I have just recieved the package. (no instruction etc)
I may be busy for th next day or two and won't be able to test this thing yet. But by Sat or Sun everything should be OK.
Steve ring Me please so I can get this thing to charge stage.
Lanky.
Ps..I have no interest in what Mr.Howe or Mr.Forrester does or has.(I am not there to test their things) As far as I am concerned this will be strictly about what Steve has or does not have that works or does not work.
Learn the techniques professionals use to beat roulette consistently. The most complete professional roulette strategy course including visual ballistics, bias analysis & much more. Submit your name & email for a free evaluation copy and more info (your email is kept private & you can remove yourself anytime):
Ok phew, also if the code is requested, pls email it me today so you can have it unlocked for the weekend. Some of the features are easily understood but you may need to ask questions about the others. Depending on the dvd you have and the wheel (the one you have, not what I sent you), you may need advice on suitable settings. If it's just bob gordon's then basically same settings as my wheel, except predictions need to be later because some of the ball spins are too slow. The main thing I want you to verify is my claim about the 6 pocket arc, then 3 pocket arc. You can start on 3 pocket arc even if your initial sample is good, but usually for that kind of accuracy the computer needs to learn the wheel a bit better first. Almost all predictions should be within those arcs. People including Bago, Forester and Howe all lie and say the predictions are virtually random - even with quite bad clicks you'll see thats not the case. Forester and Howe have never seen the computer but Bago has - he just used a skipping dvd player. This part alone refutes over 90% of the false claims about it. The instructions have the settings for the test dvd already though. Have fun with it.
Also there are number of other false claims you need to look at. I'll send you a list some time next week. Another example is Forester says that the delay for the prediction to be announced is about a second - his argument was that microprocessors are better, because that's what he sells. See if you notice the huge 1 second delay like forester claims. Anyway you'll see from the list I'll send you who has been lying, and who just didnt have any idea what they were doing. But as per previous post, the main false claim is that predictions are virtually random and that mobile phones cannot possibly produce accurate predictions. As for the system, that'll all be in time too.
Vincent, I do not know Lanky and Iwonder. The idea is to have well known forum members, who many know well are not me and do not have affiliation with me. It makes no sense to choose a random forum member that no-one knows. While you may not know Lanky and Iwonder, many others do and they trust what they have to say.
What about you bribe Iwonder and Lanky, to fake the whole thing. I am not convinced until you post a "bulletproof" testreport. Have you received your huxley get?
Vincent, the video of my meeting with Iwonder and Lanky will be made public. You will see at least the demonstration component. I can't bribe a roulette wheel. As for bribing Iwonder and Lanky, if you're concerned about that, then you can either attend yourself or encourage someone you know and trust to attend. I've done demonstrations to many people, often 15+ people at a time. The problem is such people are not well known on forums. Lanky and Iwonder are, which is why they are attending. At the end of it all, review everything and decide if I'm either honest and my claims are accurate, or if I just bribed them.
As for the new wheel, it will be shipped to me shortly. Due to the delay regarding the wheel, we're starting everything off with me sending computers to both Lanky and Iwonder. For many people, this and initial opinions of Lanky and Iwonder will be evidence enough, but like I've said, this is just the first part of validation of my claims.
I am waiting for Iwonder to receive his package then we will both set them up together off Steve's Website. That way we will both know that we have the same settings.
@ Steve . Just send the package that I have to Iwonder
Other then that Don't send us any more Stuff mate.
We don't want anything more then what we have already.....This is not a Job...its a test on Your things. We are not the slightest bit interested in what other people have or don't have. When we have both packages set up we will contact You to make sure all is right. Then You can talk to us by phone to verify it is.
You will have a time frame to do this which will be posted here. Failure by You to call in that time will result in both packages being sent back to You & everything will then be Cancelled.
@ Vincent.
Mate I have met 3 people in person from Both the Forums. Here are the names & the links to those meetings Mate.
Vincent I can assure You that Iwonder & I are doing Testing for the reason that once & for all both Forums will have impartial Reports done by us both.
If Steve's Methods /Computers etc don't work we will post that as well....Steve knows This.,..
Another precaution we are taking is that the numbers spun when we are with Steve will be recorded and sent to a friend of mine that will determine if the wheel is Bias or not or is influenced by the wheel in anyway.<<<This will have to take place before Iwonder & I will report back to both Forums.
Vincent if You are still not convinced with the evidence that I have put here & You live in NSW You/We can arrange to meet eachother. If You live in Victoria We/You can arrange a meeting with Iwonder.
Lanky, I'll send to Iwonder early this upcoming week. I know this is not a job, and I'm not expecting you two to spend days and days on this. What I'm asking you to do should about 15 minutes for a test on the test dvd, plus the play dvd which is a bit over an hour although this is optional, as is any testing you do on your own dvd. You may take a bit of extra time to get used to the clicking to level where accuracy is at least reasonable. As I said the main part I want you to verify about the computer is about the 6 then 3 pocket arc because it focuses on almost all of the false claims about it, such as the false claims that predictions are random, mobile phones arent fast enough, there's a huge 1 second delay for predictions to be announced etc etc. The only reason I sent it to you is because of the delay with the new wheel, and I wanted to get the ball rolling as stated earlier. Anyway you dont need Iwonder to do the simple test, but if you prefer to do it that way you can wait.