anandram and poit of being me. That guy is such an idiot. There is so much I could say but anyway he's outta here in a day or so now anyway. Watch out tomas or you'll share the same fate too. One of us, one of us,.. I mean one of me, one of me.

Forester's clowns patrol this forum, and some believe his lies but soon they'll know he has been lying to them. They wont admit they've been "stooged" because it'll make them look stupid, much like forester has no interest in the truth and wouldnt ever dare admitting being wrong because of how it'll look. Forester and his sheep are without a doubt the most ignorant people I've ever known, not to mention forester you have absolutely no intention of ever admitting you have been lying, because of how it will make you look, and because to you it is about putting me down coz you dont like me. Too bad, act like an adult. Beyond calling you a liar for things you have said about me, I never attacked you.

PS - This week forester, finally some justice.

Just a few points for forester's goons:

1. An auction listed price is not the reserve price

2. It costs money to travel to the other side of the world, including airfares, accommodation etc.

3. Forester has been lying to you. He speaks of players of mine, but lies about what they say. I even asked him repeatedly on the phone to check with the players themselves, but he refused. One of them even wrote a positive review about my computer, and forester says I just fabricated it. Why do you think that is? He refuses anything that would prove he has been lying, such as a meeting - any excuse to avoid it. Why do you think that is? Were you really born yesterday? Forester relies on the word of people like Yous and Bago. When you have about 600 players, a few are bound to be like them. I have dealt with a lot more people than "just a few" unlike forester, yet still one of them sent me his computer for free, and I've been offered others but I dont want them. I've posted the history of Yous, and any idiot would know he did it to himself. As for Bago, he is an incompetent moron, but would never admit that - it was easier for him to attack me. Forester just uses whatever negative information he has to manipulate you. When it comes to people that speak positively about me, he accuses them of being me or being paid. My oh my you all have a lot to learn.

4. If I were to permit all players speaking openly about me and my technology, the truth would be incredibly obvious, and forester would claim I had lots of paid actors. But for reasons already explained, I ask players to keep to the contracts, and stay out of it. It is not their war to fight. They know better, and you people do not see or know the amount of support. I know some of you are in Melbourne, and soon I'm having another public demo, and you can attend yourself and see the simple truth. Or maybe you will avoid it. I suggest you do attend, if you are interested in the truth. I'm not going to ridicule you, just show you so you know who has been lying to you.

5. Some of you are convinced by forester, and some may still be on the fence. If you have an open mind to the truth, the above isnt intended for you. The truth will be very obvious if you care to do thorough research though.
Posted by: Tomas, May 4, 2009, 7:35am; Reply: 336
Me, myself and I, eh?
Could I be recognized as you?

Cool, if that meant I'd be recognized as an roulette-expert...

Recognition at last! \o/




Anyway, Anananananadram is surely Steve... otherwise he wouldn't be singing "All of me" all the time.
;)
Posted by: Steve, May 4, 2009, 7:41am; Reply: 337
Tomas you have the first requirement to be me - you are evil. You have horns, you must be. Anandram and Poit are equally as evil - their avatars dont show it though.
Posted by: Anandram, May 4, 2009, 8:38am; Reply: 338
Quoted from Tomas
Me, myself and I, eh?
Could I be recognized as you?

Cool, if that meant I'd be recognized as an roulette-expert...

Recognition at last! \o/




Anyway, Anananananadram is surely Steve... otherwise he wouldn't be singing "All of me" all the time.
;)


What the hell you talking about mr clinton?lol  :)

Wow steve- the most annoying part i guess is that YOU yourself know the truth, and if everyone here and everywhere knew what you knew, it would be obvious. Its annoying when you know that something that someone is saying is soooooooo off the mark.

The guy is a clown (this forest guy or whatever his name is)...those that "follow" him are eqaully stupid for not opening their eyes.

I guess at the end of the day genuine people recognise genuine people.

Posted by: Anandram, May 4, 2009, 8:39am; Reply: 339
Quoted from Steve
Tomas you have the first requirement to be me - you are evil. You have horns, you must be. Anandram and Poit are equally as evil - their avatars dont show it though.


Not sure you can get more evil than a rocket propelled pig...
Posted by: Tomas, May 4, 2009, 8:49pm; Reply: 340
Quoted from Anandram


Not sure you can get more evil than a rocket propelled pig...



Hmm... me neither... are you out fighting vegetarians?
"Quick, Baconman, to the Porkmobile!"

Posted by: Anandram, May 4, 2009, 9:11pm; Reply: 341
Quoted from Tomas



Hmm... me neither... are you out fighting vegetarians?
"Quick, Baconman, to the Porkmobile!"



Acutally its called a baconmobile..
Posted by: Tomas, May 5, 2009, 12:04am; Reply: 342
Quoted from Anandram


Acutally its called a baconmobile..


Porkman with sidekick Lardboy?

Which brings me to Steve Lynch's Superhero...
Me? I'm Justice Guy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKhl6--cmIQ
Posted by: Anandram, May 5, 2009, 1:24am; Reply: 343
Quoted from Tomas


Porkman with sidekick Lardboy?

Which brings me to Steve Lynch's Superhero...
Me? I'm Justice Guy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKhl6--cmIQ


indeed - their superpowers are more long term though...the aim is clogging up arteries and such... :oO - so even when you kill them and eat them, they are really killing you...*cue mysterious music*
Posted by: Steve, May 5, 2009, 8:33am; Reply: 344
Does anyone know how to broadcast video footage live on a website so anyone can see it? I'll plan a public demo via webcam. That way more people can see for themselves, without needing to physically visit me.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 5, 2009, 8:36am; Reply: 345
That's a cool idea, wish i knew...
Posted by: Steve, May 5, 2009, 8:41am; Reply: 346
Of course some people will still say I cheated or something or that footage wasnt live, so I'll show something like a newspaper front page so the date is clear. Gee the things I do to show I'm honest.. But as always I'm only interested in what the reasonable people believe, not people that are set on attacking me for whatever reasons.
Posted by: Anandram, May 5, 2009, 9:28am; Reply: 347
Quoted from Steve
Does anyone know how to broadcast video footage live on a website so anyone can see it? I'll plan a public demo via webcam. That way more people can see for themselves, without needing to physically visit me.


Possibly embed some form of media player within a webpage..such as msn's webcam facility or something? Then yea - switch your webcam on i guess..?
Posted by: Steve, May 5, 2009, 10:17am; Reply: 348
I'm not sure a standard web hosting server would do that, but it's possible. When I have the chance I'll see if I can find some subscription services that allow me to use proper broadcast servers. It should be easy enough to do, but if I know something, there will always be idiots who still believe similar idiots like forester.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 5, 2009, 1:25pm; Reply: 349
Steve, do you know what the reserve price for that computer was?
It doesn't say anything on ebay.
Posted by: Steve, May 5, 2009, 1:55pm; Reply: 350
Sorry I dont know.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 5, 2009, 1:59pm; Reply: 351
Okay, thanks anyways i was just curious.
Posted by: Anandram, May 5, 2009, 7:28pm; Reply: 352
Quoted from Steve
I'm not sure a standard web hosting server would do that, but it's possible. When I have the chance I'll see if I can find some subscription services that allow me to use proper broadcast servers. It should be easy enough to do, but if I know something, there will always be idiots who still believe similar idiots like forester.


Hmm im not sure..an embeded media player can be achieved with some javascript coding, which most servers support. I guess the issue is the live feed though...ill take a look around.
Posted by: Steve, May 6, 2009, 7:51am; Reply: 353
Thanks, I'm still looking myself. It seems most of the services are designed for porn but they'd still be fine for the purpose. I'd love to do live streaming, then everyone can see the truth without having to visit me. And if I have time, I can also show everyone what liars mark howe and forester are about their devices - why I was sent them for free. It'd be especially quick and easy to show everyone that marks junk is indeed a scam. Forester's isnt though, but it has a long way to go before beating modern wheels and has too many issues.
Posted by: Anandram, May 6, 2009, 8:25am; Reply: 354
Quoted from Steve
Thanks, I'm still looking myself. It seems most of the services are designed for porn but they'd still be fine for the purpose. I'd love to do live streaming, then everyone can see the truth without having to visit me. And if I have time, I can also show everyone what liars mark howe and forester are about their devices - why I was sent them for free. It'd be especially quick and easy to show everyone that marks junk is indeed a scam. Forester's isnt though, but it has a long way to go before beating modern wheels and has too many issues.


http://www.articlealley.com/article_143243_11.html - food for thought? why do people say food for thought anyway?*confused*
Posted by: Anandram, May 6, 2009, 8:29am; Reply: 355
Quoted from Steve
By the way, I've spoken to the seller of the computer, and he's willing to do US$4000 - still a significant saving. I agree to give full support to the player, provided they sign all the contracts. They are also subject to typical applicant screening. If anyone's interested, they can either contact the seller directly or go through me.


lol - sods law ! Wish i still had a job *kicks laptop screen*.. :)
Posted by: Steve, May 6, 2009, 8:52am; Reply: 356
I've emailed the software developers for streaming media and asked about streaming servers. There's a lot of software that will do it, I'll see which is best for my purpose and get it organized.

Update on Ronjo: Basically I've heard nothing from him for some time. I sent him an email the other day, but still no response.
Posted by: Steve, May 6, 2009, 11:07am; Reply: 357
Just letting everyone know the computer that was being sold at a discount is now sold. On behalf of the seller, thankyou to the stooges for the additional advertising - better than ebay.
Posted by: Tomas, May 6, 2009, 5:25pm; Reply: 358
Quoted from Steve
Just letting everyone know the computer that was being sold at a discount is now sold. On behalf of the seller, thankyou to the stooges for the additional advertising - better than ebay.


Which once again shows that no publicity is bad publicity.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 6, 2009, 5:36pm; Reply: 359
Quoted from Tomas


Which once again shows that no publicity is bad publicity.


Exactly.
Posted by: Tomas, May 6, 2009, 10:38pm; Reply: 360
This thread is interesting. Also, looking at Forester's forum, it seems that the stooges are squabbling amongst themselves.

Hopefully Ronjo will be back with a "judgement" soon.
Anyway, I have a hunch of what it will say. I could evolve that hunch to several pages, but I'd rather just wait... for now.

=o)

Posted by: Steve, May 7, 2009, 7:58am; Reply: 361
Soon enough it is all going to be abundantly clear, irrespective of Ronjo but I already know what ronjo will find because I know my computer. But anyway I'll do a public demo via webcam and all the stooges can analyze the results, say I must be using magnets because it's the only explanation because you know according to them I'm a scammer and all, and to all the reasonable people the truth will be clear. The stooges will never admit to my computer being effective - already I have very clear videos with scatter charts and all, showing very clear effectiveness despite only the most basic settings being used, but they dismiss it like scared little boys running from the truth because it makes them look stupid. For example look at bago's attempt with his scatter charts - first he chooses the qualification dvd to analyse which is where the computer is still learning the wheel, he chooses a dvd with very basic computer settings for the poorest accuracy, and he completely ignores anything else. Nevertheless, the scatter chart still shows effectiveness, so he looked like a moron, so he intensifies his efforts to harm me, again. What a child. Does that suggest he cares about the truth, or just wants to harm me? I have a lot of "enemies", but it is one-sided - I dont give a toss about them other than defending myself and letting people know the truth. I can practically read what their little heads think - "who cares about the truth, i hate that **** stefano and I'll try and **** him over. It's about principles, not truth..." They are just not the type of people to admit to being wrong, but like I said it is not about truth anyway.

As for the system, they go around in circles about VB and advantage techniques praising them in one sentence, then attacking me in another. They are plain idiots. Anyway my point is the people that attack me do so for personal reasons which are varied, it is not because they believe I'm some scammer. Anyone who actually looked at the plain facts and evidence would know the truth. Thats why I've always said people like forester are ignorant in a colossal way, or they just dont care about the truth as it's not relevant to them. Time has showed people like them will never let go because their ego comes before truth, and no matter what, they will just find more excuses and twist more information to be negative. Nothing but complete dickheads.
Posted by: Steve, May 7, 2009, 8:22am; Reply: 362
Also the player that sold his computer sent me the following:

"If anyone asks you about the bullshit that Forester or Howe posts, tell them to feel free to contact me as a reference."

Remember this is a guy that has all three computers - mine, foresters and mark's. So the offer is there for anyone. Forester and Mark know this guy, so they cant say he is me. But they might say something like I paid or threatened him. They've used that kind of excuse before. Forester lies about players of mine he knows, and I even said to him on the phone to check with the players he referred to, but of course he backed down. He lies about what they say. I could give so many examples but I've wasted enough time today.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 7, 2009, 12:30pm; Reply: 363
Forrester must use other id's on that forum
There are people on there who type (i want to say sound) like he does.
I was on that forum 5 minutes and could figure that out easy.
Posted by: Steve, May 7, 2009, 1:26pm; Reply: 364
Either that or they are blind sheep. Sadly I think most of them really are blind sheep (or parrots), but on occasions I've felt some people are clearly him.
Posted by: Anandram, May 7, 2009, 8:28pm; Reply: 365
shoot ...they might all be him...wouldnt put it past him...
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 8, 2009, 12:20pm; Reply: 366
Neither would I.

Would be one amazing trick though.
Sitting around all day on a forum talking to yourself.

I don't think even the craziest of the crazy would have the patience for that.
But I bet they would have the patience for sitting around all day debunking theories in Star Trek.
Posted by: Anandram, May 8, 2009, 6:53pm; Reply: 367
Quoted from Floatinboats
Neither would I.

Would be one amazing trick though.
Sitting around all day on a forum talking to yourself.

I don't think even the craziest of the crazy would have the patience for that.
But I bet they would have the patience for sitting around all day debunking theories in Star Trek.


I talk to myself all throughout the day..... :oO  

Whos trying to debunk star trek and for what purpose?lol
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 8, 2009, 8:25pm; Reply: 368
Quoted from Anandram

Whos trying to debunk star trek and for what purpose?lol


See, makes you think doesn't it.
Cuz it's crazy. lol

Posted by: Steve, May 11, 2009, 10:04am; Reply: 369
Recently I obtained a restraining order against forester. He is no longer able to publish anything about me, harass me in any way, or even have others do it for him - this will reflect on his site soon. He could literally go to jail for breaching the order, or having sheep do it for him. This includes bago, who perhaps I have to thank for publishing a photo that forester took of my tenant's ironing board - remember what I said about "balance"? Will they have learned yet? Not a chance - only keep trying harder. It appears Forester may have broken the order already, but either way if he breaks it and I find out, it will not go unreported. There will be no second chance - I already tried being civil. The only thing I wont report is if he tells his sheep details of the order, because after all literally their actions may send him to jail. Knowing him though he'd probably post the warning thinking it gives him an alibi - he did that previously then did something contradictory. Speaking of photos, things with his Victoria police friend are far from over but like it matters now because of this justice.

