Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Genuine winner roulette system and computers
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

Roulette Forum | www.RouletteForum.net    Main Message Boards    Roulette Challenges  ›  Genuine winner roulette system and computers Moderators: Administrator Group
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

Genuine winner roulette system and computers  This thread currently has 159,314 views. Print
37 Pages « ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... » All Recommend Thread
Anandram
March 8, 2009, 3:04am Report to Moderator

www.softwarebotshop.com
Administrator Group
Posts: 2,895
wohoo! Let the games begin.
Logged Offline
Site Reply: 240 - 551
Roulette physics system Roulette computer devices
Steve
March 11, 2009, 6:49am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
Hi Ronjo, No problem. I've been away for about a week and just got back. I've got a lot of catching up to do with emails etc but I still have to send you:

1. New dvd on mk7 wheel with ivorine ball, demonstrating diamond hit predictions on near level wheel.
2. New version (which has a few improvements but nothing majorly different from version you have - it's just mainly more practical)

But you already have everything you need to at the very least do the different diamond test. With the ivorine ball and mk7 wheel you'll get even better results because the ball deceleration is smoother. Almost all predictions within 3-6 pocket arc is even easier with the ivorine.

Regarding speaking to one of my partners, I'll detail this soon. The one I mentioned so far is eager to speak with you, and he'll specify results he's been getting in casinos.
Logged
Site Reply: 241 - 551
Steve
March 11, 2009, 7:03am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
There is some debate on forester's forum about bago's chart. Kelly, I agree with you that the chart doesnt have enough spins for reliable analysis. I already said that in previous posts. That's why I referred to the video which is twice as large, with 100 spins at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/demomq.wmv - keep in mind this video shows the scatter chart. After 50 spins, I reset the chart then do it again from scratch. What is the result? Peak in the same place. Wow what are the chances of that? Bago ignores it, and a whole lot of other stuff because it doesnt suit him.

@ Kelly, if you want to get involved, I'll send you about 200 spins (continuous footage) where you can compare predictions and where the ball landed, then decide for yourself who is full of it. Regardless, forester determines computer accuracy with the different diamond test, and it is so easy to do with my computer. That test will show everyone what morons bago and forester are, and put to rest their ridiculous claims that predictions are random.

Like I also said previously, neither the video at my site, or the video bago has even shows maximum accuracy. I will send Ronjo (and kelly if he wants) a DVD of about 200 spins showing maximum accuracy on the mk7 wheel). I thought I made this clear and the reasons for it, but perhaps people like forester would like to focus on what suits them. Another consideration is Bago never knew even the most basic features of my computer and he never knew how to use it. I dont doubt Ronjo will do a lot better than him.

Anyway, Ronjo I'll send you the video with the mk7 and diamond isolation, and perhaps I'll send you forester's FF since there is debate of whether or not my computer predicts better than Forester's rubbish. Ronjo would you like to test forester's FF too to confirm what I'm saying? It's up to you, but either way I think perhaps I'll at least release a video of Forester's device predicting the same 200 spins, with my clicks visible, so we all know simple truth. Bare in mind so far one of forester's purchasers have already tested against same spins my computer was tested against, on the mk7 wheel, and his results were virtually random whereas my computer demonstrated very good results. It's a pity this player wont come forward out of fear from forester, but other players of forester's will see it for themselves when the footage is released for everyone to see. Forester cant say I manipulated the video because his other players can test his computer for themselves on the spins. However, I am not interested in telling forester how he can improve his device, except to say his first mistake is not using polynomials.

@ Bago, you are just an idiot. I'll let you have your site at least for now I just dont care. Even the other players considered you a complete idiot. As for all this talk about charts, you completely ignore the chart in the video at http://www.roulettecomputers.com/demomq.wmv among other things. Anyone that actually looks into this stuff sees how you manipulate. Go for it. Just PLEASE, PLEASE, stop calling me a fat pig. It is devastating my ego and I can't live with it much longer. child. I must say though bago, I do believe you have real problems with anger - I think you have problems beyond just anger management though. You are angry because you are made to look stupid, but you yourself said to me you have "issues". As always, despite that I consider you a complete tosser, I do wish you the best Bago, seriously although feelings aren't mutual. Can i just suggest though to perhaps meditate a little. Only someone unhappy with their own life can be as aggressive as you.
Logged
Site Reply: 242 - 551
Steve
March 11, 2009, 12:37pm Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
Ronjo, I sent you a PM about speaking with the partner. As I said he's a new partner, and has tested in casinos so can tell you more about what you are going to find for yourself. There are many others you can speak to, but the one now arranged is most appropriate. Oh hang on, didnt Mark Howe say I don't have partners? Oh that's right, Mark is just a "richard", and he doesnt want people to know they can get my computer free instead of paying for his scam.

