While I was testing the system live, this is what Jobsaboba said exactly as I write it below:

"Sometimes we will put the same amount on both colours (pml - p*ssing myself laughing). And everyone says you can't possibly win betting like that. But it's part of the math behind the system."

When I was testing and I asked Jobsaboba if he was a Mathematician. His response? "Kind of"

- Rouland

ohh also why did you create a new thread for the Video, just makes things awkward in my opinion.

Diarmaid

Quoted from Rouland

While I was testing the system live, this what Jobsaboba said exactly as I write it below:

"Sometimes we will put the same amount on both colours (pml - p*ssing myself laughing). And everyone says you can't possibly win betting like that. But it's part of the math behind the system."

- Rouland

Rouland, there is no point of betting the same on red and black, you would be better to skip the spin and the maths wont know any different. Just like if the maths tells you bet 3 on red and 10 on black, you just bet 7 on black and the maths wont know any different.

Diarmaid

All........

It really IS logical to place staggering wagers on EO propositions if you are playing Leap Frog.  I can make a movie at DublinBet using #money and show you.  Naturally, it will crash so I don't want to do it with real money.

This system comes from a book called HOW TO WIN AT ROULETTE by Norman Squire.  He outlines a very complicated betting scheme (which could be programmed into a computer) and it does work.  It is very slow and your winnings are dismal, but you don't lose unless you chicken out.  And I have used to to make a couple thousand at CasinoWebCam when I could bet.

I have seen Mr. Squire's systems sold all over the internet.  He is (or maybe was) a brilliant roulette player.

Sam

Quoted from 1080

Rouland, there is no point of betting the same on red and black, you would be better to skip the spin and the maths wont know any different. Just like if the maths tells you bet 3 on red and 10 on black, you just bet 7 on black and the maths wont know any different.

Diarmaid

D,

The only person who can address these specific technical points is the developer, who seems to have successfully produced a winning system -- a system which I've tested personally and which worked effectively in the space of 75 minutes.

There is no point in trying to say what should or shouldn't be. Based on what I've seen, it just plain works. And that is the most important point.

Now it's just a matter of waiting and seeing how Jobsaboba will proceed from this point forward.

If the 75-minute success is replicable over an extended period of time, then we're looking at a real success story. We just have to wait and see.

- Rouland

Quoted from TwoCatSam

All........

It really IS logical to place staggering wagers on EO propositions if you are playing Leap Frog.  I can make a movie at DublinBet using #money and show you.  Naturally, it will crash so I don't want to do it with real money.

This system comes from a book called HOW TO WIN AT ROULETTE by Norman Squire.  He outlines a very complicated betting scheme (which could be programmed into a computer) and it does work.  It is very slow and your winnings are dismal, but you don't lose unless you chicken out.  And I have used to to make a couple thousand at CasinoWebCam when I could bet.

I have seen Mr. Squire's systems sold all over the internet.  He is (or maybe was) a brilliant roulette player.

Sam

Sam,

We're all here searching for ways to win effectively at roulette.

Here's my suggestion: Can you demonstrate on Dublinbet the system that you are referring to? Do a video similar to Jobsaboba?

You say that the system is very slow and winnings are dismal. Can you quantify what you mean by slow and dismal?

- Rouland

Rouland,,, man,,, your on thin Ice bro,,, to be TOTALLY honest, youve been treated very well on this thread with the rediculousness of this system,,,  I personally believe every system should be given a chance,,, its just part of the genesis of Learning, and shareing,  

but this system is FARSICLE!!

good luck bro,,
tater

Quoted from 1080

ohh also why did you create a new thread for the Video, just makes things awkward in my opinion.

Diarmaid

D,

Are you referring to me?

- Rouland

Quoted from 1080

Rouland, there is no point of betting the same on red and black, you would be better to skip the spin and the maths wont know any different. Just like if the maths tells you bet 3 on red and 10 on black, you just bet 7 on black and the maths wont know any different.

Diarmaid

Finally the only one truth !!!

Quoted from tatehill2000

Rouland,,, man,,, your on thin Ice bro,,, to be TOTALLY honest, youve been treated very well on this thread with the rediculousness of this system,,,  I personally believe every system should be given a chance,,, its just part of the genesis of Learning, and shareing,  

but this system is FARSICLE!!

good luck bro,,
tater

Tater,

I tested the system live for 75 minutes and it worked. On that basis should I say that the system was and is a failure? Can you clarify?

- Rouland

roull,,, ok,, thats cooll,, Let me ask you 1 question,,, ONLY 1

how many Zeros fell while you were playing in the 75 minutes,,, and what where your BETS while betting Both RED and BLACK?  

Ok,,, Answer that question and I will tell you the answer.  

tater

Quoted from Rouland

D,

Are you referring to me?

- Rouland

No, you didn't make the video, is not important anyway,

Rouland

Yes, I can, but it would be hours long and I would have to break it up into bits and pieces to post it.  Bear in mind, I am NOT talking about the Leap Frog Martingale.  That is something I play for fun and not for realsies.  It works on pass/don't or and EO proposition UNTIL YOU HIT THE WALL.  (Pardon, I'm shouting!)  I am talking about the system in the book which is much like the one posted on VLS forum--it is a divisor type plan and it really does work.  Lanky has posted one much like it.

Now, even using this you will, sooner or later, hit the wall.  I developed my own method of recovery.  I simply set that progression aside until I win enough money to make my next bet.  This can take hours.

I never calculated it out, but I feel I made about $8 to $10 per hour playing this.  It is just like a job.  I would get bored and lose my place and forget to bet.  I have mild A.D.D.

But, yes, I can prove it.

Hey, maybe this bird has the "Holy Grail".  

By the way, I will play for real money.  I would need a few days to brush up on the technique and my wife is still recovering from knee surgery, so I have to calculate that in.  I must be in front of the computer constantly for two hours or more.  I can play at Dublin for fun # but I'd rather play at Suite332 for real money.  Riverbelle is too steep for me.

Sam

You can never be sure of any system without playing it for weeks or even months.  RULE NUMBER 1

Lulloz

I'm just pretty darned impressed with your video.  Do you need a beta tester??  LOL

Sam