In addition to this, I have spoken with my solicitors about suing him. My solicitors have made it clear given all circumstances, I am in excellent position to sue him - I'm not yet sure if I want to do this to him, considering it will bankrupt him so it is not a small impact, although still justice. Forester previously stated he had solicitors, and upon calling the firm he specified, they said they've never heard of him. I think he thought I was bluffing and tried to bluff me back. Anyway none of this would be possible if he had not done anything wrong, and if he was not LYING about me and my technology. You cant sue someone for telling the truth. It will be extremely easy to prove he has been spreading lies. Not that I'd need it, but many of my players that know the situation have offered to support that forester has been lying, including players that he claims say I'm a "scammer". I have done everything reasonable and civil to correct him, including a phone call, but this only made it clearer he is not interested in the truth because it doesnt suit his goals. I really have been so nice to him when most others would have acted very differently. Perhaps me being nice about it all was taken advantage of, but too late now. I sincerely never wanted any conflict and wanted to get along peacefully with sincerity, and to show him the plain truth, but again it all just became obvious he had "other" motives - it was never about truth for him. It's difficult to understand how someone can be so malicious, especially when I'm trying to be so "nice". In the end, forester just didnt change because of his motives.

I will see him in court in about a week unless he doesnt turn up. Finally I will see this man face to face. He has been trying to avoid meeting me probably because the truth will embarrass him, and all along he lies telling others I avoid meeting him.

Whether or not I sue him depends on his overall behavior from this point. No longer is his site a portal for people that have a problem with me, despite me doing nothing wrong - people like "Yous" as per previous posts, and forester fed on their attacks claiming they all support his lies about me - major manipulations. Forester should read the order carefully, including part 7 and causing others do perpetuate his harassment.

If I do sue him, it would likely literally bankrupt him. To this point he's been forced to remove all material about me, as will be reflected by his site soon. If he breaches the court order, it may mean jail for him, and it will definitely mean I pursue suing him. I honestly didnt want this for him but if it means I dont need to put up with him further, then I'd rather him learn his lesson - I just want nothing to do with him. He has lied about me, manipulated and influenced others, and harassed me by publishing various material including blatant lies to name a few things. While he claims he wants nothing to do with me, every week he publishes something new about me. All I do is refute his lies. The last time was regarding the ebay ad - pretty much a week ago, and like most other things it blew up in his face because truth speaks louder.

Anyway, I do not at all feel sorry for forester - he did it to himself and I did warn him. I'm just glad to have some justice. I have tried to be civil the entire way. Knowing forester he will probably try to do something else to secretly harm me, but again I wont feel bad when it comes back on him again.

PS - I'm going to remove material about forester now as there is no need to defend myself from him further, once all material he published is gone. The exception is if I am still asked about lies he spread, in which case I'd be more inclined to sue him. Good luck to him I really dont care - perhaps now he can get his own life. He should understand I dont give a rats arse about him and only wished he'd feel the same about me. His sheep should also understand he has been lying, but they'll learn for themselves in due course.

PPS - Sorry but star trek is extremely nerdy. It is somewhat the "gayest" thing ever to be on TV. I prefer Star Wars.
Posted by: Ramon, May 11, 2009, 10:18am; Reply: 370
Hi guys,

for some laughs... triumph the insult dog on a star wars convention

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugk37TvIR8E

Enjoy! ^^

Ramon
Posted by: Steve, May 11, 2009, 10:29am; Reply: 371
Howdy Ramon, lol really. Very clever lines. There is liking a movie, and then there is being nuts about it. Especially love the line about the kid after being born, and the last time he'll ever see a girl private.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 11, 2009, 4:19pm; Reply: 372
Thanks for letting us all know what's going on.
Posted by: Tomas, May 11, 2009, 5:56pm; Reply: 373
Interesting turn of events.

Registered at Foresters forum a long time ago, but I didn't get any activation-mail.. So I can't follow the progress there. Guess it rattled his world a little. if he believes everything he says he must have been pretty surprised when solicitors came looking for him.

Quoted Text
Forester previously stated he had solicitors, and upon calling the firm he specified, they said they've never heard of him.


That is sooooo cool. I guess he assumed you had the same setup.
=o)
Posted by: Steve, May 11, 2009, 7:13pm; Reply: 374
Quoted Text
Thanks for letting us all know what's going on.


No problem, movies are just movies and we should all be aware of the perils of star trek.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 11, 2009, 7:23pm; Reply: 375
Beam me up roulette man.
Posted by: Anandram, May 11, 2009, 7:32pm; Reply: 376
Can't say im surprised Steve.

Agreed on star Trek...I'm very much a star wars follower myself. One pet peeve of mine is when i speak to younger people say around 16 or so, and say "have you seen star wars", they're like "what's that?"..... :/

Not their fault i guess but COME ON -  STAR WARS!

Speaking of which i may start calling Tomas Vader from now on... :)

Happy birthday for a week or so ago by the way Ramon :) Think i might start publishing happy birthday threads!
Posted by: Tomas, May 11, 2009, 7:37pm; Reply: 377
Quoted from Anandram


Speaking of which i may start calling Tomas Vader from now on... :)



Because I would look better behind a black mask or because of my asthma?
=o)

For almost the same reason Ananananadram is now known as R2D2. (He runs around and squeeks a lot and you have more fun AT him than WITH him.. )
;)




Posted by: Anandram, May 11, 2009, 7:44pm; Reply: 378
Quoted from Tomas



Because I would look better behind a black mask or because of my asthma?
=o)

For almost the same reason Ananananadram is now known as R2D2. (He runs around and squeeks a lot and you have more fun AT him than WITH him.. )
;)






No because your an evil villan and a controlling maniac! Also because noone really wants to see your face :)

R2D2 is cool - i prefer the frikkn jabberwockeys or whatever their called though.
Posted by: Tomas, May 11, 2009, 8:28pm; Reply: 379
Quoted from Anandram


No because your an evil villan and a controlling maniac! Also because noone really wants to see your face :)

R2D2 is cool - i prefer the frikkn jabberwockeys or whatever their called though.



The ewoks?
Thought you were a SW-nerd... Bah!

Chewbacca is cool though. Here is his High-School picture.
http://www.2funnypics.com/index.php?id=142

Posted by: Anandram, May 11, 2009, 10:25pm; Reply: 380
Quoted from Tomas



The ewoks?
Thought you were a SW-nerd... Bah!

Chewbacca is cool though. Here is his High-School picture.
http://www.2funnypics.com/index.php?id=142



Whats a jabber wockey then? What am i talking about?
Posted by: Tomas, May 12, 2009, 12:19am; Reply: 381
Jabberwocky is a totally other kind of monster.... and not cuddly at all..

=o)
Posted by: hibernian, May 12, 2009, 4:48am; Reply: 382
Sorry to interrupt the Star Wars chat chaps......but the main point of this thread was the test on Steve's Computer ?!?!?

Is there any update from Ronjo Steve ? If not, are you starting to get worried that something has happened to him and/or your computer ?  
Posted by: Anandram, May 12, 2009, 6:39am; Reply: 383
Quoted from hibernian
Sorry to interrupt the Star Wars chat chaps......but the main point of this thread was the test on Steve's Computer ?!?!?

Is there any update from Ronjo Steve ? If not, are you starting to get worried that something has happened to him and/or your computer ?  


Chill out pigsy! (who has a pig as their avatar anyway?? ) ;)

Posted by: Tomas, May 12, 2009, 8:09am; Reply: 384
Well, I agree with the other flying swine on this one...

If (or rather when, according to my beliefs) the results are positive and come through, they will be posted here.
This will be an important thread. It will be the mother of all threads. Or at least the thread to silence the doubters and to give Steve some of the recognition he deserves after being so slandered.

And this very important thread will be full of muppets like us talking about cuddly starwars-monsters and the evolution of chewbacca.

Some ignoramus even confessed not knowing what a Jabberwocky is. Can you believe that? Huh?

(When I lived in Tasmania about 100 years ago, I actually performed a poem, for my Drama class, called The Jabberwocky. Not that I remember it nowadays, though...)
Posted by: Steve, May 12, 2009, 8:52am; Reply: 385
Yes i am starting to get worried about Ronjo. I believe he is honest, but at this point he appears to have fallen off the face of the earth. I have emailed him and still no response. If anyone knows him personally and has his phone number, please give him a call to see what's going on.

In all, the different diamond test (that would refute 90% of the false claims about the computer) would literally only take a few minutes, so I dont understand the hold up. It should take minutes, not weeks or months. I'm aware Ronjo may have some personal business to attend to, so I'm being patient but Ronjo if you're reading this and dont feel you can do the testing within a reasonable timeframe, let me know and we can find someone else. I am in no hurry, but that doesnt mean I'm not concerned by the complete lack of response. Plenty of players are willing to validate my claims, as some have already, but the problem is no-one knows them. But some things are obvious like the authenticity of the player who advertised on ebay - it should be clear he's not me, and he said both marks and foresters computers dont work whereas mine does. He even said I can give his contact details to anyone who wants to verify this. It should all be clear, and there are others like him. I did not get foresters and marks computer for free from happy purchasers and I could go on and on about the "others" but I'm not interested in attacking others - only defending myself.

Thing is I have tried to do testing with three different people, and at this stage nothing has happened in all cases though no fault of my own. Anyone would realize I would NOT be sending out computers for free and open testing if my claims about it weren't true, but it is not a report on a computer unless tests are done and reports are given. I am not going to show everything my technology can do, ie when it comes to the system and especially hybrid I'll only show parts, and as for the standard computer even just the different diamond test is enough (to at least refute lies), but I'll still show more than enough to know everything is legit. But then again even the video on roulettecomputers.com is enough, even when using extremely basic settings which gives nowhere near maximum accuracy. Perhaps thats why stooges ignore such videos. I recall recently forester said for my computer to achieve a 1 in 16 hit rate, the computer would need to predict the ball fall-off point at around 1 in 8 or something accuracy, so he didnt believe it was possible, despite me showing the scatter chart in the video, both of which have 1 in 16 hit rates and virtually identical scatter charts and over two directly consecutive segments of 50 spins... and again using only basic settings! Forester just doesnt understand how my computer works, and he makes critical incorrect assumptions about the algorithms which are quite different to his. I mean to me and anyone that actually understands this, it is a truth-slap in the face.

Either way I definitely want to do the live webcam demo. As expected, it would not be good enough proof for some people, but I'm getting to the point where I just dont care what others think - I mean I've already done so much to make the truth clear, and anyone that actually does thorough research will find the truth is ALREADY quite clear. What I'm attempting to do on this thread and in this challenge is serve the truth on a silver platter to make it even clearer. Part of me wants to show the truth so who's been lying and who's been honest is made clearer, and part of me says "screw it, just focus on your teams". I guess I'm a sucker for the truth.
Posted by: Anandram, May 13, 2009, 8:47pm; Reply: 386
Quoted Text
Anyway it is just finally great to have justice.


FREE BEERS AT THE OPEN BAR THREAD!! ;)  

(put it on the genuinewinner tab)
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 13, 2009, 9:45pm; Reply: 387
Thanks for the updates once again. :-)
Posted by: Tomas, May 13, 2009, 11:58pm; Reply: 388
Foresters forum looks quite stripped now. Amazing how many threads that must have mentioned Steve or GW.

One of the topics in the subscription section have 0 threads. Don't know how many there was before... (No, I'm not a paying subscriber. In fact, they haven't activated my account there yet (for 1 month) so I'm just a guest.)

A bit cool... Coming for that beer now!
Posted by: Anandram, May 14, 2009, 12:34am; Reply: 389
Quoted from Tomas
Foresters forum looks quite stripped now. Amazing how many threads that must have mentioned Steve or GW.

One of the topics in the subscription section have 0 threads. Don't know how many there was before... (No, I'm not a paying subscriber. In fact, they haven't activated my account there yet (for 1 month) so I'm just a guest.)

A bit cool... Coming for that beer now!


I knew you were evil. :p
Posted by: Tomas, May 14, 2009, 12:55am; Reply: 390
Quoted from Anandram


I knew you were evil. :p


Duh! I haven't tried to hide it in any way...

:p
Posted by: Steve, May 14, 2009, 6:21am; Reply: 391
For someone who says he wants nothing to do with me, he tries awful hard to maintain material about me to harm me and always had something to say about me - he is a spiteful and vengeful person. Anyway good luck to him, he can bugger off now and get his own life.
Posted by: Anandram, May 14, 2009, 7:05am; Reply: 392
but you WERE his life....*cue soap opera music*
Posted by: Tomas, May 14, 2009, 7:09am; Reply: 393
Quoted from Steve
For someone who says he wants nothing to do with me, he tries awful hard to maintain material about me to harm me and always had something to say about me - he is a spiteful and vengeful person. Anyway good luck to him, he can bugger off now and get his own life.


Don't let him drag you down to his level... he'll beat you on experience then...
=o)

Posted by: Steve, May 14, 2009, 7:47am; Reply: 394
If I stooped to his level, I would write pages and pages of material attacking him and calling him scammer due to his device's problems. But instead, I've been writing pages and pages merely defending myself from his lies. I'm not interested in attacking or harming anyone. My last attempt to resolve matters with him was calling him man to man, hoping he was a "normal" adult, but he was extremely pigheaded and not interested in the truth, so nothing could be done. You cant resolve issues with someone who's motives are not related to the truth. All that's left is a bit of other material that needs removal, then he can get his own life. Really people dont know how far this man went to harass me and for what? What did he get out of it other than simple revenge for being embarrassed. It started when he was caught out lying saying he had my computer, it embarrassed him, and he couldn't handle it. And lately he couldnt handle this public challenge so kept attacking me and called me Ronjo etc. The more he tried to attack me, the more I defended and the more pissed off he got because of how truth made him look - now the cycle has stopped but not from maturity. There are so many blatant lies and very clever manipulative distortions of the truth and withholding information that didnt suit his purpose. He even said the only public demos I've had are with my family - the list is incredibly long with what he has done to try discredit me. People dont know this man like I do - some of lies and manipulations are atrocious but he is a very clever liar. Anyway I dont want to waste more time on this.
Posted by: Anandram, May 16, 2009, 10:11pm; Reply: 395
You put a hit out on Ronjo yet? :)
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 16, 2009, 10:59pm; Reply: 396
Maybe he took the computer to a casino in a illegal jurisdiction and got caught with it.
I hope i am being sarcastic.
Posted by: Anandram, May 16, 2009, 11:48pm; Reply: 397
Maybe he clicked too hard and broke his thumb and now cannot type to let us know the progress!? :oO
Posted by: Tomas, May 17, 2009, 7:04am; Reply: 398
Steve not answering here, mostly, on the weekends is a proof that it is working... He sees roulette as a job, and don't work weekends (lucky man). Cause he doesn't have to. We're left to our own devices, so to speak.

Ronjo's lack of response is weird, though.
Posted by: Steve, May 18, 2009, 7:58am; Reply: 399
I'm convinced something is going on with Ronjo, which is likely not good. I know he had personal issues in his life, which is all I can think of being the cause. One day he says he'll be complete in a day or so, and the next we never hear from him. Again the different diamond test literally takes a few minutes, but he hasnt even been responding to emails or anything. Of course I'm disappointed at the situation, but not mad at him at all - I really don't know what's going on.

PS - Boats it would have nothing to do with the computer. All a casino would do is ban you.

PPS - I dont work weekends because I need to have a life, plus my wife would divorce me. I strictly work 9am-5pm mon-fri like everyone else. It has nothing to do with computer application because my teams use them, not me, and most dont play on weekends anyway (too busy in casinos). If I access the net on weekends, it is usually just for a few seconds to check something like weather forecasts, downloading porn, you know the usual stuff.

If anyone here knows Ronjo and if he's ok, let us know. Ronjo if you're reading this, please let us know what on earth is going on.
Posted by: Steve, May 19, 2009, 7:39am; Reply: 400
I've heard from Ronjo. There was a problem and something did happen to him. I'll let Ronjo explain it himself as I dont know how much he wants to say.
Posted by: Steve, May 19, 2009, 7:10pm; Reply: 401
In addition to hearing from Ronjo, I met with forester today. There was a HUGE all-in brawl and i flung the judge's hammer at him! Kidding, it was positive, for us both. Keep an eye on this thread as I'll post details within 24hrs.
Posted by: Anandram, May 19, 2009, 11:03pm; Reply: 402
I wouldnt have thought Steve would even consider to be in partnership with Forester as Steve's devices seem superior anyway - no offense intended to Forester though.
Posted by: Tomas, May 19, 2009, 11:43pm; Reply: 403

Seconded... But you never know. He might add something.

I'm looking forward to the sum-up. :)
Posted by: Anandram, May 19, 2009, 11:57pm; Reply: 404
me too! This sh!t is better than scrubs! (maybe i went too far again) :(
Posted by: Shorty, May 20, 2009, 3:11am; Reply: 405
Dude... Better than Scrubs? Sorry, you went a lil' bit far. I am glad that there is a positive result for both parties, and I look forward to Steve explaining the details of the situation.
Posted by: Ronjo, May 20, 2009, 3:13am; Reply: 406
Quoted from Steve
I've heard from Ronjo. There was a problem and something did happen to him. I'll let Ronjo explain it himself as I dont know how much he wants to say.


Hi everyone,

Sorry about the delay the past few weeks,but I have good reason as I was hijacked by three men when I was visiting Zululand I was beaten till I was unconcious and robbed of my valuable belongings,I wont go into detail of the whole episode but there has been repercusions of the beating and I have recovered and functional now and lucky to be alive. This type of thing is very common here in South Africa,we live in a very violent society here everyone has a story to telll of some one they know and that is scary in this country,and any South African that are members on this forum know what I am talking about, this is no eggeration.So its back to business I will have all the facts posted by early next week.
Steve I will e-mail sometime on the weekend to let you know how things are.

Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: hibernian, May 20, 2009, 3:58am; Reply: 407
Wow Ronnie, that puts things into perspective mate !
  
Glad you lived to tell the tale my friend. Looking forward to hearing how you are getting on with the computer.
  
Take Care,
Mike.
Posted by: Anandram, May 20, 2009, 4:18am; Reply: 408
Damn, glad you're ok though Ronjo. That place sounds rough as hell.
Posted by: Tomas, May 20, 2009, 4:27am; Reply: 409
Wow, glad you made it out of there....

(And here one is complaining about the need to exercise... I really need to get things in perspective.)

Looking forward to the report.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 20, 2009, 5:24am; Reply: 410
Glad to hear you are ok.
Looking forward to your report on the computer.
Posted by: Steve, May 20, 2009, 7:16am; Reply: 411
Ronjo, I didnt know how much detail you wanted to give so I didnt say anything about what happened. I'm very sorry to hear what happened and sincerely hope you are ok, as much as you can be. One of my players lived in SA for a while, then he and his family were held hostage in his own house and beaten among other things. He had enough and ended up coming of all places to australia. As much as I'd like to visit, I dont think I'll include SA in my list of preferred destinations. Regarding testing, take your time and again if you find any of my claims are inaccurate, let me know and they'll be addressed. Otherwise if you are happy with everything, please let me check over your report to ensure nothing sensitive is discussed, then we can move to the next step.

On the note of forester, I'm just putting together full details and will post here soon.
Posted by: Anandram, May 20, 2009, 7:45am; Reply: 412
As weird as it may sound - ill actually miss this thread once all is said and done... :(   -13 odd pages of drama and finally the truth is revealed, this sh!t is worthy of movie status.lol. I feel a great way to mark my thousand posts - with an honest statement that reflects a struggle going on for a long time, but with the truth revealed in the end, with the "good" teaming with the "bad".  If noone else understands this statement, the guy at the forefront of it all will.

Sounds like things are drawing to an inevitable close - Steve - can you inadvertenltly p!ss someone else off so this keep going ;)
Posted by: Steve, May 20, 2009, 9:02am; Reply: 413
Quoted Text
Sounds like things are drawing to an inevitable close - Steve - can you inadvertenltly p!ss someone else off so this keep going ;)


Ok.. umm Poit:

One of your testicles randomly hangs lower than the other.
Posted by: Tomas, May 20, 2009, 11:18pm; Reply: 414
So his loyal henchwoman will be shown the way..? That's sort of a knucklesandwich he can't stubborn his way out of...

I noticed today that Forester's forum is up at (as far as I can see) full strenght again. Guess he saved the threads (topics, posts, boards... Happy Anandram?) somewhere.

I do wanna see that photo though.. A Kodak-moment if there ever was any....

=o)

Following this with great interest, although I'm a quite good judge of charachter and firmly believe I know where they'll be laughing last and where the laughs lasts.

Agree with Anandram... I'll miss this thread. Lots of drama and excitement.
Posted by: Anandram, May 21, 2009, 12:06am; Reply: 415
Quoted Text
believe I know where they'll be laughing last and where the laughs lasts.


wtf was that bit? lol ;)
Posted by: Tomas, May 21, 2009, 1:52am; Reply: 416
Quoted from Anandram


wtf was that bit? lol ;)


A technicality... :p
Posted by: Steve, May 21, 2009, 8:37am; Reply: 417
From here I just want to get on with things. His email this morning indicated he removed what he said he would. I havent checked yet but even if things were missed I wont kick up a fuss. Of course the various things like the challenge with ronjo and forester's associate, webcam demo etc will still proceed like nothing has changed, and eventually I may send forester a dvd so he is aware that when i say my device can predict what he calls random scatter, he'll know fact. It is not to force him to state it all publicly or anything - it's just between him and me so the truth is clear. When we discussed this point he didn't believe it was possible - he thought I was full of it. But he expressed he'd have great interest in a device that could do it. What he believes at the moment doesnt matter, but in time he'll see things differently.
Posted by: Tomas, May 21, 2009, 8:55am; Reply: 418
Excellent! So it is back to business!
=o)
Posted by: Steve, May 21, 2009, 9:34am; Reply: 419
Yes, moving on now..

1. Ronjo has said to me he'll do testing this weekend.

2. For the webcam demo, I need to figure out how I'm going to have audio predictions (so everyone can hear), but there are some parts of the audio I dont want to broadcast. I could use an earpiece only for me to operate the computer, and everyone can see the predictions on the screen. But live video via the internet is not exactly high definition. I'll have to discuss some issues with my developers about this but one way or another we'll still definitely do this. In the end I may just resort to pointing to the predicted number and diamond - it'd be very hard to fake that kind of thing especially on live video.

3. I'll need to meet forester's associate for a whole day if he's going to see numerous computer models. About late June would be ok for me, but a lot of other things will happen before then.
Posted by: Anandram, May 21, 2009, 8:48pm; Reply: 420
Steve  - although im aware you want to make it as transparent as possible, don't fret too much about making it overly transparent. The people who acknowledge you are a genuine person will not need all that in place to "believe you".

I understand your position but would you really want people having your system that doubt you with everything you do anyway? If you done audio/video and had the pope thereto confirim legitimacy, there would still be someone that said "that's not the pope".
Posted by: Tomas, May 21, 2009, 9:40pm; Reply: 421
Quoted from Anandram
Steve  - although im aware you want to make it as transparent as possible, don't fret too much about making it overly transparent. The people who acknowledge you are a genuine person will not need all that in place to "believe you".

I understand your position but would you really want people having your system that doubt you with everything you do anyway? If you done audio/video and had the pope thereto confirim legitimacy, there would still be someone that said "that's not the pope".


Between the lines, that sounds like that's how Steve is reasoning... Some people will never change, some will... but there will always be the 'that's not the pope'-characters...

Then again, if I'd come up with something as good as what I think Steve has, I'd want some credit for it. Money in all its glory, recognition is not to be underestimated. Even though, it is only in a, from a global point of view, small group.
Posted by: Anandram, May 22, 2009, 4:26am; Reply: 422
I agree with the fact that he should try and be transparent for the "inbetweeners" - good point.
Posted by: Steve, May 22, 2009, 9:17am; Reply: 423
The aim of this challenge and any other challenge is to show the truth, then forget about it. I know some people will never believe and I'm not worrying about them. I dont intend to waste more time with it. Yes I do want credit, rather than let a few people spread rubbish about me. But I dont really look at it like that - I just want the truth to be known and for lack of a better term, it just shits me how ignorant people can be.
Posted by: 436 (Guest), May 23, 2009, 7:10pm; Reply: 424
omg this challenge is more drawn out than "gone with the wind " and "ben hur" put together.LOL and it still has'nt started ??????Tell me Steve is there a novel in the pipeline here perhaps ?
Posted by: Tomas, May 23, 2009, 7:28pm; Reply: 425
Quoted from 436
omg this challenge is more drawn out than "gone with the wind " and "ben hur" put together.LOL and it still has'nt started ??????Tell me Steve is there a novel in the pipeline here perhaps ?


I have the rights to the puzzle, lunch box and t-shirts...
Lines form to the right...


Posted by: 1894 (Guest), May 23, 2009, 9:40pm; Reply: 426
What about fairy floss?
Posted by: Steve, May 25, 2009, 9:11am; Reply: 427
Yes it has gone on a lot longer than needed, but there have been circumstances that have nothing to do with me as you can see if you read the entire thread.
Posted by: Steve, May 25, 2009, 10:44am; Reply: 428
I heard from Ronjo this morning. I still need to run over some things with him to clarify his report and ask him some questions about other findings and tests, but below are his findings as he'll confirm himself soon (I'll just email you first Ronjo).

As I understand his report, as per my instructions, with the dvd of about 100 spins I sent Ronjo, he selected one diamond, then set the computer to give predictions only when that diamond was predicted to be hit. Of course the computer can give predictions when any diamond is predicted to be hit, but for testing purposes it is best to just focus on one diamond.

The wheel used is a mk7 huxley, and there are 4 dominant diamonds as below. The red diamonds are the dominant diamonds. Three of them are vertical diamonds, and one is horizontal. It is important to note the dominant horizontal diamond is right between two dominant vertical diamonds. This ensures things arent easy like it would be if there was a single dominant vertical diamond because when a horizontal diamond is hit, the ball is typically deflected to the other side of the wheel where the ball may hit another diamond:



An ivorine ball was used, which is quite bouncy, especially since the plastic from the pockets was removed - this means the ball bounces on metal, not plastic. The mk7 wheel is John Huxley's current model wheel. You can see photos of the wheel design at http://www.tcsjohnhuxley.com/en/live-gaming/roulette-wheels/traditional-roulette-wheel.html - as this page says, it's the world's most popular wheel.

Ronjo was able to adjust the tolerance levels so accuracy can be maximized. The tighter the tolerance, the less predictions he'd receive, but the more accurate the predictions would be. This is because the computer would reject any spins where it calculates the ball will not hit the target diamond. Again the computer can give predictions 100% of the time and for any diamond, but we stuck to only one diamond in this case to keep things simple. This resulted in 15 predictions out of about 100 spins. Below is what Ronjo said:

Quoted Text
Steves claims are correct about the Diamond hits and I had predictions within a three pocket arc several times and
within a six pocket arc as well,and hits more than 50% on one half of the wheel. I did not have a direct hit on one number, but I had a hit on the next pocket to the predicted number three times in fifteen plays,in my opion that is close enough. As personally I would not play one number in the casino as it could cost you if you are on a losing streak. So to recap in fifteen spins I had a three pocket arc hit three times, a seven pocket arc hit five times the rest were losses or they were out of the three and seven pocket range but in half the wheel. This pattern kept on repeating in my testing.


So for all 15 spins, the ball landed on the same half of the wheel as the prediction. That means the ball always landed within the predicted 18 or so pockets, including all factors such as diamond hits, scatter etc. While 15 spins is not a large number, you have to keep in mind the computer was set to give predictions only when a specific diamond was predicted to be hit, within whatever tolerance range he set. In a real casino environment, if you bet on every spin, it is too obvious. So it is better to make small diversionary bets to stay at the table, and on those 15 spins when a prediction is given, you bet large. In the tests done by Ronjo with the ball landing on the correct half of the wheel every time, the results should be quite clear. Additionally, Ronjo would have been able to see that when the computer announced "risk", the target diamond was not hit. This is an important part of the testing, as he would have witnessed this over 100 or so spins. When you see the computer is accurate with respect to predicting diamond hits over 100 or so spins, you understand the results are not due to luck. Ronjo has confirmed my claims about the diamond hit predictions are true. Of course clowns like bago will focus on "15 spins only" and forget about the rest, like how he usually manipulates information, but nobody cares about that kid's rubbish anymore - stick to ironing boards bago.

The test with diamond isolation (predictions only when a diamond was predicted to be hit) was to verify my computer was capable of determining which diamond was hit, which would also confirm it was capable of accurate timings (the different diamond test is something else and it will be addressed soon). The computer can give predictions for any of the diamonds, but for testing purposes it is more appropriate to just choose one diamond then focus on testing for that diamond alone.

So this is what we have learned from Ronjo's testing to this point:

1. The computer is capable of determining which diamond will be hit clearly the majority of the time. On the mk7 wheel we can predict exact diamonds, but on the mk2 wheel you can predict within 1/3rd of a diamond. I think Ronjo has the mk2 video, but the mk7 is more relevant anyway.

2. Out of the spins where the computer determined a particular diamond would be hit, on all spins the ball landed on the same wheel half as the prediction. This is not a minor thing - others may be happy when the rotor strike point alone is predicted within 18 pockets accuracy. With Ronjo's results, it is with scatter and all incorporated. I know "experts" like Barnett will say it is impossible, but then again he hasn't seen any of my computers, and certainly not my latest computers - especially he wont see it whether he purchases under a fake name or not because I'm not selling them anymore soon. Of course not always will you get all predictions that close, but in this case that's what the result were. Even if we just considered 15 spins without consideration to the total 100 or so spins, the results would still be statistically relevant because of how close to the winning number the predictions were. But again you also consider the diamond hit predictions over the 100 spins.

None of the above would be possible if the hardware and software wasn't capable of accurate timings. You also need to keep in mind various factors such as the wheel and ball used, the ball track distortions which decrease accuracy, and the general layout of dominant diamonds including the dominant horizontal diamond. It's not like we used an easily beaten wheel - it is a wheel that others say cannot be beaten, yet as per Ronjo's testing the wheel was more than just "beaten". Plus for the dominant diamonds I deliberately had a dominant horizontal diamond - it was intentionally made more difficult, and still the results are what they are.

All up I'm satisfied with the results, even without using additional features to better manage ball bounce on different rotor speeds. All Ronjo looked at was the basics of accuracy for diamond hits and end predictions. The end predictions part is most relevant of course, but again you need to consider accuracy of diamond hits which tells us a lot about computer capabilities. There will of course be people that claim Ronjo must be wrong somehow, or that he is me under a fake name etc, but we expected that from the start. There are more than enough well known and trusted forum members to back ronjo up with respect to his identity and credibility.

Anyway there is more to come soon so keep an eye on this section. Thanks for your testing ronjo and I'll email you soon to confirm a few points. On a final note if anyone believes Bago's stupid claims like Ronjo is me, ask around even at VLS - there are plenty of well known and reputable forum members who know Ronjo personally, and know for a fact he is not me. Ronjo was chosen because he is reputable, well-known and trusted. When I asked Victor (VLS) who on his forum would meet the criteria, Ronjo was one of the suggested people.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 26, 2009, 7:51am; Reply: 429
Excellent.
Hope to hear from Ronjo on this thread soon. :-)
Posted by: mattflann, May 26, 2009, 11:16pm; Reply: 430
has anyone on this forum actully bought or used the genuine winner system and can you prove you can make a consistent amount of money over along period of time
Posted by: Tomas, May 26, 2009, 11:20pm; Reply: 431
Quoted from mattflann
has anyone on this forum actully bought or used the genuine winner system and can you prove you can make a consistent amount of money over along period of time


Read this thread from the beginning... and you'll find this guy: http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial7CSUSA.wma
;)
Posted by: Anandram, May 27, 2009, 12:06am; Reply: 432
Quoted from mattflann
has anyone on this forum actully bought or used the genuine winner system and can you prove you can make a consistent amount of money over along period of time


Upon purchase i believe you sign an agreement of sorts which "forbids" you from disclosing you are a player of the system. Many say it's for this and that reason, i personally believe its to help maintain secrets of the system. My point being noone could answer your question if they wanted to.

Indeed though - the testimonials page @ Steve's site is quite reassuring.
Posted by: Ronjo, May 27, 2009, 4:00am; Reply: 433
Hi Everyone,
Steves explanation is correct on my testing.The different diamond test was done and is correct and that the prediction was within a three pocket arc,the first spin and several others as the sample spin gets updated and deals with errors,as below as per quote that there were no predictions as the tolerance got tighter which is better than getting a poor prediction.I tested the whole DVD and as the sample was updated I got the same results.

Quoted from Steve
Ronjo was able to adjust the tolerance levels so accuracy can be maximized. The tighter the tolerance, the less predictions he'd receive, but the more accurate the predictions would be. This is because the computer would reject any spins where it calculates the ball will not hit the target diamond. Again the computer can give predictions 100% of the time and for any diamond, but we stuck to only one diamond in this case to keep things simple. This resulted in 15 predictions out of about 100 spins. Below is what Ronjo said:


I was very impressed with the accuracy of the predictions,where I got predictions in a three pocket arc and a seven pocket arc and over 50% of half the wheel within the three pocket arc.
Now it would be interesting to take this a step further and test in real casino conditions.

Steve thank you for inviting me to take part in this challenge and hope I can be of assistance in the future.It will be my pleasure and am very honoured.
Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Posted by: Anandram, May 27, 2009, 4:16am; Reply: 434
Quoted from Ronjo
Hi Everyone,
Steves explanation is correct on my testing.The different diamond test was done and is correct and that the prediction was within a three pocket arc,the first spin and several others as the sample spin gets updated and deals with errors,as below as per quote that there were no predictions as the tolerance got tighter which is better than getting a poor prediction.I tested the whole DVD and as the sample was updated I got the same results.



I was very impressed with the accuracy of the predictions,where I got predictions in a three pocket arc and a seven pocket arc and over 50% of half the wheel within the three pocket arc.
Now it would be interesting to take this a step further and test in real casino conditions.

Steve thank you for inviting me to take part in this challenge and hope I can be of assistance in the future.It will be my pleasure and am very honoured.
Best Regards,
Ronjo.


Why not try that?

Posted by: Steve, May 27, 2009, 7:55am; Reply: 435
Thanks again Ronjo. Regarding other issues, I'll be in touch via email.

Also Mattflan, as per the contracts for both the roulette computers and system, players are not even permitted to disclose they are players. If you want testimonials, see below:

http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial1EricUSA.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial2MarkAustralia.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial3AdamAustralia.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial4FPCanada.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial5DGAustralia.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial6ADGermany.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial7CSUSA.wma
http://www.genuinewinner.com/Testimonial8EIFrance.wma

There's a good mix of players - some are quite new, and some have been playing for a while. Unfortunately having a term that players aren't permitted to disclose anything (including that they are a player) has meant the majority of people that have spoken about dealing with me are people that had no clue what they were doing, and ended up directing frustration at me, then lashed out on forums giving me more of a bad reputation. I'm talking about a few legitimate players over about 3 years, not the million fake names from morons like mark howe. Do many people experience troubles? There is a learning curve, but generally no, relatively few have serious trouble - usually if a player has trouble, almost certainly they dont speak english well, so communication can be a problem. Some players really are morons though, and I hate to say this but it is true - take a sample of 600 or so people, and a few are bound to be like this. And occasionally you really get a gem like bago (tony duhamel from france) who appears to literally have mental problems. Really some people are their own worst enemy. Nevertheless I always do my best to help them, whether or not they slap me for trying. Regarding players giving 'public" feedback, there are those who make positive statements (after asking permission), but they are usually accused of being me under a fake name. Really it is much easier for a bad tradesman to blame his tools than it is for them to blame themselves. Out of the people that speak publicly, who is going to have more motivation to make lots of posts? Someone who is aggressive and has a personal vendetta, OR someone who is doing well and would rather just keep the technology to themselves, whether or not they approve of the things being said about me. So you can understand I've been fighting an up-hill battle for the truth, while maintaining secrets, so it's not a simple or easy situation.

There are actually a lot of my players on this forum, VLS and GG. There are many reasons why they are asked to never disclose who they are, one of which this leads to questions to them, and information can accidentally slip. On occasions actual players have been deceived by non-players by pretending to be players, and asking questions - the real players were tricked into releasing information, but luckily none that really mattered. Some players ignore the terms, like the most recent one "yous" and the full story with him is explained on this thread. I really don't like banning players, but I can't afford to have tolerance with some things, and most of players agree with this stance and appreciate it. I mentioned earlier that I could easily show every little detail about my technology and really put my "attackers" in their place, but that would come at a price of leaked information, all for what.. just to set the record straight. I admit it is tempting but it would not be worth it. So I do the next best option which is a public challenge such as this. You have to keep in mind Ronjo was selected because he met the criteria of being experienced, well-known and trusted by many others. Many others who are also well known can back up his honesty and credibility.

No further validations should be needed with the computer but I still want to do the webcam demo, but like I said I have to resolve some issues with my developers first to maintain secrets.

Again thanks for your time and effort with this Ronjo. I'll be in touch regarding other issues.

To those who attacked me: *victory dance* etc etc.. but seriously, I know people will still attack me and will do whatever they can to harm or discredit me, but people need to understand their motives are not anything to do with truth - they just don't like me, and they all have their personal reasons. Things are sorted with forester enough that I dont need to go into detail about things with him. But as for bago and mark: bago is just a stupid kid that attacks everyone who says something that opposes him. Anyone who's been on forums knows what he's like - the justice is his own stupidity harmed his lifestyle. As for mark, we all know he is nuts, but many people don't know that he really is nuts - I mean he really appears sick. People who have a personal vendetta against me will distort and manipulate information any way they can. Anyway perhaps I wont waste more time on them. The end result is my claims are proven accurate, and people can review the information and decide for themselves.

On a final statement to people like bago and mark howe: get your own life. Mark I understand you are just trying to sell computers, but how much of a man are you if you have to lie to people to get through your life? I consider lying to be like treason against yourself - like hiding from yourself. And Bago, grow up, seriously. You publish photos and manipulate information because you are made to look like an idiot. You would well and truly know the truth, as would you mark, but you dont care - you just want to try and harm me and stomp your feet like pouting children. I never wanted to harm or embarrass either of you - just defend myself. There really is the balance in the universe I keep talking about - what you do to harm others most certainly comes back on yourself. It really is not just hippie-talk. For you mark, what you did to your own life should be obvious. For you bago, you missed out. Although I consider you both morons of the highest caliber, sincerely I really do wish you the best.
Posted by: Steve, May 28, 2009, 1:52pm; Reply: 436
Well as expected, Bago has gone nuts and now claims I am Ronjo. Even forester told him thats not the case. Like he cares. Anyway we expected this reaction.
Posted by: Anandram, May 28, 2009, 7:40pm; Reply: 437
That was hilarious - i loved

Quoted Text
Otherwise, you can suck my balls for all I care


Maybe you should order him to suck your balls and then you'll remove the first letter from his name so a google search won't be relevant.lol. Every nut you bust is another letter removed!

Good one, was an entertaining read - glad the genuines get the justice they deserve. Honestly - happy for you mate!
Posted by: mattflann, May 28, 2009, 10:05pm; Reply: 438
does any one actully play roullete seem to spend alot of time on forums
Posted by: Tomas, May 28, 2009, 11:24pm; Reply: 439
Quoted from mattflann
does any one actully play roullete seem to spend alot of time on forums


All things in good time...

Some actually play.

Posted by: 1894 (Guest), May 28, 2009, 11:32pm; Reply: 440
lol... i guess its like bird watching.... you arnt CATCHING the birds or molesting them your WATCHING them
Posted by: Tomas, May 29, 2009, 12:19am; Reply: 441
Quoted from 1894
lol... i guess its like bird watching.... you arnt CATCHING the birds or molesting them your WATCHING them


What happened to your english? =o)




Don't forget the important - picking on other posters. That's fun.
And also trying to find out all of Steve's alternate nicks. ;)


Posted by: Anandram, May 29, 2009, 3:16am; Reply: 442
Some "bird watchers" are smart though - whilst the other bird catchers are running around like headless chickens trying to catch a bird, the watchers observe what works and what doesn't. They do no waste any "bird food" trying to decide which way is best, they then go back home and formulate the best possible strategy based on what didn't and doesn't work for the other bird catchers.
Posted by: Anandram, May 29, 2009, 3:20am; Reply: 443
Quoted from mattflann
does any one actully play roullete seem to spend alot of time on forums


How would you know how people spend their time?
Posted by: Tomas, May 29, 2009, 6:08am; Reply: 444
Quoted from Anandram
Some "bird watchers" are smart though - whilst the other bird catchers are running around like headless chickens trying to catch a bird, the watchers observe what works and what doesn't. They do no waste any "bird food" trying to decide which way is best, they then go back home and formulate the best possible strategy based on what didn't and doesn't work for the other bird catchers.


But if you watch 5 cranes, surely an emu is due to come by for sure, eh?
Posted by: Anandram, May 29, 2009, 6:19am; Reply: 445
Quoted from Tomas


But if you watch 5 cranes, surely an emu is due to come by for sure, eh?


indeed ;)
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 29, 2009, 9:05am; Reply: 446
Quoted from mattflann
does any one actully play roullete seem to spend alot of time on forums


Actually, besides being on this forum for 23 hours a day, i spend the other hour learning proper punctuation
and spelling.

Would you care to join me? :-D

Posted by: Steve, May 29, 2009, 1:09pm; Reply: 447
Ronjo, I've posted a message at VLS, and just need you to confirm I have not murdered you to give a positive review and ensure the real Ronjo doesnt come back etc etc.. Maybe that's an excuse people like Bago may eventually use, who knows. So please confirm at VLS what I've said is accurate (http://vlsroulette.com/gambling-and-roulette-related/ronjo%27s-genuinewinner-com-roulette-computer-testing/). Thanks. Also I'll be in touch via email about other things.
Posted by: Floatinboats, May 29, 2009, 4:03pm; Reply: 448
"You say that the computer does what i said it does. I must murder you now!"

To me, that sounds hilarious.

*puts bong down*
Posted by: Steve, June 1, 2009, 9:14am; Reply: 449
Yes Boats it also sits and rolls over on command. And yes it is time to put the bong down.
Posted by: Floatinboats, June 3, 2009, 3:05pm; Reply: 450
*click* *click* *click*

...oooh...this looks good, i'll watch this. :-)
Posted by: Anandram, June 3, 2009, 10:33pm; Reply: 451
Wohoooo - more conflict! Grabs poopcorn and glass of wine..

Erm......i mean .....sorry you are being subject to this blind ignorance Steve... :/
Posted by: Tomas, June 3, 2009, 10:46pm; Reply: 452
Quoted from Anandram
Wohoooo - more conflict! Grabs poopcorn and glass of wine..

Erm......i mean .....sorry you are being subject to this blind ignorance Steve... :/


You and your toilet habits....


Posted by: Floatinboats, June 4, 2009, 2:46pm; Reply: 453
I guess some people insist on learning things the hard way.
*sigh*
Posted by: Tomas, June 4, 2009, 5:32pm; Reply: 454
With the risk of a court order, I'd be pretty scared, and learning dam fast.

Guess all people are not like that, though...
There is a thread on the 'infamous' forum, on the paying section, where Bago is active, and Forester too. It is almost worth the investment to get access to that... =o)

I'm grateful to Steve for posting it here, though, to keep us up to date. :)
Posted by: 1894 (Guest), June 6, 2009, 9:44pm; Reply: 455
This thread should be compiled into a Ebook lol.... i mean like wtf! 14 pages? 17k of hits.. if every hit = 1cent thats 170 bucks! lol
Posted by: Anandram, June 6, 2009, 11:26pm; Reply: 456
yea but you don't get paid for forum views/hits... :/ - only sponsored links, those links are obvious to distinguish.
Posted by: Tomas, June 7, 2009, 2:23am; Reply: 457
Quoted from 1894
This thread should be compiled into a Ebook lol.... i mean like wtf! 14 pages? 17k of hits.. if every hit = 1cent thats 170 bucks! lol


Well, it would only be one or two pages if you only kept the relevant posts... Steve's and perhaps a few more... =o)

Posted by: bootneck, June 7, 2009, 9:22pm; Reply: 458
Hi everyone.
Ive been a member for a little while but this is my first post.
Its an old saying but very true I think:
"If you believe in something no proof is necessary, If you dont no proof is possible."



Posted by: Tomas, June 8, 2009, 12:15am; Reply: 459
Quoted from bootneck
Hi everyone.
Ive been a member for a little while but this is my first post.
Its an old saying but very true I think:
"If you believe in something no proof is necessary, If you dont no proof is possible."





Very true indeed....

Posted by: Steve, June 22, 2009, 10:55am; Reply: 460
Thanks Coolpaddy. Yes Bago certainly wasnt the only one concerned about it - about looking incompetent. So bago now claims I am Ronjo, but even forester corrected him. Forester said Ronjo just must be incompetent. Again we expected them to make some kind of excuse. But the challenge was not for them - it was for everyone actually interested in the truth.

It is too much for forester to event mention the different diamond test now, despite it previously being all the man ever yapped on about to try and discredit me. Anyway we all knew the type of peoplethey are, and pretty much what their reaction would be.

As for other testing Ronjo did, which was not even needed - Ronjo could see what Forester and Barnett calls random scatter is easily predicted by my computer. That was the point of the testing. If Ronjo wanted to replicate Barnett's testing with my computer, he would simply check the prediction at the end of the spin and the beep when the ball is predicted. The beep would be when the ball is under a number, and the distance from that number to the actual prediction would be constant. Ronjo's testing went one step further to check what happened at the point when the ball fall, not like Barnett who only looked at what was going on before the ball fell. How Barnett got his jollies about this showed he in reality had a vague knowledge of modern roulette prediction. I assume that's why he consults to casinos rather than plays himself
Posted by: Steve, June 23, 2009, 3:34pm; Reply: 461
Yay I had another "admirer" (Vincent). who knows who this one is, using fake names again
Posted by: Anandram, June 23, 2009, 10:37pm; Reply: 462
another severe case of ownage. Ignorance eh? What can you do..
Posted by: Tomas, June 24, 2009, 8:31am; Reply: 463
Amazing....

Just read a little 'over there', and Bago and Vincent seems to be pissing on each others backs, claiming it is raining, and believing it...

It makes me wonder (always, not just here) why people never take full opportunity when given something good. If Vincent didn't get it to work, why didn't he seek the support he is entitled, and have paid for? Instead, letting it be for 10 months and then starts whining about it. Instead of trying, trying and trying again. I always assume that everyone can learn almost anything, given time and tutoring.
But I guess it comes down to laziness (and worse). It is easier to say that Steve is a scammer, than to actually practice and learn what he is saying.

Stunning, and although this is a bit sad (the ignorance) I find this thread good reading.

Keep it up, Steve.

;)


Posted by: Steve, June 24, 2009, 8:45am; Reply: 464
Thanks Tomas.

Quoted Text
Just read a little 'over there', and Bago and Vincent seems to be pissing on each others backs, claiming it is raining, and believing it...


yes, true. Forester and Bago also do the same
Posted by: Anandram, June 24, 2009, 10:31pm; Reply: 465
Where did coolpaddy's post go?
Posted by: 1894 (Guest), June 24, 2009, 11:35pm; Reply: 466
Quoted from Anandram
Where did coolpaddy's post go?


yea lol.. for once he wasnt been 100% negative... even some compliments in it lol. I guess steve didnt like it?
Posted by: Tomas, June 25, 2009, 12:28am; Reply: 467
Coolpaddy has been positive earlier in this thread. Perhaps he has overextended his 'speak freely about the systems' permissions.

To bad I missed it. Most stuff in this thread are a good read.
Posted by: Anandram, June 25, 2009, 1:08am; Reply: 468
I dont know guys - Coolpaddy's post in here was ridden with innuendos regarding VLS - i think the post was more so geared towards his inner contempt for VLS rather than praising Steve..or perhaps a mixture.

Perhaps CP deleted it after Steve re-instated Rpro, lol-  Who knows, who cares.
Posted by: Tomas, June 25, 2009, 3:58am; Reply: 469
Quoted from Anandram
I dont know guys - Coolpaddy's post in here was ridden with innuendos regarding VLS - i think the post was more so geared towards his inner contempt for VLS rather than praising Steve..or perhaps a mixture.

Perhaps CP deleted it after Steve re-instated Rpro, lol-  Who knows, who cares.


Aaahh, you meant the earlier posts... well, there are some other that will have to go too. :)

Don't remember the VLS-bashing in them, though.

Posted by: Anandram, June 25, 2009, 4:04am; Reply: 470
Quoted from Tomas


Aaahh, you meant the earlier posts... well, there are some other that will have to go too. :)

Don't remember the VLS-bashing in them, though.



No you numpty - lol i meant the post on this page that he posted. Theres a post from steve here on this page that says "thanks Coolpady", obviously the post before that was CP's post.
Posted by: Tomas, June 25, 2009, 5:24am; Reply: 471
Numpty... haha... Now say it 10 times with Apu's voice. ;) It's cute.


Well, I think I missed that one too...
Posted by: Steve, June 25, 2009, 8:16am; Reply: 472
I didnt touch Coolpaddy's post. I dont know what happened to it.
Posted by: Anandram, June 25, 2009, 9:33am; Reply: 473
he must have deleted it...uh-oh - steve you have another enemy :oO
Posted by: Floatinboats, June 25, 2009, 11:20am; Reply: 474
numpty? wtf is that?

lol
Posted by: Steve, June 25, 2009, 1:27pm; Reply: 475
Numpty

Noun:
numpty (plural numpties)

Singular:
numpty

Plural:
numpties

Synonyms:
Forester, Bago, Mark Howe

   1. (pejorative) A person that embarrasses themselves by making a mistake based on ignorance.

This perfectly describes Forester. But Forester has too much pride to admit he was wrong, and long ago it became more a matter of pride anyway. As for Bago, my little fruitcake, he is bordering on narcissism, but it'd be better to say he's mentally aged about 8, but the type of character that just doesnt grow up.

===========

Come to think of it, Numpties happens to be pretty accurate. Although there is a lot more to it than plain ignorance.

There's also:

Malevolent:
–adjective
1.      wishing evil or harm to another or others; showing ill will; ill-disposed; malicious: His failures made him malevolent toward those who were successful. <--- now that's interesting.
2.      evil; harmful; injurious: a malevolent inclination to destroy the happiness of others.

(why? because the poor buggers are miserable with their own lives)

===========

There's also:

Envious

–adjective
1.      full of, feeling, or expressing envy: envious of a person's success; an envious attack.

Well they are a lot of things. Thanks for the word Numpties. I'll add it to my vocab.
Posted by: Steve, June 25, 2009, 1:32pm; Reply: 476
Quoted Text
Numpty... haha... Now say it 10 times with Apu's voice.


Well that's my laugh for the day
Posted by: Steve, June 27, 2009, 4:52pm; Reply: 477
Update: I've been flat out testing the latest computer so I havent had time for the other part of this challenge yet. Ronjo sorry for the delay, I'll be in contact soon. After thinking about how is best to structure things, it really wont be difficult to prove my methods (non electronic) are legitimate. I mean you are already familiar with traditional advantage play anyway. So are the stooges, but they make all kinds of rubbish excuses to still call me "scammer". Nevertheless people take your word so you can clear this up for people, but to make it clear for the purposes of the challenge, I'll still have to go over the techniques with you, then you can publish whether you think I know what I;m talking about or not, and whether or not what I teach is legit. Of course anyone that understands advantage play already knows the answer, but a report with you explaining this is part of what I wanted to achieve. Anyway my point here is I'll be in touch soon - for now I'm just flat out.
Posted by: Tomas, June 27, 2009, 7:42pm; Reply: 478
Wtf, Steve working on a Saturday. That IS flat out... Or, Mrs Steve is out for a while... :)

Looking forward to this... And, the cynical side of me is curious about what F will make up for excuses next...
Posted by: Steve, June 27, 2009, 10:53pm; Reply: 479
I knew they would make excuses, but still cant understand what's so hard about a simple apology. If I was ever wrong I'd gladly admit it. I put truth first. It comes down to pride, and the truth not being a factor to them.

Yes working a saturday.. a very rare occurrence. No Mrs Steve is around, she just has to tolerate a working Mr Steve for today because the developers had to finish a few things and I had to test it. I close my eyes and see and a red and black wheel. Bah, that's when you know you play roulette too much.
Posted by: Steve, July 9, 2009, 9:49am; Reply: 480
I was just emailed asking me if my computers can predict at any time in the spin. This is because forester just figured out a way to do it, and he adjusted his computers. Hmm and he was calling me a scammer for how long now because I said my computers can do it while his didnt, so he said it was impossible? Forester has a long history of calling me names because I claim my computers do things that his computers dont... but when he finally changes his computers to be more like mine, he wants everyone to believe it's the newest greatest thing on earth. History repeats itself, again. Anyway below is my response:

I read what he wrote. From what I can tell his adjustment relies on smooth deceleration, so the wheel would need to be in near perfect condition, but even so assumption of linear deceleration has limited accuracy. My computer's standard algorithm doesnt have this limitation as it learns real deceleration curve rather than estimating [which is why polynomials must be used, as forester will learn], but it cant be applied on some wheels like the cammeghs - for them you need the other algorithm. But good for him if he finally figured out one way to do it. To use my computer at any point in the spin, set the algorithm to "standard" - refer to the instructions for details to use this algorithm. Dont forget to check the polynomial curve in ball samples menu. As for his claims about prediction within 2.5 seconds, there are conditions where it would be possible: for example, use the standard algorithm and 0.5 wheel revolution. On a 3 second wheel, that's 1.5 seconds for the rotor, a small delay for the ball to come around, then clock one revolution at about 1 second, then you get a prediction. This would only be viable on a wheel with strong tilt though. Still would likely give better results than VB. Predictions this early can be done with the hybrid with much greater accuracy though as you dont need multiple revolutions.

I think maybe forester is starting to see he is frequently wrong, I mean he'd have to see it by now, but like he's ever going to admit it or god forbid apologize.
Posted by: Ramon, July 9, 2009, 11:06am; Reply: 481
Yea and give you some peace, I think some people actually start believing their own lies after some time. They're in too deep and aren't able or willing to make distinctions between their mental projections and reality. Perhaps used as defense mechanism because the truth is too confronting.
Posted by: Steve, July 9, 2009, 1:05pm; Reply: 482
His arrogance causes his ignorance. He doesn't believe and doesn't want to believe (ignorance), because he doesn't want to believe someone can do better than him (arrogance). That in combination with that he wants to be "king of the hill", and he wants to harm me which includes trying to discredit me. I've tried to correct him many times but he just wasn't interested. He knows a lot of stuff he says about me is plain wrong (but he doesnt care), but he also believes a lot of it because of his ignorance and arrogance. Bad circle. If he put truth before his pride, everyone would be happy. I sure as hell have no problem giving the guy credit where is due - i am not his enemy as I've told him many times. But I stopped developing on chips for good reason. To do what is needed for modern wheels with microchips, you'd need huge development, I mean massive. If he has such a boner for chips, just use chips to take timings and send them to a phone, then you have the best of both worlds. But long ago I checked if phones had a problem, and some do especially without mods. An easy test is hook up two modified phones to the same cable, and see if there is a difference in predictions. Woopie. Big drama.
Posted by: Tomas, July 9, 2009, 4:24pm; Reply: 483
Well, as long as he doesn't listen, he'll never copy the good ideas.
And that's why some are still in the dark ages...

=o)
Posted by: 436 (Guest), July 12, 2009, 10:14pm; Reply: 484
im starting to wonder if steve n anandram are one n the same.never saw so much arse licking in all my life from someone who was a roulette newbie 6 months previously now a moderator and forum veteran hmmm ?
Posted by: Anandram, July 13, 2009, 5:47am; Reply: 485
Quoted from 436
im starting to wonder if steve n anandram are one n the same.never saw so much arse licking in all my life from someone who was a roulette newbie 6 months previously now a moderator and forum veteran hmmm ?


lol - dude, me and Steve are the only ones that know how much rubbish your talking...why? Because we are the only ones that know that we are not each other.

Indeed i was somewhat of a newbie 6months ago, i still somwhat am - so what's the difference with why i am less of a newbie now than previously? Probably because i listened to the people who know better, opened my mind and learnt the effective methods and didn't trot along with the sheep developing methods to do with the outside. Spending 6months or so efficiently and with the correct methods can do wonders you know, that's probably a foreign language to most because most are thinking right now "i've been at roulette for years with the outside bets and i have got nowhere".

Also Vegas - please keep it civil without the personal insults.
Posted by: hibernian, July 13, 2009, 6:38am; Reply: 486
Quoted from Anandram


lol - dude, me and Steve are the only ones that know how much rubbish your talking...why? Because we are the only ones that know that we are not each other.

Indeed i was somewhat of a newbie 6months ago, i still somwhat am - so what's the difference with why i am less of a newbie now than previously? Probably because i listened to the people who know better, opened my mind and learnt the effective methods and didn't trot along with the sheep developing methods to do with the outside. Spending 6months or so efficiently and with the correct methods can do wonders you know, that's probably a foreign language to most because most are thinking right now "i've been at roulette for years with the outside bets and i have got nowhere".

Also Vegas - please keep it civil without the personal insults.


Hi Anandram - I know for sure that you and Steve are not the same person (if that is any consolation!)

If I could be so rude to ask - do you have Steve's Computer and do you play with it (and win?)  
  
I am genuinely interested (and nosey!) - there is no alterior motive behind my question !

Cheers.  


Posted by: Anandram, July 13, 2009, 7:45am; Reply: 487
Quoted from hibernian


Hi Anandram - I know for sure that you and Steve are not the same person (if that is any consolation!)

If I could be so rude to ask - do you have Steve's Computer and do you play with it (and win?)  
  
I am genuinely interested (and nosey!) - there is no alterior motive behind my question !

Cheers.  




Hi fellow pig lover! Your my new best friend :)

I am not a player of Steve's. I have said before that if i could afford the technology i would purchase yes, but then i wouldn't say if i was a player (which brings me to your next question) because if i was a player i wouldn't be able to discuss the fact that i am, as per Steve's contractual terms.

I have no doubt that the technology (system and computer) wins in the right conditions. Not because i am an "arse licker" as what's his name up there pointed out, but because the technology makes sense and is based on sound physics. Yes Steve could lie and just say what people want to hear, but i generally can tell a genuine person from an idiot, not to mention you cannot lie about the facts of physics. I'll put it this way:

solid techniques based on physics = system that wins long term.



Posted by: hibernian, July 14, 2009, 4:09am; Reply: 488
Quoted from Anandram


Hi fellow pig lover! Your my new best friend :)

I am not a player of Steve's. I have said before that if i could afford the technology i would purchase yes, but then i wouldn't say if i was a player (which brings me to your next question) because if i was a player i wouldn't be able to discuss the fact that i am, as per Steve's contractual terms.

I have no doubt that the technology (system and computer) wins in the right conditions. Not because i am an "arse licker" as what's his name up there pointed out, but because the technology makes sense and is based on sound physics. Yes Steve could lie and just say what people want to hear, but i generally can tell a genuine person from an idiot, not to mention you cannot lie about the facts of physics. I'll put it this way:

solid techniques based on physics = system that wins long term.





OK mate, thanks for your reply.

I would have thought that as a thank you for all your moderating, Steve might allow you to be one of his players.....and you can pay him back with your winnings ! ;-D

I said that tongue in cheek, but what a powerful story/testimony that would be !!!!!

No doubt, some folk would still accuse you of being Steve, but hey,  lets be sensible, you are not him, end of story.  
Posted by: Anandram, July 14, 2009, 4:30am; Reply: 489
Quoted from hibernian


OK mate, thanks for your reply.

I would have thought that as a thank you for all your moderating, Steve might allow you to be one of his players.....and you can pay him back with your winnings ! ;-D

I said that tongue in cheek, but what a powerful story/testimony that would be !!!!!

No doubt, some folk would still accuse you of being Steve, but hey,  lets be sensible, you are not him, end of story.  


Some people will say that i am you because we both have pigs as our avatars...:p
Posted by: 436 (Guest), July 14, 2009, 12:11pm; Reply: 490
@ anandrum
  and also promoting bots as well i noticed.Hows the sales and commissions going? meeting your quotas i trust ?your a shill if i ever i saw one anandram.To say otherwise my reply is pigs might fly lol
Posted by: Anandram, July 14, 2009, 11:29pm; Reply: 491
Quoted from 436
@ anandrum
  and also promoting bots as well i noticed.Hows the sales and commissions going? meeting your quotas i trust ?your a shill if i ever i saw one anandram.To say otherwise my reply is pigs might fly lol


I don't promote anything. Yes i advertise but you kind of have to do that to create business. Goto business school.

A large portion of customers come to me via the internet/search engines. They want their bots created and i make money from it - so what's your problem? We are not limited to gambling bots, we do business bots which automate data entry and invoicing etc, but did you know that - no.

It's also none of your business how the sales are going. I;ve asked you before to not get personal, but you continue to do so, carry on you'll be banned. Express all you want just leave out the personal insults.
Posted by: Steve, July 15, 2009, 11:56am; Reply: 492
Anandram, advertising and running a business makes you an evil scammer, didn't you know? I have about 20 websites that have nothing to do with roulette, so I must be the biggest scammer of all.
Posted by: Steve, July 15, 2009, 12:14pm; Reply: 493
I forgot to add something for forester: Ronjo could have obtained predictions for any diamond on 100% of the spins. Who knows, maybe you cant read the report well enough. There was a fairly even spread of diamond hits around the wheel. You seem to want to think the ball virtually always hit the same diamond. How you guessed the diamond predictions work is wrong because you base assumptions on your grade 2 mathematics. You still dont understand how the polynomials work - really I am trying to help you. Nevertheless, I am "bemused" that you publish your 4 diamond test and tell everyone it is the ultimate test, then when Ronjo did it and confirmed my claims, you just said he was incompetent and that his testing was nonsense. But by all means go on telling people your suggested tests are everything, except when they make you look like an idiot. I really dont understand what's so hard about saying "sorry, i was wrong", instead of going all over the place trying to discredit ronjo's testing.
Posted by: 436 (Guest), July 15, 2009, 12:52pm; Reply: 494
wow so touchy anandram ???? me thinks you doth protest too much.Rather defensive for what you claim is a legitimate way of doing business.And what is personal about a casual enquiry on sales i ask ?
Posted by: Steve, July 15, 2009, 1:44pm; Reply: 495
Exactly what is wrong with him advertising, or his way of business? He is offering a legitimate service, and he is advertising it.
Posted by: Anandram, July 15, 2009, 11:15pm; Reply: 496
Quoted from 436
wow so touchy anandram ???? me thinks you doth protest too much.Rather defensive for what you claim is a legitimate way of doing business.And what is personal about a casual enquiry on sales i ask ?


sales are fine thanks for asking. :)

yes i "doth protest too much" when people yell out incorrect rubbish.
Posted by: Anandram, July 15, 2009, 11:20pm; Reply: 497
Quoted from Steve
Exactly what is wrong with him advertising, or his way of business? He is offering a legitimate service, and he is advertising it.


I have no idea...that's what i'm trying to figure out - if he tells me i can address it.

for some reason "bots" have a really bad reputation here. What 99.9% of people don't know is that "bots" are not limited to implementing gambling systems. We create them also for:

spin collection for gambling
automating business related processes such as data entry and invoicing etc.

I have no idea what the big deal is.

Anyway vegas: this is Steve's thread for his technology, if you must carry this on, perhaps goto uncensored so i can swear at you :) (joke)
Posted by: Floatinboats, July 16, 2009, 9:33am; Reply: 498
he's "trolling". if you don't answer, there can be no argument, and the person tends to either go away or make
fools of themselves.

i like the last one. heh
Posted by: Anandram, July 16, 2009, 9:49am; Reply: 499
Quoted from Floatinboats
he's "trolling". if you don't answer, there can be no argument, and the person tends to either go away or make
fools of themselves.

i like the last one. heh


I don't mind people making a fool of themselves, but not by trying to take the piss outta something i work hard at. Good point anyway - *turns face away from vegas* :p
Posted by: Steve, July 23, 2009, 2:39pm; Reply: 500
Recently one of my computer players hired a Cammegh Connoisseur (http://www.cammegh.com/connoisseur.html) - wheel is in excellent condition with only slight drop zone (dominant diamonds). He videoed 200 spins for testing. His first results are below (distance to prediction) which I just received:

79 predictions out of 200 spins predicted:

+18:X X
+17:X
+16:X
+15:X X
+14:X
+13:X X X
+12:X X
+11:
+10:X
+9 :
+8 :X X
+7 :X X
+6 :X X
+5 :X X X X X X
+4 :X X X X
+3 :X X X
+2 :X X X X X X
+1 :X X X X X
0   :X X X X X
-1  :X X X X X X
-2  :X X X X
-3  :X
-4  :X X X
-5  :
-6  :X X
-7  :
-8  :
-9  :X X X
-10:X X
-11:X
-12:
-13:X X
-14:X
-15:
-16:X
-17:X X
-18:X X

That is about a 1 in 15 direct number hit rate. He was about 1-2 pockets off target from perfection but edge is still very clear. It is with the latest computer version (minus a slight correction of a bug which will be corrected in about a week). The wheel has only a very minor drop zone which is much less tilt than the average wheel. I'll get the dvds of spins soon so I can test myself. The latest version is a bit more technical to use, but whether or not you need to use the more technical features depends on the wheel and how difficult it is to beat. As for these results, there is no way in hell mark's or forester's computers could do this, not on this wheel. Bare in mind this is a wheel forester doesnt believe can be beaten, AT ALL, this my computer is getting 1 in 15 on it. As for mark's computer, it can only barely deal with 50 year old tilted wheels. This kind of thing gives me what Tomas would call a "binge". I'm not selling this version though - it's only for partners. I'm a big scammer giving away free computers..
Posted by: Tomas, July 23, 2009, 5:27pm; Reply: 501
Quoted from Steve
I'm a big scammer giving away free computers..


Aha.. I knew it! A confession! Something for Bago to throw up at F's site.
=o)


Those predictions look pretty accurate. Amazing.  
Specially on the Cammegh wheel. Guess I'm still to novice to understand how difficult that really is, but if F says it is impossible to beat... well, I wonder if he'll be impressed. ;)




Posted by: Steve, July 24, 2009, 10:00am; Reply: 502
Forester wouldnt believe it. He didnt even believe my computer could do accurate predictions anytime in the spin, then he modifies his computer to do the same. He said his zap was best, until he added audio predictions. He believes an automated computer is a "silly" idea too. His computers have a long way to go. If he hasnt done it or cant do it, then according to him it cant be done. I dont think his ego can handle it. He once sent me a bunch of emails under a fake name asking about my computers, then said:

Quoted Text
"did you know where N.Tesla was born ? do you know what country invented most stuff ??? what was
their nationality ?? MY.... "my friend" me and my closest friends are SMART ENOUGH...to make such device....."


His english is always great. I know it was him from other specific things he said. Forester fancies himself as a genius. Tesla was born in Croatia. Tesla wrote the paper "The problem of increasing human energy" in which he specifies one of the major inhibitors of mankind is IGNORANCE. How fitting. He's probably the most arrogant person I know, with such a "need" to feel superior, and this I guess leads to his ignorance.

As for Bago, just a stupid kid. he really looks like it too. I showed his photo to a player the other day when having a laugh. Funnily he pointed out he has an abnormally large forehead, and one bigger eye. It also "looks" like there something wrong with him. Mark Howe is still the worst with his lies though - all three of them have real problems.

Anyhow, when I have time I'll do a video with mark's and forester's computers. I did one with foresters once, and forester rekons it got a 1 in 15 hit rate. Suure, if you do about 15 spins and create a scatter chart, you can choose whatever area you want on the chart. That's what mark does in his videos.  But even so 1 in 15 is not special at all for that wheel, point is he twisted the info to suit his ego. I'm believe forester already tried his computer in a mk7 wheel though but didnt achieve success anyway.. so of course no computer can beat them according to him. I think forester is pissed I have tested his computer publicly which is part of his reasons for attacks, but I only did that because he was lying. Recently he was saying "oh it is an inferior device and my new ones are much better". May be the case, point is it is still pathetic when he was calling me the scammer. Anyway as anyone would see from the videos, mark's is incredibly bad - I mean atrocious. literally he spent maybe a day on the whole program without any thought to real application at all. Forester's still has merit, but there's no way it can beat modern wheels. At least he admits it himself though. Problem is he thinks all computers have a few lines of code.

Ps - stooges, lighten up. Especially you bago, you salivate at any possible opportunity to try and discredit me - you'll give yourself an ulcer. I'd love you guys to get a life of your own.
Posted by: Steve, July 24, 2009, 12:39pm; Reply: 503
A player requested I post this:

I am a player of steves. I first got steves computer something like about 2 years ago.

When I did not know about bago and what he was I saw he was selling his earpiece. So i asked if I could buy it cheaper from him but he already sold it.

Later I then started discussing the computer with him. he was extremely rude and aggressive like he really has issues. He hates steve with passion! I queried him about what he said about the computer because I did not see what he meant. When I told him I was actually very happy with the computer he lost it and got very angry. I think he also tried to hack my computer later because my zonealarm blocked an ip after our convos which it never did before.

Regards to steves computer, It gets incredible accuracy on the casino wheels and I do extremely well. It is not perfect for all casinos but it is not a magical solution anyway. Bago really was a cretan that did not know boo and with such a person I did not want association. I dont know why he hates steve so badly. I think bago cant handle being wrong even steve said this also.

I asked bago in confidence to not tell anyone I had discussed the computer with him because of the contracts, and next thing I knew he posted my name all over the forums. Im not sure why he did that, I think he was trying to use that I asked him for an earpiece saying that steve lies saying that his computer doesnt need earpieces. It actually doesnt but is much easier with them. not like bago knows anything. I think he also wanted to just get me angry or banned.

But steve did not ban me. For anyone who wants to know the truth, bago has no integrity at all. He is one of the most hateful people I have ever been in contact.

I dont know howie and dont want to. I dont know forester but spoke to him once. he came off as very arrogant and smug like he knows everything. I dont care about his device because I know he lies about steves. Steve has always been very professional and supportive with me and I can tell some of you guys do not know how knowledgable he really is. Listen to him he really knows roulette.

I posted this on another forum but it was deleted by one of the moderators. I dont know why. At least I know it will stay here. I have wanted to post this all again.

Steve please do not waste time with these jealous a**holes. everyone do not believe the bull spread by steves enemies. He is a very sincere guy and I hate to see a few jealous pricks spread garbage about him.


For that I say thanks. I wont let it get to my head. Back to work.
Posted by: Kelly, July 24, 2009, 1:40pm; Reply: 504
One of the main issues with the Cammegh Connosieur and also many other Cammeghs, is that with the correct ball type, the scatter alters extremely much with different wheel speeds.  And its not in a logical way like a little longer bounce with a little faster wheel speed. At one speed there is no bounce at all, the ball will stick in the struck number once it hits the rotor in 8 out 10 sessions. 0.05 - 0.10 wheel speed faster or slower the ball will run maybe 16 - 18 pockets.

For the VB player who tries to construct a clocking key with observation points for various wheel speeds, it means that he will get a very mixed and disturbed distribution round the wheel instead of a nicely even distribution of observation points.  I don`t know exacly how many Connosieur spins i have tracked but its something between 5 - 10.000 and after the first 2 - 300 i was pulling hair out of my head until it startet to make sense.  One can imagine what a large drop zone will give of further distribution spread for the final number you wanna bet on. Even if you have developed a tecknik that narrows the predicted drop zone (even though it might be 3/4 of a wheel), you can still get very much in trouble if you are not aware of the influence of wheel speed on this wheel/ball type.   Other ball types gives still the same problem but more compressed  and much more predictable.
Posted by: Steve, July 24, 2009, 3:18pm; Reply: 505
Knowing which spins to announce risk for, and which to give prediction is one of the computer's strongest point. Even on the mk7 wheel what may look like a minor rotor speed difference will give results on virtually opposing sides. Of course pocket design varies on mk7's though. The ball used in the above results was a 3/4 ivorine. On some wheels the effect is close enough to linear. On others it is not. The trajectory of the ball when it enters the rotor is different in different parts of the wheel, and so is the ball bounce. In earlier versions the computer would have needed to reject many more spins for the same accuracy, but the current can accurately predict a lot more spins so the overall playtime is much shorter. Overall the biggest challenge with development was the algorithm to deal with the dynamic nature of ball deceleration and behavior, while retaining other required components. Forester is still stuck on the mobile phones thing - if there was a problem with what I use, I would be using straight microprocessors for timings and send them to the phone. If you assume ball behavior is static as forester does, it is impossible to beat modern cammeghs - there is a very small distance difference that can determine if the ball goes one way or another.
Posted by: 2489 (Guest), July 25, 2009, 12:00am; Reply: 506
Hi,
Just wanted to testify that i purchased the genuinewinner roulette system from Stefano hoo-hoo, and i've been quite deceived about the system and also about him. Deceived by the system because i thought i would learn new methods (patterns) and it was not the case, all what is contained in the ebook and what he told me on the phone have been already known by myself. Deceived about Stefano because he is more active on his roulette forum than responding to my emails and supporting me. I've the feeling that now his sale has been done, he does not care at all. More than one time i had to wait for 4-5 days before receiving a reply from him, just to tell me that the patterns are not strong enough to give me a custom variant. Also he refuses to give access to the online custom variant software, and refuses to give access to the private roulette message board but i've been told by another player that it does not exist...

For those who already have some knowledge about roulette (dealer signature, bias, vb..), then 2,500$ is really really NOT WORTH the money. All what is taught is available for free around the Internet.
No offense Stefano, but i don't like to keep problems for myself, it is always better to share feelings and opinions to progress in the right direction.
Posted by: Anandram, July 25, 2009, 1:09am; Reply: 507
1. Lose the bolded text
2. You sound like a competitor but you may not be i dont know.
3. Sounds like you haven't been introduced to the more sensitive material that Steve offers to more trusted players, perhaps for reasons exactly as the above in your post, ie: the fact that you're not supposed to be introducing yourself as steve's player.
4. It's "funny" how this "testimony" from you comes straight after Steve posted a decent review from his player, i may be looking into this too much though.
Posted by: 2489 (Guest), July 25, 2009, 3:41am; Reply: 508
1) Is it a rule written in the roulette forum rules? Who the hell are you to tell what i've to do?
2) Therefore when you don't know, you shut up. If you want to make a real bet that i am not one of Stefano's player, then go for it, you will lose. Tell me though if you are interested.
3) Sounds like you are not one of Stefano's player and you don't even have his system. Why do you repeat word for word what Stefano is writing on his forum?. It's been around one year that i've the system. I never did something wrong. I've called him many times, i've exchanged many emails, he never gave something "secret" to win at Roulette. I reckon he is saying that to attract potential purchasers, because dealer signature and bias will never beat online casinos, people know that, so Stefano pretexts to sell something special "undiscovered" to beat online Casinos and modern wheels even before the wheel and ball are spun. We are around 500 genuinewinner roulette system players, if such method existed, everyone would stay at home front of his computer playing online casinos all day long and making millions.
4) What is funny is you are talking about something you don't know and don't even have. But i guess the positive attitude you have towards Stefano is the price to pay to have your automatedbots advertising available on his roulette forum...

With My Best Regards,

Barbaro
Posted by: Anandram, July 25, 2009, 4:05am; Reply: 509
wtf... :o/ - i removed the bold from your post so it's easier to read. Why don't you relax man...jeez.

i forgot to add

5) the forum you refer to: is not a right it's a privellige. ;)

I'm not repeating anything, i just have done my research and know what i should expect should i purchase his system. Sounds like you should have done the same.

I cant imagine why you haven't been taught other methods with the calm and non-defensive stance you take ..../sarcasm.

Yes of course, all this is about me advertising my services, it must be right? ;)
Posted by: Floatinboats, July 25, 2009, 1:12pm; Reply: 510
You can read it right on steve's website.
You are not supposed to reveal yourself or risk being booted.
I guess that person didn't take the time to read the site over.

And the fact that the person is so aggressive, basically telling anandram to shut up, speaks volumes to me.
Posted by: Steve, July 25, 2009, 5:05pm; Reply: 511
Barbaro is NOT a player. I'm sure it is mark howe. The email in the account is the same email being used to email me ridiculous questions probably just to try and get under my skin. Nice try. If they were a real player, yes they would now be banned for contract breach as they would expect, but I'd also have no problem saying whether or not they were a real player. Still dont have a life of your own, Mark? Have a nice day mark.

PS - On moday I'll post here some of the stupid emails from this moron so you can see what I mean.

Let me also make very clear that if any legitimate player wanted to criticize my product, they are except from the usual rule to not reveal yourself as a player. People have the right to complain, and I welcome the open criticisms specifically so I can openly address them in front of everyone. Very few players have complained compared to happy players
Posted by: Tomas, July 25, 2009, 6:52pm; Reply: 512
Amazing how Barbaro went from slightly whining to flat out aggressive in just a few questions.

Basic rule in life is that a person who is content with themselves does never have to be angry with someone else for no reason.


Otherwise, what Boaty said...
Posted by: Anandram, July 25, 2009, 9:15pm; Reply: 513
Jeez...what a loser.
Posted by: Steve, July 27, 2009, 9:56am; Reply: 514
Mark why dont you try and compete by legitimate means, like perhaps making your computer better? If you are so super competent like you want to believe, why do you have to lie your arse off to get through life? I guess your incompetence is a hard fact for you to deal with. You blame others for your failures, and hate them with passion because looking at yourself is too hard. Well, you are a grown man but I cant figure out how you got so screwed. You state that phrase from the movie Gladiator (what we do in life echoes in eternity), like you are some kind of master. I'm sorry, but you as a human being are disgusting; unbelievably abysmal, and you really do need help. But anyway in your post you didnt mention my computer, so perhaps you just want to try discredit me. You are such a jealous and spiteful wanker, really. What kind of man are you? Too incompetent to develop something that is actually effective? Cant handle the success of others because you are too unhappy with yourself and own life? I know you dont see it mark, but you really are a sick person although you appear far, far too gone - honestly and truly, I do not understand of the point of your very existence - the world would certainly never miss you. People here dont know the full extent of your behavior and the type of person you are, and if anything you've taught me just how screwed up people can be, whether or not I can make any sense of it.

Anyway in mark's emails under fake names, he says stuff like:

"Sorry but i am convinced you are nothing more than a promoter and scammer."

"i figured out your system only 10% of your players know about..."

"Now, i make 4 charts looking for Four dimensions at the same time, and always i find a pattern in one of the four dimensions.
I have won 5,650$ at dublinbet.com and i hope it will continue.
I would like to give you a gift but i don't know if i have to send it directly to you or to the player who explained me your master system?."


I think he is trying to upsert me saying "I got your system for FREE". Thats great but the only system I care about is on a server and well protected. Players access it online.

ps - just this morning Bob Gordon showed me that Mark had hijacked my account at Gamblers Glen and made posts in my name. So he is now pretending to be me to deliberately make silly comments. Mark, you really need to re-evaluate your life.
Posted by: Anandram, July 27, 2009, 10:40am; Reply: 515
let's have a poll to see who thinks mr howe is an idiot...then it'll be planted in the polling area for all existence. :p - dude might go even crazier :o/
Posted by: Steve, July 27, 2009, 10:49am; Reply: 516
I dont think this man could get more messed up, really.
Posted by: Steve, July 27, 2009, 4:58pm; Reply: 517
I'd like to apologize to mark howe. Why? Because I thought he was the only one involved in recent attacks against me, but it appears all 3 stooges were involved - not just him. Long story, basically fake names and publishing stuff on other forums - even forester using a fake name, which really isnt new to those who know what he's really like. So anyway... SORRY Mark, I should've realised the others are as screwed up as you. It appears in addition to the embarrassment forester already suffered, the cammegh results tipped him over the edge. Anyway all three of you, while I understand you cant use the truth to harm or discredit me, by all means continue stomping your feet like pouting little brats. Anyway I'd love to play kids, but I have work to do.

PS - dont you think it's time you actually faced up to the fact you lied and/or were wrong, and were made out to be idiots? Be men about it. I mean I just defended myself by revealing the truth, and for that you hate me with such passion? Get a life, really.
Posted by: Steve, July 27, 2009, 5:23pm; Reply: 518
And in response to a pm i just received, YES I do make fun of them, and YES I do know it antagonizes them, and YES I know it makes them want to harm me more. But NO, I don't care - they really can't do anything. It's actually worth it. I don't like them and it amuses me how hard they try. Sorry guys, but truth is truth, and I suggest you start living with it. Too bad if the truth doesnt suit your purpose. I know you are forced into the lying corner, but it always seems to end up you make idiots of yourselves.  Anyway have a great day guys.
Posted by: Tomas, July 27, 2009, 5:51pm; Reply: 519
Quoted from Steve
And in response to a pm i just received, YES I do make fun of them, and YES I do know it antagonizes them, and YES I know it makes them want to harm me more. But NO, I don't care - they really can't do anything. It's actually worth it. I don't like them and it amuses me how hard they try. Sorry guys, but truth is truth, and I suggest you start living with it. Too bad if the truth doesnt suit your purpose. I know you are forced into the lying corner, but it always seems to end up you make idiots of yourselves.  Anyway have a great day guys.


Gotta love this taunting. Bago had some post at Foresters, but it was removed... He sounded quite spiteful, though. But really, he shouldn't start a battle of wits when he is unarmed.

=o)
Posted by: Kelly, July 27, 2009, 6:47pm; Reply: 520
LOL Tomas  you do on ocasion have some pretty funny quotes with indians paddling canoes in different directions and people fighting wits unarmed.
Posted by: Tomas, July 27, 2009, 6:52pm; Reply: 521
=o)

Wish they were my original though..

Is that danish or norwegian on your Excel-diagram?
Posted by: Steve, July 27, 2009, 11:39pm; Reply: 522
Quoted Text
He sounded quite spiteful, though. But really, he shouldn't start a battle of wits when he is unarmed.


All three of them are spiteful beyond belief. Poor damaged egos of little kids that cant handle truth, which is why they have to do crap like take photos of ironing boards. All I try and do to stick to my computers and system. I have no interest in publishing photos of forester's kid, or showing everyone how fugly bago is. While I made them look like d*cks, it's their problem to deal with - they did it to themselves. I mean I only defended myself - after years of their attacks, how could I not get satisfaction from it without rubbing it in.. just a little? I mean put yourself in my shoes.. putting up with their sh*t for years, then watching their lies fall apart with just a tad of truth. Would you do a little dance and watch them squirm too? But if I wanted to publish photos and all kindsa crap, I'd do it - but I do have morals, which was a disadvantage in the early days as their lies became so widespread, but hey it was worth it. It is actually quite sad how none of them can focus on the core issues because the truth makes them look like even bigger idiots. As for bago, there's something seriously wrong with that kid - well all 3 of them actually, just as f-ed up as the other. Anyway enjoying it or not, I really do waste too much time on them.
Posted by: Steve, July 27, 2009, 11:55pm; Reply: 523
Just confirming one thing: above I said only my partners will get the latest software version. Of course some of my more trusted "paying" players will get it too. They should know who they are. I'm very careful about who i trust with what, and some would say too careful, but hey so far my decisions to be wary have paid off, and nothing at all really senstive has ever leaked. Not to say it wont ever happen, but we've done pretty well so far.
Posted by: Anandram, July 28, 2009, 12:05am; Reply: 524
I actually started by saying to you Steve not to bother etc etc, but in my VERY VERY short time in running my bot thing, it's very hard to not defend what you put so much hard work into, just for the truth to be known, and so people can see a genuine response to allegations etc.

You're situation is 5000% more complexed than mine, so i can now understand why you feel the need to defend yourself with just the truth. Ignorance is indeed in abundance just on forums alone, i can see how it gets tiresome for you, but also applaud the calm stance you take with it all.
Posted by: Steve, July 28, 2009, 8:57am; Reply: 525
Whether or not you be professional and respond in detail to allegations, it doesnt matter if people just don't like you for childish reasons. If your response to allegations embarrasses people and make them look stupid, they will tend to hate you more, and throw more rubbish at you, and the cycle goes around and around. Especially if the attackers are egotistical - they cant stand to be wrong. Before you know it, they go so insane that they're taking photos of ironing boards and publishing every snippet of information conceivable. All I ever really did was defend myself, and they just lost it more and more.
Posted by: Steve, July 31, 2009, 2:24pm; Reply: 526
I know a lot of computer players read here, so just letting you know the latest version is complete including testing. Rock on.
Posted by: Steve, August 3, 2009, 10:07am; Reply: 527
PJ from forester's forum was one of the people that was with forester when I met him. Anyway, as you might know I was going to meet him, until we argued about things and I just couldnt be bothered with him anymore. So anyway, PJ posted a bunch of crap on forester's forum, saying that I backed out of meeting with him etc etc, so below is my email to PJ this morning:

Phil,

Are you available to meet this Wednesday? Or Friday? What area are you from again? I'm about 45 min drive for me where we met last time.

What I will show you is the different diamond test with my standard computer. To confirm my claims: Irrespective of reference point, most predictions are within around a 3 pocket arc. This will take maybe 20 minutes including a coffee (plus travel time), as opposed to a whole day wasted moving the wheel etc.

While of course forester will probably claim I used some kind of jedi mind trick on you, or perhaps I simply loaded the phone only with specific numbers like he claimed last time, we will do the following tests to prove otherwise:

1. Intentionally poor clicks, so you see different predictions.

2. Set the computer to beep when the ball is above the prediction. This is exactly what Forester's FFZ does. My computer is not designed or optimized for such an impractical method of prediction, but with the correct settings it can do it. This way you will know with even greater clarity how full of sh*t forester really is.

3. Set the computer to beep when the ball is predicted to fall.

Especially with points 2 and 3: It'd be rather hard for me to fake the timing of the beep, time after time, irrespective of the timing reference point we use, wouldn't you agree?

I am not going to show you anything beyond this because:

1. The above alone perfectly and completely demonstrates to you that forester is full of sh*t, and you have been misled by him. After all his ignorant and unknowledgable claims about mobile phones and my computers, you will see it with your own eyes. Among many other things, the idiot thinks the computers are just java applets - it is firmware, hardware (chips) and java combined.

2. I dont trust you with anything sensitive. You previously claimed you are neutral, with a "neutral" attitude, which is most certainly bullshit. You are as biased as forester because you believe rubbish he feeds you.

3. Frankly, you don't deserve to see anything further, and I dont have time for you - to arrange a venue and move/setup the wheel just to waste a day to show a few idiots how ignorant they are. Like I said I really do have better things to do. If you want to attend a public demo and see the hybrid, by all means do so, then you will understand what a sophisticated roulette computer is. Forester makes a big deal over mundane things like the different diamond test, zapping, point set for tilted wheels etc.. things that really are no big deal. His computers are vastly inferior, but let's stick to the basics here.

You really have been reading too much of forester's bullshit, and now I'd like to enlighten you.

Now as for your other claims:

1. You weren't in court. Even if you were, you would have heard things you never heard before. You are in no position to determine if my application is unjust. I trust you will be in our next hearing though, where you will hear for yourself how attrocious forester's lies were in the last hearing, and on his site, and you'll also hear the full array of evidence I did not submit last time. Then you'll know for yourself what forester did satisfies all the requirements for stalking. If you truly think my application was "unscupulous" and dishonest, how about I publish photos of you, your address, your wife, your kids, inside your property, and then I'll drive by your property to take a photo and cowardly send it to someone else for publishing, and then give people a tool to see around the sides of the property? Would that be ok with you? Based on what you've said, I'm sure it would.

2. Within approximately 60 seconds of speaking with you for the first time in person, I recall thinking "oh god, they grow on trees..". You were extremely ignorant, and clearly utterly convinced that forester's claims about me were all true. You were no different to forester's female friend - influenced by an idiot who is convinced he knows best. At the conclusion of our meeting, we shook hands and you said "the proof is in the pudding", so I believed you appeared to then have a more neutral view. However, in our email correspondence, it was abundantly clear you still held the same ignorant views. Your choice of words indicated your mind was already made up. Phil, like I said to you many times, I was not born yesterday. I was not offended by your remarks - actually disgusted at your ignorance and arrogance.

In the end, it was clear you people really do grow on trees, and I didnt want have anything to do with you. In my second-last email, you didnt appear to like the truth - specifically you did not appear to accept you are incredibly ignorant and far from unbiased, so you responded, predictably, without response to basic truth. So I said to you "Now thats a "cop-out" if i ever saw one - the line when the truth is too confronting. Your arrogance appears to have you convinced I'm the one with issues. Nevertheless, all the best Phil, really there are no ill feelings.", to which you then responded "Likewise, I have no ill feelings and do sincerely wish you every success.   The casino is the real enemy and anyone who can consistently conquer them is to be admired."

In your post at forester's forum of ignorance and deception, you said "I do not for one minute believe Steven has the capability, capacity and focus to defeat the game of roulette.  I do however believe that he believes he can and is."

Tell you what, Phil. You have read my confidence in my claims correctly. What you mis-read what the reasons behind my confidence. So you think I am just DELUDED? Wow. So I ask again, how does Wednesday or Friday sound?

PS - I've previously learned that arrogant and ignorant people have a very hard time apologizing. I hope you are able to put pride aside and state the truth as it is, irrespective of your personal opinion of me now. Based on my experience with you so far, I dont believe you are any different, although I am perhaps foolish enough to hope.

PPS - Once again Phil, although clearly we are aware of what we think of each other, I still do not have ill feelings towards you. Do not expect me to be aggressive towards you when we meet. I will show you exactly what you need to see, have a coffee, then leave.
Posted by: Ramon, August 3, 2009, 10:13am; Reply: 528
well done sir
Posted by: Tomas, August 3, 2009, 10:19am; Reply: 529
\o/
The game is afoot!

Although the odds are 2:1 for PJ backing out because he doesn't wanna be proven wrong. Any takers?
Posted by: Steve, August 3, 2009, 3:11pm; Reply: 530
PS - Forester, am I going to get an apology when PJ confirms my claims? Like I said, I already know the results of my demo to him. But I doubt either of you would be in a hurry to admit you were "ignorant". PJ seems to think I'm the deluded one that needs help. I most sincerely am looking forward to this.
Posted by: Steve, August 5, 2009, 8:46am; Reply: 531
PJ has backed out of our scheduled meeting. In addition to the email already published above, the last few emails from me and PJ are below:

PJ: I can attend on either Wednesday or Friday, so which ever suits you will be ok for me.  I am 90 minutes drive from Ringwood.

STEVE: Does Friday 11am Ringwood suit?

PJ:That's good for me.  Where will we meet?
NOTE: Subject of email was "Friday 11am Ringwood is fine."

STEVE: Call my mobile when you're there. I'll see if I can find a private enough area to set up the dvd player.

PJ:Forget it.  I wouldn't drive for 90 seconds to see a video demonstration.. let alone 90 minutes. You are wasting my time.

Good bye.
Phil          


My last email to PJ is below:

Phil,

1. The reason for the demonstration is because Forester's flight was leaving in a few hours, so you would see a demonstration in his place. The overall effect of this is so both you and forester have a reality check, and see who the deluded & ignorant ones are. I had hoped you would then tell the other sheep about the truth.

2. You are well aware of the significance of the video demo - it will demolish forester's false claims about my computers, and it is far from a trivial thing - in fact it is THE major one thing. Before we set a date, time and place, you knew full-well what you would see and wanted to proceed - I even laid out every detail of what you would see in my previous email. You then agreed on the day, time and venue. But then when you see I'm deadly serious about it, you claim it is just wasting your time and tell me to "forget it". Clearly, you didn't think I would proceed - but you have the audacity to post your rubbish about me on forester's forum.

Phil, I'm not the one who is deluded. I'm not the one that has run from a meeting. I hoped you were put your pride aside and consider the truth, irrespective of how it would make you and forester look. Nevertheless, when we meet again, I'll show both you and forester himself the dvd test in person, so I can see both your faces side-by-side. Unless of course forester has the balls to let me call him in a last attempt to speak man to man trying to sort things out first, as I have tried many times before but only run into his brickhead wall - tell him if he wants one last shot at it, to email me a time to call him at home. Although given all circumstances surrounding his head, I dont think there will be any progress - same with my other attempts.

Otherwise, I'll see you in December with all equipment needed for the test. Again, don't expect me to be all cranky and standoffish when we meet again - same goes for Miro. Sure, we dont like each other, but I am a friendly person, even if you two dont share my sentiments.

PS - Tell forester I'm not psychic, but I can predict he will refuse to see the different diamond test when we meet again. I pray I am wrong.

PPS - As I may have said previously, my problem with your other emails is that your mind was already made up, and your arrogant ignorant remarks made it abuntantly clear. And when I reacted to your behavior and choice of words, you tell me I'm just paranoid and need "help". I cant say I'm not disappointed to find you people really do grow on trees.


Well, that was rather short lived. Bare in mind PJ was told, in advance, EXACTLY what he would see... then he agreed to meeting, even the time and place, and at the last minute he backs out saying he wouldnt even travel 90 seconds to see it. Someone actually suggested to me he'll chicken out, but I didn't actually believe he'd do it because of how he'd look. But I suppose this is better for him than actually attending. *sigh* Well at least when I see them in person next, PJ wont need to drive 90 seconds.. I'll walk right up to him and open the dvd player in front of his and forester's noses, then forester will have to explain to the judge how I'm a scammer and it justifies all he did (like he tried to do last time), but he just saw a clearly effective demonstration that proves otherwise. Hmm.

In all forester, that particular court case has nothing to do with computers, or where I actually live, or my wealth, at all. Only you made it about that stuff, trying to justify to the judge what you did. I dont think you realized how many times you have contradicted yourself, and as I said previously, when you're on the stand next time the issues and questions will not be so kind. Then when it's over, we can proceed with the next case, just as justified as the first. And you sit there asking why oh why. Take a look in the mirror. I think Bago's case is going to be just as humiliating for him, but again he need only look in the mirror. All I've ever done is defend myself. You morons did it all to yourself.
Posted by: Steve, August 11, 2009, 4:09pm; Reply: 532
To the players who check here: I've been testing the latest computer version all day - works flawlessly. I did 100 spins on the mk7 which is close to level, which will be sent with the updates. The diamond hits have a pretty even spread across all diamonds except 2 particular horizontal diamonds which are scarcely hit. Regardless it is harder to beat than the average casino wheel.
Posted by: Anandram, August 11, 2009, 8:41pm; Reply: 533

This your standard comp, or the alien hybrid device?
Posted by: Tomas, August 11, 2009, 11:45pm; Reply: 534
Quoted from Anandram

This your standard comp, or the alien hybrid device?


A ZOMBIE hybrid device, now, that would be cool. Alien Schmalien...


Guess Steve is seeing red/black and the occasional green in his dreams again... Like playing Tetris two hours before bed... Yikes!
Posted by: Steve, August 12, 2009, 7:35am; Reply: 535
I dont see red/black/green, I see the ball going around and every time I cant help mentally trying to mark when the ball has X revolutions to go. I know my wheels so well I'm right almost every time.

Anyway it is pertaining to the standard computer.
Posted by: Tomas, August 12, 2009, 8:03am; Reply: 536
Quoted from Steve
I dont see red/black/green, I see the ball going around and every time I cant help mentally trying to mark when the ball has X revolutions to go. I know my wheels so well I'm right almost every time.


Wow! That's impressive, and a little... erh, Rainman?

;)




Posted by: Steve, August 12, 2009, 9:07am; Reply: 537
I'm an excellent driver... Qantas never crashed.

BTW I received the DVDs of Cammegh wheel spins. I havent had a chance to have a good look at it all yet, but one thing I noticed was the ball is teflon, not ivorine. It does sound like ivorine though when it falls. I'll test the latest computer versions on it when I have the chance.
Posted by: Steve, August 12, 2009, 9:21am; Reply: 538
To players: from now on use the player only forum for announcements of my availability. I removed the blog a while ago for reasons I'll explain in the forum. If you havent yet been validated in the forum, you will be soon enough. It's just easier for me to do validations in one go rather than every time someone joins.
Posted by: Tomas, August 12, 2009, 9:31am; Reply: 539
We're counting cards.. yeah, counting cards in Vegas...
That movie still rules over reality; Quantas has since then crashed, but noone think so since the movie must be 'eternally true'.




Teflon on Cammegh... does it get trickier than that? From an AP or computer point of view... (of course for an Oscar's grind it matters little...)
Posted by: Steve, August 12, 2009, 10:27am; Reply: 540
There are a few teflon balls. Sometimes ivorine are worse as they're bouncy as hell. He appears to have used the wrong teflon ball which makes it a bit easier. There is still a fair bit of bounce but not more than the ivorine. But it's not really the bounce that makes the wheel more difficult to beat. But anyway the wheel type is correct - beautiful looking wheel. I have a thing for wheels.
Posted by: Steve, August 12, 2009, 4:20pm; Reply: 541
Just a reminder for players: email me for the new player only forum, which includes partners who view here - even if you havent yet gotten the computer. Everyone will receive the latest dvd which is around 100 spins (1 hour of very quick spins) on the mk7 wheel with ivorine ball. Testing with basic settings and getting predictions about 80% of the time, and with predictions about 9 seconds before the ball falls, I got the following approximate exact number hit rates based on scatter charts and AREA where prediction was in the charts, not "exact" number hit rates because they are irrelevant if you dont consider the area:

Diamond 1: 1 in 20
Diamond 2: 1 in 8
Diamond 3: 1 in 20
Diamond 4: 1 in 15

You can isolate to any diamond, but this means you get fewer predictions. Given how early predictions were, on an old ball track, the wheel is near level, got predictions on about 80% of spins, I almost wet my pants. These results will be easy enough for you to replicate as they are only basic settings. If you scout for easily beaten wheels, you can do much better, but the mk7 wheel represents pretty much the average "modern" wheel in a casino that knows what they're doing.

If you are playing a modern wheel like the mk7, you will need to have greater knowledge and skill of what you're doing. If you are playing on an easy wheel, it is much more basic. In reality you should NOT be playing 80% of spins or it's too obvious. I will advise more on how to play in the player only forum so please signup there.
Posted by: Steve, August 12, 2009, 4:32pm; Reply: 542
BTW I'm locking this thread now. It's gotten too long and announcements will be made by the player only forum. As for the challenge which Ronjo did, my point was proven with the computer. The only people that debate it are the kiddies like Bago, oh and forester who says Ronjo was just incompetent. As for system testing, it is advantage play, and even the stooges admit it is effective. They only call it a scam when I teach it, otherwise, it is all legit. I think that speaks for itself.

Ooh, PS, the diamond 2 predictions were 20% of the overall total of spins. The actual exact number hit rate was 1 in 5, but to be fair I considered the average value in the area of prediction which was 8. During testing I actually found a bit of room for further improvement, but I wont bother having it implemented as it would be a lot of extra work for a bit of extra accuracy when it's certainly not needed. 1 in 8 on a wheel forester doesnt believe can be beaten at all, with predictions 9 seconds before the ball falls and near level wheel, I think I did wet my pants, I love it.
Posted by: Steve, August 19, 2009, 3:32pm; Reply: 543
Have to add a few things: Recently forester claimed a young player lost $50,000 with my computer - apparently money his parents gave him - and that as a result he couldn't pay for his education. Forester said this a few times, and the last time his exact words were:

"Stefano took $5000 from student which he convinced that with his computer he can play automated roulette. Kid lost $50,000 parents gave him for study and still couldn’t get money back from Stefano because according to Stefano he did not try hard enough and because he is far so Stefano couldn’t help him. "

This is complete bullshit - there is no other word for it.. everything down to even rubbish saying I couldnt help him because he was too far way. I asked this player himself what on Earth forester was talking about. Here's a few quotes from the player:

"Of course I haven't lost 50,000USD"

"he is full of sh*t...this xxxxxx guy"

"every time this idiot tells something, we have to chat, mail each other in order to get to the bottom of the truth, and there is no truth - its just him saying bullshit."


Most people dont know how blatant Forester's lies actually are, because he doesn't usually come across as wacky like bago and mark. Forester, your behavior and lies are absolutely atrocious - you have become as bad as Mark.. Ah and speaking of automated roulette, see http://www.rouletteforum.net/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?m-1250574660/ - dont worry forester, eventually I'll release these videos openly so everyone can see you for what you are. What I dont understand is why he doesnt think I'll actually ask the player for themselves and expose his lies. I think the man really has lost it. If you were over at GG you would have seen him really lose it when he posted under a fake name.
Posted by: Steve, August 28, 2009, 9:29am; Reply: 544
I forgot to add the video here. Download http://www.genuinewinner.com/alfa.wmv

This is a video of application on a wheel that forester said was impossible to beat for his computer, and any computer.

Because the spins are on an lcd screen, the numbers are a bit fuzzy so it's a good idea to have the wheel layout in front of you while you watch the video. This way you can verify how close the predictions are to the winning number. You can at the very least see the location of green zero, even if the other numbers arent clear.

Below are more details:

I just did the automated roulette wheel video. Below are the results:

0   :
1   : X X
2   : X X
3   :
4   :
5   :
6   :
7   : X X
8   :
9   :
10 : X
11 :
12 :
13 : X X
14 :
15 : X X X
16 : X X
17 : X X
18 : X
-18: X X X
-17: X
-16: X X X
-15: X X X
-14: X
-13: X X X
-12: X
-11: X
-10: X X
-9 : X
-8 : X X X X X
-7 : X
-6 : X X
-5 : X
-4 :
-3 : X
-2 : X X
-1 :

This is with predictions just a few seconds after ball release so they are very early - the ball completes a revolution in like 600ms at the time of prediction. The reason I did this one is mainly for a particular person who was told by forester that his computers cant beat this wheel, and no computer can possibly beat this wheel. I can only smile. Anyway if you see the video, remember it was made for only one person, not public release so you might see me in my robe looking rather unprofessional, I dont know yet I havent played back the video.

PS - The predictions are about 13 seconds before the ball falls and wheel is almost perfectly level. Bare in mind the prediction is given when the ball is around 600ms per revolution which is very fast. Plus predictions are only a few seconds after ball release. Also we have to take into consideration the automated wheel's in-built countermeasures. My point being the scatter chart is still good irrespective of these points. Only very basic settings were used and predictions are given almost every spin. With other settings predictions can be about 2 seconds earlier, and accuracy is about 50% greater. So much for an unbeatable wheel. Well it is if you use a basic computer, or even worse, use something like forester's FFZ where you have barely even any hope of knowing which side of the wheel the zap occurred on. Hmm who's the scammer? Further details are at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/videos.html
Posted by: Londonboy, November 26, 2010, 6:41am; Reply: 545
Just a question for steve. Is the 'free roulette analysis software' project still on. http://www.genuinewinner.com/freesoftware.htm
Posted by: Steve, November 26, 2010, 8:06am; Reply: 546
Hell yes - it's a bigger project than even the roulette computers, and that is massive. I have to get a new programmer for it though as it involves a lot of J2EE and server programming. Ultimately part of it will be free, and other parts for players only.
Posted by: L4KNG, November 26, 2010, 10:15am; Reply: 547
Roughly how long are we looking at, Steve?
Posted by: Steve, November 26, 2010, 10:31am; Reply: 548
I estimate about march 2011, I'll announce it everywhere when done and when closer to release date.
Posted by: Henry, April 20, 2011, 6:41pm; Reply: 549
Steve, Settle this once and for all eternity :D Challenge them. Post the challenge all over the forums. Have a public contest. Your system(s) vs theirs. Unfortunately it cannot be done in a real casino, but let them supply the wheel and whatever else is neccesary. Make it a public contest and webcast it live. The loser then pays the winner $ xxx. I wanted to write $1 million, but can both parties afford it? Have the contest in Madison Square Garden. Just think of the publicity. :)

Maybe Huxley can supply the wheel and set it up. I don't think a casino will sponsor the event though. :D
Posted by: Henry, April 20, 2011, 6:44pm; Reply: 550
What was the verdict of the testing of the computer? Can you point me to the post or if nothing materialized, do you know why not?
Posted by: Steve, April 21, 2011, 10:30am; Reply: 551
Henry, I've even done public demonstrations with recordings available at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/videos.html - there is an enormous amount of information. Most people cant be bothered reading it and researching. The people that DO read it then know the truth and laugh at the idiots

I have done so many public challenges before and every one of them was in my favour. And as expected, the results were twisted, distorted etc by the morons. Take Ronjo for example... he found everything I said was true. Then bago accused him of being me. Forester accused him of just being incompetent. See http://www.roulettewars.com/ronjo.html - the clowns lost if after that. They got increasingly personal and why? Because they kept losing against the truth.

I even got Bago live via skype which made him even madder. See http://www.rouletteforum.net/cgi-bin/forum/Blah.pl?m-1274934777/ - there is a load of personal stuff, but look past it to what counts.

Anyone who understands the information knows the truth.

You need to understand people like forester, howe and bago dont CARE about the truth. They have personal vendettas. The most recent challenge is for me to increase the bankroll of an online casino account. I'm partially complete, but havent yet had the time to complete it. I need about 3 more consecutive days which is not easy for me to find, expecially for childish games.  What will the latest challenge prove? Nothing, because there will always be excuses - same as with the other challenges I succeeded with. Even one player of mine who previously said I scammed him came forward and posted on the forum saying that he already made the required am ount of money at an online casino with a method I taught him. Look i could go on forever wasting time. It is up to you to do the research.

You need to also understand the people that attack me by now know what i teach is legitimate. It doesnt matter to them. It is personal.

I suggest actually fully read http://www.roulettewars.com - it is all there. Howe is a sick person, and running a business. Bago is a stupid kid who doesnt want people to know that rather than me be dishonest, he is actually incompetent. Forester is also running a business, and claims he's not. There is also a lot of envy involved. None of them can conceive of achieving what I have, including but not limited to automated image recognition roulette computers. I have without any doubt achieved more in roulette than anyone on this planet, and I say this not to boast, but I consider it fact.

There are many people who attack me, who either dont know any better, or have personal vendettas. If you want to know the truth, look only at what counts and forget the personal nonsense. I wrote roulettewars.com so I didnt need to waste further time on nonsense. If you read it and see, good. If you dont, so be it. You want to know the truth? The sorry but you will need to do a lot of reading. It has taken some people over a month, literally. And that's because the truth is beneath a pile of crap from morons who dont like the truth because of how it makes them look.

This has been going on for years now. At the end of the day, for those people to do what they do, they need to be unhappy with themselves and their lives. At the end of the day, I look at my life, and I sincerely feel sorry for them.
Print page generated: December 2, 2020, 12:22am