@ Bago, I'll just correct you on something. Betting 1 number gives you the highest EDGE, but betting more numbers gives you the highest PROFIT. What matters most? Why do you think computer players aim to cover more numbers? What is more relevant - a 18 pocket arc, or an 8 pocket arc? Gee I wonder. Anyway Mr Pro, I'll let you postulate in your armchair.
Logged
Site Reply: 243 - 551
Floatinboats
March 11, 2009, 11:13pm Report to Moderator

currently doing the above. heh.
Administrator Group
Posts: 542
I have been watching this thread with great interest.
Can't wait to see the results.
Logged Offline
Windows Live Messenger Reply: 244 - 551
Steve
March 12, 2009, 7:43am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
In the end, the stooges will only say Ronjo is me under a fake name. Bago already did that in anticipation of the results, yes and he calls himself the "truth seeker" - more like a stupid kid wanting everyone to believe he's a pro. Most people know Ronjo well enough to know he certainly isnt me, which is why he was chosen. Poor Bago. Well he did bring it on himself.

Anyway, Ronjo just needs the access code for the games to commence. But as per my previous post, I will be sending him a better/clearer video with the mk7 wheel. Especially when it comes to the different diamond test, results are much better with the ivorine ball as deceleration is smooth, but even with the current dvd Ronjo has, he will easily be able to see results I claim for himself.

As for Forester and Mark, well when I get around to showing videos of their device's accuracy on the same spins, they'll have a lot to explain. Or maybe they'll worm out of it by claiming I used some invisible manipulation and they'll leave it at that. There is so much I could do that would embarass the hell out of them, but really I have better things to do - I just want the truth known about my own systems/devices.

Not long now everyone.

Logged
Site Reply: 245 - 551
Floatinboats
March 12, 2009, 8:59am Report to Moderator

currently doing the above. heh.
Administrator Group
Posts: 542
If you do get around to showing their devices, i think it would be great to have all 3 going at the same wheel
at once to really see the effectiveness of them all.

Then again, some will inevitably say you fixed the results somehow.

Still, it would be interesting to say the least.
Logged Offline
Windows Live Messenger Reply: 246 - 551
Steve
March 12, 2009, 10:24am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
I can hook up the same cable to all three devices, but they all will give predictions at different times and have different requirements. Forester's device needs clicking within a time window, but mark's computer can take clicks wherever as mine can, so it can be done with marks' device. It could probably be done with forester's too provided the same sample spin was used. But to do all three at the same time wouldn't be simple. I also have to consider the input of the winning number, but neither mark's or forester's computer are capable of that - with their devices you need to create a scatter chart on paper then manually adjust the computer. Covert? No.

Anyway, eventually I'll demonstrate their devices too for a public video release. Of course they'll say I cheated somehow to give poor results for their computers and positive results for my computer, but I'll show all the clicks and correct setup procedures. Anyone who has any of the devices can test for themselves and see much the same results. In public demos, mark's computer is very clearly a scam after the first few spins. With foresters FFZ the zap's impracticality is very obvious. The FFZ algorithms are too simplistic, and they are shared by the FFA. I dont have forester's FFA though but if the algorithms are the same as FFZ, I only need FFZ. Honestly everyone that has seen a comparison of the computers in person knows very clearly which device is better. Worst of all is mark's. Forester's has merit but is not anywhere near as good as he claims. This is the simple truth, but forester goes so far to call me a "scammer". I've never called forester a "scammer" because that wouldnt be accurate - the terms "dickhead", "poor product" and "exaggeration" would be though.
Logged
Site Reply: 247 - 551
Steve
March 13, 2009, 10:32am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
UPDATE: Ronjo just needs the code to unlock the computer. Ronjo as per my message, you need to send me the code the computer states so I can send you the unlock code.
Logged
Site Reply: 248 - 551
Anandram
March 14, 2009, 7:08am Report to Moderator

www.softwarebotshop.com
Administrator Group
Posts: 2,895
take him to the cleaners Steve - his karma is about due i think.
Logged Offline
Site Reply: 249 - 551
Steve
March 16, 2009, 7:44am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
If Mark had money, I would have taken him to court already. Anyway if I wanted to harm him, I could do many other things including pursue a very strong harassment case against him and have him charged, and potentially banned from Internet access. At the moment the police just require the last of the call logs and emails, and I havent had time yet. So I just requested they shut down another of his sites for now, which they did. Despite me wanting nothing to do with this clown, he appears to still be literally obsessed with me. The public doesnt know even half of it.
Logged
Site Reply: 250 - 551
Anandram
March 16, 2009, 7:48am Report to Moderator

www.softwarebotshop.com
Administrator Group
Posts: 2,895
He probably had a dream that he would be roulette computer master, but then you crushed it and now he's pissed. Think that sounds about right.

on a more comedic note - how the frig do they ban you from internet access?
Logged Offline
Site Reply: 251 - 551
Steve
March 16, 2009, 8:39am Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
It's like an intervention order. If they access the telecommunications device after being banned for whatever period, they can actually go to jail because it is breaking a court order. Of course they can try an internet cafe or something, but they run a serious risk for something petty. Speaking of petty, Bago has gone all-out publishing everything he can think of because I didnt give a toss about his website. But now I'll teach him a lesson. If I wanted to play his immature games though I'd be publishing copies of his passport and photos of where he lives with mum and dad, like the big pro player he is. If I wanted to play stupid games I'd also publish photos of mark's and forester's houses. But who cares, it is just kindergarten games I dont have time for. Thing is they do and say everything conceivable, and to me that just looks DESPERATE from idiots who cling to anything possible. Really they do it with anything imaginable, and this is not even considering the rubbish they say with what is actually relevant. Anyway Bago is just getting very desperate because he knows what's around the corner. Speaking of which, I'm just about to send Ronjo the access codes for the computer.

Ronjo, did you get my email about burning downloadable footage? Perhaps I can send you some spins with the ivorine ball for the different diamond test. You will find it much easier with the other test dvd because the ivorine ball on the mk7 wheel has much smoother deceleration. The results are also better too. The focus of testing should be the different diamond tests, because that shows everyone what idiots especially forester and bago are. But I'm going to the post office today so can send you a DVD easily too, but it takes a bit longer, and I'm eager to see the stooges publish everything they can think of to divert from embarrassment.

As I said previously I'm also going to send you a newer computer, so you can more easily test accuracy of diamond hit predictions. You will see how accurately the computer determines which diamond will be hit. For the mk7 wheel, it can target diamonds. For the mk2 wheel, it can isolate to both diamond and part of diamond. I'll also send you an older dvd of predictions on the mk2 wheel where you plainly see this. If I published all this information, it would flatten the stooges, but there are more important things than embarrassing dickheads. I'll publish them publicly eventually though.
Logged
Site Reply: 252 - 551
Steve
March 16, 2009, 2:05pm Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts: 2,668
UPDATE:

1. Ronjo now has the unlock code and can start testing at his leisure.

2. Ronjo is also now in contact with one of my partners. He will be given the opportunity to speak with others too.

3. Some time this week I hope to send Ronjo a new video of the mk7 wheel with ivorine ball. I've actually done quite a few videos now, but feel a new one which specifically shows accuracy of diamond hit predictions would be best. More specifically, it will not only better demonstrate accuracy of diamond hit predictions, but this also reinforces the fact that predictions are anything but random. They are only random to clowns like Bago who wouldnt know his head from his anus - no offence Bago, love you lots xx

By the way Forester, where the ball strikes the rotor is one of many factors that contribute to where the ball will land. If that's all you look at, and it's obvious it is, you're only half way there. Your computer doesn't even predict where the ball will fall off correctly. I'm not going to tell you what's wrong with your computer, but I'll release a video of it predicting the mk7. I'm in no hurry as I dont really care.

Anyway there is actually a long way to do with the testing. We haven't even touched on the system yet, but one thing at a time.
Logged
Site Reply: 253 - 551
Ronjo
March 17, 2009, 5:09am Report to Moderator
Medium Member
Posts: 243
Hi Steve,

Thank you I am all set now and ready tp play,I just need to get familiar with everything after a few practices In the next few days,yes Steve I got the e-mail about downloading the footage,but I think it would be better to send a DVD.

Best Regards,
Ronjo.
Logged Offline
Reply: 254 - 551
37 Pages « ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... » All Recommend Thread
Print

Roulette Forum | www.RouletteForum.net    Main Message Boards    Roulette Challenges  ›  Genuine winner roulette system and computers

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread